Leaderboard

Yeah, that's crap. What we do is form tribes, and then protect ourselves and our territory, and attack our neighbours to get more. We did that for a hundred thousand years, and the strongest thrived while the weak fell by the wayside. The natives practiced the same thing, to a brutal degree, before we took over the land from them. Letting large numbers of foreigners come here and set up colonies will not end any better for us than it did for the natives.

This is a column detailing the rabid left's attempt at silencing those who disagree with them. It speaks about the succesful efforts on the part of leftist activists to influence the major online platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Google and Apple to deny a platform to the far right (the far left is okay though). It points out the dangers this poses for freedom of speech, which is ultimately the freedom all other freedoms rest upon. And it points out that those who want restrictions on 'hate speech' have a long, long list of other speech they want to eliminate. They'll never settle for just banning Nazis and white supremacists. Anyone who offends in any way, even by speaking a wrong word or sentence needs to be de platformed and shunned. That's simply the value system these people have. Witness this. Richard Spencer hates me. But in order to muzzle him, I’d have to grant censorious power to people who hate him, but who also hate me. And they won’t stop at the groups I’ve mentioned. They’ll go after mainstream conservatives, and they’ll go after center-Right people like New York Times columnists Bari Weiss, David Brooks, and Bret Stephens. They’ll cancel Joe Biden. They’ll deny a platform to everyone to the right of Chapo Trap House, because, like Richard Spencer, they do not believe in free speech and they do not value the rights of people who disagree with them. Their cause is righteous, everyone who stands against them is a villain, and their creed doesn’t permit tolerance of dissent. https://quillette.com/2019/06/23/how-free-speech-dies-online/

Scott, you seem to have an issue with religion. However, you over estimate the power of religion in Canada. You seem to underestimate the horror of communism as it has been practiced. However, today is a glorious day for celebrating our blessings because of where we live. Happy Canada Day and to our American correspondents on this forum, Happy Independence Day!

All races have done terrible things over the millennia and to some extent a few still are but no, it is only the White person who deserves shaming and blaming. What a farcical idiotic illogical notion.

Yeah that would have maybe been slightly better than the current batch of clowns acting as moderators. How is Sanders a useful idiot? His stances and policies have been the the same for decades. He's consistent and won't budge on certain issues. I like a person who takes a stance (against the Iraq War) and keeps it, he does not wave off of it. Same with health care. Most of these others will change their stances with some kind of influence via money and be simply bought by it. Zero integrity. Sanders has integrity and that is his best quality.

Travis Patron wants to form a political party; he holds some far-right views. He talks about the 'parasitic tribe' and says they should be removed from Canada. The Canadian Anti-Hate Network thinks 'parasitic tribe' refers to Jews, and that this is hate speech. Are they correct? I don't know; presumably Travis knows exactly who he is referring to, but prefers not to name them too directly. The Canadian Anti-Hate Network thinks Patron is engaging in hate speech has just as much right to their opinion as Patron has to his opinion about the "parasitic tribe', whoever he means. Patron, concerned about this "parasitic tribe' (as well as LGBTQ+) wants to form a political party - which is within his rights. The Canadian Anti-Hate Network, concerned about hate speech, reported him to authorities - also within their rights. The investigation is happening, as it should. This is how democracy works, is it not? The article also points out that Canada is very reluctant to refuse political status to far-right or far-left groups: "Pauline Beange, an Elections Canada expert at the University of Toronto, believes Canadian governments would be "very reluctant" to pass legislation restricting access to political participation. "Basically anybody can apply to be registered," she said. "They have to choose a name. They have to have a certain number of signatures. But after that, it is not Elections Canada's job to decide who should or who should not become a political party." There is always a risk of extreme views on the left or right, she said, but whether the groups that espouse those views actually gain a political foothold is another matter. "We have had parties on the extreme left like the Marxist-Leninist Party, the Communist Party of Canada. So, we have tolerated those. They have not hijacked democracy in any way, shape or form. And again, I rely on Canadian voters and their judgment." " So again, it seems to me your argument fails due to your assumptions about 'what's really going on here'.

Nothing surprising here. Been saying it all along - years ago! The gay movement was in bed with NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association until they (gay movement) distanced themselves because it's detrimental to their cause. The Gay movement had opened the can of worms for the pedophiles. They know it, too.

1. The entrenched culture does not have a problem with immigration. The only problem that most of the entrenched culture has with immigration is with the numbers of immigrants being allowed to immigrate to Canada and where they are coming from is their problem. When approx. 85% of all new immigrants are coming from non western countries, that is a problem for some entrenched cultures in Canada. 2. There needs to be more discussion about what native Indians have done to each other in the past, and not continue to keep trying to hide that fact. 3. Living in the past has nothing to do with it. It is your dear leaders who are trying to convince we the people that more non western immigration will be great for Canada. Such bull chit indeed. More immigration has done nothing to help make Canada great but just the opposite. More social and medical services required. More infrastructure required. More assaults and attacks on the environment. More wildlife being killed. More garbage for the landfills. Do you honestly want to try and make the entrenched people and others out there believe that massive non western immigration is going to be all that great for Canada? Give your head a shake will you. What part of what I have posted here are you not getting here yet? But I must realize that you have no answer to anything at all. All you appear to want to do is try to look like Mr. Nice Guy here and we should all just try to get along. Well, tell that to your politically correct politicians who do not want us to all just get along. Division is their strength. Diversity and multiculturalism is we the entrenched people's enemy.

Black Africans and Asians and even the North American native Indians have always plundered and slaughtered each other for centuries now. Hello? It took the white man in North America to stop the Indians from killing one another. But we will not give the white man any credit for that. Those wars where whites were killing whites were wars created by the globalist international bankster elites who were able to get our puppet on a string politicians to get white men and women to go off to war to make money for them and to get white people to kill each other and die for their elite created wars. Scum like G. Soros is one big threat to Western man and woman, and that pos is trying to destroy Western culture and values and ways of life. Those international globalist banksters have been at it for centuries now starting with the Rothchilds. Don't believe me. Go on the internet and look it up. It's all there if you take the time to want to learn and read all about why white people were forced into killing other white people. Educate yourself and get away from the lying lame duck western libmedia propaganda who despises you and me and thee. As Trump has said many times already? "The media is the enemy of we the people. Trump is so bloody right on that alright. The libmedia lies to we the people every day and people like you still will believe their lies. Deplorable.

Ever heard of the Cultural revolution? The Killing Fields? Rwanda?

Progress will be bringing the individuals responsible for murdering Indigenous females to justice, Indigenous bands tackling abuse of females on their reserves, Canadian police forces giving greater care and consideration for vulnerable women, those kinds of concrete policies based on factual data. Accusations of genocide are quite a stretch, but I don’t know how many tears would be shed if Trudeau went up for trial. You do also realize we already have a truth and reconciliation commission. Do you want another one? How about an inquiry into the commission, maybe an inquiry into the inquiry?

No one is infallible, anyone who thinks otherwise is lying to themselves or believes in fairy tales.

Only White Pride is racist, and all other forms of racial pride aren't racist? That's ridiculous and anti-white discrimination. People who only are suspicious of the motives of white people when they are proud of their heritage, and no other race, they are the real racists, projecting their racism on everyone else.| Either be suspicious of all races who use the term "fill in the blank" Pride here, or don't be suspicious of any race who the term "fill in the blank" Pride here. There are plenty of people who use those terms who aren't racists, and plenty of people who use those phrases who are racists, I don't see why a few fringe extremists get to ruin the term for everyone else, and narrowly define the term from much broader use. Why do they get to control the english language? That sounds like a really stupid idea to give fringe extremists the power to define entire terms for the rest of society, not sure why Hardner can't see that.

I'm not going to look through a thousand posts to prove that I was wrong once, either take my word for it that I'm not infallible, or look for your own proof that I was definitely wrong in at least one of those posts.