Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/13/2019 in all areas
-
The Dems are completely apoplectic because AG Barr said that he wants to look into whether or not Trump's campaign was spied on. If you recall the Dems are the same US political party that's famous for saying that: -all criminal allegations need to be believed (well, they do if they're against Republicans but not Democrats) and -the Steele/Hillary/Fusion GPS dossier was enough evidence to warrant a 2 yr+ Russian collusion investigation to the tune of $20M or so. So, after looking through all the evidence (or lack thereof) from the Mueller investigation, Barr has reason to believe that an investigation into election spying is warranted. GASP!!!!!!!!! But he doesn't have enough evidence to start an investigation! He needs a self-corroborating dossier compiled by Russians and a discredited British spy to start a real investigation!!!! He can't even look into it!!!!!!! Who the hell does he think he is? The Attorney general?!?!?!?!?! Carved in stone: "If you're a Dem supporter - you're an idiot".1 point
-
Trump would probably like a few of those to go with his 6 pack of cokes at lunch.1 point
-
I have found out over the years that most Canadians appear to be quite clueless when it comes to Canadian politics. Why they keep choosing french leftist liberals and NDP socialists/communists is beyond comprehension. This country never really ever had that many conservative governments in power long enough in Canada to make and keep and do things smart and proper. They mostly just keep voting for Quebec politicians who have done nothing for Canada but who have pretty much destroyed this once great WASP/European nation called Canada. Canada needs more "righties" to run and rule this country. Having voted for and allowing too many french leftist lieberals and no mind socialists to run this country has been a disaster for Canada and it shows. Aw well.1 point
-
1 point
-
You do realize that dumping them somewhere is what's done now, right? What do you imagine happens to a hundred thousand people a month? That they're all given special language lessons and then enrolled in skills training courses?1 point
-
You could, but the "all whites are racist" hacks will simply claim the only reason that massacre happened is that white people didn't ride in on a white horse to save them. So they'll still blame whites for that, you can't reason with these people.1 point
-
1 point
-
Okay...these guys are just way too cool. Another reason so many people secretly wish they were Scottish. Go ahead, I dare anyone here to deny that flaming Bag Pipes are ultra cool.1 point
-
Suspicions confirmed, Trudeau will of course lie and spin with the most despicable campaign narrative yet. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-road-tests-campaign-strategy-1.50969981 point
-
Yes absolutely but the current AG by not being the original person to decide the dpa's applicability is in fact not capable now at this point in contradicting the DPP and previous AG unless he has some very solid legal grounds. Without a Federal Court of Appeal decision giving him a pretext to try overturn what the former AG and DPP did, this current AG can't just decide to ignore the court Federal Court decision. Z in a response to me said JWR ignored new evidence which would give the new AG the right to over turn the DPA. I am not aware of any evidence the DPP and AG ignored and one must ask, what evidence would be so strong as to cancel out the preconditions, considerations and prohibition in the dpa law itself to allow the imposition of a dpa. You are dead on Wes but this current government caught violating the rule of law and in direct conflict of interest, tried to interfere with the independence of both the AG and DPP on a criminal case to get favourable treatment for an accused. It was a flagrant violation of the rule of law which has never in the history of any British parliamentary model of law ever been done. We are witnessing what has to be one of the most flagrant violations of the rule of law and we have Liberal partisans trying to say the law allows this and AG's have arbitrary powers to act political and make decisions based on what the PM wants for his constituents. I apologize for my long drawn out explanations, but I am trying to make sure these Liberal partisans do not misrepresent the law. There is a smugness about partisan politics where partisans pick and chose parts of the law they think suit their political agenda and ignore the rest. There is no law and no procedure in Canada that allows an AG to act in a political manner and arbitrarily interfere with prosecutors and replace them and their decisions on procedural matters unless a court says they must. The law when it does provide absolute discretion to exercise a power as it did for the DPP in deciding the eligibility of a dpa, does not say in s.15 as was quoted, the AG can undo a previous decision of the DPP or its previous AG. It does say the AG could have on their own simply imposed a dpa but JWR did not because it would have abused the intent of the AG's role to remain distinct from political consideration. These liberals can spin all they want, their desire or need to justify imposing a dpa, is a political one. Its not about job loss which is the cover story its about preventing evidence from coming out at trial and we know why. You and I and most Canadians know why. We know damn well there is no job loss issue but there is a cover up because evidence that would come out in a trial could damage Trudeau and mp's in his party who may have accepted bribes or other favours from Lavalin. Given Trudeau's open and brazen arrogance in accepting a gift from the Aga Kahn and laughing off the ethical concerns in that matter, is it a stretch to believe he did something similar with Lavalin he is now trying to hide? The bottom line is Trudeau is screwed. If he tries to force a dpa before the election it will blow up in his face. He has to stall until after the election if he is going to try force a dpa and hope he wins the election. The way it looks now, he will lose the election and the current AG will no longer be in power and the trial will proceed and we will get to the evidence. If Trudeau wins, there will be a minority government and any attempt to ram through a dpa will result in a no confidence vote and his being tossed on his ass. I love watching Liberal partisans blindly spin excuses for him and dictate what the law can do for them but then ignore the law when it does not suit them. Liberal partisans seem to only focus on laws where they think it gives them power to ignore other laws. This reflects a philosophy of entitlement and why should that surprise anyone. Trudeau, Morneau are rich boys. They cater to elitist interests and operate in a vacuum. Here is Trudeau claiming to be a champion of the middle class awarding government carbon tax assistance to Loblaws while ignoring small businesses. He vacations with the elite like the Aga Kahn or when he goes on vacation flies to and fro because the air pollution he causes doesn't count. His shit don't stink in his world. He lives in a world of one standard, the rest of us another. The laws do not apply to him if they are inconvenient. People who work for him must blindly agree with him or else. These are the same Liberals that accused Harper of acting unethically and a tyrant. I bet you most Canadians comparing Trudeau to Harper would choose Harper today in a vote.1 point
-
The Democrats did not anticipate having to go on the defensive, having won a House majority with committee control. AG Barr has raised the ante considerably going into the 2020 election season, as credible findings of illegal surveillance (spying) on the Trump campaign by the Obama administration would cost the Democrats dearly. Trump already has a substantial win on alleged "collusion" with Russia, which is really a good outcome for all Americans who believe their president should not be a Russian asset. Clinton's fate has already been sealed, and she will never become U.S. president no matter what lies ahead for Trump...even Obama's FBI could not save her from herself.1 point
-
Brexit is not a financial advantage for the banks, therefore there will be no Brexit. They already voted out the "No Deal" option, so there will be no crashing out of the EU. That means there has to be a deal. No deal, no Brexit. Now MP's can do what they like to do best- nothing.1 point
-
I didn't commit no crimes, shouldn't be punished for the sins of people who share my skin color. A few bad apples doesn't ruin the entire barrel. No one is trying to whitewash the crimes of committed by Western nations, they are simply putting it in historical context, and not placing collective blame on an entire race for the actions of a few bad actors who happen to be white. I can sleep soundly at night, because I don't buy your all white people are guilty bullshit.1 point
-
The Democrats say they're not dangerous and they add to the economy. They should be grateful to have as many as possible! They'll be welcomed with open arms! Don't you care about the poor migrants!? Do you want them to go to cities and towns where people don't want them!? How cruel are you anyway!?1 point
-
Most Americans are murdered by other Americans, by a long shot. But as usual your posts contain blatant racism and not fact.1 point
