Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/11/2017 in all areas
-
No, we have not. The census taken in 1971 did not even list Muslims separately since there were so few of them. They were lumped in with 'other'. In 1981 they were first counted - immigration having been opened up for some years by then, and there were 98,000 of them. Also, the immigrants we're taking in now are much more conservative and religious than back then. If you went back to Iran or Egypt or Lebanon in 1971 or 1981 you'd find very few women wearing Hijabs, let alone covering their faces. Now the great majority of women do, and the numbers increase each year - as they do in Canada. The Saudi influence has been growing in the Muslim world for decades.2 points
-
It's not my baby. And I can find babies all over the place. And plenty of evidence that many don't. The cite you posted makes a number of assumptions, but also points out that the degree to which Muslims will assimilate is related to where in the world they come from, and the degree of education and language skills they possess when they get here.1 point
-
Anything new? You trying to deny history (ie., old hat) and then trying to re-write it (make it new) is in fact nothing new.1 point
-
There's good people & complete morons/cruel people on both sides of the ideological isle so let's not kid ourselves with this self-righteous nonsense. Stephen Harper and Justin aren't saints by any stretch nor are they Hitler/Stalin.1 point
-
Or just get off your butt, stick your head outside & out of your protective cultural bubble & learn the language of the place you live in if you want to become a Canadian. I wouldn't even grant permanent residence status to anyone who couldn't speak English or french, not even a refugee (as I said before, they should be given temporary protected status until they prove worthy of living here permanently). There needs to be significant incentive. Do you understand that language is the most fundamental aspect of culture? If you can't do something such as basic as communicating with another person, how are you supposed to function together in a society? How are people going to collaborate together at ie: the workplace if everyone speaks a different language? Is everyone going to have to bring a family member to work with them so they can translate for them? Do you understand the huge cultural schisms that have occurred & still occur between french-canada and english-canada simply because of language, including the country almost splitting apart numerous times? Would you like to repeat this phenomenon? It's you who isn't making sense, as I've demonstrated. Is it "right wing conservative" to want a functioning society where people understand each other and share the most very basic sense of common cohesion? Do you understand that because of the english/french schism in Canada, the overwhelming majority of Canadians can't even work for their own government in their own country's capital because in order to work for the federal gov in Ottawa you need to be bilingual because people need to be able to communicate with each other in order to function? That's why they call it "reasonable accommodation", & your idea isn't. You'll tolerate transforming the country into a nation of 1000 different languages where english/french isn't a requirement where everyone will need a "translator", but you won't tolerate someone typing a single word in capital letters?1 point
-
Lol. That's why comrade Trudeau, a trust fund baby was charging upwards of 100k to speak at orphanages and such as an MP while Harper wrote a book about hockey and donated every cent made to the veterans of Canada. Tells me all I need to know about right...and left.1 point
-
"Whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender"1 point
-
How sweet. Canada's answer to Linda Sarsour is calling me a fanatic for not kowtowing to her death cult of Islam. What's the penalty for leaving your cult of Islam?1 point
-
You're free to rewrite history for yourself. I'm not going to buy it. Perhaps dialamah will give it a 'like'. Meanwhile: Islam = Nazism1 point
-
Other than plotting to behead the PM in front of a terrorized nation...but everybody does that.1 point
-
The use of my taxes should be narrow and small. "Thinking bigger" will simply spread the money of Canadians too thinly and gain basically nothing. All the while, Canadians go without in this country - and that should be our only focus. edit->sp1 point
-
Not sure about him, but I would ignore their peril because they're not my responsibility and therefore not my problem. Now, other Canadians are my concern.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Again a classic example of "Marcus" providing a canned script and no response to the actual question, how is this land dispute, racist.1 point
-
Clearly, that concept hasn't taken hold. And not just by right wingers.1 point
-
Seems improbable, doesn't it? I'm starting to reach the conclusion that democracy is broken. It was the best form of government from around 1600-2000 but seems increasingly unsuitable to the present day. Much like monarchy seemed like the natural and obvious choice before that and yet became obsolete. Countries can only handle so many decades of self-destruction at the hands of incompetent or corrupt leadership before rivals with alternative systems that function better start to out-compete them.1 point
-
There are no "fellow Earthlings". Everybody all around the world belongs to some kinda group... and some of them are right wingers. Just curious, would you approve of more immigrants or refugees coming here from far away lands if they were hardened right wingers?1 point
-
Really? I don't ever remember girls sitting in the back of the class when I was in school. That said , all 3 Abrahamic religions ARE misogynist. Only Islam takes it to extremism on a large scale in the modern world.1 point
-
Wrong quote, I meant the one about the turban, eyeball said it. I call utter b.s. on you too...1 point
-
I didn't say that... other than that your posts are b.s. too1 point
-
I beg to differ. They don't like it because it ends up being discriminatory and unfair to others, as in allowing Islamic prayers and female subservience/bigotry in schools. Since when do we accept that women should be treated as second class citizens and sent to the back of the 'bus'. Since when is it fair to force Christian bakers to accommodate gay requests for cakes and so on, but okay to allow Muslim to refuse to handle/sell us pork in a supermarket. Accommodation is an issue because it goes too far as religious tolerance becomes a one way street.1 point
-
1 point
-
I guess pipelines do look a little bit too phallic?1 point
-
Refugees shouldn't automatically get Permanent Residence status. That's absolutely ridiculous. There's areas in most major Canadian cities of ie: Somali refuges which are-poor & crime-riddled. Refugees should all be given temporary protected status. If after a certain # of years( 5 or 6? Depending on the home country situation), if it's safe to return home you should be forced to do so. And every few years the home situation should be re-evaluated. If you have done well in Canada over those 6 years, are employed, no criminal record, have learned English or french, then you could apply on a fast track to stay as a permanent resident before you're forced to go home. As of now, approved refugees automatically receive PR status, and there's no requirement for them to learn English/french, and many do not. As an aside, the rules are now (thanks to the Liberals new rules) that to become a Canadian Citizen, only people 18 to 54 have to pass a language test for English/French. What a bunch of BS. Absolutely 100% of new Canadian citizens should be required to be able to speak, read, and write english or french fluently, I don't care if you're 6 or 90. How are supposed to vote if you can't even understand the news or what the politicians are saying? How are you supposed to fit into Canadian society as a Canadian? NONSENSE.1 point
-
Citizens who speak openly about how much they hate us and our values, who now have $10 million in taxpayer money to funnel into their anti-West activities, who have never renounced their allegiance to Al-queda, who use our principles and medical care against us. Yes. They are soooooo law-abiding.1 point
-
I don't like it either. But how do you deal democratically, humanely, in a principled way with humans who have made the choice to act worse than animals? Did we not stick our principles and allow the Khadr family their "rights" to raise their children as terrorists and coddle them? How did that work out for us? How did that work out for the Khadr children? How did that work out for public safety? Now we have Canada's #1 terrorist family walking the streets with pockets filled with our money, openly despising us. No. I don't understand how some people can be so concerned about the rights of terrorists and extremists and care nothing about the average Canadian's rights. So Khadr spent a little more time in Guantanamo than he feels he should've. I couldn't care less. He should still be there and his terrorist family should be deported to some Islamic hellhole. How does paying off terrorists who have some little right violated and allowing them to continue to use Canada as a base for their activities and for free medical when they are injured in their war against the West - how does that show our "principles"? Yeah, I know the argument - we stick to our principles and they somehow magically turn into law abiding citizens who love Western freedom and tolerance because they are so impressed by us. Drivel. They still hate us and everything we stand for and now they know how to operate because we are constrained by rights and principles while they are constrained by absolutely nothing.1 point
-
1 point
-
Complete bullshit. It doesn't "end up" being discriminatory. Racists bawl on here when religions get equal treatment INCLUDING Islamic prayer clubs in schools. Female subservience is not taught in schools, but is part of all 3 Abrahamic religions. The fact that people are screaming about it now and pointing at Islam is the worst kind of racism wearing the fake mask of enlightenmentP faux-feminism conveniently borrowed from progressives. The fact that we hear the same bullshit posted on here again and again despite it having been pointed out as utter bullshit shows that they don't care or are lying. All of this is more made up garbage, comparing apples and oranges. Nobody cares about this scare mongering anymore because... like other conspiracy theories, you can't stop it with reason.0 points
-
Yes, you did. You knew I was going to try as you advised - and I even told you we'd try the boa. What do you mean? Stop there and think! Who's made the intention to troll - Squid or me? Who posted the first trolling comment? You know why I responded the way I did. Yet, you'd let the blatant trolling comment by Squid, to stay - when in fact, it didn't say anything else but to insult! Why do you think trolling comments followed??? Squid was trashing a new thread right off the bat, and yet that's okay with you. You've made a batshoot crazy decision leaving Squid's post up there, Charles.....and you're making an even more batshoot crazy decision trying to shift the blame! You're showing you're not playing fair.0 points
-
Hey Charles, regarding the 6-foot Boa thread in Arts and Culture - you should've responded to Squid's ignorance by explaining why I posted that topic. He had no business throwing insults even if it was genuinely misplaced! We both know why it's there - and yet you labelled that topic as a trolling thread! You should've come out like the Mod that you are - especially when you're involved and equally responsible for that topic getting posted - and straightened it out right away!0 points
