Leaderboard

Came across this which I thought some ought to read. It's a copy of an article in ISIS' official magazine. It is called "Why we hate you, and why we fight you." It does not talk much about revenge for Western intervention or colonialism. It makes it absolutely clear the primary reason they hate us and fight us is entirely religious in nature. They hate us because we disbelieve in Allah and because we will not accept Islam. The interesting thing about the article is that they clearly know very well about the people like the ones on this web site, the apologists for them (who they feel contempt for) who continually claim that terrorism is merely a 'blowback' for our own actions. 1. We hate you, first and foremost, because you are disbelievers; you reject the oneness of Allah – whether you realize it or not – by making partners for Him in worship, you blaspheme against Him, claiming that He has a son, you fabricate lies against His prophets and messengers, and you indulge in all manner of devilish practices. It is for this reason that we were commanded to openly declare our hatred for you and our enmity towards you. “There has already been for you an excellent example in Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people, ‘Indeed, we are disassociated from you and from whatever you worship other than Allah. We have rejected you, and there has arisen, between us and you, enmity and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone’” (Al-Mumtahanah 4). Furthermore, just as your disbelief is the primary reason we hate you, your disbelief is the primary reason we fight you, as we have been commanded to fight the disbelievers until they submit to the authority of Islam, either by becoming Muslims, or by paying jizyah – for those afforded this option – and living in humiliation under the rule of the Muslims. Thus, even if you were to stop fighting us, your best-case scenario in a state of war would be that we would suspend our attacks against you – if we deemed it necessary – in order to focus on the closer and more immediate threats, before eventually resuming our campaigns against you. Apart from the option of a temporary truce, this is the only likely scenario that would bring you fleeting respite from our attacks. So in the end, you cannot bring an indefinite halt to our war against you. At most, you could only delay it temporarily. “And fight them until there is no fitnah [paganism] and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah” (Al-Baqarah 193). http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2016/07/31/isis-why-we-hate-you-why-we-fight-you/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfv3kBzJZgU

The endgame is simple: the destruction of the West.

There is a reason why certain individuals speak about 'atrocities' and 'slaughter' and 'genocide' in Palestine, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual situation on the ground. After all, to quote Sam Harris, we know what Israel would do if they had the military power to do whatever they wanted, because they're doing it. And yet, the number of Palestinians continues to grow, not shrink. He also makes the point that when it comes to fighting in densely populated urban environments civilian casualties are unavoidable, and yet Israel has put more effort into avoiding them than anyone in the history of warfare ever has, including us. You need only compare how the Israelis fought in Gaza to what the Syrian and Russian governments are doing in Syria, or for that matter, what the Iraqi government is doing in Mosul, or what ISIS does. The other part of that narrative of Harris' of course, is what would Hamas do if it had the power to? And we know that from their own founding documents. They would indeed commit genocide. They say so quite bluntly, and they kill any civilian Jew they can, and applaud the deaths of others. So how can we not call it antisemitism when someone focuses with such zealotry and outrage on Israel while exempting all other nations from a similar scrutiny? However much people try to weasel around what their motivations are by using words like 'Zionist' in place of 'Jew', we still know where they're coming from.

Mr. Black's verbosity aside, he competently relates a garden variety western civ story arc that has been told many times, particularly whenever the "Huns" were at the door. He invokes the popular American political term "silent majority" (Harding/Nixon) and has faith that they will once again rise up to meet the challenge. If gun sales in Canada are any indicator, he may be right.

I have already answered this question from you before, as did Dr. Peter Venkman. Please try to stay on topic and avoid needless deflection and disinformation.

Yes, anybody who doesn't go along with the Liberal or NDP agenda is a racist or Islamophobe. Now can we have an intelligent discussion with those that think a little deeper?

He was found not guilty or the the charges were dropped of most of the charges but was convicted of one charge I believe. He served his time in the U.S. and has since made a comeback to television and newspaper commentary. He is an excellent writer. I would recommend his thick book about the history of the United States which I read. He has a perspective which is different from the usual CBC type left wing journalists.

Suicidal hijackers can have that effect.

Conspiracy theorist, 9/11 denier, conspiracy theorist, 9/11 blah blah....which is it? Troo....trut...stop it!!

Feeling shame is for weak leftists. We on the right are Strong.

It couldn't be that there are no Muslims there, could it? Just a thought...

Your English is improving, my dear.

Actually I totally agree with you but thought this way might be more palatable to the country as a whole. Quebec would get what they want, we westerners would have our way and Ontario in the middle would be lonesome.

@hot enough You clearly have some animosity towards America. I imagine you were one of the millions worldwide cheering the collapse of the buildings and the deaths of thousands of people who just went to work Monday morning. Allahu akbar.

So canada isn't racist, but there needs to be a jewish state to defend jews from racist in Canada? LOL, which one is it. If Canada is racist enough to justify jews having a state, then it is racist enough to justify african canadian schools.

It's not irrelevant; it's part of the nuance you refuse to admit. The point is that younger Muslims, even second generation ones, who are more likely to consider themselves Muslim first are also the ones most likely to feel that Canadians do not accept them. I bet if you asked Christians if they were 'Christian first' or 'Canadian first', the majority would say 'Christian first', because that is part of being Christian, as explained in this article: Nobody is concerned by this, because most of us do understand that for religious people, God comes first. This doesn't mean that they can't be loyal or committed Canadians; it just means they are religious. And note even as this younger, second generation of Muslims are becoming more religious, they are also rejecting the themes of patriarchy and anti-homosexuality that their parents and grandparents were raised with. So what we have, when we put all this 'nuance' together are second generation Muslims who are more religious than their parents, more proud of being Canadian than previous generations and who are more likely to reject patriarchy and to accept the prevailing social attitude towards homosexuality - which is acceptance. Kind of like Christians, eh? Christians who put God first, who are proud to be Canadian, who believe in the rights and freedoms Canada offers, who may or may not approve of homosexuality, and who may or may not embrace patriarchy as "God's way". I take the broad statements of the people who carried out the survey and analyzed the results over the one-sided statements of an anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant commentator on a political forum. Did you even note that Muslim Canadians are more proud to be Canadian than non-Muslims, and that pride has grown in the last decade? Here, 'facts and figures' that you choose to ignore in favor of the single point you believe buttresses your anti-Muslim argument.

You believe that watching people slaughter each other would be fun. There really is nothing I can say that would adequately display the depth of disgust I feel about your idea of fun.

There was no genocide of Natives in Canada. Quite the opposite: many Natives in the US fighting the Indian Wars fled to Canada.

Sorry but you're just spouting made up none sense. I've done a search and didn't come up with anything on child brides/forced marriages in Canada except among immigrants, including those from Turkey. There are a few among Christian immigrants though, however these are in the minority and Canada is actively working to eliminate this practice. The following article looks at this specific subject and gives an idea about the numbers. I'm sure there are more cases that aren't known about. As you can see this is not a problem that is native to Canada but rather imported from other places. Interestingly the majority of cases are among Muslims. If you wish to answer please do so with credible information, or remove yourself from the forum forever. Thank you. https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/2013/09/20/forced_marriages_a_hidden_problem_in_canada.html

You know, if someone else made an outlandish claim and then said "Yeah, I can't prove it, just trust me",...... YOU would be screeching about how they are liars and dishonest and demand they leave the forum. This is what is most irritating about Muslims. The rules they impose on others, somehow never apply to themselves.

The gentiles made me do it.

That is small potatoes, Altai. We are dealing with the USA, the folks of death squads and worldwide torture chambers. And those are the nice things.

Here's a link which lists the violent protests by the left in recent years. http://www.dailywire.com/news/13228/here-are-all-left-wing-violent-protests-over-past-aaron-bandler Quote The left has a bad habit of allowing their protests to descend into rioting and violence, particularly over the last several years. Whether it's a police shooting or just being angry about the democratic election of President Donald Trump, destructive riots seem to have become the status quo for the left's "demonstrations." Here are all the leftist violent protests and riots that have occurred over the past several years. The protests following the Oscar Grant shooting. In 2009, a police officer for Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) shot Grant as he was being detained, later claiming that he thought he was firing his taser. Since the shooting involved cop and a black victim, protests ensued in Oakland, CA. The protests quickly disintegrated into rioting and looting. Occupy Wall Street. The left-wing movement in 2011 spawned numerous sexual assaults, rapes, destruction of property and all kinds other shocking and nonsensical violence. The riots in Oakland and Los Angeles after George Zimmerman was acquitted in the Trayvon Martin shooting. In Oakland, the protesters were chucking bottles and rocks at police officers and attacked a reporter, photographer and TV cameraman. They also slowed down traffic. In Los Angeles, numerous protesters vandalized cars and businesses as well as assaulted people on the street. Unquote

Right but we also have millions of arm chair chicken hawks casually calling for war against various muslim countries. My idea would get rid of the most violent and hateful people on both sides, without all the collateral damage. Plus the sheer spectacle of it would be so damn entertaining and fun to watch it it might be therapeutic! Its win win.

"terrorists" are folks that don't have a gigantic propaganda system. It's ironic but in reality, the most active terrorists are those with the biggest propaganda systems. Japan doesn't have much of a propaganda system. An unbelievable train system. The top propaganda systems are to be found in English speaking countries that revolve around the propaganda hub. No one has to be told where that hub is.

What do you reckon happened? WTC7 was a controlled demolition, as were the twin towers. Is it that difficult for you to make logical deductions?

Just reported on CTV news. A pro Trump demonstration in California was met with anti-Trump supporters, several of whom used pepper spray against Trump supporters causing a riot and physical confrontation. Several people were arrested. Why is it the liberal anti-Trump people have to resort to illegal, violent confrontations?

Facts don't mean anything to you. It was Tuesday morning. The cheering crowds was another US propaganda myth. But let's turn this around. Consider all the cheering from Americans over the deaths of tens of millions their governments have slaughtered since WWII. The huge majority of Americans who supported the illegal invasions of both Iraq and Afghanistan, all because of US lies. Your perpetual whining is really really sickening considering the death and suffering that has been pretty much the sum total of the USA. And to top this all off, it wasn't the alleged hijackers that the US has falsely accused. The science says, unequivocally, it is impossible. Who could have done? Who is the only group that had access to the nanothermite which was found at WTC?

I am sure millions of people from various countries were dancing and celebrating somethings at the same time when 9-11 was happened. This is your responsiblity to explain what they were celebrating, not mine. Because its your claim, not mine. We are told that "Someone said so" is not a proof. I dont care who is or what is Occam Razor. Someones can easily create fake stories in a way that leads to a logical illusion, this is how false-flags are created. Anyone could dance if you give them 5 dollar and kindly ask them to dance in front of a camera and this is just an example, I dont say it was happened in this way. Even its told by God, I am asking for evidence, God have to give me a proof if he want me to believe in him. There are many media organs controlled by Zionists. Now I am asking for last time and you will be ignored. Can you please give me an evidence that these people were celebrating 9-11 ?

We only have to note that this is a 16 year old girl debating like the rational, normal, thinking adult she is and then compare hers to yours, OftenWrong. And still you have no sense of shame.

That was 100 years ago. Now the elections are decided by easterners long before the the polls close in the west.

Trudeau says he speaks for all Canadians but all he speaks is lies and deceit

Why are you ignoring the facts, B_C? Because that is what you do, always, without exception. I'll take a look at your source. Why did you provide a source link for this but not for the Dwain Deets graphic?

I am stunned at the lack of knowledge being advanced here on Japan by so many.

This is definitely a major problem, not only in Canada but around the world. It's evident here at MLW. People will make racist statements, vile, awful remarks that were last heard when?, in the Red Scare of the 1950s. Right-Wing Extremism Is Thriving in Canada

This is what the Rebel Media reveals to us: After receiving over a billion dollars in taxpayer money, a Canadian company is laying off 2000 workers in Canada and advertising jobs in Mexico and China. Do you think Trump would do a deal like this? Check Rebel Media dot com