Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/27/2017 in Posts
-
I'm glad I was able to communicate with such clarity even you could understand it.2 points
-
So you need to understand that they are my schools too - that one religion should not enforce their religious/cultural/medieval practices on anyone else. Pray in private, at home or wherever. Keep our schools free of religion - they are secular and should remain so. !!! As an aside, I believe it is discriminatory to publicly fund Catholic Separate schools.2 points
-
Lied to the vets ,lied to the military ,lied to the small business, lied to the middle class, lies, lies, and more lies.2 points
-
What part of "Public Schools" don't you understand? Public = open to all persons, for the community as a whole, the common interest being Education Schools = Not churches or mosques2 points
-
I'm not interested in prayers or religion of any kind in our PUBLIC SECULAR schools... freedom of religion doesn't include turning our schools into places of worship, it belongs at home or wherever you go to genuflect to your idols. Not to mention condoning medieval rubbish in our system. The school they are referencing here is in Toronto, https://themuslimtimes.info/2017/01/18/muslim-students-gain-group-prayer-rights-in-canadian-schools/comment-page-1/ In addition, the education director is allowing Muslim students to gather in groups for daily prayers in the schools. At school prayer services, mosque rules apply, meaning genders are segregated and menstruating girls are permitted to watch but not participate.2 points
-
Of course Christians are subjects to attacks - all you have to do is listen to what's being said against Christians. We know of actual Christian persecutions in Muslim countries.....Muslims targetting Christians for atrocious acts! Now we're talking about the very likelihood of physical violence in Canada. Especially so when an imam calls for violence to be committed on Christians! We know who's most likely to follow an imam's call for violence!2 points
-
Papers please! Are you perhaps Muslim, a brown-skinned devil from one of the countries we have illegally invaded, one of the countries from which we have been stealing since the 1920s? If not do have any connection to those brown skinned devils? Do you think we had no right to steal, rape and murder? I can see it in your eyes. [stamps passport] Go back where you came from!1 point
-
Hooo hoo hooooooo, what I found now. British dictatorship's Prence's helicopter been harrashed by an unmanned air vehicle. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3179851/prince-williams-horror-as-drone-comes-within-half-a-second-of-hitting-his-air-ambulance-in-shocking-near-miss/1 point
-
The article itself gives reasons that directly reflect the harder stance Trump has taken - people being more careful in their paperwork or just choosing not to go to the States. The article does not support the OP implication that Canadians' concerns about crossing the border are unwarranted.1 point
-
Fine. But any organization that cancels trips to the US because of anecdotal stories are being reactionary and stupid.1 point
-
Your conclusions are not necessarily accurate ones. Raw numbers do not tell the story.1 point
-
Deniz Yucel. Journalist. Feb 2017,carted of to jail to join 86 other Turkish journalists, some of whom have been detained for years for speaking their minds. Erdogan issued arrest warrants for about 80 more late last year, to go along with the 35,000 imprisoned already for speaking. Time for you to explain why you think this Fascist swine from the Middle Ages is the right man to lead Turkey?1 point
-
Judging Trump by his personal behavior has nothing to do with his policies and how he will govern. Lots of people have divorces and often there are good reasons for it. Women (or men) who are abused should get divorced. Abuse of all kinds is prevalent in the world; many people should get out. Staying in marriage when there is abuse is contributing to the abuse. It is pharisaical to judge divorced people. You do not know them or their circumstances. Supporting Hillary and the democrats which endorse and defend abortion (8 million abortions in a short number of years) and being judgmental about Trump's personal life is very Pharisaical and hypocritical. Hillary also attacked the women whom Bill Clinton assaulted.1 point
-
Nothing to do with the thread, not a damn thing, again an example of trying to change the topic from a terrorist attack to trying to piss on US foreign policies. This deflection does not address what the terrorist did or justify what the terrorist did. It is however a classic example of people whose agenda is to come on this board and justify and apologize for terrorism by trying to state that the US is evil. The terrorist did not attack innocent civilians because of Rumsfled or Wolfowitz or so called fabricaton of the WMD which is that this individual is trying to suggest. Its a classic example of trying to legitimize terrorism by arguing its justified since he US in this responder's opinion is evil. It is illogical and it apologizes for terrorism.1 point
-
Yes really....regime change in Iraq was the purpose and intention of "Desert Fox" and subsequent actions by the Clinton administration. Terrorist attacks in the UK were dominated by the IRA and "The Troubles" until the early 2000's, then the radical Islamists took over.1 point
-
Nope...as along with the UK, the purpose of the attacks was to decapitate Saddam's regime and any remaining military capability to resist US/UK enforcement of the inspection and offensive weapons demil program. "Regime change" was made a matter of public law in the United States under Bill Clinton. Cheney in fact refuted arguments favouring invasion as SecDef in the early 90's. UK support for invasion developed in parallel with U.S. frustration over Saddam's rejection of UN weapons inspectors. Domestic protests over PM Blair's complicity with U.S. policy no doubt contributed to home grown terrorists long before ISIL.1 point
-
We are in trouble if a lot of Canadians think it is a crime to tear up a religious book. Freedom (including freedom to offend) is a tenuous thing and will only exist as long as people are prepared to defend it. There are a lot of left wing freedom justice warriors in Canada who think nobody should be able to legally "offend" anyone else. They are on the warpath. Watch out.1 point
-
I seriously think having a Muslim prayer room is part of a bigger, orchestrated agenda. It's happening in other places too. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4059428/Muslim-University-Maryland-students-demand-prayer-rooms-major-building-ask-names-kept-Donald-Trump.html#ixzz4cXSMLywC Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook1 point
-
Nice try, Jihadi. I am your worst nightmare. A kuffar who has read the Quran. I fully expect you to support Islam as it attempts to force everybody to dance to its tune.1 point
-
These two are not mutually exclusive as the evidence suggests....1 point
-
Let's not be coy: only Muslims are clamoring for 'prayer rooms'. Not Hindus, not Buddhists, not Jews, not Christians..... Only Muslims are demanding special treatment...and they're getting it.1 point
-
Nothing to do with the thread and another example of someone trying to legitimize a terrorist attack by changing the subject of the thread to suggest the UK deserves to be attacked by terrorists. This is precisely the kind of terrorist cheer leading some of us have come to expect on this board.1 point
-
What that you have come on this board and on a thread to discuss a London terrorist attack deny its a terrorist attack and try change the subject to draw a moral equivalency between what the terrorist did and what you perceive is the West engaging in terrorism against Muslims? Overly voluble. Lol. You know what your agenda is. Have the integrity to state it and stop couching your words.1 point
-
I don't think so. I think a very particular kind of person goes to a forum to express themselves and argue with others. The vast majority of Canadians I know do not trouble themselves with this let alone keep up with the news or politics. Most people are quiet and prefer to mind their own business. The attitude generally is "you go ahead and do your thing and I will do my thing." It's only when people feel they are being unfairly singled out or given less chance than others, then they feel offended. An example is this thread- the issue at hand is that there are laws to protect secularism, which suppressed some people's freedom of expression. Before this it was normal to have a prayer at school in the morning. The state took action to eliminate these references. The problem today is people feel Islam is being given preferential treatment. If you listen to the video you will hear one man keeps saying "No special treatment for anyone." That is the issue.1 point
-
The principal difference is that the American administration is telling illegals to "GET OUT", whilst the Canadian administration is telling illegals "WECOME", in purposeful and direct opposition to the U.S. for political expediency. So let's just see how many illegals Canada can handle before the backlash is severe.1 point
-
C'mon Betsy, we are living in a new Canada today, don't you know, where if one is white and Christian you are evil. But be of a religion who cuts of heads, throws gays and infidels off roofs blindfolded, drowns it's victims in cages, and kills it's women for being raped then they are welcome in Canada with open arms. Our politicians are totally out of whack. They are on the road to destroying everything decent and moral for a world of sodom and gomorrah, and the killing of infidels. I have to wonder as to what the hell these politicians are smoking? Maybe that is why the liberals would like to legalize marijuana, it makes them feel all warm and fuzzy all over, and are ready to accept the world with no questions asked. They say welcome to Canada. We don't care what you do or have done, just come on down.1 point
-
Frankly, I find such Canadian reactions to be delightfully refreshing, and a sharp departure from the usual passive, docile mindset. Now they will have more than the damn Americans to fight about.1 point
-
I think his name was not-so-hot1 point
-
That wasn't created by the U.S. the jihad terrorists have been at it for about 1300 years.1 point
-
Agreed....the RCMP and CBSA have purposely stopped reporting "irregular" entries into Canada. Politically, if they don't count the illegals then maybe they will just go away, disappearing into Canada's largest cities. Canada has created legal and political circumstances that are very favourable to illegal entry at the U.S. border. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/asylum-seekers-statistics-difficult-to-track-1.40284681 point
-
Fully disagree with your analysis and yet another pass you're trying to give. The neo-cons, led by Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz had been pushing for an attack on Iraq since before 911. They actually tried to push for the Iraq attack right after 911, but then they got some pushback. Especially since Iraq had 0 to do with the attack. Then they said, okay, fine, we'll go to Afghanistan. But then of course, the whole Iraq WMD and attack followed after. This is when the Bush administration, knowingly, cooked up so-called evidence and used that as an excuse to shock and awe Iraq into becoming a lawless terrorist haven. That's when the old Saddam generals and well-paid (by Saudi and Gulf States) mercenaries from around the Wahabi world started arriving into Iraq to form what is now ISIS/ISIL/DAESH. Looking at U.S.' adventures around the world and you will notice that "regime change and order" has never been the end result. It has always been chaos and terrible consequences. Look at what Bush and Obama have created in the Middle East. Perhaps this is an indication that it's not a good idea and people should speak against it, instead of "oh it might work next time. let's give these guys a break."1 point
-
They attacked the Koran because our Left wing politicians are giving preferential treatment to Islam, as in banning the Lord's Prayer but allowing Islamic prayers on Fridays. Our schools are secular, there should be no prayers of any kind during school hours. Meanwhile Imams can call for the extermination of Jews and what - silence of course.1 point
-
You state, and overstate lots of things, Rue, in way overly voluble ways.1 point
-
For anyone British, you call sausages bangers. That is proof you are terrorists.1 point
-
So now let's see. the vast majority of not just US citizens but MOST Westerns are brainwashed. Hey nice to know. As I stated earlier, your agenda is simply to come on this forum and justify terrorism by stereotyping the entire West's civilians as evil. You don't you have the integrity to explain your actual religious views and why you support terrorism.1 point
-
Montreal Imam: Jews are the most evil of mankind, human demons, quotes kill Jews passage from hadiths. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSzSTd3kN3E Different Montreal Imam says "Destroy the accursed Jews" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_6wEZJT9dM Imam and congregation of Toronto Masjid Mosque Call for the Death of All Jews and Christians. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13WTFjcZWes1 point
-
Nothing says "kind and benevolent US/UK" like murdering half a million Iraqi children and another half a million Iraqi adults in the 1990s. And then a further million or so in the illegal invasion of 2003, based completely on lies.1 point
-
It is very simple actually. How do you think that the vast majority of US citizens, and most westerners who are equally brainwashed, think that the USA is a kind, benevolent peace loving country when it is totally the opposite. It's a nation born of terrorism and genocide, it has been at war for some 93% of its years as a "nation".1 point
-
No doubt you are correct. Righties are rather more cowardly, preferring to appease bullies for fear of offending them and scared witless of people who don't look or act like them. Good thing lefties are around to push for things like equal rights for all people; righties would have kept us back in the 50s. Aren't sweeping generalizations fun?1 point
-
The point that you are trying so desperately to avoid is that the US school system is every bit as propagandist as the Madrassas.1 point
-
Do you know how many US militants invaded, illegally, Iraq and Afghanisan? Do you know how long this same history has repeated itself?1 point
-
No, there was no way for him to know who was a tourist, the assumption would be this is near government, people in the area are government workers. He didn't jump out his car and stab random people but cops, he was clearly targetting government. Even if he did hit some tourist or was indifferent to it, its not terrorism because the target was government, they were just collateral damage.1 point
-
Muslims have been victims, the victims of illegal attacks on their countries, which far outweigh any attacks on the western illegal invaders. It doesn't help your case to always be crying wolf or running around screaming, "the sky is falling, the sky is falling". Why do you keep repeating this self-delusion, above?1 point
-
I never denied that, Captain Reading Comprehension. There's all kinds of people preaching hate in Canada, you being one of them, right here in this thread. Like I said though... If these people are so hell bent on genocide, why aren't our million+ muslim's killing at LEAST a few hundred unbelievers a week? Could it be... that your'e full of crap?1 point
-
Well, that's an opinion. A certain band of First Nations used to be able to harvest clams as a mainstay of their diet. Climate change has made this impossible and they are suffering as a result. Sharia law, not so much. There is already climate change-related movement of plant, animal and human populations, albeit so small that if you keep your eyes focused firmly elsewhere, you won't notice. Now a good conspiracy-minded person might think that all this Muslim fear is deliberately stoked by the powers-that-be to keep people from noticing their environment disappearing, along with the viability of the human race.1 point
-
Not really. I've pointed out pacifist Muslim sects, told you what my non-violent and equality-minded Muslim family and friends believe, and you've responded that unless they are willing to kill apostates, gays, oppress women, etc, then they are "not true Muslims". What is that but demanding that Muslims behave reprehensibly in order to be considered 'true Muslims' in your mind? I don't think I've misrepresented your position at all. I think you lose every single one of these discussions.1 point
-
I get the fact that the warning points are confidential between mod and member.....However i asked why have them and your mods explained they mean nothing , and will not count again'st us in the future....That being said they really do not have value, and with no value or consequence then why have them at all.1 point