Leaderboard

Islam is not interested in interfaith co-existence. Unless, of course, Islam is in the Dar-al-Harb (like Canada)...then it's all smiles and fraternity with the kufar until the numbers of Muslims increases. Then the push for Sharia starts... Islam means submission. Everybody submits...not just Muslims.

Bang on TSS-the issue is a suprising ignorance as to sexual behaviour in North America. You will find in North America TSS the attitude about sexuality, and for that matter teaching about sexuality and sexual behaviour is quite different than in Scandinavia, Finland, Western Europe and we have a long way to go. We still are quite stupid and puroe when it comes to dealing with sexuality. eaching adolescents and adults about sexual procreation and behaviour is an up-hill battle. Many parents want to pull their children from sex education classes and anything to do with sexual education. Then we have prevalent attitudes of adolescents very much influenced by a culture that teaches them sex is a casual exercise and young girls should put out. Its also hard not to miss the racist image the American black man so tied up in being defined by how sexually aggressive he is with women who are portrayed as butt vibrating penis parking lots. Its deeply rooted in this North American sub-conscious that still defines black men as slaves whose worth was based on how many babies they could procreate, thus the number of women they had sex with. Its a hard racist image to break. In North America all relationships, let alone intimate ones have been likened and defined the way we do material values, as disposable, i.e., instant feel good exercises that are thrown away with no thought when the feel good they offer is used up.. We go through relationships like we do material commodities, we treat them as disposable quick fixes and then out they go as trash.. Spiritually developed societies tend to deal with sexuality in a more stable and sedate manner as anthropology shows. However societies where religions teach sex is dirty and needs to be repressed and in our case in the West also mixes it with being one and the same as disposable material values sends out the prevalent attitude that leads to unwanted pregnancy. Pregnancy like sexually transmitted diseases is a direct result of ignorance, of people living in the feel good, self indulging moment. If you work with teenagers and have seen how and what goes on in Family Court here , the level of sexual ignorance would shock you. The peer group pressure to have sex. and for young women now as young as 9 to have sex is there. Sky rocketing rates of syphilis and gonorrhea in the throat have arisen now in not just high school but elementary school because children are being told oral sex doesn't create pregnancies. Teaching young girls their value is not defined by who they allow to have sex with them is not something believe it or not parents spend much time with. Neither for that matter do parents even if they are at home talk to their children because most like their children are on the cell phone avoiding conversation Sexual ignorance is tied deeply to sexual violence and sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted children, yes but its also tied to lack of parental role models talking honestly, candoidly and non judgementally about sexuality. It is still prevalent that men assume women should take the pill and its the woman's individual responsibility not to get pregnant and once pregnant to be subordinate to what others say she should do with her body. For me when I hear people call all abortions murder or refer to embryos as unborn babies, I don't spend too much time on what they say. The fact they call an embryo or a fetus a baby shows they lack a basic level of awareness as to the stages of development in the womb. Now I say this to you, if my daughters are raped and impregnated how dare anyone presume to tell them they must come to term. Women make decisions each day. Some have been raped by their fathers, brothers, other relatives, etc. Some have serious illnesses that may mean they risk giving birth to a child with severe defects or for that matter threaten their own lives. Those are not easy issues to deal with and judgemental by-standards with archaic and puritanical rigid morality systems annoy the snot out of me. We have technology today that can reveal when an embryo is dead or when its being born without vital organs or such severe deformities it should be terminated very early before it develops. If the very God these religious fanatics quote did not want us to have such knowledge he would not have given us free thought and the ability to have our medical technology that offers us alternative approaches. Yah tell that to these religious geniues. Bottom line, If people want to come on this form and refer to cells smaller than the eye of a pin as unborn babies and presume to judge in the name of God and tell people how to behave, I can' stop them but I sure as hell ignore them. All I say is the free choice I believe should be be made in private with the doctor, the woman and/or her loved ones, not anyone on this forum or me who presumes to speak for God or life. Proper counselling explains all the alternatives including coming to full term and adoption yes. Me personally I would of course hate to see someone give up a chilld for adoption or terminate a pregnancy if it was not done by free choice. I just don't see the issue as a black and white one. I see it as one clouded in morality and implications as to when and how we intervene with someone's right to exercise free choice and thought. I just don't see this as the government's role but I do see it as a role of the individual and her loved ones and her physician(s) and if she chooses her spiritual advisor, but ultimately the choice must be the woman's-it's her body. In our country TSS we have many religious prophets who declare what's good for other people. They often are men like me. Thank's but a woman's body is not for me to control. Not interested. I have enough problems with my own prostate thank you. Here this should not surprise you: http://www.alternet.org/story/155396/why_are_american_teens_so_ignorant_about_sex_and_birth_control

Yeah because all the Liberal support immediately goes to the NDP. It's obvious the Liberal's voter base is fluid with factions that could go one way or the other. However, considering many Ontario Liberals are involved in this government, I wouldn't be surprised seeing another massive scandal coming from this lot.

The Non-Sequitur Fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic) But, I suppose fallacious statements are all one has when defending Islam.

As a Canadian, you unwittingly pay for Halal Certification of products in your grocery store. A tax to Islam, as it were. Anything can be certified Halal...not just food.

I would rather you leave the forum forever considering you are not a Canadian but obviously a hired gun to collect opinions and possibly convert people into radicals. Not going to waste my time with you anymore wee peanut. END the Alt-Wing Debate -- VOTE Against Sharia Law in Canada

The end game is Islam ruling over ALL. Let's not be coy. It's in the Quran.

At least tell the truth.

Islam means SUBMISSION to Allah. Not belief.

Islam's goal is to spread (by violence if needed) until religion is all for Allah. https://quran.com/9/29 Should the West tolerate Islam's intolerance? Remember, Islam was created to be AGAINST the West...to destroy it.

What our nation needs is to replace equipment as it becomes due for replacement, to have a steady form of funding, not one that gets chopped just before every election because it is an easy target....I am not advocating for a huge military, or a military capable of knocking over small countries.....i am advocating a military large enough to defend our sovereignty, all our foreign interests, all our defensive pacts to include NATO, NORAD, ABCA, plus have the resources to assist with any operations that other security agencies with our nation might have , Such as CSIS , RCMP, DFO, etc etc and lastly to be able to respond to any natural disaster within our borders with a reasonable force level to make a difference....

As opposed to "left-wing conservatives" lol. What a statement. Vegreville (full of rural, conservative 2nd and 3rd gen Canadians) handled a lot of Immigration canada's paperwork. Suggesting that conservatives lack empathy as a group is both fallacious and detached from reality.

People came here to build a new country and get away from the old countries crap. And she brought this up to cause trouble for the conservative candidates, and that is the only reason. She proved that by not compromising on it. It was a dirty move by a dirty government. They are the ones pushing hatred with that motion, by only sticking to Islam. Why do you think people in this country are getting sick and tired of immigrants and refuges being treated like some god and we the people must bend over for them. The past events have proven that people have had enough of it.

Oh don't worry. I'm not 'Native enough' by far to enjoy any perks. But I'm Italian enough looking for folks to ask what part of the boot I'm from, Paisan.

I am one such part-Native. You can't pick your family.

Present-day Germans invade economically rather than militarily.

False? I assure you that many Canadians...especially out West (real Canadians...not imports) have some Native heritage. "White women" were a rarity....or non-existent. As the old joke goes: Do you have a little Native in you? Would you like some??

Three posts ago.

Well, you can leave at any time... that is the beauty of freedom! I hear a really great place for women to live and practice Sharia is in Saudi.

There is only ONE LAW IN CANADA---- THAT IS CANADIAN LAW... you or they want "Other laws", lots of places in the world to live, easy to immigrate as long as you put your mind to it.

So the obvious question is what are "Islamic Rules"? Do we accept only what is explicitly in the Quran, or do we interpret it through the record of the teachings of Muhammad (sunnah)? If we do accept an interpretation, then which one do we accept as there are several. Do we use reasoning to apply the law to new circumstances, and do we need an authority or consensus of authorities to arrive at these interpretations. Sharia seems to encompass all of the above, and that is where the mass confusion is. Is Sharia simply rules in how to live my life, or is it rules to be enforced by others on me. Once we have the enforcement by others, and the many interpretations then we are no longer following Allah but other men.

No, the act of consensual unprotected sex during a woman's window of opportunity should be recognized as consent to bear a child unless explicitly stated that the sex is recreational or protection is used. Just because you have all the womb doesn't mean you have all the control over my genetic property. Abortion as birth control is wasteful considering all the preventative measures we have. I think single men would be more conscious of who they were impregnating if they knew that they would be liable as fathers if unprotected sex was had. Same for women. We need to rebuild the family unit. Technology has us all isolated and in a state of anomie. Fuck tax breaks for single moms.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Army Guy, from the bottom of my heart thank you for your service to our country. And thanks to your family for making it possible.

Actually, in my opinion its people like you that threaten our traditions. Canada has a history of tolerating unpopular thought. We have a culture of having many cultures. All this MP did was ask parliament to look into an issue, and you would label her an enemy of the state. Talk about uncanadian.

Thank you for highlighting many of the concerns facing our military and expressing what Afghan deployment was like. You're right about Chretien green-lighting afghanistan with no debate or criticism much like the Iraq WMD debacle. We need two years of 10% GDP spending on defence and a stronger domestic military-industrial base. We are so weak in so many regards because we have wasted so much money on useless crap.

I agree there are processes to follow but I wouldn't entrust their application to right-wing conservatives. I think conservatism lacks the empathy and the ethical and moral background that such a sensitive task requires. The failings and deficiencies of conservatives are always on topic when it comes to dealing with the needs of human beings in distress.

Conservatives and Liberals are the same globalist party, neo libs and neo cons have the same end game in mind.

Many are...some aren't...just as in any profession. Canadians/Americans/Mexicans have no right to cross the border, and no right to be treated with sensitive, kid gloves. Don't like it ?....go elsewhere.

I assume you are talking about the employees in the Refugee Protection Division and Refugee Appeal Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. How do you suggest we structure such hiring practices, and remain conformant to the law? Are you specifically talking about the senior people in these divisions? My guess is that Sylvia Cox-Duquette meets your requirement, but certainly Ken Sandhu has one of those funny sounding names that says we need to investigate his background as who knows where he came from before he started working for the Ontario Public Service in 1971. Since however you seem to think it is a big problem, obviously you have some evidence to suggest that the "Refugee Boards" are composed entirely of foreign born refugees with a built-in bias.

And after they get 'arrested' they're put on a bus for Montreal where they can claim refugee status and pick up their cheques before heading to their in-law's houses. What should happen is all of them are put into confinement and given hearings within 48hrs. It won't take long to figure out 95% are migrants not refugees.

That sounds more like a browser setting that's still defaulting to your old name. If you use chrome, you should be able to fix this in the passwords and forms section in your settings. It'll be in the advanced settings.

What do they call you when you know full well who your enemies are but you fail to do anything about them? The same thing they call me? Quisling, traitor, coward, supporter..what?

You've got enemies of Western civilization all around you - you're free to support Islam by doing nothing about their fifth column. Imagine if you were a Muslim talking about your enemies on the internet while advertising an interest in propane and propane accessories. How would you connect those dots?

PM Trudeau celebrates International Women's Day by giving away $650 million for reproductive health and rights around the world. If we are to allocate that money for this purpose, how about we spend that money in Canada? Our First Nations could surely put some of those millions to good use. To top it off: Er, excuse me Ms. Bibeau, that's an insult to all the single mothers and single women in Canada who have done it alone without needing the help of a man. Do these politicians not think before they open their big trap. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-women-reproductive-rights-1.4014841

Oh great....never been denied but rudely admitted to the USA ! Is this a SJW thing ? Why not ? Think of the greenhouse gases that will be saved. I like the idea. See #1 again. Dealing with illegals and smugglers all day can make one bitter. Right...go if/when you want to gain entry on U.S. terms....or go elsewhere. No drama required either way. Have I "visited" Canada ? Yes....several times in a military capacity (Esquimalt port calls, Nanoose Range weapons testing, etc....no passports or CBSA border guards required. Oh, and one time in the 80's to drive from Ann Arbor to Buffalo the easy way...border entry and transit were not otherwise memorable.

Most of these people in Manitoba are crossing into Canada illegally, and are well aware of it. They're also coming from the USA, which is not a refugee destination country. I suspect the vast majority are in the US illegally, and are afraid of being caught by Trump so are breaking the law yet again and coming into Canada illegally. I have no problem taking in a healthy portion of refugees, but they need to do it by legal means, or get in the immigration line like everyone else. If they wish to break our laws, we should be sending tanks and soldiers and maps to the nearest legal border crossing for these people instead of blankets & hugs. I have no sympathy for lawbreakers. Trudeau just doesn't want to look like Trump so he plays Mother Teresa. Grow some balls man!

In a rare case we agree. I don't want illegals here either. However our government seems to not think that way. My grandparents followed proper immigration policies to get here, and that would have been tougher for them coming from Germany shortly after WWII. I have no problem with anyone who wants to come here and wants to do it legally. Trudeau is a pretty boy poser, while Trump is living up to his word by doing what he said he would do.

So what ? If entry is denied then go someplace else or stay home. Use Skype...another American gift. Why it is a big time drama queen meltdown when a border agent does his/her job ? Playing the indignant boycott game is just petulance.

The authorities at JFK want to be sure you have the means and intention to return home and not become another illegal overstay in the USA.

Trudeau poses for selfies with naked women in parades to exploit them for political purposes, then calls himself a "feminist".

Good for the EU...visas should be required for all international travel and border crossings. I wonder how many Canadian overstays are in Europe too !

Saw an interview on the CBC this evening, which makes clear that most of the migrants are not refugees at all, but economic migrants. Many are not even fleeing Donald Trump. They set out to come to Canada to begin with. The interview made clear that they definitely know all about Trudeau's tweet, and that they know all about the rules and how to get around them. With European borders tightening and increased anti-immigration anxiety in the United States, a rising number of migrants from as far away as Africa and Asia are turning to the Central American migrant corridor in the hopes of reaching a new promised land: Canada. \\ Tapachula, in the Chiapas region of Mexico, is a key transit hub on the Mexican-Guatemalan border. CBC News met dozens of migrants there, young men and women who fled their homes in Somalia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Ethiopia, Eritrea, India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Haiti. Many say they began their journeys — which take between three and five months and cost upwards of $20,000 US — with Canada in mind. Others changed their plans and want to reach Canada in fear of U.S. President Donald Trump. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/african-migrants-mexico-dreams-canada-1.3992471

U.S. Sec'y of Defense "Mad Dog" Mattis has fired the first Trump era warning shots at NATO defense spending deadbeats like Canada and Germany:

President Obama signed the U.S. bill (“Promoting Travel, Commerce, and National Security Act of 2016” ) into law on Dec. 16, 2016: https://trainsinthevalley.org/2016/12/ Waiting for Canada now....

Yes, you nailed it exactly. Being "Big Hearted" and at the same time, dumb brained. How can anyone expect that you just drop in some guy who's practically a complete savage compared to our culture, and have him go to a beach or swimming pool. Or people just out for a nice evening stroll, in Germany. Thanks to these naive leftist policies on immigration, we are in danger. Grave danger.

When the beacon is shining you follow it.

Some are calling it Putinism.

I don't think you've seen anything yet. All these people are doing is throwing it back in your faces. It's about bloody time too.

This is PC I can easily get behind. There's a school in my region that was named after a local elected official who was also a well known racist with repugnant views. Listening to folks who are OK with keeping the schools name the same because everyone held similar views back then only underscores why it should be changed IMO.