Leaderboard

Just received another one today, thanks chuck,keep them coming.

And we have a terrible reputation of treating First Nation aboriginals like dog doodoo. Blame game is a child's game.

I am so conservative, I wanted to know so I can rip them a new one and tell them not to do it again. That is why I love my warning pts, with your amount of posts and such a little warnings tells me you are more liberal.

Funny how people were upset that muslims being picked on, but the universities ''Israeli apartheid week'' and ''punch a zionist'' hardly received any media attention.

Agreed...Trudeau needs Trump a lot more than Trump needs Trudeau. American networks do not provide live coverage of Trudeau speeches in Canada.

Now writing in from a new location on his recliner!

That last one is a rebuttal to your nanothermite! I'd given a rebuttal quite a while back to your molten metal!

Our immigration minister just said he will allow convicted dual citizenship terrorist to keep thier canadian citizenship even if they were trying to kill canadians and the toronto 18 guy that lost his ,it will be given back. That is not looking after the interest of canadians, it is all political. Time to get old stock canadians back into running this country before it is too late..

Charles has trouble following the logic behind some posts. And who can blame him? If you were a child as I suspect, your age would colour what you thought you had seen. And since you claim there was no aircraft involved that day....

No complaints from you about your partners in subterfuge. Oh wait, here comes one now.

I couldn't begin to know. Do you? Danny Jowenko - WTC7 Demolition Interviews, 1 of 3

The science surrounding 9/11 is fairly complex, and we don't have a million ton laboratory filled with many complex components to study. It is important however to note that many of the claims being made are ignoring some fairly well understood basics of science. Again I repeat my question from yesterday: Concerning you blowing up the towers theory, how long did it take to rig the explosives in these 3 towers?

Why do you have time for tangents that, while they talk about science, they don't address the science involved surrounding the events of 911? Nero fiddled while Rome burned. How did US, military scientist invented, US patented, non-commercially available nanothermite come to be at WTC on 9-11-2001? A material that CAN produce the temperatures that were needed to melt the steel, Mo, vaporize the lead, vaporize the steel.

Wait, we're on the topic The First 5. If you want to pursue your conspiracy theory, go to your Turmoil thread. There were no important questions asked.....only silly ones by someone who ignores every rebuttals that were given. Free society. Believe what you want to believe.

Becasue he sounds like one. To soft for me. And of cousre he has been sucked into the CC scandals with his carbon tax.

Not even close to being as conservative as myself, I have over a yrs worth of bans, that my friend is real conservatism.

Billy was a mountain. Ethel was a tree growing out of his shoulder.

Such a simple straight forward question that is fundamental to what happened that day and all you can do is dance around it spewing manure.

Perhaps a badge, then. Plus some lagers....errrr....camps. You know...so their right-wing poison doesn't infect the purity of the group.

So you are saying no aircraft hit those buildings. Did they or didn't they? Simple question.

"Slay them one by one filthy jews"

Pretty frickin weird if you ask me.

Good choice.

Some messages are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value. An example would be a person who persistently creates conflict without contributing anything useful. In newsgroup circles, such a person is known as a "troll". We define "trolling" as a message that serves no constructive purpose and is likely to cause offence or arguments. We define "annoying" as any message that results in a complaint from a registered user -- we will then decide whether to take action.

He should be running for the liberals.

Exterminating folks with nerve gas is many factors greater than ANYTHING done in Canada. Yes.

That's the standard you're using to make the comparison? Wow. Gassing, bad. Anything else = good treatment. Right on.

I'm now leaning towards Bernier. He is a Conservative.

There's some BS. The US supplied Saddam with the chemical thiodiglycol as part of some program...forget exactly and can't be bothered to look. It has many peaceful uses and one particularly nasty one: the manufacture of mustard 'gas'. That's what Saddam used it for: not newspaper ink or whatever BS he claimed it was used for. Mustard gas isn't VX or Sarin...which Saddam got the precursors from via Arab Gulf-State holding companies in Singapore as well as various European nations with no scruples when it comes to trade. India and Egypt also provided nerve agent precursors...just so as to not let them off the hook.

You fail to mention those same Kurds that the US let, actually arranged for Saddam Hussein to use chemical weapons made with materiel supplied by the USA. After Bush the elder had told the Kurds and the ShiiteIraqis that the US would support them in a revolt against Saddam. http://www.alternet.org/story/49864/how_george_h.w._bush_helped_saddam_hussein_prevent_an_iraqi_uprising/

They will be detained and get fined not beheaded or stoned. i hear your country Turkey has a terrible reputation in treating their own muslim citizens like Kurds. So don't go and blame us infidels.

No, if anything he just rigged it.

An empty promise of security and prosperity for all. Oh well,m it's not like the bar for yet another Trump speech was very high going in and Congress sounded like a typical crowd of cheering rubes. The widows and orphans were a nice touch.

You don't even understand. You can't grasp what many write. Or you are just playing. Neither is nice.

I am free to pretend you say, but you want to believe that the alleged hijackers vaporized steel, 5,000+F, with jet fuel?

Always long on uninformed opinion, short on facts.

Trump is the smartest man in the world, he is the most importantest man in the world, he got the hugest majority in world history, everyone adores Trump, the media can't help but continually talk about him - even the Canadian media. ... I also remember another train wreck that even the American media couldn't help but continually talk about from Toronto city hall a few years back.

Interesting as to how you have apparently risen yourself to the position of being able to speak for world leaders. Is that some sort of inbred American trait?

Oh yes, a master once again of the dangling participle.

Perfectly ok to rant and rave all you like. Your moronic country clearly crossed a line in Iran though - a line that was recognized way back in Westphalia.

Because Trump's a complete asshole that's why.

It's good to see that the law as it pertains to mental illness is still trumped by medical experts. Patients belong where their doctors prescribe, not where politicians or the mob they often cater too want.

Then there's the uber-sensitivity of the defenders of right-wing concernism. No, they're extreme centrists

Get in line. I've been saying stuff for years now online that I'm quite certain ruling classes of all stripes would cast their stink-eye at.

Hey at least the US is giving Iran a heads up this time. More than they got back in '53 when they first destabilized the region by practicing democracy. Launching missiles seems pretty tame in comparison really.

That's hilarious.

Well, at least they're all Earthlings. No it isn't.

Hmmm, 22 views....I'm guessing these folks also have no problem reading pill bottle labels.

So because some few idiots want to justify the horrible actions of some catholic priests, we can't talk about a separate issue that is now happening on a much larger scale and is in the process of being made much worse? Literally no one here is defending Catholic priests raping people in Churches. They are evil. horrible people and should be punished to the fullest extent possible under the law. They should get no special consideration because they belong to the Church, nor for any "good works" they may have done. In fact, their punishment should be made more severe if possible in consideration of how they abused their position of trust and power. Any religious organization that attempts to interfere with the proper course of justice in such cases should also be sanctioned to the maximum extent possible. On the other hand, there are posters here who agree or partially agree with the statements made by the person in the link in the OP. That's why the latter is being discussed, and the former is not. As I already explained, the revolution against the Church and its evil practices has, very fortunately, been in progress in the West for centuries. The Church is a pale shadow of its former self. Sadly, just as we were finally laying to rest most of the fanaticism and suffering caused by one religion, we decided to let in millions of followers of a new religion, younger and as yet untamed, as fanatical and violent as Christianity was in its darkest days. Why are we doing this? Why, as triumph over religion and an embrace of rationality and secularism is so close (in most western countries except the US), must we snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? Do people want to fight the battle that has been fought since the dark ages against the tyranny and violence of religion all over again for the next thousand years?