Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/02/2017 in all areas

  1. Just received another one today, thanks chuck,keep them coming.
    2 points
  2. And we have a terrible reputation of treating First Nation aboriginals like dog doodoo. Blame game is a child's game.
    2 points
  3. I am so conservative, I wanted to know so I can rip them a new one and tell them not to do it again. That is why I love my warning pts, with your amount of posts and such a little warnings tells me you are more liberal.
    2 points
  4. Now it is official; Sweden will reintroduce conscription.
    1 point
  5. She needs to get back to her profession, which I understand she is damn good at.
    1 point
  6. Now writing in from a new location on his recliner!
    1 point
  7. Charles has trouble following the logic behind some posts. And who can blame him? If you were a child as I suspect, your age would colour what you thought you had seen. And since you claim there was no aircraft involved that day....
    1 point
  8. Have you now abandoned your glowing scientific experiment and ALL we should learn from it?
    1 point
  9. No sources. You've illustrated that you employ deceptive practices. The link I just gave you describes a much more compressed schedule. You, and "There was an explosives expert", none of us, have any idea of the capabilities of the new superthermites/nanothermites. You, in your deceptive ways, have not even acknowledged its existence, though there is voluminous proof. Nor have you, in your deceptive ways, ever addressed the proof of the molten metals, described, for dog's sake, by FEMA, by scientists who support the official conspiracy theory. Please offer one reason, good or bad, why anyone should trust what you say.
    1 point
  10. Then why do you so studiously avoid getting to this "science"? I didn't blow up the towers. That is apparent, even to back yard scientists. So right after pleading for calm so we can discuss the science, you go into speculative nonsense. Regarding WTC7, Danny Jowenko, a top Dutch demolitions expert, after watching WTC7 said, "This is controlled demolition". He was asked, "Are you certain?" He replied, "Absolutely".
    1 point
  11. The science surrounding 9/11 is fairly complex, and we don't have a million ton laboratory filled with many complex components to study. It is important however to note that many of the claims being made are ignoring some fairly well understood basics of science. Again I repeat my question from yesterday: Concerning you blowing up the towers theory, how long did it take to rig the explosives in these 3 towers?
    1 point
  12. Time for another chemistry tangent related to iron. I already brought up the other day that I was able to burn/melt/vaporize steel the other day, using nothing but a low temperature match and could accelerate it with some added oxygen (gently blowing on it). Lets take it a step further and see what is burning or combustion. As you might remember from high school chemistry, burning is a chemical reaction. First look at the normal 'carbon' burning we are familiar with (e.g. paper, wood, gasoline, etc.). These are all carbon based materials and they experience an exothermic reaction with oxygen and produce a gas (generally carbon dioxide and/or carbon monoxide). This process is known as oxidization, and the oxygen comes from the air. When NASA wants to send a rocket into space where there is no oxygen to sustain such a reaction, they bring it along in either compressed or liquid form (e.g. cryogenic liquid oxygen used in Saturn V rocket) or bound up with some other elements in a solid (e.g. ammonium perchlorate on the shuttle solid fuel booster rockets) or liquid (e.g. dinitrogen tetroxide on the Lunar Excursion Module) known as an oxidant (or oxidizing agent). One of the challenges with carbon oxidization is that the high volume of carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide will tend to displace any airborne oxygen so you need to keep feeding the fire with oxygen or it will extinguish. A similar oxidization also occurs with elements other than carbon. My burning of steel is also an exothermic reaction with oxygen. In that case the oxygen also comes from the air, by gently blowing on it I am adding more air and accelerating the oxidization reaction. There product of the reaction however is not carbon dioxide or carbon monoxide because it is the iron in the steel that is being oxidized; therefore the product will be iron oxide, better known as rust. The iron oxide is however not a gas like in the carbon based combustion, it is a solid and therefore does not displace the air. Iron combustion tends to pull more air towards itself instead of smothering itself. While iron oxidation (rusting) occurs at all temperatures, with enough oxygen and a little heat (ie. well below melting temperature of iron) it becomes an exothermic reaction which will help it to self sustain or accelerate.
    1 point
  13. What a ludicrous argument!. Advancing a lie for which you have zero proof. A child wouldn't make such a silly argument. But you are. We aren't talking about history, we are talking about science. That you unscientific folks want to make it personal illustrates just how desperate you are. You know the deep deep evil that this has caused and here you are, defending the equivalent of the Holocaust. The science that Professor Leroy Hulsey is doing at UofA-F. The science that says NIST's investigation is a fraud. The science that other scientists have done that that NIST won't even look at. The lies and the cover ups of NIST and you folks keep defending the deep evil.
    1 point
  14. Sorry, I've been away and am now late to this party. Advertisers use repetition because it WORKS. When a religion requires prayers daily and weekly for victory and genocide of not just others, but SPECIFIC others, how can it not affect the adherents of that religion? Yes, it may not lead ALL of them to suicide bombings of innocent people, but the chances are great that some will. Others will manifest their belief in the death of all others by refusing to integrate into society, by court battles to have their religious beliefs enshrined in law, others will simply go through their daily interactions treating infidels as lower forms of life because this is what they REPEAT to themselves daily. These prayers are like seeds that are planted. What sprouts is up to the individual. But these daily and weekly prayers need to be investigated more closely. I know of no other religion that obsessively prays for the death of all others.
    1 point
  15. <slap forehead> Bye bye.
    1 point
  16. Wait, we're on the topic The First 5. If you want to pursue your conspiracy theory, go to your Turmoil thread. There were no important questions asked.....only silly ones by someone who ignores every rebuttals that were given. Free society. Believe what you want to believe.
    1 point
  17. Shopping for a laptop for grandson 9th grader. Are there any teenage-proof laptops out there? Grrrr!!!!
    1 point
  18. Apparently the stock markets have been doing really well since Trump became President. The economy appears to be on the move up thanks to Trump's presidency.
    1 point
  19. I watched Kellie's video about values screening. While I didn't find any of the content objectionable, I thought the delivery was dismal... it made me cringe in embarrassment for her. She has the charisma of soggy drywall, and will never lead the Conservatives to success. -k
    1 point
  20. Come on, you've got to be kidding. Liberals.
    1 point
  21. Perhaps a badge, then. Plus some lagers....errrr....camps. You know...so their right-wing poison doesn't infect the purity of the group.
    1 point
  22. Perhaps some sort of identifying tattoo could be used to distinguish those you consider right wing.
    1 point
  23. Well from the way the press was going on before the speech, even CTV news in Canada, they were expecting Trump to come out and give a speech like Hitler. Now they're scrambling to find a way... any way... to say bad things about it. But the media's not biased against Trump. Noooooo
    1 point
  24. So you are saying no aircraft hit those buildings. Did they or didn't they? Simple question.
    1 point
  25. "Slay them one by one filthy jews"
    1 point
  26. You didn't just pull the "40% longer than free fall out of the air or your ******. You advanced the falsehood, you defend your falsehood.
    1 point
  27. Part native, German background, yeah yeah, not sure it has relevance to anything at all.
    1 point
  28. It's quite sad that you say that. Statements like that make it obvious people are living in a bubble in this country with their fingers in the ears. Start reading about what life is like for aboriginals in this country and what conditions they live in. Better yet, aboriginal women. I know you won't but at least I've done my part. Nothing left to say to someone who is not well informed on this topic.
    1 point
  29. The same end doesn't justify the means
    1 point
  30. That's the standard you're using to make the comparison? Wow. Gassing, bad. Anything else = good treatment. Right on.
    1 point
  31. I don't believe Canada used nerve gas on the Native population.
    1 point
  32. Perhaps the Democrats will follow the example of the Republicans over the last 8 years. That would be good, eh?
    1 point
  33. He should have included Turkey to the list of these countries
    1 point
  34. An empty promise of security and prosperity for all. Oh well,m it's not like the bar for yet another Trump speech was very high going in and Congress sounded like a typical crowd of cheering rubes. The widows and orphans were a nice touch.
    1 point
  35. At least you admit their right of existence.
    1 point
  36. He would have known going in. JT has to walk a fine line, as have all Canadian PMs. When one's biggest trading partner is the equivalent of other well known world leaders that have been convicted of war crimes, what is a guy to do?
    1 point
  37. That is laughable, DoP. You raise another thoroughly discredited right wing meme but you refuse to look at any facts that illustrate clearly that this whole kefuffle has been another US false flag. Why would the US be negotiating with the Taliban over the pipeline and other humongous business prospects "up to August 2001"? But, confronted with Taliban's refusal to accept US conditions, "this rationale of energy security changed into a military one", the authors claim. "At one moment during the negotiations, the US representatives told the Taliban, 'either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs,'" Brisard said in an interview in Paris. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/oil.html
    1 point
  38. Yes, one sitting in the chair sat upon by so many infamous individuals, ... . Did Ivanka say, "eeeewwww, I feel like I have to go and have a shower"?
    1 point
  39. Hopefully Trump doesn't feel insecure about Trudeau's big mouth though. We have to be careful and acknowledge that Trump's mouth is more bigly. It's a great mouth - the best mouth. He can do wonderful things with his mouth - the best things. It's going to be great.
    1 point
  40. I knew I could rely on you for a valid knowledge of this condition. Thanks.
    1 point
  41. Trump is the smartest man in the world, he is the most importantest man in the world, he got the hugest majority in world history, everyone adores Trump, the media can't help but continually talk about him - even the Canadian media. ... I also remember another train wreck that even the American media couldn't help but continually talk about from Toronto city hall a few years back.
    1 point
  42. Way to go. Well done Donald! Good job!
    1 point
  43. Perfectly ok to rant and rave all you like. Your moronic country clearly crossed a line in Iran though - a line that was recognized way back in Westphalia.
    1 point
  44. Sorry, I forgot facetiousness baffles you. What people practice in their own country is their business. Washington made it America's business to see to it however that Iran was subjected to a dictatorship instead. Imagine that eh, the most powerful and Shiniest Beacon of democracy on the planet killing democracy and installing dictators instead. It's disgusting, like priests raping children. Who and why on Earth would anyone want to defend or apologize or otherwise shrug off such an abomination is beyond me. There clearly something wrong with anyone who would do that.
    1 point
  45. That reminds me, my septic tank will be due for a pump-out soon.
    1 point
  46. I tried changing the phone settings but it didn't do the trick. Thanks for looking into it. I'm going deaf too so...it is what it is I guess.
    1 point
  47. I think the US did a lot more damage to itself and the world by trashing it's principles while pursuing it's values. We in the meantime sat around like a bunch of useless enablers who let their friends drive drunk while saying and doing squat about it. Now we get rich ourselves outfitting murderous dictatorships like Saudi Arabia with even more capacity for murdering and dictating. We all got it coming.
    1 point
  48. What will you do in the event some government goes rogue and it's death squads start scouring the internet looking for reasons to round us up?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...