All Activity

Canadian's are saps, fools and this because conservatives can't find a credible leader and win an election. Sure, go with that one... 😂 Is this a copy and past from 2013 - 2015 ish in Vancouver and Toronto housing markets? I forget who was PM back then but do recall he was an unabashed supporter and proponent of Chinese investment in our markets that drove market prices. Let me know when moving day is and I'll come by to help you pack and load the van. I'll also bring directions for the quickest way to the border so you can get out of the country as quickly as possible. Let me know... 👍

YOUR ^SPECULATION is FOS.

Hey look, the noodles lady won every single ballot drop. That's weird. How was she a distant 3rd until all these late arriving ballots just showed up in her favor. I don't know. Must be a coincidence I guess. Bass went from an 18 point lead to a 4 point lead. But the DNC just got a 100% chance of winning. That is just how they do it. Nothing to see here.

Fake justifications for investigations are all the rage at Trump's DoJ and that's why they've ALL FAILED. Duh ONLY conviction is John Bolton Republican, for sharing classified material with his familiy. You know, exactly what Trump did. LMAO

Exactly.

YET! There doesn't appear to be evidence of voter fraud YET. I see the following happening...Bass and her Muslim pal will win the primary and one of them will be elected mayor. Shortly there after, an investigation will turn over ballots by dead people, ballots from people who left the state, ballots with no signatures, ballots mailed on the very last day...lots of them the majority for the Muslim woman, and so on. The Dems will claim its too late and that will be that. Republicans just cannot bring themselves to play as dirty as the Demoncrats...and its costing everyone. They have to start jailing these b@stards or they will never stop. And this "mail-in" chickenshit has to end.

If your platform was and continues to be 'look at what the liberals did' you're not going to get elected... I hope the next Conservative leader does have some credentials and appeal that people can get behind. That only benefits our country.

Too bad that reviews for him come from more than purely Conservative lenses. You do realize that there is information out there in the big wide world outside your narrow little echo chamber, right? Nobody cares whether you think he's an elite performer. You're gauging him on almost literally nothing but his party affiliation, which is all you ever do. Maybe you can tell us more about what Liz Truss thinks...🫠

Milhouse's only real claim to fame is being a 25 year Trough Dweller. Other than trying to trick Canadians with a neat little make over he has accomplished nothing. That is why he continues to be a loser. Most people can see through the smoke and mirrors. However, if an actual Conservative Leader with some serious credentials comes along, then perhaps people will take another look.

On any political shows I've watched on CBC (Power & Politics & Rosemary Barton) there is always conservative and NDP guests for 'the other sides' perspective. How is that bias to liberals? CBC has not said "Canada is failing, and it's Poilievre's fault." that I'm aware of. Why would they when he's have zero influence on anything?

We've had 11 years of liberals because of Harpers failures that got Trudeau elected, and the conservatives having no appealing leader since. Them's the facts... Why would anyone blame Poilievre...he's irrelevant. And of course wyou wouldn't blame Trump for his attempt to break our economy with tariffs.... it's the liberals fault. You obviously can't comprehend what the impact of tariffs has done to the economy. Sure, layoffs and job loses in the lumber, steel, aluminum and auto sectors is all because of the liberals. I'd agree Trudeau was near the top of the worst. A good argument that Harper is the upper echelon of the worst as well. If not for Carney, we'd have a living breathing in-office today worst ever PM in Poilievre. I highly doubt your opinion carries any weight with our allies. If anyone ever did listen to you I'm sure they'd have figured our you're a Conversative and Trump *ss kisser. On the contrary.... The vast majority of Canadians are proud of there fact that we are a reliable partner. It's you sorry ass complainers that have a problem because the conservatives can't win an election with the fools you continue to put on the stage. Not much to chirp about with Poilievre, other than thank goodness Carney came along and that clown isn't our PM. If you believe a career politician with zero background in anything is qualified to run our country keep believing it. There is a reason he lost a 27% poll lead and an election that should have been a slam dunk and continues to have unfavourable approval ratings. A snap election today would end his career. There likely won't be one so we get the pleasure of watching him fade into the past tense...

They didn't wait until after the election, dummy. They said it constantly, and they lied about it. Just look at CBC now: they're still busy fishing for anyone who ever identified as a conservative that doesn't like Pierre Poilievre, but they can't find anyone t interview who can critique ayatollah Carney after 1 yr+ of constant failure. CBC: "Canada is failing, and it's Poilievre's fault." That's what we get.

Russian collusion just called, shithead. They said "That's more than enough for a 3-year investigation."

That looks far more realistic to me, but this was the word on CBC street a few days ago: Surveys from firms like Spark Insights and Angus Reid show Prime Minister Mark Carney's approval hovering between 58% and 67%, making him one of the most favorably viewed Canadian leaders since Jean Chrétien's early tenure I mean, they might just as well start saying "The Liberal candidate had 18 holes-in-one that morning, and then won 99% of the popular vote in the election." The propaganda is literally getting that outrageous. 67% approval would mean that he has taken over almost all of the NDP and Green voters, the undecideds, and even winning over some conservative voters. That's into "Winning a defensive war as an underdog" territory... It takes a monumental success to get into that rarified air. It doesn't happen after: months of giving away billions of dollars that we can't afford talking big and then rolling over lying constantly lavishing exotic, luxury meals on himself and his staff while on 90-minute flights to meetings where he just gets humiliated and embarrasses the country pretending to remove taxes but not doing it at all running a massive deficit shutting down investigations into his own skullduggery, and running the country off-camera changing his opinion about an American war 4 times in one week achieving nothing, and making our country into the only one in the G20 that's in a recession, after bragging that we would be at the top of the G7 If that's the path to 67% approval, what would he have to do to get to 35%? Drop bombs on our NHL arenas?

CBC didn't decide anything. They just reported it as it was, and is.... 2015 Harper = Loser 2019 Scheer = Loser 2021 O'Toole = Loser 2025 Poilievre = Loser Today Poilievre = Loser Them's the facts.... Loser

Buddy, we have a fair cross-section of those people here. When did you ever notice eyeball, moonbox, exflyer, herbie, MH, etc seeming to be open-minded, intelligent, conscientious, balanced, or mature? All but one of them meet fair critiques of their cult-leaders with ad hominem attacks and childish accusations. In the case of MH, he ignores anything that he can't deny and regurgitates all the popular left4rd platitudes. At what stage of the game do you think any of those guys ever got to a point where their confirmation bias would allow them to see anything the LPoC did as a failure? If ^^that's^^ not a parody of LPoC cultists, it's only because it lacks exaggeration.

Funny how CBC can decide that every conservative leader is a loser the instant that they're selected but that they didn't notice that about Trudeau after 10 years.

Lol...ahhh Tweenkie-Poo, you lyin' sucks cant ever deal with reality. You have to warp and obscure it in order to make an argument. We've seen your gutless chickenshit way to many times now.

800 from 329 million is about 0.000229226361%. The other 99.9999977077 like Dandelion and Burdock. So totally unjustified.

???? For carney? They only voted for him once so far i think.

Awwwww now you're losing again because you forgot to say LOOOOZER! LOOOOOZER!!!! As you know that's the only way you can tell you're winning

The left takes their marching orders from radical Islam. They allow extremists to overrun college campuses and do harm to Jewish students. Then turn around and blame the right. Very sick

Please. The survey is extremely flawed and you should be able to see that, and your headline is just a lie, Did you even read it or just post what you thought was a headline that supported you They asked not if "Political Violence was justified", they asked if violence was justified in ANY OF 20 HYPOTHETICAL SITUATIONS, including "stopping a protest' and 'violence' includes pushing and shoving. So if someone says yes, they'd prevent someone from smashing up their store in a protest, that's "political violence". It's also weighted - they took the small number of people they identified as belonging to a 'maga group' by their definition and then extrapolated that across how many "maga' people they feel are out there And they only report "Maga", and democrats. Yet 'republicans' is much lower. AND it's an online poll. Here's a more honest survey and it shows that republicans and democrats are about tied. This STILL suffers from some of the problems of the previous poll but it's much more honest: Political Violence in America: Public Perceptions, Polarization, and Accountability - PRRI This poll and others like it use a more general queston, and when it comes to supporting "political violence' generally, democrats win hands down: Is the American left really more supportive of political violence? Polling commissioned by The Economist (also conducted by YouGov) shows that 20% of liberals think political violence can be justified, compared with 7% of conservatives and moderates. Our polling shows that liberals of all ages are more likely to condone political violence than conservatives but those under 40 are especially likely to do so. Almost one in three young American liberals thinks that violence can sometimes be justified to achieve political goals (see chart 1). The results agree with polling which suggests that a substantial minority of young liberals were sympathetic to Luigi Mangione, a 27-year-old who is charged with the murder of Brian Thompson, a health-care executive The reality is that liberals and democrats are far more likely to support political violence in general.

Sure it does. A black guy killed a white guy. That's all this story needs. Now what's NOT "Federal Politics" is your crybaby thread about West downvoting your ass.

I know you're slow, but 6 months slow is impressive, even for you. But, to be fair, you would have missed the point at that time too.