All Activity

What's ridiculous is the notion everyone else gets along without any problems.

Lol nope 1) you posted screenshots of rhe stock market. As you republicans were so fond of saying when the stocks went uo under biden “the stock market isn’t the economy” 2) Americans didn’t all get wage increases when the Trumpflation started and the Trumpflation isnt backed into annual inflation figures yet. Furthermore if it’s a “lie” then according to you there was no inflation problem nder Biden either and yet Trump’s campaign and the screeching MAGAs was heavily centred upon supposed runaway inflation under Biden. You can’t have it both ways Sorry, writing hastily. A trillion is the economy cost, 100 Billion+ is the direct cost to taxpayers. Still a hell of a lot money that’s A BILLION DOLLARS A DAY! You guys screech about small public expenditures for basic services and supports for people in need but a billion dollars a day for nothing and you’re like “oh well”. Hilarious. There is no evidence “Iran planned to make and use nuclear weapons” especially prior to 2018 when Trump tore up JCPOA without replacement for no concrete reason except “Iran bad, Obama bad”. And nothing in this deal prevents Iran from pursuing a nuclear program except they pinkie promise not to use all the uranium they got to enrich over the past 9 years thanks to Trump. Certainly nothing in this MOU provides any of the assurances that the JCPOA did. Furthermore even if Iran WAS pursuing a nuclear program not only did this misadventure not stop that, but Iran was still YEARS away from developing a nuclear weapon. Plenty of time for the carrots and deals without military action. We were not “minutes til midnight”. What is thai gibberish you’re spouting? America doesn’t have a “just for iran” stockpile and this is not just “low tech stuff”. You didn’t attack Iran with cheap weapons you were going to throw away anyways. Patriots, THAAD, tomahawks, etc. those are all KEY FRONT-LINE systems that the US needs against every and any enemy. It will take YEARS to replenish them, it says so right in your link and that article is a couple months old. You MAGA clowns really need to start reading the articles you link to, you all have the same problem I don’t know it’s ADHD or impaired reading comprehension or what LMAO they weren’t alienated but they are leaches who exploited and refused to help you donyou even hear yourself? NOBODY HELPED YOU BECAUSE THEY WERE ALIENATED AND THEY KNEW THE MISSION WAS DOOMED. It’s true they were ALREADY alienated due to Trump’s trade wars and annexation threats but that was made ten times worse by his failed war of folly for which he added even more tariff threats and a military drawdown in Europe. And now he is estranged from Israel the only friend he had left other than maybe the Arab Gulf states that pay massive personal bribes to him Nothing in Trump’s MOU prevents either and while they were enriching uranium (not the same as “developing nukes” but heading on that path) it is Trump’s destruction of the JCPOA that allowed and encouraged them to do that. They also weren’t “refusing to come to the table” they were refusing to be dictated to. Maybe if Trump had offered to lift sanctions and give them $300B from the stated he wouldn’t have had to bomb them. As a reminder, Trump wa demanding “unconditional surrender” and having failed to achieve that is now paying them and lifting all sanctions because he is desperate to end this. That’s for sure. I copied and pasted the above comment of yours into ChatGPT, which confirmed that true to form, your statement is just more of the usual Republican MAGA bullshit cocktail of lies, exaggerations and out-of-context facts. Here is the unedited response from chatgpt, you should fact check it yourself: The claim mixes together several different issues. Some parts are partly true, some are misleading, and some are unsupported. Claim 1: “The JCPOA did not allow inspectors to visit actual centrifuges.” False. One of the strongest features of the JCPOA was extensive monitoring of Iran’s declared enrichment facilities and centrifuge production chain. The IAEA had continuous monitoring at key enrichment sites and oversight of centrifuge manufacturing and storage. Critics of the JCPOA generally did not argue that inspectors were barred from seeing declared centrifuges; they argued that inspectors might not detect a covert program at undeclared locations. The real controversy concerned access to undeclared military sites, not declared enrichment facilities where centrifuges were operating. Claim 2: “The inspectors even said they declined to ask to visit the sites because they thought Iran might get mad.” Overstated and partly misleading. The concern comes from comments made by then-IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano and other officials indicating that the IAEA only requests access when it has a credible safeguards reason to do so. Critics argued that the IAEA was reluctant to force confrontations with Iran over military-site access. Iran publicly stated that foreign inspectors would never be allowed into military facilities, while Amano maintained that the IAEA had the authority to request access if necessary. However, I am not aware of any credible source where IAEA inspectors literally said, “We didn’t ask because Iran might get mad.” That is a political interpretation of their caution, not a direct statement. Claim 3: “Effectively, Iran was enriching uranium toward weapons grade while using the money from their oil sales and the billions Obama gave them to fund enrichment and terrorism.” This combines several separate claims. A. Was Iran enriching toward weapons grade during the JCPOA period (2015–2018)? Evidence at the time indicates no. The IAEA repeatedly reported Iranian compliance with the enrichment limits established by the agreement. The major expansion of enrichment occurred after the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA and the subsequent collapse of the deal’s restrictions. B. Did sanctions relief provide Iran with additional economic resources? Yes. The JCPOA enabled Iran to regain access to frozen assets and conduct more oil sales. Critics argued that this strengthened the Iranian government and indirectly benefited organizations supported by Tehran. Supporters argued that sanctions relief was the negotiated price of obtaining nuclear restrictions. C. Did Obama “give” Iran billions of taxpayer dollars? This is largely misleading. The frequently cited $1.7 billion payment was a settlement of a decades-old legal dispute involving Iranian funds from before the 1979 revolution, plus interest. Whether one views it as wise policy is debatable, but it was not generally characterized as a foreign-aid grant of new U.S. taxpayer money. Likewise, the much larger sums often discussed in connection with the JCPOA were mostly Iranian assets that had been frozen by sanctions and then became accessible again under the agreement, not checks written by U.S. taxpayers. Bottom line Your linked article supports the narrower claim that Iran strongly resisted inspections of military sites and publicly declared them off limits, which was indeed a major criticism of the JCPOA. But the broader statement that: inspectors could not see centrifuges, inspectors admitted they avoided requests merely to avoid angering Iran, Iran was already enriching toward weapons-grade uranium while technically inside the JCPOA, and Obama simply gave Iran taxpayer money, goes beyond what the available evidence supports. The strongest fact-based criticism of the JCPOA is that it relied on a verification regime that critics considered insufficiently intrusive at suspicious military sites—not that inspectors were completely barred from Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. I disproved your alleged “disproving” 1) So what Iran still gets a shit-ton of money 2) Those other countries aren’t “similar to them” you ignorant American clown. Arguably those countries aren’t more civilized either they all have horrible human rights records and rank near the bottom with Iran. So they’re similar in that one regard. I don’t believe China was paying “black market rates” or that they “lose” in any scenario. LMAO DID YOU???? Why would they be lower than prewar? So much oil and gas infrastructure in the neighbouring ME countries was damaged not to mention insurance and risk calculations for anyone wanting to ship or operate infrastructure all go up, the industry is saying it will be years before anything resembling “normal” happens It will be good foe Canada though, G7 out out a statement confirming they want to diversify away from ME and towards Canada

I can't even read what it says. And it looks like a disaster, it looks like the kind of place where Darth Maul would be hanging out with vader or that the heroes would assault at the end of the series in order to fight the demon king.

I also said I wasn't a Liberal. Buy it.

Its disturbing they would allow such a deeply personal conversation to be overheard in a shared room. The story may be fake.

Lest we forget... The specific policy shift in the late 1980s to decouple immigration targets from the economic cycle—raising numbers to sustain Canada's aging workforce and social safety net was initiated by Progressive Conservative, Minister of Employment and Immigration, Barbara McDougall. Meanwhile her boss Brian Mulroney was off engineering global free trade and making other countries safe for our manufacturers to migrate to. What did they think would happen?

Well, Obama will be a footnote in history compared to Trump. First half-Black President about sums it up.

Reposting this from elsewhere. 2 yrs ago when I had surgery for cancer, the lady in the next bed was visited by a hospital administrator she had not met before, not her doctor, who stood at the end of her bed and said she had no option but to have MAID. The woman said “Absolutely not! I plan to get up and dance again”. The administrator then started to argue with her saying she had no choice but MAID without explaining why. The woman said “Well I’ll talk to my family when they come on Monday.” The administrator replied “They’re coming on Monday? Good, I’ll talk to them”. She headed off the family on Monday before they saw her and they came to our room primed to convince her she had to have MAID according to the hospital. She then argued with the family that she didn’t want it. During the day she was firm but at night when they weren’t there she cried. Ultimately they convinced her and started preparing a party for her to say goodbye to all her friends. So sad. And it has made me more skeptical about MAID procedures.

Very Liberal of you. The comment is yours, own it.

Imagine if a country that was in peace negotiations with the US slaughtered everyone at a State of the Union address. Think how rational the Americans would be after that. We are told the Iranians are deranged fanatics and yet their pronouncements during the war were more reliable than the endless contradictory nonsense from Trump. Furthermore, America couldn’t move fast enough to conclude a deal with these people who apparently can’t be reasoned with.

Exactly as follows: Governor General Louise Arbour, Why Bill C-9 Doesn't Deserve Royal Ascent The proposed Bill C-9 clearly states: Hatred means an emotion of intense and extreme nature that is clearly associated with vilification and detestation; (haine) If a person or specific group of people go around lying too and deceiving people for example then that person or group of people deserve to be vilified for it and it is not hatred and people have every right to naturally feel detestation for such actions but that is not hatred either. It is the emotion that comes with being lied too or deceived that gives people the will power to have even extreme nature of seeking justice by raising awareness among other citizens to put a stop to such behavior which is also clearly not hatred. The Liberal attempt at trying to define what qualifies as hatred is completely invalid thus Bill C-9 is not worthy of Royal Ascent. Thank you for your time and attention on this most important current matter Governor General Louise Arbour. love Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist David Jeffrey Spetch Ps. Be good, be strong! Ontario Canada (Then I sent a copy of what I sent to the Governor General to all MP’s across the country from my updated list following the most recent so called election Along with fellow activists and journalists etc. and after leaving a copy here for you to see I’m going to send it to all Senators, MLA’s, MPP’s, government agencies etc. from my most recently updated contact lists FYI)

I look at and judge everyone equally. You're the one who wants special rules about brown people. If i was gay or a woman, would you call me a bigot for disliking, distrusting, and not wanting anything to do with Islam and those who worship under its rules? After all, under Islam, I must be killed. If I were a woman, Islam says I'm someone's property to do with as the man decides. I can be beaten whenever the man wants to, and I have very few rights, including the right to any children I have. Ah, but I don't have to join! But as per Islam, infidels can be beaten, tortured, raped, robbed and murdered if a Muslim so wishes. Allah blesses this. I'm neither gay nor a woman, but I do own property, and I really don't want my country filling up with people who are taught they can kill me if they want to. My religion, not that I pay it much mind, has NONE of those things. Christianity and Judiasm have gone through several reformation periods over the centuries, and no longer believe in violence or revenge. Islam has not. All of their barbaric, backward rules and laws are still official centrist interpretations. Gays must be killed. Infidels are fair game. Women are at best third class citizens, and democracy is not a proper type of government. I would if there was any evidence of that. Did you see the UK government commission into the rape gangs just reported this week? A quarter of a million mostly white girls as young as twelve were raped, beaten, and tortured by Muslim rape gangs over the years. Not by individuals, but by large groups of acquaintances and family members. It was so prevalent that everyone in the Pakistani community knew about it. No one ever reported it because no one thought there was anything wrong with it, including their wives, sisters, and mothers. Why? In almost every trial, the men said the same thing. they were infidels, and so they were allowed. Their wives and families said the same. The girls who reported it were harassed, screamed at and threatened by these men's families. Otherwise respected men and clerics said this was just fine under Islam. But that was unique! Involving hundreds of Muslim men! Not so much. New arrests every week now. And throughout the Muslim world and its 50 countries, none have equal rights between men and women and none have equal rights between Muslims and unbelievers. Wherever Islam rules, there is deep and terrible violence. Whether it's Iran ordering women who protested about having to wear the hijab be raped before their execution so they don't go to heaven, or Syria slaughtering Kurds or Nigerian Muslims slaughtering Christians, or other Muslims in North Africa taking hundreds of thousands of Christians as slaves or Afghanistan deciding women shouldn't be allowed to talk outside for fks sake or Palestinians raping, torturing and murdering women and children with glee and bragging about it to their joyful parents. And I'm supposed to want those people HERE? Are you f0cking retarded?!

With the exception of the US has any nation used nukes to solve any conflict and are you suggesting that Iran be given the same responsibility...we are talking about the globes largest supporter of terrorism, do you really trust them with that weapon....most of the world does not....same goes for many other nations...

There was romance within the SPLC one of the leaders was boning a Neo Nazi and paid him 1.2 million https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/splc-official-accused-of-funneling-12-million-to-informant-in-neo-nazi-group-report-department-of-justice-southern-poverty-law-center

How come we can't make God accountable for all the pain and suffering he's caused? The Lord will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind. Deuteronomy 28:28 What am I missing here?

It's juvenile, braindead comments like this that keep making The Left™ tent larger. We're voting against the stupidification of politics that you've so eagerly embraced.

Prove me wrong. And like I said, I'm not a Liberal.

Have you ever heard the term natural capital? I suspect social capital must sound even more bizarre.

The obligatory name calling, Typical Liberal response.

Until Israel and America both officially admit that Israel has nuclear weapons, neither country is in a position to lecture Iran on the subject. https://mondoweiss.net/2026/05/there-is-a-long-history-of-members-of-congress-calling-out-israels-nuclear-arsenal-it-is-now-time-to-take-action/

I would say the Left has also steamrolled ahead on the environment without a single second thought about the economics or science involved. Everything they've said about climate change and how to address it seems to now be so much bullshit.

Virtually everything you look at is a distorted caricature of your own making. A pair of moróns by the look of it.