All Activity

Fair enough, but I created this thread to talk about the DSA lunatics. There's enough Israel stuff everywhere else. Just like the TDS nonsense, it seems to permeate everything and ruins the point of the thread.

It doesn't mean it's right, either. You just assume it's right because it says what you want it to say. You don't have enough knowledge to know the difference or evaluate each study on its merits and methodology. Amongst other criteria.

Guess you're WHINING about a drop in the bucket. 22 "slipped through" out of 46 MILLION clients served. LMAO

confux....a sad sad sad little man and a LOSER living in his basement making 41.6K posts in 3 short years (about 38 post on this forum per day )because he has no life. I am over it but clearly, you have nothing else in your life except to argue facelessly in social media. Hunker down any post away LOSER LOL LOL LOL

That's not what he said. What he said was people that weren't him. But by all means feel free to jump into a conversation you're not part of and look like a tart again

Well that's what happens when you lie kid LOL "WHAT ABOUT STORNAWAY!!" Stornoway's fine, doesn't need anything, "WHO MENTIONED STORNAWAY!?!?!!!!!! ? WHO WAS IT!?? OH IF ONLY WE COULD FIND THE CULPRIT!!" Bwaahahahahaah!!!!! You're frikkin priceless And not content to bring it up once and look like a tard, you've got to go full Megtard and Keep bringing it up!!!!!!!!

Why is it weird? Yes, there is horseshoe theory, where the fringe right and left come around together on some issues. In this case, it is much more of the left than the right. We get benefits of technology sharing from Israel, their support and bases when needed, and a democracy in the region. It isn’t reasonable debate about funding that triggers massive campaigns, but the radical anti-Israeli positions that do, and there is nothing mysterious about it, the PAC is no secret nor is it a secret than many Americans do in fact support supporting Israel and Nate to that end. No conspiracy.

I admitted the mistake.

1. What interests? Oil? We need to be drilling, not importing. It's time to tell the environuts to f*ck off. We can get our oil here. 2. Great. then we have a legitimate excuse to wipe them off the map if they use them. 3. All the more reason to permanently disable them. 4. There's nothing silly or outlandish about it. Mike Johnson made supporting Israel his first act as speaker - that isn't a coincidence. "Attention, America: my FIRST act as speaker will be to insert my entire head up Israel's ass".

Like every country in the world, Israel has its own legitimate national interests which are different from America’s. Naturally, Israel will try to conceal those differences as much as possible. It’s up to US politicians to find them.

Concern about the weird US relationship with Israel is spread across the political spectrum now. Why does such a wealthy country still need subsidies and why does reasonable debate about it by Dem pols trigger massively funded primary campaigns against them?

They’re 1990s version of libertarians Texas. It’s not that hard. The prairie provinces and middle America share more in common than differences.

I merely pointed out the facts about your source, then you decided you had to make a false claim about it being published and peer reviewed and keep pushing that point. I also pointed out the limits of this study as cited by the authors themselves.

It’s not their war when we have mutual interests and wanted to help. Iran was developing Nuclear weapons. They also have their terror proxies in the region like the Houthis that have been attacking our ships. The point is, you made silly and outlandish assertions about being controlled by Israel.

Sure anyone can write a paper, this was a study done by Lois Lamerato, PhD1 , Abigail Chatfield, MS1 , Amy Tang, PhD1 , Marcus Zervos, MD2,3, involving 18,468 children. The absurdity is your attempt tp pass it off as some flim flam piece. Take it as it is, or not, that's your choice.

My oh my confux...you can never get it straight. LOL LOL LOL LOSER

Climate change is every bit as dangerous as the boogeyman.

I don't have "funny 9/11 beliefs". Just the unanswered questions about inexplicable events surrounding WTC 7. What did I say happened that so concerns you, eyeball? Unlike a left4rd, I didn't make declarative statements about "WHAT ABSOLUTELY HAPPENED BECAUSE SO AND SO SAID IT HAPPENED!!!! EVERYONE WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE WHAT THEY SAID ON CBC IS A RET4RDED RACIST!!!!", I just pointed out things that contradict the official narrative. You, on the other hand, made dozens of declarative statements about covid jabs and the origin of covid that were all wildly stupid, and now thoroughly debunked. You're still on the record as being stuck at "Safe, you won't get sick, and you don't have to worry about giving it to granny." You're so far out in left field that even Fauci feels sorry for you.

So… you did or did not understand the concept of published? No one said an unpublished study means the information inside is negated. The point is that anyone can write a paper. That's why peer review exists in the first place. It's a quality-control process where independent experts try to poke holes in the methodology, statistics, and conclusions before the broader scientific community accepts it. Published doesn't automatically mean true. Unpublished certainly doesn't automatically mean false. But you taking an unpublished manuscript, posting a fancy chart like you did, trying to show it proves vaccines broadly cause chronic disease is absurdity. Extraordinary claims deserve more than, "Here's a PDF."