The COVID 'lab leak' theory debunked in two minutes.

[robosmith]

The COVID 'lab leak' theory debunked in two minutes. VIDEO

Source

Quote

Arguments Favoring the Zoonotic (Natural Spillover) Theory

Videos and articles that aim to rapidly "debunk" the lab leak theory generally rely on specific geographical and genetic data:

• The Market Hub: Early cases of SARS-CoV-2 clustered tightly around the western section of the Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market in Wuhan. [1, 2]
• Environmental DNA: Positive genetic samples of the virus were recovered directly from carts, cages, and wildlife stalls that housed mammals known to be susceptible to coronaviruses. [1]
• Evolutionary Lineages: Evolutionary mapping of the virus's early genome indicates a pattern matching previous natural spillovers (like SARS-1 and MERS), suggesting it jumped from animals to humans at the market. [1, 2]

 

[CdnFox]

45 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The COVID 'lab leak' theory debunked in two minutes. VIDEO

Source

 

Well the guy in your video certainly looks like he knows a lot about drugs that's for sure. Probably not covid though

The real experts say that the lab league theory is the most likely

FBI chief Christopher Wray says China lab leak most likely

The FBI seems to have less hair but more brains when it comes to this

[Goddess]

Lame.

It 99% for sure came from the Wuhan lab and Daschak's "research."  Read his damn proposal paper.

The only reason we don't know 100% is because the Chinese destroyed documents and evidence and the first patients "disappeared."

[gatomontes99]

 

I see your lwnj and raise you a popular lwnj. 

[Legato]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

The COVID 'lab leak' theory debunked in two minutes. VIDEO

Source

 

Tell that guy not stand to close to a candle in the wind.

 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Lame.

It 99% for sure came from the Wuhan lab and Daschak's "research."  Read his damn proposal paper.

The only reason we don't know 100% is because the Chinese destroyed documents and evidence and the first patients "disappeared."

Viral genetics cited in the video says otherwise.

[CdnFox]

16 minutes ago, Legato said:

Tell that guy not stand to close to a candle in the wind.

 

I doubt that guy can even hear the wind or anything else.

His hair is a prime example of what happens when you lose containment

14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Viral genetics cited in the video says otherwise.

It's a false cite. You were just too stupid to realize it

[Legato]

16 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Viral genetics cited in the video says otherwise.

when did genetics go viral?

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, Legato said:

when did genetics go viral?

I think the YouTubers name  was viral genetics. It would certainly explain the hair.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

when did genetics go viral?

Thanks for proving your STUPIDITY, CLOWN.

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

we don't know 100%

If we did it still wouldn't have made any difference in how we needed to respond.

Shit happens.

Of course if you did know 100% you'd still have a long way to go to prove that it was deliberate.

You do think it was deliberate don't you or am I mistaken? My apologies if that's the case.

[Goddess]

19 minutes ago, eyeball said:

If we did it still wouldn't have made any difference in how we needed to respond.

Shit happens.

We've discussed this extensively. We differ on the necessary response. 

19 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You do think it was deliberate don't you or am I mistaken? My apologies if that's the case.

I don't know if it was deliberate. You'd be shitting your pants if you actually knew how many accidental lab leaks there are every year from BSL4 labs. I know, so its a possibility it was accidental. 

Either way, accidental or intentional, the people who were responsible massively profited from it and went to great lengths to cover it up. 

They had a plan either way. 

I don't think 👇 this 👇 was a coincidence.

[eyeball]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

We differ on the necessary response. 

Sure but why do you think knowing it was a lab leak would or should have resulted in a different response?

7 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Either way, accidental or intentional, the people who were responsible massively profited from it and went to great lengths to cover it up. 

They had a plan either way. 

I don't think 👇 this 👇 was a coincidence.

Again, so what? We'd still have needed to respond to it either way.

That's not a coincidence it just is what it is.

[Nationalist]

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

Sure but why do you think knowing it was a lab leak would or should have resulted in a different response?

Again, so what? We'd still have needed to respond to it either way.

That's not a coincidence it just is what it is.

Perhaps.

But what it is, is proof that Fauci purgered himself to congress and the world.

The little monster belongs in jail.

[gatomontes99]

The stupid part of this video is that it does not consider the possibility that someone from the lab could have visited the booth at the market, infected the booth owner who then infected everyone else. Never mind that the Wuhan lab was working with bats from Laos at the time.

Does that make more sense than a bat migrated 1000 miles from laos before infecting a dog (and nothing else along the way) that the booth owner killed and then infected people that visited the booth? 

Edited 7 hours ago by gatomontes99

[Nationalist]

38 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The stupid part of this video is that it does not consider the possibility that someone from the lab could have visited the booth at the market, infected the booth owner who then infected everyone else. Never mind that the Wuhan lab was working with bats from Laos at the time.

Does that make more sense than a bat migrated 1000 miles from laos before infecting a dog (and nothing else along the way) that the booth owner killed and then infected people that visited the booth? 

Their quandary is simple and recurring. They cannot admit they were wrong. Like "climate change" or the open border, such admissions would expose them as liars. Or at least, week minded fools.

In this case, should the lab leak be acknowledged, it means Fauci purgered himself and puts in question all the insanity that shut down the whole world, based on the proclamations of a proven liar.

Its really all as simple as that.

[Goddess]

9 hours ago, eyeball said:

Sure but why do you think knowing it was a lab leak would or should have resulted in a different response?

I didn't say where it originated from would influence the response, I've never said that.

I have consistently said the response was overblown fear-mongering.

Every country already had a pandemic plan and Sweden was the only one who didn't throw it out the window.

Look, the IFR of covid was slightly higher than for seasonal flu and we don't shut down the world, crash the economies, lock people down, have 24/7 media coverage of cases and deaths every year for the flu.

Risk factors for covid were the same as for the flu - the very elderly, the very obese, the already terminally ill.

I picked Feb. 2018 Stats Can for flu cases - just under 51,000.

FluWatch report: February 25 to March 3, 2018 (week 9) - Canada.ca

And in the middle of this post, I found I can no longer get on the Stats Can Flu Watch site:

But before it shut down on me - the flu cases for same week in Feb. 2020-2021...........were 64.

64.

Down from 51,000.

Where did all those flu cases go during covid?

10 hours ago, eyeball said:

We'd still have needed to respond to it either way.

Hardly anybody is still defending the overblown, economy-crushing, life destroying response anymore.

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Perhaps.

But what it is, is proof that Fauci purgered himself to congress and the world.

The little monster belongs in jail.

Doesn't he belong in court first?

[Nationalist]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Doesn't he belong in court first?

Was this post necessary? Or do you just have a burning need to oppose for the sake of opposition?

Man-up.

[eyeball]

49 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Look, the IFR of covid was slightly higher than for seasonal flu and we don't shut down the world, crash the economies, lock people down, have 24/7 media coverage of cases and deaths every year for the flu.

I bet if we had to resort to using  excavators to bury dead flu victims we would.

[eyeball]

12 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Was this post necessary? Or do you just have a burning need to oppose for the sake of opposition?

Man-up.

No, I'm just wondering how you convict anyone without going to court first.

It seems to me you'd need a dictator or something.

 

[Goddess]

18 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I bet if we had to resort to using  excavators to bury dead flu victims we would.

I already showed you that never happened.

You need to update the software in your brain.  You're now years behind everyone else.

[Nationalist]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

No, I'm just wondering how you convict anyone without going to court first.

It seems to me you'd need a dictator or something.

 

Wow...just...wow.

No wonder you have a bad habit of being wrong.

You're obviously a very shallow person.

My sympathies.

[eyeball]

27 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Wow...just...wow.

No wonder you have a bad habit of being wrong.

You're obviously a very shallow person.

My sympathies.

What are you babbling about exactly?

[Goddess]

The same people are talking excitedly about the next pandemic.

Wake.  The.  F*ck.  Up.