DOJ Suppressed Christians' Rights

[gatomontes99]

FoxNews

Justice.gov

It seems like the left is literally doing every thing they can to harm people. They open the borders, push kids in to transmania, push girls out of sports, pay terrorist nations to build nukes, tax wealth out of existence, subsidize everything out of affordability, sensor dissenting opinion, and espoused hatred for or killed anyone that dared disagree with them. So I am not surprised or shocked to see FBI documented proof of government suppression of Christians. 

[Nationalist]

Of course they did. We all watched them do it. The question is...what the fck will they do about it?

DO SOMETHING FOR GAWD'S SAKE!

[gatomontes99]

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Of course they did. We all watched them do it. The question is...what the fck will they do about it?

DO SOMETHING FOR GAWD'S SAKE!

It takes time to do it right.

[Nationalist]

10 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

It takes time to do it right.

Time? Charge them in Kentucky...roast their arses...put 'em in a Kentucky jail.

Done. 

[gatomontes99]

6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Time? Charge them in Kentucky...roast their arses...put 'em in a Kentucky jail.

Done. 

Lol...that would be nice. But the FBI is making sure they have a solid case. Ending such horrific violations of rights starts with unimpeachable prosecution. 

[robosmith]

49 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

FoxNews

Justice.gov

It seems like the left is literally doing every thing they can to harm people. They open the borders, push kids in to transmania, push girls out of sports, pay terrorist nations to build nukes, tax wealth out of existence, subsidize everything out of affordability, sensor dissenting opinion, and espoused hatred for or killed anyone that dared disagree with them. So I am not surprised or shocked to see FBI documented proof of government suppression of Christians. 

You've quoted ZERO EVIDENCE for your ^OPINION RANT.

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You've quoted ZERO EVIDENCE for your ^OPINION RANT.

Go through the 200 page report. It is in there. I can't quote the whole thing. 

[Nationalist]

12 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lol...that would be nice. But the FBI is making sure they have a solid case. Ending such horrific violations of rights starts with unimpeachable prosecution. 

Really?

Unimpeachable prosecution didn't seem to hinder the Democrats.

[robosmith]

8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Go through the 200 page report. It is in there. I can't quote the whole thing. 

You didn't quote ANYTHING. Probably because it doesn't say WHAT YOU CLAIM. LMAO

[Nationalist]

Just lay indictment after indictment. 1 for each of them. Drag them through court till they're tapped out and ruined financially. Who cares if the charges produce guilty verdicts. Destroy them!

And let Flynn watch it all inside the courts!

[User]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You didn't quote ANYTHING. Probably because it doesn't say WHAT YOU CLAIM. LMAO

From the link he provided. You are such a clown.

A. Enforcement Actions

Key Finding 1: The Biden DOJ pursued aggressive prosecutions against non-violent, pro-

life, Christian demonstrators under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act

but responded less aggressively to violent attacks against pregnancy resource centers.

[Michael Hardner]

39 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You've quoted ZERO EVIDENCE for your ^OPINION RANT.

Maybe not but there are *some* details given, like this:

""The Task Force found that during the COVID-19 period, federal agencies frequently subjected employees seeking religious accommodations to invasive scrutiny of their beliefs," the report stated, saying the practice was at odds with court precedent requiring employers to "presume sincerity" of beliefs."

So it seems like the assertions are not entirely groundless, but yes it would be good to know what the incident(s) in question were.

There was a famous Toronto lawyer who used to book Jewish holidays but one time appeared in front of a different judge after begging off a case for Yom Kippur or somesuch.

Got caught... 

[Nationalist]

3 minutes ago, User said:

From the link he provided. You are such a clown.

 

A. Enforcement Actions

Key Finding 1: The Biden DOJ pursued aggressive prosecutions against non-violent, pro-

life, Christian demonstrators under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act

but responded less aggressively to violent attacks against pregnancy resource centers.

That's true.

Now...I understand that a person or two went to jail for "protesting" outside abortion clinics.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2832741/abortion-convictions-spotlight-dojs-handling-protesters/

Hmmm...

"The Family Research Council identified 436 church attacks in 2023 alone which reveals a whopping 800% increase over six years! In contrast, pro-life pregnancy centers have faced similar hostility, with fire bombings and threats aimed at their offices.

The hearing also shed light on the Biden administration’s weaponization of the FACE Act against pro-life individuals."

https://revivalnation.com/blog/2024/12/30/436-churches-were-attacked-in-2023-zero-prosecuted/

Drag those responsible into court and destroy their lives!

[Fluffypants]

30 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You didn't quote ANYTHING. Probably because it doesn't say WHAT YOU CLAIM. LMAO

Why don't you I don't know READ IT and then tell us hes wrong?

Reading is hard for Robo he just watches facebook videos of softcore porn actresses telling him the BS he wants to hear all day.

[herbie]

So tell us where in the New Testament it speaks against vaccinations.

[Deluge]

52 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You've quoted ZERO EVIDENCE for your ^OPINION RANT.

The evidence is everywhere, wokejob. How dishonest do you have to be? Ask your communist overlords - they may surprise even you. 

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, herbie said:

So tell us where in the New Testament it speaks against vaccinations.

The NT doesn't talk about vaccinations, so it's our choice, and my choice is to tell you Jesus trashing communists to f*ck off.  

[herbie]

2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

The NT doesn't talk about vaccinations, so it's our choice, and my choice is to tell you Jesus trashing communists to f*ck off

Then you can't use it as an example of discrimination against Christians, can you?

There is no such thing as "Christian Rights" to complain about.

[Deluge]

8 minutes ago, herbie said:

Then you can't use it as an example of discrimination against Christians, can you?

There is no such thing as "Christian Rights" to complain about.

Sure I can. This is a Christian nation. If a knuckle dragging heathen weaponizes the DOJ against me because I'm Christian then I have a legitimate complaint. 

[Michael Hardner]

30 minutes ago, herbie said:

So tell us where in the New Testament it speaks against vaccinations.

It's a reasonable argument that people have the right to put themselves in harm's way to go to a religious ceremony.

It's also reasonable to say they don't.

But since Freedom of Religion is protected in their foundational legal documents I would say the former position should be the default.

[User]

36 minutes ago, herbie said:

Then you can't use it as an example of discrimination against Christians, can you?

There is no such thing as "Christian Rights" to complain about.

This is America, where we actually respect freedom of religion and have it in our Constitution. 

 

[User]

58 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

So it seems like the assertions are not entirely groundless, but yes it would be good to know what the incident(s) in question were.

It is an almost 600-page report that presents specific examples...

[herbie]

54 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

But since Freedom of Religion is protected in their foundational legal documents I would say the former position should be the default.

So you're not in favour of the practice where the province will take custody of a child needing aq blood transfusion when their parent refuses one on religious grounds?

There is nothing in either the Cdn or US Constitution that protects Christians. Nor any other religion.
MOF I like the people I have met that don't vote because of religious objections. I don't f*cking want their voting 'on religious grounds'.

[User]

16 minutes ago, herbie said:

So you're not in favour of the practice where the province will take custody of a child needing aq blood transfusion when their parent refuses one on religious grounds?

There is nothing in either the Cdn or US Constitution that protects Christians. Nor any other religion.
MOF I like the people I have met that don't vote because of religious objections. I don't f*cking want their voting 'on religious grounds'.

The 1st Amendment protects Christians and every other religion. 

Too bad so sad Mr Bigot. 

 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Just lay indictment after indictment. 1 for each of them. Drag them through court till they're tapped out and ruined financially. Who cares if the charges produce guilty verdicts. Destroy them!

And let Flynn watch it all inside the courts!

Using the DoJ in ^this way is totally unethical and the antithesis of JUSTICE.

Not surprised you believe that's a good idea because it FITS your lack of integrity. LMAO

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Maybe not but there are *some* details given, like this:

""The Task Force found that during the COVID-19 period, federal agencies frequently subjected employees seeking religious accommodations to invasive scrutiny of their beliefs," the report stated, saying the practice was at odds with court precedent requiring employers to "presume sincerity" of beliefs."

So it seems like the assertions are not entirely groundless, but yes it would be good to know what the incident(s) in question were.

There was a famous Toronto lawyer who used to book Jewish holidays but one time appeared in front of a different judge after begging off a case for Yom Kippur or somesuch.

Got caught... 

Your quote was not quoted here by the OP.