Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No. Im anti-stupid.

Good luck with that.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

It only makes sense to right wingers.

Americans let their feelings be known. Only 5% of them supported admitting more Jewish refugees following the war.

 

Im a right winger. But I cannot abide stupidity. This "war" appears to only benefit Isreal. Thus its stupid for America to get involved. All they've done is reverse the direction of the economy. 

Just now, eyeball said:

Good luck with that.

Considering that 70% of humans are not all that sharp, it is an up-hill battle.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
Just now, Nationalist said:

Im a right winger.

You have to be 100% unequivocally behind Israel to qualify.

  • Haha 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You have to be 100% unequivocally behind Israel to qualify.

No I dont. This is half your problem. You make stupid assumptions. 

Welcome to the 70% club.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
Just now, Nationalist said:

No I dont. This is half your problem. You make stupid assumptions. 

Welcome to the 70% club.

I have much the same feelings you have, America is being played like it's the string section while imagining it's the conductor.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
On 4/12/2026 at 8:22 AM, John Johnston said:

Trump is like a four year old with a lighter. 

And I suppose Iran is the grownup. lol

Your TDS is level fiving again. 

Posted
59 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You're trying to listen with too much shît between your ears...

It is what it is...  not quite the wipe out your guy and his Fox News minion Hegseth told you, is it.

Strongly disliking Trump doesn't even register in my guiding principles.  Why exactly do you rely on him to guide yours?

You don’t get to blame me for your contradictory two faced forked tongue double speak. 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

You don’t get to blame me for your contradictory two faced forked tongue double speak. 

Huh...  I've been clear from the start.  Iran is playing Trump real well in this war.  

You're too awestruck by Trump to see the reality of the situation 🤩

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

And? Is Russia not allowed to engage in business?

Do you not understand the politics of that era? Communism was the #1 threat. Russia was the leading country for communism. Eisenhower, for better or worse, foresaw a lost ally, so he bribed a few people to oust the leader. And they did. It did not go well for us. After that, the new leadership began funding terror. We put bases over there because that was were the threat was. 

Today, we are at war with Iran because Iran was planning a nuclear holocaust. They were on the precipice of wiping out a large swath of humanity. Whatever bad things you think we did, their ambition was not about us. It was about the end of the world. 

Notice the guy said it would be over. Maybe he meant the program, maybe he meant something else. 

 

 

 

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
53 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

China is not under an economic collapse.  It's called a slowdown

No they are deindustrializing as manufactures are getting out of dodge. For a manufacturing economy, that’s not a slowdown that’s collapse. Don’t mince words. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

No they are deindustrializing as manufactures are getting out of dodge. For a manufacturing economy, that’s not a slowdown that’s collapse. Don’t mince words. 

Fell free to substitute the US for China;

AI Overview
China is not experiencing a sudden, total economic collapse in early 2026, but rather a profound, prolonged structural slowdown characterized by a property sector crisis, high debt, weak consumer confidence, and deflationary pressures. While GDP growth is slowing, it has not halted, with some sectors showing resilience, prompting analysts to describe the situation as a "bumpy path" or "stagnation" rather than a catastrophic collapse.
Posted
14 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

Well now you dumb asses cannot afford gasoline, housing, healthcare, food. Smart bunch. LMAO. 

You first, I insist.

Posted
59 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Huh...  I've been clear from the start.  Iran is playing Trump real well in this war.  

You're too awestruck by Trump to see the reality of the situation 🤩

No, I rightly point out that you are on here cheering Iran on in the same breath you cry and blame Trump.

 

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

What shared strategic interests? 

Already answered. 

 

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

No they are deindustrializing as manufactures are getting out of dodge. For a manufacturing economy, that’s not a slowdown that’s collapse. Don’t mince words. 

The whole world needs a good whack upside the head. I still think it'll have to be a nuclear whack to really drive it home though.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
1 hour ago, John Johnston said:

Well now you dumb asses cannot afford gasoline, housing, healthcare, food. Smart bunch. LMAO. 

Um… what are you talking about? 
 

whatever global impact is hitting us is hitting you too in whatever shit hole country you call home. 
 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, John Johnston said:

Well now you dumb asses cannot afford gasoline, housing, healthcare, food. Smart bunch. LMAO. 

Looks like we got a double dose of dumbasses here in Canada, it was called the liberal party, and those that voted for them...stand up take a bow 

  • Like 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
43 minutes ago, eyeball said:

The whole world needs a good whack upside the head. I still think it'll have to be a nuclear whack to really drive it home though.

Great. Let’s start with Gaza. 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, User said:

Great. Let’s start with Gaza. 

You might want to finish that because when the collapse goes global Israel is going to find itself increasingly on its own.

Good luck convincing Americans that funding Israel will still be a priority.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You might want to finish that because when the collapse goes global Israel is going to find itself increasingly on its own.

Good luck convincing Americans that funding Israel will still be a priority.

Israel will be a lot better with no Gaza terrorists to worry about! 

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, eyeball said:

I have much the same feelings you have, America is being played like it's the string section while imagining it's the conductor.

Knowing what I do about Isreal, and that iran just isnt a realistic threat to the USA, I just cant get behind this crap.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Do you not understand the politics of that era? Communism was the #1 threat. Russia was the leading country for communism. Eisenhower, for better or worse, foresaw a lost ally, so he bribed a few people to oust the leader. And they did. It did not go well for us. After that, the new leadership began funding terror. We put bases over there because that was were the threat was. 

Today, we are at war with Iran because Iran was planning a nuclear holocaust. They were on the precipice of wiping out a large swath of humanity. Whatever bad things you think we did, their ambition was not about us. It was about the end of the world. 

Notice the guy said it would be over. Maybe he meant the program, maybe he meant something else. 

 

 

 

I care about Iran having nukes about as much as I care that Isreal has nukes.

Sorry man but I cant get behind this. If Isreal has a problem...let Isreal deal with it.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I care about Iran having nukes about as much as I care that Isreal has nukes.

Sorry man but I cant get behind this. If Isreal has a problem...let Isreal deal with it.

You don't have to care. But you should. They 1000% would have used them as an offensive weapon. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,016
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    eninn
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...