What Side are the LPoC and CBC on in the IRGC/US & Israel War?

User · March 19

Just now, cougar said:

There was a 13 year old who claimed Trump raped her. She was interviewed by FBI in 2019 and the files were hidden never to see the light of day.

If he is not a pedophile, why hide all Epstein files? Why all those materials where his name appears tens of thousands of times are not released?

That other guy who is "in the deep end", or rather having a fried mind can fill up his truck with expensive gasoline and go and hide.

Really. OK, who was she? Where is she now? What evidence did she have to corroborate her story?

Claims of rape with no real substance or evidence don't prove anything. When Brett Kavanaugh was put up for the Supreme Court, the FBI received something like 5,000 tips. Welcome to the life of popular people, where they get accused of all sorts of crap for all sorts of reasons.

But yeah, sure, let's go with the very plausible notion that the FBI covered this all up and hid the files so well that an entire Biden administration never knew... or maybe Biden was in on the cover-up too!???

The DOJ and FBI do not release files on every criminal case, nor was anything ever hidden in Epstein's case. But back to that big conspiratorial cover-up, I guess Biden was in on that, too?

So, in summary, you are sitting here accusing Trump of being a pedophile and raping little girls based on nothing.

cougar · March 19

6 minutes ago, User said:

So, in summary, you are sitting here accusing Trump of being a pedophile and raping little girls based on nothing.

Pro Trump?

He needs you in Iran. Go help him.

There is no doubt in my mind he slept with 13 year olds. Unlike the UK, the USA is a much more corrupt entity with evidence being destroyed.

User · March 19

18 minutes ago, cougar said:

Pro Trump?

He needs you in Iran. Go help him.

There is no doubt in my mind he slept with 13 year olds. Unlike the UK, the USA is a much more corrupt entity with evidence being destroyed.

Oh, so now it is not just 1 girl, you think he slept with more than one. You base this on... what? I mean, other than your irrational hatred of the man, do you have anything of substance?

Edited March 19 by User

WestCanMan · March 19

Hey left4rd dung-beetles!

In accordance with my new resolution to use AI replies, in order to keep my interactions with you all more polite, I just ran this question through for you:

Do Iran and Hamas have long-standing commitments to commit genocide against the Israelis
Both Iran and Hamas have long-standing, official commitments to the destruction of the State of Israel, which many international observers, human rights organizations, and legal scholars characterize as genocidal in intent

Hamas

Hamas's foundational ideology is rooted in the elimination of Israel and its replacement with an Islamic state.

The 1988 Charter: This original founding document explicitly calls for the "obliteration" of Israel. It contains virulently antisemitic language, including a call for Muslims to kill Jews, which many scholars identify as a direct incitement to genocide.

2017 Policy Document: While Hamas released a revised platform in 2017 that removed some of the original's overt antisemitic tropes—framing the conflict as against "Zionism" rather than Judaism—it did not renounce the 1988 Charter. Senior leaders have since clarified that the original goals remain intact.

Recent Rhetoric: Following the October 7, 2023, attacks, senior Hamas officials have stated they would repeat such massacres "again and again" until Israel is annihilated.

Iran

The Islamic Republic of Iran has consistently called for the removal of Israel as a state since the 1979 revolution.

State Policy: Iranian leaders, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, have repeatedly described Israel as a "cancerous tumor" that must be "uprooted" or "eradicated from the world map".

Support for Proxies: Iran provides hundreds of millions of dollars in funding, weaponry, and training annually to groups it calls the "Axis of Resistance"—including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis—specifically to advance the goal of destroying the Jewish state.

Genocidal Incitement: Organizations like Genocide Watch and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum have flagged this rhetoric as state-sponsored incitement to genocide, noting that it dehumanizes Israelis and Jews to make acts of terror seem more permissible.

While both Iran and Hamas frequently use "resistance" as a justification for their actions, their formal documents and leadership statements consistently prioritize the total elimination of Israel over a negotiated two-state solution.

There ya have it, Iran and Hamas openly talk about slaughtering Jews.

If you think that you can make the same case against Israelis, go ahead and try. But it's plain to see that the US and Israel could turn Iran into glass right now if they wanted to, and all they're doing is removing the tumours.

WestCanMan · March 19

As to the topic of "Whether or not Iran was becoming a serious enough threat to America to justify this level of deterrence:

Was Iran really getting to the point where they were becoming powerful enough to rely on their stockpile of ballistc missiles and drones to keep enemies at bay while they built nuclear warheads?
Prior to the major military escalations in 2025 and 2026,
Iran's
strategic doctrine was precisely to use its massive conventional arsenal to create a "shield" while advancing its nuclear capabilities to the threshold of weaponization. This strategy, known as "asymmetric deterrence" or "forward defense," relied on three main pillars:

1. The Ballistic Missile and Drone "Shield"

Iran built the largest and most diverse missile and drone arsenal in the Middle East to offset its lack of a modern air force.

Massive Stockpile: Before the 2025–2026 conflict, Iran was estimated to have over 3,000 ballistic missiles and tens of thousands of low-cost Shahed-series drones.

Deterrence by Punishment: This arsenal was designed to strike throughout the region, targeting Israel and U.S. bases to impose high costs for any attack on Iran.

Economic War of Attrition: Drones costing as little as $20,000 forced adversaries to use interceptor missiles costing up to $4 million, a ratio Iran used to strain enemy resources.
Arms Control Association +3

2. Strategic "Missile Cities"

To ensure its arsenal survived a first strike, Iran constructed "missile cities"—extensive underground tunnel networks across multiple provinces.

These hardened facilities allowed Iran to store and launch missiles even under heavy bombardment.

The mobility of road-mobile launchers further complicated efforts by the U.S. and Israel to neutralize the threat entirely.

3. Reaching the Nuclear Threshold

While the conventional "shield" kept enemies at bay, Iran's nuclear program reached a critical "breakout" stage:

Enrichment Levels: By mid-2025, Iran had accumulated over 440 kg of 60% enriched uranium.

Breakout Capability: The IAEA warned this stockpile was sufficient for at least 10 nuclear weapons if enriched further to 90% (weapons-grade), a step estimated to take only a few weeks.

Strategic Ambiguity: Iran leveraged its "threshold status"—having all the components for a bomb without taking the final step of weaponization—as a source of diplomatic and military leverage.

The Collapse of the Strategy

This "new equation" faced a severe test during the conflicts of 2025 and 2026. Joint U.S.-Israeli strikes reportedly destroyed up to two-thirds of Iran's missile launchers and significantly degraded its naval and drone capabilities. By early 2026, Iran's daily missile launch rates had dropped by as much as 86%, suggesting the conventional shield was not enough to prevent a high-intensity, technologically superior campaign against its core assets.

OK, I'll admit it. This AI is smarter than me.

Don't look so shocked. We all knew this could happen one day. We just thought it would be in about 2096.

WestCanMan · March 19

1 hour ago, cougar said:

There is no doubt in my mind he slept with 13 year olds.

There is no doubt in my mind you slept with 13 year olds.

User · March 19

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

There is no doubt in my mind you slept with 13 year olds.

Which is just as much evidence as there is against Trump!

Actually a bit more because you are here to make the accusation.

cougar · March 19

1 hour ago, User said:

Oh, so now it is not just 1 girl, you think he slept with more than one. You base this on... what? I mean, other than your irrational hatred of the man, do you have anything of substance?

Was a school with some 200 such girls in Iran bombed with a US Tomahawk missile ? Yes.

This was under Trump's command. If he slept with 10 such girls in the States, it is probably a smaller crime than killing 200 of them with a bomb.

So who cares what he slept with. One way or another it takes you to the same conclusion. Any path of reasoning you take - again leads you to the same thing!

cougar · March 19

2 minutes ago, User said:

Which is just as much evidence as there is against Trump!

Actually a bit more because you are here to make the accusation.

Except no 13 year old was interviewed by FBI because she claimed I raped her and my name is not in the Epstein files. Not one time! 🤣

Now TWO FRIED BRAINS are having at it!

Keep it up. I can handle way more than you two.

User · March 19

8 minutes ago, cougar said:

Was a school with some 200 such girls in Iran bombed with a US Tomahawk missile ? Yes.

This was under Trump's command. If he slept with 10 such girls in the States, it is probably a smaller crime than killing 200 of them with a bomb.

So who cares what he slept with. One way or another it takes you to the same conclusion. Any path of reasoning you take - again leads you to the same thing!

Gotta change that subject! Your pedophile BS was getting called out.

5 minutes ago, cougar said:

Except no 13 year old was interviewed by FBI because she claimed I raped her and my name is not in the Epstein files. Not one time! 🤣

Now TWO FRIED BRAINS are having at it!

Keep it up. I can handle way more than you two.

Sorry, we have someone here accusing you of sleeping with children. That’s all we need with your standards.

cougar · March 19

6 minutes ago, User said:

Sorry, we have someone here accusing you of sleeping with children. That’s all we need with your standards.

Oh, I see.

WestCanMan is in fact a 13 year old WestCanGirl who claims I raped her!

Sorry WestCanGirl, I was trying to hump the keyboard and you happened in the way.🤣

Edited March 19 by cougar

ExFlyer · March 19

10 hours ago, User said:

Oh, so now it is not just 1 girl, you think he slept with more than one. You base this on... what? I mean, other than your irrational hatred of the man, do you have anything of substance?

AI Overview

Donald Trump has been accused of sexual misconduct—ranging from unwanted touching and kissing to rape—by more than two dozen women since the 1970s

. The allegations have been consistently denied by Trump, who has frequently dismissed them as politically motivated "lies" and "fictions".

Key Developments and Cases

E. Jean Carroll Case (2023–2024): In May 2023, a federal jury in New York found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll regarding a 1996 incident. The jury awarded her $5 million, though they did not find him liable for rape under the narrow legal definition at the time. In January 2024, a second jury ordered Trump to pay an additional $83.3 million in damages for defamatory statements made against Carroll in 2019.
"Access Hollywood" Tape (2016): A 2005 recording surfaced shortly before the 2016 election in which Trump boasted about grabbing women by their genitals and kissing them without consent. He dismissed these comments as "locker room talk" and denied acting in such a manner.
Other Notable Accusations:
- Ivana Trump (1989): In their 1990 divorce deposition, Trump's first wife stated that he had raped her; she later stated it was not meant in a "criminal sense".
- Stacey Williams (2024): A former model claimed Trump groped her in 1993 in a "twisted game" with Jeffrey Epstein.
- Summer Zervos (2017): A former Apprentice contestant filed a defamation suit after Trump called her sexual assault allegations a hoax; she withdrew the suit in 2021.
- Jessica Leeds (2016): Claimed Trump groped her on a flight in the late 1970s.
Epstein-Related Allegations (2025-2026): Following the release of Epstein-related files in 2025-2026, it was revealed that the FBI had investigated allegations involving Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s, including a 1994 accusation by a "Jane Doe" who claimed to be assaulted at age 13

WestCanMan · March 19

11 hours ago, cougar said:

Was a school with some 200 such girls in Iran bombed with a US Tomahawk missile ? Yes.

This was under Trump's command. If he slept with 10 such girls in the States, it is probably a smaller crime than killing 200 of them with a bomb.

So who cares what he slept with. One way or another it takes you to the same conclusion. Any path of reasoning you take - again leads you to the same thing!

Cougar, the US and Israel have hit about 7,000 targets now, and one was a school at a military base. It actually used to be part of that base.

1/7,000th of America's/Israel's munitions have hit civilian targets (Biden fired 1 drone during the Afgh withdrawal, it hit kids)

1/400th as many Iranian civilians have been killed by the US/IDF as by the IRGC in the last month [200/40,000]. The US would have to bomb 1 school that size every day for over half a year to catch up the the IRGC.

Contrast that with:

Iran's ballistic missiles are mostly aimed at civilian targets, cougar.

Hamas fired 70,000 rockets into Israel, almost all aimed at civilian targets.

Your friends in Hamas threw babies into the oven to die there, they beheaded others. They raped and tortured and killed women. They held women prisoner for 3 years and raped them almost every day.

Your friends in Hamas intentionally murdered over 1,000 civilians on Oct 7th.

Your friends in the IRGC have been torturing and raping women for decades. They flog them and throw them in jail for not wearing hijabs.

Your friends in the IRGC killed around 40,000 protesters.

Your friends in the IRGC don't have a minimum age limit for marriage, and children don't even have to consent to their own marriage. Small children get married off to old men, who have sex with them.

Now your friends' strategy to fight this war is to sink oil tankers.

Your friends in the IRGC and Hamas have openly called for genocide against Jews for 40 years now (in the case of Hamas, since their inception 35 years ago).

Your friends are literally the shittiest people on earth. You can't possibly find more evil people on the planet than your own friends and allies.

What redeeming qualities do the IRGC and Hamas actually have?

Can you say one good thing about the IRGC and Hamas, aside from "They're fighting against Trump"? Is that it, you f'ing child? Can you say 1 good thing about the ayatollah?

If Kamala Harris was the president while this was happening, would to still be cheering for the child-fking terrorists?

Buddy, YOU CAN'T EVEN SAY THAT THE IRGC PROTECTS THEIR OWN PEOPLE, because they don't, they kill them. They rape them. They torture them.

You're such a f'king loser that you'll cry for a woman who got shot while driving her car into a cop, but you're ok with women being raped, flogged and thrown in jail in Iran for not wearing a hijab.

You are just one sick piece of shit, cougar. If there's a hell, you be ~~chilling~~ baking with mohammed when you die.

Tell me: why do you love Hamas and the IRGC so much? What "good" things do you think they would do in the world if they finally managed to slaughter all the Jews and the Americans? Do you think they would be peaceful if they were as powerful as America is, or would tens of millions of people die every week?

Keep in mind that Pakistan had nowhere near America's power and they killed 1M Sikhs and Hindus in a few days. And guess what the entire muslim world did when Pakistan was done slaughtering all those people? Did they hate them for 80 years, like they do Israel, who killed only 400 people? Nope. Pakistan was warmly embraced, and welcomed as a respected sovereign nation.

You're abysmally stupid, cougar, and that's not even your worst quality.

User · March 19

12 hours ago, cougar said:

Except no 13 year old was interviewed by FBI because she claimed I raped her and my name is not in the Epstein files. Not one time! 🤣

Now TWO FRIED BRAINS are having at it!

Keep it up. I can handle way more than you two.

Doesn't matter, we have a credible witness here to speak on all the children's behalf.

User · March 19

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

AI Overview

Did you have a point here?

Why don't you go act like the petty little child you are and downvote some more stuff.

DogOnPorch · March 19

There are reports and video evidence that said missile strike on a school was actually an Iranian missile that failed. Leftists mullah aficionados are free to ignore this, however.

WestCanMan · March 19

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

AI Overview

Donald Trump has been accused of sexual misconduct—ranging from unwanted touching and kissing to rape—by more than two dozen women since the 1970s
. The allegations have been consistently denied by Trump, who has frequently dismissed them as politically motivated "lies" and "fictions".

Key Developments and Cases

E. Jean Carroll Case (2023–2024): In May 2023, a federal jury in New York found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll regarding a 1996 incident. The jury awarded her $5 million, though they did not find him liable for rape under the narrow legal definition at the time. In January 2024, a second jury ordered Trump to pay an additional $83.3 million in damages for defamatory statements made against Carroll in 2019.

"Access Hollywood" Tape (2016): A 2005 recording surfaced shortly before the 2016 election in which Trump boasted about grabbing women by their genitals and kissing them without consent. He dismissed these comments as "locker room talk" and denied acting in such a manner.

Other Notable Accusations:

Ivana Trump (1989): In their 1990 divorce deposition, Trump's first wife stated that he had raped her; she later stated it was not meant in a "criminal sense".

Stacey Williams (2024): A former model claimed Trump groped her in 1993 in a "twisted game" with Jeffrey Epstein.

Summer Zervos (2017): A former Apprentice contestant filed a defamation suit after Trump called her sexual assault allegations a hoax; she withdrew the suit in 2021.

Jessica Leeds (2016): Claimed Trump groped her on a flight in the late 1970s.

Epstein-Related Allegations (2025-2026): Following the release of Epstein-related files in 2025-2026, it was revealed that the FBI had investigated allegations involving Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s, including a 1994 accusation by a "Jane Doe" who claimed to be assaulted at age 13

OMG, down-arrow boy has words!!!

Not his own, mind you, just an AI overview where he doesn't even show what his question was.

And TBH, all his page shows is either statements that were retracted or where he was neither found guilty nor liable. That page reads like "Some b1tches that he dumped are angry at him, so they talked some sh1t, then had to backtrack."

The only embarrassing for Trump on that page is the story of him going into the changeroom with the Bergdorf's slut. Not that he was accused of r4pe for that, because he clearly never r4ped her, just because being with a crazy ditch-pig like that is just not a good look.

WestCanMan · March 19

3 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

There are reports and video evidence that said missile strike on a school was actually an Iranian missile that failed. Leftists mullah aficionados are free to ignore this, however.

It could have been, and I said before this war happened that Iran was likely to already have plans in place to hit schools and hospitals of their own just so that they could blame the US/IDF, but the evidence that it was Iranian is just a picture of a missile travelling between Mach II & IV... In the age of AI I think we all need a bit more evidence than just a photo, especially when I have no reason to believe there was a camera nearby capable of catching a clear shot of a speeding missile.

I can't really get behind that. It may be true, it may be fake (we're all gonna be lied to dozens of times during any war), but in the end, people understand that:

there are tragedies like that in war, and one such mistake in 7,000 strikes takes an unbelievable amount of precision and luck
The US clearly didn't do it intentionally because they had nothing to gain from killing children: their goal isn't terrorism, it's killing everyone in the IRGC.

DogOnPorch · March 19

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

It could have been, and I said before this war happened that Iran was likely to already have plans in place to hit schools and hospitals of their own just so that they could blame the US/IDF, but the evidence that it was Iranian is just a picture of a missile travelling between Mach II & IV... In the age of AI I think we all need a bit more evidence than just a photo, especially when I have no reason to believe there was a camera nearby capable of catching a clear shot of a speeding missile.

I can't really get behind that. It may be true, it may be fake (we're all gonna be lied to dozens of times during any war), but in the end, people understand that:

there are tragedies like that in war, and one such mistake in 7,000 strikes takes an unbelievable amount of precision and luck

The US clearly didn't do it intentionally because they had nothing to gain from killing children: their goal isn't terrorism, it's killing everyone in the IRGC.

The footage I saw was some MRBM in boost suddenly not in boost...and falling to the Earth. It seemed to land on some complex of sorts. It's likely still out there somewhere. But I'm sure the poor devil that took the footage has been dealt with by the 'regime'.

WestCanMan · March 19

10 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

The footage I saw was some MRBM in boost suddenly not in boost...and falling to the Earth. It seemed to land on some complex of sorts. It's likely still out there somewhere. But I'm sure the poor devil that took the footage has been dealt with by the 'regime'.

If I had to bet my life on it, I would probably still bet that it was American, but I 100% understand where you're coming from. If one side had anything to benefit from this it is Iran, 100%, and they would do something like this without the slightest bit of remorse.

Just, in the age of AI, I really question video's that are easy to fake. Especially when there's this much at stake. So I don't feel like it's worth arguing with left4rds about. It's hard enough to just convince them that Hamas isn't the army of peace.

I am gonna side with Rampage on this one:

DogOnPorch · March 19

Either way, Iranian civilians are not the target here. A quick search on X produces a number of Iranian missile failures from all over the region during the last several days. At first I thought this one below was a air-defense missile of some sort that failed...but then realized it was going far too slow for that.

herbie · March 19

Go ahead. Believe the news coverage from the side that started the war and accuse the reports from non partisam countries of supporting Iran.

We sane Canadians will continue to trust CBC - BBC over anything American.

User · March 19

5 minutes ago, herbie said:

Go ahead. Believe the news coverage from the side that started the war and accuse the reports from non partisam countries of supporting Iran.

We sane Canadians will continue to trust CBC - BBC over anything American.

Well, you were already headed downhill with the first sentence but went right off the cliff trying to call yourself sane.

ExFlyer · March 19

2 hours ago, User said:

Did you have a point here?

Why don't you go act like the petty little child you are and downvote some more stuff.

Awww, poor little man...down arrows are bane of your posts LOL

At least my post is right cause you only complain about a little arrow LOL

Oh and the point is obvious..Trump is a pervert and someone asked for "anything of substance? "

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG, down-arrow boy has words!!!

Not his own, mind you, just an AI overview where he doesn't even show what his question was.

And TBH, all his page shows is either statements that were retracted or where he was neither found guilty nor liable. That page reads like "Some b1tches that he dumped are angry at him, so they talked some sh1t, then had to backtrack."

The only embarrassing for Trump on that page is the story of him going into the changeroom with the Bergdorf's slut. Not that he was accused of r4pe for that, because he clearly never r4ped her, just because being with a crazy ditch-pig like that is just not a good look.

Well, if you did not read the question...then there was no reason for you to respond.

Awww, another LOSER that fears the mighty down arrow...here is another for ya LOL

User · March 19

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

Oh and the point is obvious..Trump is a pervert and someone asked for "anything of substance? "

The discussion was not about if Trump was a pervert or not. Go away clown. Entertain yourself with the downvotes.

Sign In

What Side are the LPoC and CBC on in the IRGC/US & Israel War?

What Side are the LPoC and CBC on in the IRGC/US & Israel War? 5 members have voted

Recommended Posts

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

West

WestCanMan

WestCanMan

Posted Images

Join the conversation

Tell a friend

Member Statistics

Recent Achievements

Recently Browsing

What Side are the LPoC and CBC on in the IRGC/US & Israel War?
5 members have voted