Legato Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 9 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Correction... it's you and your fellow fools who on-queue go to the playbook and spout the 'where is the evidence of doom and gloom' whenever climate changed is mentioned. Nobody says it's doom and gloom except you clowns. Is it the need to deny science, or just because...? It's been pointed out many times about the doom and gloom predictions. The fact that you deny this is your problem not mine. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 32 minutes ago, Legato said: It's been pointed out many times about the doom and gloom predictions. The fact that you deny this is your problem not mine. Well if you want to think about, a serious challenge for your mind, yes it would be doom and gloom if we kept going down the same path. When the end would come, who knows.... Fortunately fools like you are immensely under-qualified to be in any sort of forward thinking or decision making discussions. Quote
Legato Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said: Well if you want to think about, a serious challenge for your mind, yes it would be doom and gloom if we kept going down the same path. When the end would come, who knows.... Fortunately fools like you are immensely under-qualified to be in any sort of forward thinking or decision making discussions. Dodge. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 Just now, Legato said: Dodge. Small minds think small, and turtle when confronted with facts. Carry on little guy.... Quote
eyeball Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 8 hours ago, CdnFox said: The last time you provided a link to that site I pointed out after going through everything there that there wasn't a single thing that supported your argument. You went through the entire IPCC repository? LMAO! Like fùck you did. 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
User Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 9 hours ago, eyeball said: SETI is starting to lean towards the idea we can't find anything because technological civilizations wipe themselves out almost as soon as they arise. Some researchers are becoming seriously concerned about why they're drawing such a blank and what it might tell us about ourselves. In any case, I'm pretty sure we'll be one of the very last things to go extinct. We're one of the weediest species on the planet. It probably won't be much of an existence but why the fùck should we care? It won't be us. What evidence is there that technological civilizations wipe themselves out almost as soon as they arise? ROFL Seriously man, put up or shut up. Give us this doomsday timeline. You can't. You won't, because its BS. 1 hour ago, eyeball said: You went through the entire IPCC repository? LMAO! Like fùck you did. You didn't either. You can't even bring yourself to cite anything relevant. You just say IPCC. Quote
User Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: Well if you want to think about, a serious challenge for your mind, yes it would be doom and gloom if we kept going down the same path. When the end would come, who knows.... Fortunately fools like you are immensely under-qualified to be in any sort of forward thinking or decision making discussions. What a convenient argument: ERMERGAWD, DOOM AND GLOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Er, when you say? DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR No one knows! DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Quote
Legato Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Small minds think small, and turtle when confronted with facts. Carry on little guy.... You must be speaking from experience. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 3 hours ago, eyeball said: You went through the entire IPCC repository? LMAO! Like fùck you did. Oh well by all means then find out the one I missed!! You can't can you. Cuz it doesn't exist LOL you work so hard at making yourself look like a twat WHEEE LOOK AT HIM GO!!!!! Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Reg Volk Posted March 15 Author Report Posted March 15 1 Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
eyeball Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 (edited) 2 hours ago, User said: What evidence is there that technological civilizations wipe themselves out almost as soon as they arise? ROFL Its conjecture based on the fact we haven't found a single thing despite scanning our entire galaxy now for decades. That's billions of star systems emanating radio noise from 100000 years ago or more up to the present. After all the time, distance and space the question where are they has moved to why can't we find them? Difficult questions like this lead to conjecture based on what we know. We know ourselves well enough to see that even after just 300 years of modern technological civilization we are already more than capable of wiping ourselves out in a matter of hours just as effectively as a giant asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs. The evidence of our own already precarious existence plus the fact we haven't found a shred of evidence for the existence of any other technological civilizations should give us pause to consider. The way the ubiquity of asteroid impacts throughout the solar system gave Hawking pause to consider. 300 years is extremely fast compared to nearly a hundred thousand years or more of human history. We've gone from horse and buggy to interstellar probes. Hopefully we have a few more decades left to choose a more sustainable path. Even another hundred years may be too much to hope for. Edited March 15 by eyeball Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 10 minutes ago, eyeball said: Its conjecture based on the fact we haven't found a single thing despite scanning our entire galaxy now for decades. That's billions of star systems emanating radio noise from 100000 years ago or more up to the present. After all the time, distance and space the question where are they has moved to why can't we find them? Difficult questions like this lead to conjecture based on what we know. We know ourselves well enough to see that even after just 300 years of modern technological civilization we are already more than capable of wiping ourselves out in a matter of hours just as effectively as a giant asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs. The evidence of our own already precarious existence plus the fact we haven't found a shred of evidence for the existence of any other technological civilizations should give us pause to consider. The way the ubiquity of asteroid impacts throughout the solar system gave Hawking pause to consider. 300 years is extremely fast compared to nearly a hundred thousand years or more of human history. We've gone from horse and buggy to interstellar probes. Hopefully we have a few more decades left to choose a more sustainable path. Even another hundred years may be too much to hope for. You don't even understand what the Fermi Paradox is By the way bright guy, how many electronic emissions was earth transmitting out to the universe 100,000 years ago? So why would you think other planets had life that did. And it still has nothing at all to do with seti. The question came about when scientists began to come up with models to suggest how many planets out there were likely to have been able to support and create life as it did here on earth. By our estimates it should be a large number. So if it is where is everyone. But there's no shock that even if there ARE a bunch of them that we haven't heard them. Even if they are there, and even if they were transmitting 100,000 years before us. you STILL have to be listening to that specific point in space which is far worse than a needle in a haystack, and that point in space is where they were 100,000 years ago, not where their planet is now. Yeash. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
herbie Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 If you don't 'believe' the measured and recorded CO2 ppm levels have risen almost 1/3 just within my own lifetime, you're too stupid to talk to. If you don't believe the science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, you're too stupid to talk to. If you don't think 7+ billion people heating, cooking, manufacturing and travelling contributed to part of the increase. you're too stupid to talk to. Likewise if it will cause economic and social disruption yet you think we should do sweet f-ck all because it's 'natural', you're too stupid to talk to. So squawk all you want about "myths" because the idea that anyone takes you seriously is the biggest one. Quote
Legato Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 3 minutes ago, herbie said: If you don't 'believe' the measured and recorded CO2 ppm levels have risen almost 1/3 just within my own lifetime, you're too stupid to talk to. If you don't believe the science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, you're too stupid to talk to. If you don't think 7+ billion people heating, cooking, manufacturing and travelling contributed to part of the increase. you're too stupid to talk to. Likewise if it will cause economic and social disruption yet you think we should do sweet f-ck all because it's 'natural', you're too stupid to talk to. So squawk all you want about "myths" because the idea that anyone takes you seriously is the biggest one. You forgot about the magic credit card and the sliced bread syndrome. Quote
eyeball Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 33 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Oh well by all means then find out the one I missed!! You can't can you. Cuz it doesn't exist LOL you work so hard at making yourself look like a twat And you're the one who says he went through the entire 1.7 petabytes of data in the IPCC's archives? You looked at 8,000 pages of comprehensive assessment reports, more than 18,000 scientific papers reviewed by 278 authors and more than 60,000 expert and government comments and concluded it's all a hoax... propaganda? And where's your evidence for that? 12 hours ago, CdnFox said: I pointed out after going through everything there that there wasn't a single thing that supported your argument. LMAO! Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Legato Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 (edited) 19 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You don't even understand what the Fermi Paradox is By the way bright guy, how many electronic emissions was earth transmitting out to the universe 100,000 years ago? So why would you think other planets had life that did. And it still has nothing at all to do with seti. The question came about when scientists began to come up with models to suggest how many planets out there were likely to have been able to support and create life as it did here on earth. By our estimates it should be a large number. So if it is where is everyone. But there's no shock that even if there ARE a bunch of them that we haven't heard them. Even if they are there, and even if they were transmitting 100,000 years before us. you STILL have to be listening to that specific point in space which is far worse than a needle in a haystack, and that point in space is where they were 100,000 years ago, not where their planet is now. Yeash. Then how the hell did the Liberals get here. They are not natural. That sure is a paradox. Edited March 15 by Legato Quote
Legato Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 1 minute ago, eyeball said: And you're the one who says he went through the entire 1.7 petabytes of data in the IPCC's archives? You looked at 8,000 pages of comprehensive assessment reports, more than 18,000 scientific papers reviewed by 278 authors and more than 60,000 expert and government comments and concluded it's all a hoax... propaganda? And where's your evidence for that? LMAO! Yes but 1 Billion tons of granite is still not as hard as 1 oz of diamond. Quote
herbie Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 I sated my case quite clearly and if you can only respond with as hominem and doubling down on your warped 'beliefs' in the face of fact, you only prove my conclusions. While you're at it enjoy filling you tank today and celebrate that not a penny of the increase is being 'wasted' on carbon tax or any other public benefit. Pretend you're a shareholder who'll get a few taxable dividend bucks back on that extra $10-$20 a fill. Quote
eyeball Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 (edited) 44 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You don't even understand what the Fermi Paradox is Fermi himself didn't understand it. The term wasn't even coined until he was dead for 40 years. His equation had to do with the number aliens capable of interstellar travel not the number of civilizations that might exist, AKA the Drake Equation. I either case both are now up against the reality of the Great Silence and whatever Great Filter might account for that silence. (Don't forget highlight, copy and paste are your friends). 44 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Even if they are there, and even if they were transmitting 100,000 years before us. you STILL have to be listening to that specific point in space which is far worse than a needle in a haystack, Nearly 80% of the sky is under continuous observation. Edited March 15 by eyeball Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
User Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 58 minutes ago, eyeball said: Its conjecture You could have stopped right there. 37 minutes ago, herbie said: If you don't 'believe' the measured and recorded CO2 ppm levels have risen almost 1/3 just within my own lifetime, you're too stupid to talk to. If you don't believe the science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, you're too stupid to talk to. If you don't think 7+ billion people heating, cooking, manufacturing and travelling contributed to part of the increase. you're too stupid to talk to. Likewise if it will cause economic and social disruption yet you think we should do sweet f-ck all because it's 'natural', you're too stupid to talk to. So squawk all you want about "myths" because the idea that anyone takes you seriously is the biggest one. Do you even believe any of this? You are just fine with pushing all the CO2 off to China while pretending you are doing something to combat Climate Change. Quote
eyeball Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 27 minutes ago, Legato said: Yes but 1 Billion tons of granite is still not as hard as 1 oz of diamond. Goalposts... Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
eyeball Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 2 minutes ago, User said: You could have stopped right there. True, but it's a good thing it's not in our human nature to do that or we might still live in the trees. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
User Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 21 minutes ago, herbie said: While you're at it enjoy filling you tank today and celebrate that not a penny of the increase is being 'wasted' on carbon tax or any other public benefit. Pretend you're a shareholder who'll get a few taxable dividend bucks back on that extra $10-$20 a fill. How much do you voluntarily give every month, extra to the carbon tax, to your heart's desire? Quote
CdnFox Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 1 hour ago, eyeball said: And you're the one who says he went through the entire 1.7 petabytes of data in the IPCC's archives? I never actually made that claim, but Whether I did or I didn't isn't relevant, if there's one there that I didn't see but you feel proves your point post it You can't because there isn't one. Remember each post it becomes more and more obvious you're a liar to everyone reading this Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Legato Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 36 minutes ago, eyeball said: Goalposts... Paradox and that relativity thingy. 37 minutes ago, eyeball said: True, but it's a good thing it's not in our human nature to do that or we might still live in the trees. So when did you last decorate your treehouse? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.