The Most Egregious Leftist Hypocrisy of All, Exposed In Iran

[WestCanMan]

The left4rds who tried their best to downplay the importance of the lives of the Israeli victims of Oct 7 terrorism, while shedding crocodile for tears for Gazan children as they secretly welcomed those deaths because of the increase in hatred and religious bigotry that came with them, and screeching lies about the TWO deaths in America by ICE agents, are once again finding it impossible to care about the deaths of innocents, this time it's the Iranian freedom protesters.  

If you're keeping score at home:

• Israeli deaths don't matter to leftists, nor do the lives of Jews on Bondi beach (as Radiorum said "reporters should have blamed those deaths on Israel")
• the lives of Iranian protesters don't matter to leftists
• the deaths of two violent anti-ICE rioters somehow constitutes a national crisis
• every Gazan killed by Israel was an innocent victim, and needs to be mourned as a martyr for the cause 

Newsflash: Iranian women get prison sentences, along with floggings, for removing their religious headdress. That penalty comes straight from the Ayatollah, who's busy killing protesters by the thousands to stay in power.

Leftists here fully support the murders of thousands of Iranian people, by the ayatollah, to protect him and his right to "hand out prison sentences, along with floggings, for women who remove their religious headdress".

Am I wrong? Is there a single leftist here who can say anything critical of the ayatollah? 

You guys freak out about two losers killed by ICE 24/7. Tell us about the ayatollah. 

[robosmith]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The left4rds...

Am I wrong?

Any post which starts the way yours does is wrong by default.

Simpletons never know how intelligent others are because you don't know what you don't know.

[WestCanMan]

23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Any post which starts the way yours does is wrong by default.

Simpletons never know how intelligent others are because you don't know what you don't know.

Any post that starts with "robosmith said" is wrong by default. 

You have nothing honest or insightful to add, ever. 

 

 

Can you say anything critical of the ayatollah, robo?  

I don't think you can. Surprise me. 

Edited January 27 by WestCanMan

[herbie]

WTF do 'left' and 'right' have to do with Iran?
What's with the utter bullshit implication that 'the left' is not behind the removal of the Islamic state?

Or are you so brainwashed you support a US intervention for regiime change and so politically ignorant you don't know how the Ayatikkahs got in there in the first place? They probably wouldn't be seen as liberators by many Iranians.

Your constant claims of shit that isn't there and tacking the word and claim that anything at all you disagree with is left make your every post show as the ravings of a totally brainwashed mor0n.

No one on Earth disagrees with the fact suppression, intimidation and denial of basic rights is not even worse than under the Shah. But in light of that, only an utter fascist would support a return to that period either.

 

[ironstone]

15 minutes ago, herbie said:

No one on Earth disagrees with the fact suppression, intimidation and denial of basic rights is not even worse than under the Shah. But in light of that, only an utter fascist would support a return to that period either.

In that case, there are a lot of fascists on the streets in Iran.

https://spectator.com/article/iran-wants-its-monarchy-back/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/javid-shah-why-iranians-are-calling-for-the-return-of-the-pahlavis-and-their-monarchy/ar-AA1TptL9

I'm not saying that things were exactly rosy under the Shah in the 70s, but maybe it was the lesser of the two evils compared to the Islamist regime that replaced him?

[WestCanMan]

13 minutes ago, herbie said:

WTF do 'left' and 'right' have to do with Iran?

You'd think 'nothing', but leftists don't care about thousands of dead protesters in Iran.

All that left4rds can talk about is 2 dead criminals in the US.

 

Think about that for a second:

1. there are two Americans who were both killed while committing violent crimes against officers who were just trying to perform their lawful duties, and left4rds are apoplectic about it
2. there are thousands of Iranians who were murdered, actually murdered for real, for protesting against violent religious bigotry from their own gov't, and left4rds can't even pretend to care a little bit. 

 

 

Can you say something critical of the ayatollah, and maybe something about how to help Iranians now? 

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, ironstone said:

In that case, there are a lot of fascists on the streets in Iran.

I'm not saying that things were exactly rosy under the Shah in the 70s, but maybe it was the lesser of the two evils compared to the Islamist regime that replaced him?

I don't even know if "permanently re-installing the new shah" is being considered.

Just like the US is trying to establish a temporary solution in Venezuela, that will last until the Venezuelans can get their poop in a group, I can't see the new shah as anything more than a semi-reasonable stopgap until something better can be established.

That's if the US and their new "Board of Peace" gets involved. 

Board of Peace:

1. Trump is basically replacing the UN with this new Board of Peace. The UN can't possibly see it as anything less than a direct competitor for global leadership/stewardship
2. As soon as 1 bullet is fired by the US, people will start saying "Bored of Peace" 😂 It's a matter of minutes, or seconds. The name really lends itself to the easiest jokes imaginable.  

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Any post that starts with "robosmith said" is wrong by default. 

You have nothing honest or insightful to add, ever. 

You mean nothing you can understand.

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

 

 

Can you say anything critical of the ayatollah, robo?  

I don't know anything about the ayatollah except he had a woman killed for not wearing a scarf.

No worse than Trump's ICE murdering Good. 🤮

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I don't think....

Not usually, I agree.

[Hodad]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The left4rds who tried their best to downplay the importance of the lives of the Israeli victims of Oct 7 terrorism, while shedding crocodile for tears for Gazan children as they secretly welcomed those deaths because of the increase in hatred and religious bigotry that came with them, and screeching lies about the TWO deaths in America by ICE agents, are once again finding it impossible to care about the deaths of innocents, this time it's the Iranian freedom protesters.  

If you're keeping score at home:

• Israeli deaths don't matter to leftists, nor do the lives of Jews on Bondi beach (as Radiorum said "reporters should have blamed those deaths on Israel")
• the lives of Iranian protesters don't matter to leftists
• the deaths of two violent anti-ICE rioters somehow constitutes a national crisis
• every Gazan killed by Israel was an innocent victim, and needs to be mourned as a martyr for the cause 

Newsflash: Iranian women get prison sentences, along with floggings, for removing their religious headdress. That penalty comes straight from the Ayatollah, who's busy killing protesters by the thousands to stay in power.

Leftists here fully support the murders of thousands of Iranian people, by the ayatollah, to protect him and his right to "hand out prison sentences, along with floggings, for women who remove their religious headdress".

Am I wrong? Is there a single leftist here who can say anything critical of the ayatollah? 

You guys freak out about two losers killed by ICE 24/7. Tell us about the ayatollah. 

This entire premise is unbelievably dumb, but beyond that, it's cruel. "The left" is not happy for dead Gazan children, you farking gargoyle. That's the grotesque, cynical filter through which you view the world, but don't project it onto others. 

Fark right off.

There is, no doubt, some intelligent way to ask that more attention be paid to politics in Iran, but it's clearly far beyond you.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You mean nothing you can understand.

Ohhh, I understand the difference between "You won't get sick" and "Dead as a door nail", but I've never been able to explain that to you.

Quote

I don't know anything about the ayatollah except he had a woman killed for not wearing a scarf.

Well, that's just decades of ignorance on your part, plus over a week of willful ignorance after you knew that the Iranian regime was killing thousands of protesters (to be fair, I'd call them rioters if they were in BLM).

Still, the bottom line is: you couldn't even be bothered to find out what was happening after thousands of people were already killed, and that just proves that you don't GAF about Iranians who were murdered. You've spent countless hours in that time searching for ways to spin the shooting death of ONE known violent criminal, and zero hours looking into what's happening in Iran.

Quote

No worse than Trump's ICE murdering Good. 🤮

When Barack Obama was president, pedophiles were arrested. The US also sent ICE agents out to make arrests of violent criminals when Obama was the president. 

So the ICE agents were just doing their job when they were attacked by these two people. 

In Iran they're murdering people after they have been brought into custody. No trial. Just "guilt by religious authoritarian decree."

Again, You're just ignorant and plainly wrong. 

I can't say whether that's your own stupidity causing that, your laziness, willful ignorance born of confirmation bias, or you just don't care because CNN/Al Jazeera never told you to care, but 2 things are still crystal clear:

1. you don't give a shit about about the the deaths of thousands of Iranians
2. you don't know enough about this topic to weigh in on it, because you don't GAF about thousands of dead Iranians. 

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Is there a single leftist here who can say anything critical of the ayatollah? 

Yeah, he's a misogynist, a really fùcking conservative one at that.

[WestCanMan]

15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yeah, he's a misogynist, a really fùcking conservative one at that.

That's a start.

One left4rd called the ayatollah "a misogynist" lol.

So IOW, you think that he's comparable to your hero, Justin "groper" Trudeau... the guy who famously quipped "I wouldn't have grabbed your cooter as if you were a basic whore if I knew that you had a decent job."

TBH, Trudeau is a lot like the ayatollah, but not just for his misogyny. 

Next...

Edited January 28 by WestCanMan

[eyeball]

19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

So IOW, you think that he's comparable to your hero, Justin "groper" Trudeau...the guy who famously quipped "I wouldn't have grabbed your cooter as if you were a basic whore if I knew that you had a decent job."

I don't know, Trudeau is also right-wing from where I'm sitting so...but it sounds like you're conflating Trudeau with Trump. He's certainly known for grabbing women there too.

[West]

Sad but true. Leftists love Iran because they murder Christians and jews. Sad

[Legato]

31 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I don't know, Trudeau is also right-wing from where I'm sitting so...but it sounds like you're conflating Trudeau with Trump. He's certainly known for grabbing women there too.

You must be sitting out somewhere near Pluto, close to the left hand of Hades.

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

You must be sitting out somewhere near Pluto, close to the left hand of Hades.

Nope. I'm sitting in a NDP riding out on the coast.

[John Stone]

Any military actions by the U.S. depend on the desires of Israel and  SA.

SA and other regional countries are against it.

Israel on the other hand is understandably keen for a strike, and strikes, and strikes ..........u get the idea. 

Should be interesting ........... the U.S.' hubris has painted itself into a corner tho. WTF!  

......... oh, forgot to mention the humanitarian argument............................................................................ that too.  

[Legato]

10 hours ago, eyeball said:

Nope. I'm sitting in a NDP riding out on the coast.

Riding? Into the sunset?

Edited January 28 by Legato
Spleeeling

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, John Stone said:

Any military actions by the U.S. depend on the desires of Israel and  SA.

Of course those countries are most affected by this, so their opinions count more than ours do, from over here.

Quote

SA and other regional countries are against it.

All of those countries supported the genocide of Sikhs and Hindus in Pakistan, so let's not pretend that they're looking at this from a humanitarian POV. At all.

Quote

Israel on the other hand is understandably keen for a strike, and strikes, and strikes ..........u get the idea.  

And on the other hand, these Iranian leaders make no bones about their desire to wipe out all of the Jews, so there's that. 

Quote

Should be interesting ........... the U.S.' hubris has painted itself into a corner tho. WTF!  

If you had Trump's power right now, would you just let the murderous regime continue to murder right now? 

You have no idea how devoid that country is of freedom... The vax-fascism we experienced here lasted less than a year, but generations of Iranians have lived that way all of their lives. 

It would be sad if no one supported them. 

Quote

......... oh, forgot to mention the humanitarian argument............................................................................ that too. 

Leftists never think from a humanitarian POV. They get their marching orders from CNN and CBC and that instantly becomes their new opinion. 

[robosmith]

21 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You'd think 'nothing', but leftists don't care about thousands of dead protesters in Iran.

All that left4rds can talk about is 2 dead criminals in the US.

 

Think about that for a second:

1. there are two Americans who were both killed while committing violent crimes against officers who were just trying to perform their lawful duties, and left4rds are apoplectic about it
2. there are thousands of Iranians who were murdered, actually murdered for real, for protesting against violent religious bigotry from their own gov't, and left4rds can't even pretend to care a little bit. 

 

 

Can you say something critical of the ayatollah, and maybe something about how to help Iranians now? 

You have ZERO EVIDENCE of "violent crimes" by Good nor Pretti. All the violence was their MURDERS by Federal agents.

Of course you KNOW NOTHING about that CONTEXT because FOS LIES never tells you about it.

[robosmith]

19 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Ohhh, I understand the difference between "You won't get sick" and "Dead as a door nail", but I've never been able to explain that to you.

You "understand" how to ^deflect" with IRRELEVANCE.

 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

You have ZERO EVIDENCE of "violent crimes" by Good nor Pretti.

That's a great opening for your 3-page book, called "Darwin wuz a Ideeit". 

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

You "understand" how to ^deflect" with IRRELEVANCE.

You just keep getting dumber and dumber. I swear your IQ is somewhere around negative 12,000 right now. 

[eyeball]

10 hours ago, Legato said:

Riding? Into the sunset?

AKA an electoral district. I drive into sunsets, and sunrises, by boat.