robosmith Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 (edited) Lawyer Rep Dan Goldman grills Kristi Noes while she tries to filibuster by blaming Biden. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1093899209417827 "Why Are You Filibustering? Why Can't You Answer The Question?" Edited January 15 by robosmith Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 Since immigrants are not citizens and not privy to the same protections, they are in a prove you are innocence space. If they come to this country and have no legal basis to be here, they go. If they make a plea to stay under asylum exemptions, they have to prove they have a legitimate case. Until they do, they are here illegally. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 56 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Since immigrants are not citizens and not privy to the same protections, they are in a prove you are innocence space. If they come to this country and have no legal basis to be here, they go. If they make a plea to stay under asylum exemptions, they have to prove they have a legitimate case. Until they do, they are here illegally. Nope. As long as they have a hearing to determine they have a legitimate case, they are here LEGALLY as stated by LAWYER Dan Goldman. Your amateur legal claims NOTWITHSTANDING. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 (edited) 14 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nope. As long as they have a hearing to determine they have a legitimate case, they are here LEGALLY as stated by LAWYER Dan Goldman. Your amateur legal claims NOTWITHSTANDING. Dan Goldman is a politician in a political setting. He is not giving legal advice. They do not have a legal status. They have a stay of deportation until their claim is heard. That does not make them here legally. It prevents them from being deported until their hearing. Quote A pending asylum claim is not a formal legal status but confers authorization to stay in the U.S. Learn the important distinctions and protections involved. https://legalclarity.org/does-pending-asylum-grant-you-legal-status/ The problem occurred when Joe Biden's council of Presidents determined that they should just let asylum seekers go rather than have their case heard within 3 to 4 days (as was the norm). Many Asylum seekers did not return for their hearing and had rulings against them. I haven't looked up the number, but the asylum denial rate is in the 90's. All lf the asylum seekers under the dark years of Biden should have been detained until their hearing. Releasing them was and is a violation of immigration law. Edited January 15 by gatomontes99 3 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
eyeball Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: If they come to this country and have no legal basis to be here, they go. If they make a plea to stay under asylum exemptions, they have to prove they have a legitimate case. Until they do, they are here illegally. If there was ever a time and a place for a statute of limitations not to mention outright amnesty it's the case of immigrants that have been here so long they have kids in schools. To turn this into a crime is just cruel and inhumane. It wasn't just a president or political party that caused this, there was always a great big elephant in the room called cheap labour that drove immigration so high. A boon then but a curse now? It's just not fair. That's all there is too it. As for the argument allowing illegal immigrants to stay is unfair to immigrants that followed the process...what if anything are you people doing to ensure they're allowed in too? 1 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
gatomontes99 Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 47 minutes ago, eyeball said: If there was ever a time and a place for a statute of limitations not to mention outright amnesty it's the case of immigrants that have been here so long they have kids in schools. No. We are not giving you jackasseṣ another way to bypass the law through delay tactics. 48 minutes ago, eyeball said: To turn this into a crime is just cruel and inhumane. No it isn't. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
eyeball Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: No. We are not giving you jackasseṣ another way to bypass the law through delay tactics. Oh well, you'll just have to resort to batons and bullets then I guess. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
gatomontes99 Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 7 minutes ago, eyeball said: Oh well, you'll just have to resort to batons and bullets then I guess. Only if they give us reason to. Or they could get a free ticket and $1000 to go home. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
eyeball Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Only if they give us reason to. Or they could get a free ticket and $1000 to go home. I'm taking about the reasons us lefties have given you. We're bent on destroying all you hold dear, we have been for 50 years now or more. Take your ticket and shove it, I'm not going anywhere. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 5 hours ago, robosmith said: Nope. As long as they have a hearing to determine they have a legitimate case, they are here LEGALLY as stated by LAWYER Dan Goldman. Your amateur legal claims NOTWITHSTANDING. Nope. They do not have lawful status, they simply have a status of waiting, and even then, that doesn't mean they were waiting in the country, and they can still enter unlawfully and that voids their request and they face deporation... or they could commit a crime or violate the terms of their being here... and that voids the reqest and they face deportation. Quote
herbie Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 You're arguing with someone so stubborn they equate immigrants with criminals and failed to notice the subjuect id asylum seekers who are neither immigrants nor criminals. Knee jerks and overrides reasoned response. 1 1 Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 21 minutes ago, herbie said: You're arguing with someone so stubborn they equate immigrants with criminals and failed to notice the subjuect id asylum seekers who are neither immigrants nor criminals. Knee jerks and overrides reasoned response. No, you dishonestly conflate immigrants with ILLEGAL immigrants. It is a crime to enter the US unlawfully; the fact that you are pending an asylum claim that will almost certainly be rejected doesn't change that fact. Asylum seekers arrive at the border, present themselves at a border facility at a port of entry, declare themselves, and make the request. People who cross illegally, get caught, then try to claim asylum are in fact illegal immigrants. 1 Quote
Hodad Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 6 hours ago, eyeball said: Oh well, you'll just have to resort to batons and bullets then I guess. Careful, you just activated a lot of hate boners. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 Brandon and his Libbie hoard invited millions of people from anywhere with no vetting, to come to the USA. Now they're upset that real patriots want them tracked down and deported. They call it "cruel" and try to hide behind the word "asylum". These people are traitors.! Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Brandon and his Libbie hoard invited millions of people from anywhere with no vetting, to come to the USA. Now they're upset that real patriots want them tracked down and deported. They call it "cruel" and try to hide behind the word "asylum". These people are traitors.! YOU keep PARROTING the same LIES with NO EVIDENCE because YOU are the LIAR. 1 Quote
herbie Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 14 hours ago, User said: No, you dishonestly conflate immigrants with ILLEGAL immigrants. If you have a Lawful Asylum case, you are here LEGALLY The terminally ignorant love to claim those that can comprehend English are dishonest. If you can read, it's not talking about immigrants at all and states the pretty damn obvious. What kind of mental twist equates something lawful with being illegal? You and your brainwashed by hate buddies got trolled. Again.... 1 Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 4 minutes ago, herbie said: If you have a Lawful Asylum case, you are here LEGALLY The terminally ignorant love to claim those that can comprehend English are dishonest. If you can read, it's not talking about immigrants at all and states the pretty damn obvious. What kind of mental twist equates something lawful with being illegal? You and your brainwashed by hate buddies got trolled. Again.... No, YOU used the word immigrant instead of ILLEGAL. I responded to YOU. Then you go get someone else's quote. I can read just fine, you are just a dishonest clown. 1 Quote
herbie Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 Duhhh! Never met someone so proud to demonstrate how ignorant they are. Butt stubborn, bone stupid and proud of it, what a combination. Get yourself a red baseball cap with PROUD TO BE IGNURNT on it. 1 Quote
User Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 7 minutes ago, herbie said: Duhhh! Never met someone so proud to demonstrate how ignorant they are. Butt stubborn, bone stupid and proud of it, what a combination. Get yourself a red baseball cap with PROUD TO BE IGNURNT on it. You: Ignorantly/dishonestly conflate ILLEGAL immigrant with immigrant Me: Points that out You: DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR someone else said ILLEGAL DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Me: Points out that I was responding to you You: DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR You is ignorant DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Quote
Legato Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 11 minutes ago, herbie said: Duhhh! Never met someone so proud to demonstrate how ignorant they are. Butt stubborn, bone stupid and proud of it, what a combination. Get yourself a red baseball cap with PROUD TO BE IGNURNT on it. More inane ramblings. 1 Quote
Deluge Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 On 1/15/2026 at 12:38 PM, robosmith said: Lawyer Rep Dan Goldman grills Kristi Noes while she tries to filibuster by blaming Biden. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1093899209417827 "Why Are You Filibustering? Why Can't You Answer The Question?" If you break into this country, it doesn't matter what legal status you achieve after that - your ass is out of here for border violation. This is what Noem needs to say. Quote
Deluge Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 30 minutes ago, herbie said: If you have a Lawful Asylum case, you are here LEGALLY Nope, it's too favorable for the alien - they can disappear into society while they're waiting and never be seen until they're caught for committing crimes. That's why ALL cases need to be handled at the border. Quote
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Legato said: More inane ramblings. You're really good at ^inane ramblings. 💡 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 2 hours ago, robosmith said: YOU keep PARROTING the same LIES with NO EVIDENCE because YOU are the LIAR. Fify 🤣 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Deluge Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 23 hours ago, robosmith said: Nope. As long as they have a hearing to determine they have a legitimate case, they are here LEGALLY as stated by LAWYER Dan Goldman. Your amateur legal claims NOTWITHSTANDING. Nope. Your LOVER Dan Goldman is an open borders slut and he needs to be disbarred. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.