Beware those who seem to love the cruelty of moral indignation. They do not seek a better world only the pleasure of punishment.

[User]

17 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Nor could I tell if you were a poet, a dreamer or a psychopath, but they exist

It's brain function that determines your identity

So, now your big claim is that someone is born a poet?

Your comments just get dumber and dumber. 

Yeah, no crap, someone is a poet... but ANYONE can CHOOSE to be a poet. I could write poetry right now. 

This doesn't support your case at all, it only further supports mine, that this is either a mental illness or some choice someone makes for their own fetish desires. 

 

21 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

The question is - why won't you believe them? 

I am the King of England. 

Why won't you believe me?

[Radiorum]

22 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

That's a long post just to explore psychological issues.

I'm sorry you did not get its meaning.

23 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

And if a person is born a male, but cant shake this idea that he's a she, that person has psychological issues. Which you say here...

You misread the scientific evidence.

23 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

But your solution is to affirm a psychological issue rather than treat the psychological issue. 

how do you treat the gender-identity of a brain?

[Radiorum]

20 minutes ago, User said:

This doesn't support your case at all, it only further supports mine, that this is either a mental illness or some choice someone makes for their own fetish desires. 

i actually feel pity for your constricted brain

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Of course environmental stimuli affect us after birth.

 

That is not what you said.

Quote

But how the stimuli is interpreted and responded to depends on the brain we developed in utero.

What you posted does not say that. At all. Not even a little bit

That is made up in your mind. And it's probably made up in your mind because of things that happen to you after you were born rather than in utero.

So no, people are not born transgender. And yes, it is a negative psychological condition which almost always leads to one level or another of gender dysphoria which can be extremely dangerous. If it doesn't lead to that then in those cases it tends to be more of a choice or preference than anything else

As has been said, you can't have a pathology without an illness.

[User]

2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

i actually feel pity for your constricted brain

I am doing fine. I don't think I am something I am not nor do I pretend others are to play along with their delusions. 

[Deluge]

On 12/21/2025 at 7:54 PM, Radiorum said:

The indignation is no more powerful than in the so called “Christian base” –

In the US, transgender persons are not safe from Christian hate

The man in the video below is angry. He’s speaking on stage at Turning Point’s (founded by Charlie Kirk, now run by his widow Erica) Americafest. He cites Charlie as a martyr, then scapegoats an entire community, cloaked in a warped version of Christianity. His speech is chilling, and yet earned him a standing ovation.

“The person who pulled the trigger (on Charlie) is part of the demonic transgender ideology that warps the minds of our young children, that poisons them, that is antithetical to creation itself … God doesn’t make mistakes. Transgenderism is a lie from the pit of hell … and I’m sick of seeing transgender violence and murderers in my country … what a horrid and wretched ideology … it’s time to kick in doors, come on FBI, do some door-kicking, round them up.”

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSi3WJiEewU/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

Transgenderism is a Satanic mindset. Jesus taught to love the sinner, not the sinner's sins. If Trannies and homosexuals were truly in danger here then things like drag queen story hour would be nowhere to be found. 

See, what you perverts need to understand is that it's not the queers who are in danger here, but just normal every day citizens who don't embrace woke cultism. 

YOU are the murderers (abortion, Charlie Kirk). YOU are the authors of confusion (identity politics). YOU are the rioters, the vandals, the border erasers, the criminals (illegal immigration, legal petty theft). The list could go on and on and on...

 

[eyeball]

10 hours ago, Deluge said:

See, what you perverts need to understand is that it's not the queers who are in danger here, but just normal every day citizens who don't embrace woke cultism. 

YOU are the murderers (abortion, Charlie Kirk). YOU are the authors of confusion (identity politics). YOU are the rioters, the vandals, the border erasers, the criminals (illegal immigration, legal petty theft). The list could go on and on and on...

You coulda done something about it 50 years ago when it was just a few hippies. Guys with long hair and girls wearing pants shoulda been your first clue of the approaching Gender Apocalypse. The Che shirts and Pierre Trudeau woulda clinched the need for action if you'd had the courage of your convictions.

What did you think would happen after 50 years without lifting a single finger in resistance?

A commie takeover without having to fire a single shot. LMAO!

[Michael Hardner]

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

You coulda done something about it 50 years ago when it was just a few hippies. Guys with long hair and girls wearing pants shoulda been your first clue of the approaching Gender Apocalypse. The Che shirts and Pierre Trudeau woulda clinched the need for action if you'd had the courage of your convictions.

What did you think would happen after 50 years without lifting a single finger in resistance?

A commie takeover without having to fire a single shot. LMAO!

Indeed the Chuds of the 1960s thought that long hair on boys represented a desire to be a woman.

But as Peter Fonda explained in Easy Rider... it's tough for people who buy and sell themselves on the market every day to imagine true freedom...

Edited December 27, 2025 by Michael Hardner

[Nationalist]

14 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Indeed the Chuds of the 1960s thought that long hair on boys represented a desire to be a woman.

But as Peter Fonda explained in Easy Rider... it's tough for people who buy and sell themselves on the market every day to imagine true freedom...

True freedom? Mike if you wanna larp as a woman...you're free to do so. Just leave the children out of it.

But we both know you're not really interested in true freedom...dont we.

[Michael Hardner]

38 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

True freedom? Mike if you wanna larp as a woman...you're free to do so. Just leave the children out of it.

But we both know you're not really interested in true freedom...dont we.

Go back to what eyeball was comments on... "Normal everyday citizens" in danger because of someone's freedom.

Aren't you in favour of restriction religion?  Immigration?

 

Spare me that moral high ground... You're not better than me, stop being arrogant.

[Legato]

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Indeed the Chuds of the 1960s thought that long hair on boys represented a desire to be a woman.

But as Peter Fonda explained in Easy Rider... it's tough for people who buy and sell themselves on the market every day to imagine true freedom...

Indeed there were no 60's chuds, a word made up in the present time by the weak minded.

Long hair on men was the fashion came after the 60's at the time emanating mainly from the music scene nothing to do with Trans stuff.

Mods and rockers were the 60's scene.

[Nationalist]

34 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Go back to what eyeball was comments on... "Normal everyday citizens" in danger because of someone's freedom.

Aren't you in favour of restriction religion?  Immigration?

 

Spare me that moral high ground... You're not better than me, stop being arrogant.

What @eyeball posted was nonsense. 

Restriction religion? Like climate religion?

True freedom is anarchy. Are you in favor of that?

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Long hair on men was the fashion came after the 60's at the time emanating mainly from the music scene nothing to do with Trans stuff.

How does that explain girls wearing pants?

[Legato]

13 minutes ago, eyeball said:

How does that explain girls wearing pants?

Mode of transport.

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Indeed the Chuds of the 1960s thought that long hair on boys represented a desire to be a woman.

But as Peter Fonda explained in Easy Rider... it's tough for people who buy and sell themselves on the market every day to imagine true freedom...

Nobody anywhere thought that. Yet another lie that you can talk without evidence to try and prop up your narrative

And again calling people you disagree with chuds in order to dehumanize them.

You are a terrible person mike. You should be deeply ashamed