All Gay/Les refugees coming to canada now get 1 full year of income and support.

[CdnFox]

45 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yeah but he's a billionaire first,

 

No, he's an American first. That was a stupid thing to say. Although considering bringing him up in the first place was pretty stupid I guess you're trying to distract from your initial stupid by offering some species of different stupid

45 minutes ago, eyeball said:

They'll all be on the run once government budgets and people around the planet have been pushed to the brink

No they won't. History shows us that that is not how it works

They will be perfectly fine, and in canada the poor will be poorer and there will be more of them and they won't get the services they need. 

that is already happening thanks to your friends the libs. 

45 minutes ago, eyeball said:

No, it was the blue collar Khmer Orange guy I said.

You lied  

Edited December 23, 2025 by CdnFox

[Moonlight Graham]

We should only accept moderate Muslims into Canada, whether refugees or regular immigrants.  People who believe in the abuse and severe control of women, for instance, shouldn't be welcomed into our society.  People who support a terrorist group like Hamas or ISIS shouldn't be welcomed, and should probably be deported.  I'm assuming LGBT refugee claimants from the middle-east are either moderate Muslims or not even Muslims at all (based on the fact that they embrace an LGBT lifestyle).

[Moonlight Graham]

On 12/21/2025 at 7:57 PM, eyeball said:

No, pension, Airbnb and filling in for someone now and then at work... I'm just down to a couple days a week now.

Everyone who owns an investment property should sell it so that younger Canadians can actually afford a mortgage.  People can invest in the stock markets like normal people.  Canadian banks give great dividends for retirees.  Politicians should make it unprofitable to own a home the owners doesn't live in so that it makes owners to start to sell them.  But they won't, because the baby boomers who vote for them would get mad.  Airbnb's should be illegal.

[CdnFox]

59 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Everyone who owns an investment property should sell it so that younger Canadians can actually afford a mortgage.  People can invest in the stock markets like normal people.  Canadian banks give great dividends for retirees.  Politicians should make it unprofitable to own a home the owners doesn't live in so that it makes owners to start to sell them.  But they won't, because the baby boomers who vote for them would get mad.  Airbnb's should be illegal.

That sounds nice but it wouldn't work out the way you think.

For a very short time that would help a handful of people as the sudden rush onto the marketplace of all of those homes would drive prices down

But very shortly that supply would be absorbed and developers would not be interested in building more places. I can explain how that market works in detail if you like but the end result will be that far fewer homes will be built than we need.

And all those rental places will have been removed from the rental market and rents will have skyrocketed even worse than before. Four people will have to share a two bedroom suite and have good jobs to do it just to afford a roof over their head and their budget will be tight. 

Which means in a couple of years we will be back to having not enough homes, We won't be building anywhere near enough homes because developers won't be interested, and now there's nobody left to force the sale of their homes. At that point the situation would be largely hopeless and wouldn't be able to be recovered from for at least two or three generations.

What we need is for people to build more homes. It is literally that simple.

The challenge is there's not a lot of motivation for them to do that right now. Governments need to incentivize developers to build as many homes as they can, and foreigners can buy as many homes as they want they're not going to buy any more than the market will support for rental.

None of that is terribly difficult to achieve but the problem is the liberals and carney do not understand how that market works and they don't understand how to incentivize it. They also don't care

Edited December 23, 2025 by CdnFox

[eyeball]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No they won't. History shows us that that is not how it works

Oh, there was a point in history when national tax regimes were synced in a way that made it pointless to move wealth around?

Bullshit.

[User]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Oh, there was a point in history when national tax regimes were synced in a way that made it pointless to move wealth around?

Bullshit.

Instead of spending all this time crying about how you want to take other people’s money, you could just be helping all these people on your own now

[CdnFox]

12 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Oh, there was a point in history when national tax regimes were synced in a way that made it pointless to move wealth around?

 

Yeah. Trudeau signed on to that. Tons and tons of other countries did too. It was one of Biden's ideas

Biden synchronize international business tax - Google Search

It did not work out the way you think it did.

You're such a tard that you didn't even realize what your proposing had already been tried.

And it never works. There's always someone that breaks the rules, there's always a loophole, there's always someone like mark carney he's out there finding ways for wealthy people to avoid it the taxes. And all it takes is a couple countries who don't sign on for people to move their businesses there. Which is precisely how mark carney hit wealthy businesses money, he found one country that wouldn't sign on and funnel the profits into that

 

Why are you so dumb? You know god damn well if I'm talking about something I probably know what I'm talking about, and if I don't know what I'm talking about then I don't say anything on that subject but you're so goddamn stupid you can't even check your own facts before you honk your own stupidity to the world like some sort of Canada goose

[eyeball]

10 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Airbnb's should be illegal.

Why? Around here they're vital to young people starting out with their first place and to seniors staying in their homes as long as possible.  

[eyeball]

51 minutes ago, User said:

Instead of spending all this time crying about how you want to take other people’s money, you could just be helping all these people on your own now

I do what I can and as noted 70% of the funding in this case is already coming from the private sector.

Quit your whining and pony up.

[eyeball]

49 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Yeah. Trudeau signed on to that. Tons and tons of other countries did too. It was one of Biden's ideas

Biden synchronize international business tax - Google Search

It did not work out the way you think it did.

Only because of Trump, MAGA and the oligarchs jerking Congress around. Otherwise another 130 countries representing 90% of the global economy are on side.

53 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And it never works.

The U.S. has yet to fully implement the Pillar Two rules through domestic legislation, a situation that international tax experts are closely monitoring as other countries move forward with their own implementation.

Its coming...

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Only because of Trump, MAGA and the oligarchs jerking Congress around. Otherwise another 130 countries representing 90% of the global economy are on side.

Nope. Absolutely lie. It did not work when Biden had those 130 countries on board. It was already failing before trump got elected

And you are still too stupid to even realize it was something that had happened.

I could understand if it was something that happened 150 years ago and you just didn't know the history but this was like two years ago

11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

The U.S. has yet to fully implement the Pillar Two rules through domestic legislation, a situation that international tax experts are closely monitoring as other countries move forward with their own implementation.

It never works. No matter what you do it fails. It's like communism, people like you always say that communism is going to work if it was just done right but there is no way to do it right. It always fails.

And considering you didn't even realize this was a thing until 5 minutes ago when I told you what you're doing is trying desperately to Google search for something to mitigate your utter failure. And you just can't educate yourself on this stuff in 5 minutes

It doesn't work, it fails every single time, it will always fail there is no chance of it working. It's the kind of thing people like you propose to virtue signal because reality is an important, and your world children can die to terrorist attack and it's perfectly fine as long as your ideology is preserved

[eyeball]

44 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It never works. No matter what you do it fails. It's like communism, people like you always say that communism is going to work if it was just done right but there is no way to do it right. It always fails.

People like you say the same thing about capitalism except you don't try to get it right. Just shoveling everything to the top is all you know how to do.

 

[User]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

I do what I can and as noted 70% of the funding in this case is already coming from the private sector.

Quit your whining and pony up.

You are the beggar here crying for my money. I am just fine.

Go do what you want with your own money and stop pretending you are helping others by spending someone else’s money. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

People like you say the same thing about capitalism except you don't try to get it right.

 

You mean we tell the truth and you don't like it. Yeah that would be a you problem rather than a me problem  

Quote

Just shoveling everything to the top is all you know how to do.

I don't even know what you mean by that, I don't think you do either. I think you're just angry because you're wrong again and you want it to be my fault as usual.

So here's the thing. Rich people already pay more than their fair share of taxes. And they will always have a way to shelter their income if you ask for unreasonable level of taxes. They're not here to be your cash cow

Instead of trying to steal from the rich because your teeny tiny mind can't imagine anything else and believe theft is a viable economic option, the correct answer is actually to find ways to make those who have less money yet more money

In other words, instead of trying to make the rich poor,  try and make the poor rich.

And the way to do that is to encourage business investment, keep taxes low and keep more money in the hands of the middle class, and reward success in business to encourage others to create new business and invest. While you're at it make sure there's pathways to education and skills although that's already pretty good in Canada.

Nothing has made more people rich and lifted more people from poverty in the history of mankind than capitalism. We need to harness that power and let people earn whatever levels of income they're prepared to work for and prepared to develop the skills for.

It's that easy

Edited December 23, 2025 by CdnFox

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Nothing has made more people rich and lifted more people from poverty in the history of mankind than capitalism. We need to harness that power and let people earn whatever levels of income they're prepared to work for and prepared to develop the skills for.

It's that easy

Sure, when you have a planet for the easy taking. That tide is turning though and ebbing tides always kick up the worst seas.

Especially in a bottleneck.

Of course if we're talking about a waterhole going dry the animals get meaner to make it through.

We'll kinda of be faced with a scenario that has elements of both.

[herbie]

32 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Nothing has made more people rich and lifted more people from poverty in the history of mankind than capitalism.

No thought, discussion, comparison, debate necessary; it's instinctual behaviour to a Ferengi.

And oh so relevant to refugee benefits.
Goes right along with posting a headline that both that"Canada" gives 12 months of benefits while 2 paragraphs in it points out 3 months and implies they're only for gay refugees.
Your gripe is that they mention refugees from gay persecution can come too.

[Legato]

3 minutes ago, herbie said:

No thought, discussion, comparison, debate necessary; it's instinctual behaviour to a Ferengi.

And oh so relevant to refugee benefits.
Goes right along with posting a headline that both that"Canada" gives 12 months of benefits while 2 paragraphs in it points out 3 months and implies they're only for gay refugees.
Your gripe is that they mention refugees from gay persecution can come too.

Bong problems again?

[eyeball]

3 minutes ago, herbie said:

No thought, discussion, comparison, debate necessary; it's instinctual behaviour to a Ferengi.

Oops, that was confux who said that - but I hear you.

[herbie]

Oh good, a forum member without his hands over his ears and tongue out yelling Na Na Na....

[User]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

No thought, discussion, comparison, debate necessary; it's instinctual behaviour to a Ferengi.

And oh so relevant to refugee benefits.
Goes right along with posting a headline that both that"Canada" gives 12 months of benefits while 2 paragraphs in it points out 3 months and implies they're only for gay refugees.
Your gripe is that they mention refugees from gay persecution can come too.

Well, when you are done on the front lines in Ukraine, why don't you pay for all the gay refugees you can with your own money?

You sure do seem to have plenty of time on here... 

Edited December 24, 2025 by User

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

Sure, when you have a planet for the easy taking.

We're kind of standing on one

Quote

That tide is turning though and ebbing tides always kick up the worst seas.

Nope. Let's just stupid

Quote

Especially in a bottleneck.

You don't even know what you're talking about anymore do you

Quote

Of course if we're talking about a waterhole going dry the animals get meaner to make it through.

If the water holes going dry then someone will dig a well.  That's the beautiful thing about capitalism, if there's a need there's ALWAYS a way to fill it. And capitalism finds the way better than anything else. 

Quote

We'll kinda of be faced with a scenario that has elements of both.

Nope. 

What we're faced with is lunatic communistic twats on the left who think you can multiply something by dividing it and who are so sure they're going to fail that they want everyone else around them to do so. 

Let slip the dogs of commerce and keep the playing field level and these things take care of themselves. Or more accurately someone will find a solution and implement it for profit. 

Edited December 24, 2025 by CdnFox

[herbie]

17 hours ago, User said:

Well, when you are done on the front lines in Ukraine, why don't you pay for all the gay refugees you can with your own money?

Another dimwitted response from our resident LUser who can't argue to a point to even save his own life.
When I want mere jargon for a response, I'll ask Pierre Poilievre 

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, herbie said:

Another dimwitted response from our resident LUser who can't argue to a point to even save his own life.
When I want mere jargon for a response, I'll ask Pierre Poilievre 

He actually said more than you  

[User]

4 minutes ago, herbie said:

Another dimwitted response from our resident LUser who can't argue to a point to even save his own life.
When I want mere jargon for a response, I'll ask Pierre Poilievre 

Sure, your contributions on this forum mostly consist of your screaming into the void at some strawman you created. 

As usual with you leftists, you want everyone else to do what you think is noble and good and then sit around feeling good about it like you did something when you never do it yourselves. 

[TreeBeard]

On 12/22/2025 at 5:25 AM, John Stone said:

 

- the biblical cities of Sodom and Gomorrah had gay rights, we all know how it worked out

just say'n! 

You think that really happened?