Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Epstein Transparency Act Passed Nearly Unanimously Trump Promises to Sign It

4 hours ago  The US House votes 427-1 to compel the justice department to release all of its Jeffrey Epstein files. The Senate also says it will pass the ...
 

House votes to approve release of the Epstein files

 
8 hours ago  The measure would compel the Justice Department to release files regarding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. It will soon head to the ...
 
13 hours ago  President Donald Trump, a former Epstein friend who fell out with him, recently dropped his opposition to the bipartisan bill to release the ...
Quote

A senior White House official told the Reuters news service that Trump will sign the Epstein bill “whenever it gets to the White House.”

 

Posted (edited)

And Jeffries is caught up in the scandal. He sent emails to Epstein begging Epstein to give Democrats money and Epstein was invited, by Obama, to a Democrat fundraiser. Both things happened FIVE YEARS AFTER BEING CONVICTED. 

The Democrats pushed and pushed for this and now they are the ones going down for it. The sad thing about this is we are going to become a monoparty government. While I disagree with Democrats, we need them to moderate the extremists in our party. 

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
47 minutes ago, John Stone said:

The big question (now) is whether the DOJ will factor into the release in light of their investigation into several Dems involvement? 

Democrats are expecting the lwnj judges to protect them.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted

Epstein and democrats had a relationship going back to 2014.  He was a Democrat fund raiser, and also was texting democrats during congressional hearings in 2019.

 

IMG_0250.webp

IMG_0230.jpeg

Posted

Now, we’ll have to see whose side the DOJ is on – Trump, or the survivors. After all, Bondi gives Trump blind fealty. So, will the DOJ redact, or slow-walk it, under the guise of “national security” or “ongoing investigation” excuses

Posted
35 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Now, we’ll have to see whose side the DOJ is on – Trump, or the survivors. After all, Bondi gives Trump blind fealty. So, will the DOJ redact, or slow-walk it, under the guise of “national security” or “ongoing investigation” excuses

Rule the courts, rule the land. Legitimate power is sooooooooooo sweet. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Now, we’ll have to see whose side the DOJ is on – Trump, or the survivors. After all, Bondi gives Trump blind fealty. So, will the DOJ redact, or slow-walk it, under the guise of “national security” or “ongoing investigation” excuses

You are just going to ignore that Obama invited him to dinner AFTER Epstein was convicted? Or that a D congresswoman was taking advice during a hearing from him AFTER Epstein was convicted? Or that Jeffries was begging him for money AFTER Epstein was convicted? Or that Epstein blamed Trump for getting arrested? Or that Epstein hated Trump? 

 

  • Like 2

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
16 hours ago, robosmith said:

Epstein Transparency Act Passed Nearly Unanimously Trump Promises to Sign It

4 hours ago  The US House votes 427-1 to compel the justice department to release all of its Jeffrey Epstein files. The Senate also says it will pass the ...
 

House votes to approve release of the Epstein files

 
8 hours ago  The measure would compel the Justice Department to release files regarding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. It will soon head to the ...
 
13 hours ago  President Donald Trump, a former Epstein friend who fell out with him, recently dropped his opposition to the bipartisan bill to release the ...

 

If he does sign it, I'm sure it'll take down more democrats than Republicans. 

Posted
4 hours ago, John Stone said:

Rule the courts, rule the land.

I don’t know if you are joking or not, but of course such a sentiment is antithetical to the very basic foundational principles upon with the USA is built. The USA is a land ruled by the law, not the whims of men.

So, for example, in 1962, we have then Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy remarking:

"the orders of the federal courts can and will be enforced ... Every American has the duty to obey the law and the right to expect that the law will be enforced ... It is fundamental to our system that there be respect for the law and compliance with all laws..."

image.thumb.gif.dcbc3de100ebca3f9d06f00992f9ebfa.gif

But, since Trump’s inauguration, the Department of Justice has been corrupted. Listen to the perversion (compounded by a complicit Supreme Court) voiced by current Attorney General Pam Bondi:

"No longer will we have rogue judges striking down President Trump's policies across the entire nation."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raZP-z9l9Zw&t=1s

 

Here are the mission and values of the DOJ, according to their website:

Our Mission
The mission of the Department of Justice is to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights.
 

Our Values

  • Independence and Impartiality. We work each day to earn the public’s trust by following the facts and the law wherever they may lead, without prejudice or improper influence.
  • Honesty and Integrity. Our employees adhere to the highest standards of ethical behavior, mindful that, as public servants, we must work to earn the trust of, and inspire confidence in, the public we serve.
  • Respect. Our employees value differences in people and in ideas and treat everyone with fairness, dignity, and compassion.
  • Excellence. We work every day to provide the highest levels of service to the American people and to be a responsible steward of the taxpayers’ dollars.


These values have been completely corrupted from day one of the Trump administration.

 

Recently, 60 lawyers who were fired or resigned from the DOJ were interviewed by the New York Times. The state of play at the DOJ is highly alarming, to say the least. From the opening of the article:

President Trump’s second term has brought a period of turmoil and controversy unlike any in the history of the Justice Department. Trump and his appointees have blasted through the walls designed to protect the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency from political influence; they have directed the course of criminal investigations, openly flouted ethics rules and caused a breakdown of institutional culture. To date, more than 200 career attorneys have been fired, and thousands more have resigned. (The Justice Department says many of them have been replaced.)

[...]

Beginning with Trump’s first day in office, the lawyers narrated the events that most alarmed them over the next 10 months. They described being asked to drop cases for political reasons, to find evidence for flimsy investigations and to take positions in court they thought had no legitimate basis. They also talked about the work they and their colleagues were told to abandon — investigations of terrorist plots, corruption and white-collar fraud.


 

The Unraveling of the Justice Department

Sixty attorneys describe a year of chaos and suspicion.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

I don’t know if you are joking or not, but of course such a sentiment is antithetical to the very basic foundational principles upon with the USA is built. The USA is a land ruled by the law, not the whims of men.

So, for example, in 1962, we have then Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy remarking:

"the orders of the federal courts can and will be enforced ... Every American has the duty to obey the law and the right to expect that the law will be enforced ... It is fundamental to our system that there be respect for the law and compliance with all laws..."

image.thumb.gif.dcbc3de100ebca3f9d06f00992f9ebfa.gif

But, since Trump’s inauguration, the Department of Justice has been corrupted. Listen to the perversion (compounded by a complicit Supreme Court) voiced by current Attorney General Pam Bondi:

"No longer will we have rogue judges striking down President Trump's policies across the entire nation."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raZP-z9l9Zw&t=1s

 

Here are the mission and values of the DOJ, according to their website:

Our Mission
The mission of the Department of Justice is to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights.
 

Our Values

  • Independence and Impartiality. We work each day to earn the public’s trust by following the facts and the law wherever they may lead, without prejudice or improper influence.
  • Honesty and Integrity. Our employees adhere to the highest standards of ethical behavior, mindful that, as public servants, we must work to earn the trust of, and inspire confidence in, the public we serve.
  • Respect. Our employees value differences in people and in ideas and treat everyone with fairness, dignity, and compassion.
  • Excellence. We work every day to provide the highest levels of service to the American people and to be a responsible steward of the taxpayers’ dollars.


These values have been completely corrupted from day one of the Trump administration.

 

Recently, 60 lawyers who were fired or resigned from the DOJ were interviewed by the New York Times. The state of play at the DOJ is highly alarming, to say the least. From the opening of the article:

President Trump’s second term has brought a period of turmoil and controversy unlike any in the history of the Justice Department. Trump and his appointees have blasted through the walls designed to protect the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency from political influence; they have directed the course of criminal investigations, openly flouted ethics rules and caused a breakdown of institutional culture. To date, more than 200 career attorneys have been fired, and thousands more have resigned. (The Justice Department says many of them have been replaced.)

[...]

Beginning with Trump’s first day in office, the lawyers narrated the events that most alarmed them over the next 10 months. They described being asked to drop cases for political reasons, to find evidence for flimsy investigations and to take positions in court they thought had no legitimate basis. They also talked about the work they and their colleagues were told to abandon — investigations of terrorist plots, corruption and white-collar fraud.


 

The Unraveling of the Justice Department

Sixty attorneys describe a year of chaos and suspicion.

 

What exactly does this diatribe have to do with the price of tea in china? 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

What exactly does this diatribe have to do with the price of tea in china? 

 

You want me to explain it to you? Read the quote I was replying to, and my reply, and figure it out.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

 

You want me to explain it to you? Read the quote I was replying to, and my reply, and figure it out.

I did read the quote. Your diatribe was flatly unrelated. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Sorry, I can't help it if it went over your head.

It doesn't go over my head. But the idea that Democrat friendship and alliance with Jeffrey Epstein is some how the fault of Donald Trump is the height of delusional. Trump did not force Obama to online Epstein to dinner. Trump did not force Jefferies to solicit donations from Epstein. Trump did not force a D congress woman to use Epstein's advice during a hearing. Trump did not put Clinton on the Lolita Express. 

You can't blame Trump for what Democrats did. You can't blame the DOJ for prosecuting their crimes. Those accusations, that you level, are really admissions. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

It doesn't go over my head. But the idea that Democrat friendship and alliance with Jeffrey Epstein is some how the fault of Donald Trump is the height of delusional. Trump did not force Obama to online Epstein to dinner. Trump did not force Jefferies to solicit donations from Epstein. Trump did not force a D congress woman to use Epstein's advice during a hearing. Trump did not put Clinton on the Lolita Express. 

You can't blame Trump for what Democrats did. You can't blame the DOJ for prosecuting their crimes. Those accusations, that you level, are really admissions. 

 

Uh, yeah, it went over your head.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

But, since Trump’s inauguration, the Department of Justice has been corrupted. Listen to the perversion (compounded by a complicit Supreme Court) voiced by current Attorney General Pam Bondi:

These values have been completely corrupted from day one of the Trump administration.

 

But, since Biden’s inauguration, the Department of Justice has been corrupted. Listen to the perversion voiced by current Attorney General Pam Bondi:

These values have been completely corrupted from day one of the Biden administration.

 

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Man if Epstein let everyone know he was helping "get Trump" he would be a hero to the left. Theyd be defending him right now.

Pedophilia will be back in vogue pretty soon.  Next thing you know he will be a founding member of NAMBLA and just a misunderstood minor attracted person. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted

Now that the Biden and Trump administrations have both had years to tamper with the evidence, this list is nothing more than an "enemies of the state" list. 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
2 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Man if Epstein let everyone know he was helping "get Trump" he would be a hero to the left. Theyd be defending him right now.

Man if you knew what you're talking about, you'd have posted ACTUAL EVIDENCE instead of ^BULLSHIT.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,024
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    portman123
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...