The Obama era and the use of the Court system to sway public perception, destroy political influence of their adversaries.

[West]

There's been a trend among the American left wing since the Obama era to destroy their political adversaries and their reputation through nonsensical high profile legal battles. This has historically tied up their political adversaries money and influence in never ending legal battles. Unfortunately Canada has followed suit through their treatment of freedom convoy organizers. To recap this vile trend among the Obama Democrats:

1. Attempting to imprison multiple Trump affiliates and Trump himself

2. Use of intelligence to spy on and create fictitious narratives about Trump and his associates. 

3. The destruction of a Christian baker for refusing to engage in a homosexual wedding (ended up winning on appeal)

4. Multiple lawsuits against the NRA

5. The latest targeting of church ministers to sway a narrative

6. Targeting Fox News

7. Raiding law offices of their political opponents

8. Targeting conservative Christian universities with misleading press stories and lawsuits

There are more. But the Obama era Dems are vile 

[robosmith]

36 minutes ago, West said:

There's been a trend among the American left wing since the Obama era to destroy their political adversaries and their reputation through nonsensical high profile legal battles. This has historically tied up their political adversaries money and influence in never ending legal battles. Unfortunately Canada has followed suit through their treatment of freedom convoy organizers. To recap this vile trend among the Obama Democrats:

1. Attempting to imprison multiple Trump affiliates and Trump himself

2. Use of intelligence to spy on and create fictitious narratives about Trump and his associates. 

3. The destruction of a Christian baker for refusing to engage in a homosexual wedding (ended up winning on appeal)

4. Multiple lawsuits against the NRA

5. The latest targeting of church ministers to sway a narrative

6. Targeting Fox News

7. Raiding law offices of their political opponents

8. Targeting conservative Christian universities with misleading press stories and lawsuits

There are more. But the Obama era Dems are vile 

So you made a list with ZERO EVIDENCE. Congrats LMAO

"Targeting" is not a crime unless the POTUS is conspiring to create sham DoJ prosecutions LIKE TRUMP has PROMISED and IS DOING..

[Michael Hardner]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So you made a list with ZERO EVIDENCE. 

Not exactly - it's not even CITED.

Another citless post: "Here's what I think, supported by nothing"

Please, people, just post what you had for lunch.  It's more interesting...

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Not exactly - it's not even CITED.

Another citless post: "Here's what I think, supported by nothing"

Please, people, just post what you had for lunch.  It's more interesting...

Actually...

Every point @West made, has already been established as true.

But I know your objection. You're bored because nobody discussed raping another's daughter. Its just not exciting enough for your...

Delicate sensibilities.

[West]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Not exactly - it's not even CITED.

Another citless post: "Here's what I think, supported by nothing"

Please, people, just post what you had for lunch.  It's more interesting...

https://www.deseret.com/faith/2023/10/25/23930090/christian-baker-jack-phillips-masterpiece-cakeshop-where-is-he-now/

 

Here's one for you. They tried to ruin this dudes life over a cake. 

Sad stuff

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you made a list with ZERO EVIDENCE. Congrats LMAO

"Targeting" is not a crime unless the POTUS is conspiring to create sham DoJ prosecutions LIKE TRUMP has PROMISED and IS DOING..

 

4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Not exactly - it's not even CITED.

Another citless post: "Here's what I think, supported by nothing"

Please, people, just post what you had for lunch.  It's more interesting...

Y'all are just mad because you can't attack the source. 

[Legato]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you made a list with ZERO EVIDENCE. Congrats LMAO

"Targeting" is not a crime unless the POTUS is conspiring to create sham DoJ prosecutions LIKE TRUMP has PROMISED and IS DOING..

 

Japanese Zero's had a type 98 reflector gunsight, for targeting

You made a post with zero credibility, no targets hit, not even a near miss.

 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, West said:

https://www.deseret.com/faith/2023/10/25/23930090/christian-baker-jack-phillips-masterpiece-cakeshop-where-is-he-now/

 

Here's one for you. They tried to ruin this dudes life over a cake. 

Sad stuff

He decided to ruin HIS OWN LIFE by engaging in UNWARRANTED DISCRIMINATION.

When you open a business to the public, you don't get to decide who your customers are.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

 

Japanese Zero's had a type 98 reflector gunsight, for targeting

You made a post with zero credibility, no targets hit, not even a near miss.

 

OTC it is YOUR ACCUSATION which has ZERO CREDIBILITY because you're LYING about my CLEARLY CORRECT CLAIM of ZERO EVIDENCE.

Too bad you're TOO BLIND TO SEE.

[Legato]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

OTC it is YOUR ACCUSATION which has ZERO CREDIBILITY because you're LYING about my CLEARLY CORRECT CLAIM of ZERO EVIDENCE.

Too bad you're TOO BLIND TO SEE.

Your sights seem to be unable to see past the large caps, try a different mantra, or better yet, put a new battery in the red dot.

[West]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

He decided to ruin HIS OWN LIFE by engaging in UNWARRANTED DISCRIMINATION.

When you open a business to the public, you don't get to decide who your customers are.

The frivolous lawsuit was thrown out as it should have been. Only SICKOS support the abuse of the legal system like that. 

[CdnFox]

10 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Not exactly - it's not even CITED.

Another citless post: "Here's what I think, supported by nothing"

Please, people, just post what you had for lunch.  It's more interesting...

So you can't refute any of it and you're back to "why are we talking about this".

I notice your post is citeless too  

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Legato said:

Your sights seem to be unable to see past the large caps, try a different mantra, or better yet, put a new battery in the red dot.

My "large caps" do NOTHING to prevent me from seeing YOUR BULLSHIT, CLOWN.

You never have anything but jokes to post here. 

[Legato]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

My "large caps" do NOTHING to prevent me from seeing YOUR BULLSHIT, CLOWN.

You never have anything but jokes to post here. 

Jokes? My man, your posts would be worthy of being the eminent court jester for Ivan IV.

[Nationalist]

I'd sure like to see Barry and Hilary-Billary indicted.

[WestCanMan]

21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Not exactly - it's not even CITED.

Another citless post: "Here's what I think, supported by nothing"

Please, people, just post what you had for lunch.  It's more interesting...

The OP is predicated on the assumption that you didn't forget about Russian collusion, or the constant lies about the Freedom Convoy by the LPOC and MSM. 

If you honestly believe that the BLM riots were mostly peaceful, and the Freedom Convoy protesters were out vandalizing and destroying public property, then this isn't a discussion for you. 

You need therapy, not engagement in more of the same political discussions that turned you into a cultist.

[WestCanMan]

17 hours ago, West said:

https://www.deseret.com/faith/2023/10/25/23930090/christian-baker-jack-phillips-masterpiece-cakeshop-where-is-he-now/

 

Here's one for you. They tried to ruin this dudes life over a cake. 

Sad stuff

What was the point of posting that? If they have already "forgotten" about the 3-yr Russian collusion investigation, what makes you think that they're gonna remember that cake incident for twenty seconds? 

Robo's confirmation bias will prevent him from even clicking that link, and MH will say "I'm a conservative and even I think that the cake incident was handled fairly and with great integrity by the thoughtful, conscientious, and caring LGBTQ community".

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, West said:

The frivolous lawsuit was thrown out as it should have been. Only SICKOS support the abuse of the legal system like that. 

What was the REASON it was thrown out, Mr. AMATEUR LEGAL EAGLE? Cite the LAW. 

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I'd sure like to see Barry and Hilary-Billary indicted.

Why do you care AT ALL, Canuck? I certainly don't care who is running YOUR COUNTRY. LMAO

 

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

What was the point of posting that? If they have already "forgotten" about the 3-yr Russian collusion investigation, what makes you think that they're gonna remember that cake incident for twenty seconds? 

Robo's confirmation bias will prevent him from even clicking that link, and MH will say "I'm a conservative and even I think that the cake incident was handled fairly and with great integrity by the thoughtful, conscientious, and caring LGBTQ community".

In reality, I googled and found two cases involving gay marriage wedding cake cases and NEITHER were "THOWN OUT."

One went to the SCOTUS.

No one has forgotten the Russian collusion investigation but you've CLEARLY forgotten the CONCLUSIONS reached by the US Senate Intel Committee chaired by now Trump SoS Marco Rubio. LMAO

[West]

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What was the REASON it was thrown out, Mr. AMATEUR LEGAL EAGLE? Cite the LAW. 

Why do you care AT ALL, Canuck? I certainly don't care who is running YOUR COUNTRY. LMAO

 

Read the article about why they threw it out. It violated his religious conscience 

[robosmith]

25 minutes ago, West said:

Read the article about why they threw it out. It violated his religious conscience 

Quote the article where it PROVES YOUR CASE, IF IT DOES....

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, Legato said:

Jokes? My man, your posts would be worthy of being the eminent court jester for Ivan IV.

And yet you never laugh at them because they are serious, UNLIKE your constant TROLLfoolery.

[Nationalist]

56 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Why do you care AT ALL, Canuck? I certainly don't care who is running YOUR COUNTRY. LMAO

 

Because I do. And im not surprised a squat like you doesn't care about Canada. I doubt you even know where Canada is.

[West]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Quote the article where it PROVES YOUR CASE, IF IT DOES....

Here's another one showing Tish James brought a nonsensical case against the NRA as part of a political campaign vow

https://home.nra.org/statements/nra-successfully-resolves-longstanding-legal-battle-with-new-york-attorney-general/

And Democrats whine about Trump even after they ran campaigns with the promise to utilize lawfare against their political opposition. Unhinged 

[CdnFox]

On 10/21/2025 at 11:19 PM, robosmith said:

My "large caps" do NOTHING to prevent me from seeing YOUR BULLSHIT, CLOWN.

 

Sure they do. You're too short to see over top of them.