FBI Had Agents at J6. After Action Reports Called The FBI Leadersip Political

[gatomontes99]

Just The News: FBI Bombshell: 274 agents sent to Capitol for J6, many later complained they were political ‘pawns’

...

The most persistent complaint was that the bureau during the James Comey and Chris Wray era had become infected with political biases and liberal ideology that treated the protesters from the summer 2020 Black Lives Matter riots far differently than those arrested in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 episode.

...

"Currently, the US Attorneys office is dictating what it is that gets investigated. This is a dangerous precedent because we can barely get them to prosecute investigations that clearly meet thresholds needed for Federal prosecutions,"

...

The document has proven a bombshell to lawmakers, revealing for the first time that the FBI had a total of 274 agents deployed to the Capitol in plainclothes and with guns after the violence started but with no clear safety gear of way to be recognized by other law enforcement agencies working in the chaos of the riot.

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2025-09/FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001-000050.pdf

**********

What these documents prove is that the FBI was acting politically, they were at J6 (why they didnt admit it is beyond me) and that they did treat J6ers more harshly than BLM rioters and used FBI agents for low level crimes that could and should have been handled by local police. That last one implies the brass at the FBI didnt trust the local police room be political enough to charge J6ers with petty crimes.

[Nationalist]

Chris Wray should be indicted now too.

No mercy.

[WestCanMan]

Another "RW Conspiracy" that was 100% correct. 

At this point, leftists need to admit that Alex Jones>>>>Anderson Cooper, and I don't even watch Alex Jones. 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Just The News: FBI Bombshell: 274 agents sent to Capitol for J6, many later complained they were political ‘pawns’

...

The most persistent complaint was that the bureau during the James Comey and Chris Wray era had become infected with political biases and liberal ideology that treated the protesters from the summer 2020 Black Lives Matter riots far differently than those arrested in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 episode.

...

"Currently, the US Attorneys office is dictating what it is that gets investigated. This is a dangerous precedent because we can barely get them to prosecute investigations that clearly meet thresholds needed for Federal prosecutions,"

...

The document has proven a bombshell to lawmakers, revealing for the first time that the FBI had a total of 274 agents deployed to the Capitol in plainclothes and with guns after the violence started but with no clear safety gear of way to be recognized by other law enforcement agencies working in the chaos of the riot.

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2025-09/FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001-000050.pdf

**********

What these documents prove is that the FBI was acting politically, they were at J6 (why they didnt admit it is beyond me) and that they did treat J6ers more harshly than BLM rioters and used FBI agents for low level crimes that could and should have been handled by local police. That last one implies the brass at the FBI didnt trust the local police room be political enough to charge J6ers with petty crimes.

Your DOCUMENT LINK is corrupted and cannot be opened in Adobe Acrobat Reader 2025.001.20693 LMAO

The link in the article is readable.

Edited September 26, 2025 by robosmith

[gatomontes99]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your DOCUMENT LINK is corrupted and cannot be opened in Adobe Acrobat Reader 2025.001.20693 LMAO

The link in the article is readable.

Works fine on my end. But maybe the AI in your browser is protecting your from reality because it knows what reality does to your mental health? 

[robosmith]

Author John Solomon is a notoriously biased right wing commentator.

You got a legitimate source? LMAO

Quote

Access to Trump presidential records

On June 19, 2022, Donald Trump sent a letter to the National Archives naming Solomon and Kash Patel as "representatives for access to Presidential records of my administration".^[51]

Reputational damage

Paul McCleary, writing for the Columbia Journalism Review in 2007, wrote that Solomon had earned a reputation for hyping stories without solid foundation.^[9] In 2012, Mariah Blake, writing for the Columbia Journalism Review, wrote that Solomon "has a history of bending the truth to his storyline," and that he "was notorious for massaging facts to conjure phantom scandals."^[10][28] During the 2004 presidential election between George W. Bush and John Kerry, Thomas Lang wrote for the Columbia Journalism Review that a Solomon story for the Associated Press covered criticism of John Kerry's record on national security appeared to mirror a research report released by the Republican National Committee. Lang wrote that Solomon's story was "a clear demonstration of the influence opposition research is already having on coverage of the [presidential] campaign."^[52][53]

The Washington Post wrote in September 2019 that Solomon's "recent work has been trailed by claims that it is biased and lacks rigor."^[28] The Post noted that Solomon had done award-winning investigative work during his early career, but that his work had taken a pronounced conservative bent from the late 2000s and onwards.^[28] According to Foreign Policy magazine, Solomon had "grown into a prominent conservative political commentator with a somewhat controversial track record."^[35]

In 2007, Deborah Howell, then-ombudsman at The Washington Post, criticized a story that Solomon wrote for The Post which had suggested impropriety by Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards in a real estate purchase; Solomon's reporting omitted context which would have made clear that there was no impropriety.^[8] Progressive news outlets ThinkProgress, Media Matters for America and Crooked Media have argued that Solomon's reporting has a conservative bias and that there are multiple instances of inaccuracies.^[54][55][56] According to The Intercept, Just Security and The Daily Beast, Solomon helps to advance right-wing and pro-Trump conspiracy theories.^[30][5][57] The New Republic described Solomon's columns for The Hill as "right-wing fever dreams."^[58] Independent journalist Marcy Wheeler accused Solomon of manufacturing fake scandals which suggested wrongdoing by those conducting probes into Russian interference in the 2016 election.^[59] Reporters who worked under Solomon as an editor have said that he encouraged them to bend the truth to fit a pre-existing narrative.^[10]

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Another "RW Conspiracy" that was 100% correct. 

At this point, leftists need to admit that Alex Jones>>>>Anderson Cooper, and I don't even watch Alex Jones. 

We ran out of theories, we only have conspiracy facts now.

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Works fine on my end. But maybe the AI in your browser is protecting your from reality because it knows what reality does to your mental health? 

There's no AI in my browser. Duh

There IS AI in Acrobat Reader.

[gatomontes99]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Author John Solomon is a notoriously biased right wing commentator.

You got a legitimate source? LMAO

You can attack Solomon if you want, but the fact is that the documents are the real after action reports. Unless you can prove those conclusions are not real, attack Solomon is really pointless. Could it be that you just don't want to face the reality? 

[robosmith]

DOJ OIG Releases Report on the FBI’s Handling of Its Confidential Human Sources and Intelligence Collection Efforts in the Lead Up to the January 6, 2021 Electoral Certification

 

Quote

Download Press Release

Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz announced today the release of a review examining the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) handling of its confidential human sources (CHS) and intelligence collection efforts in the lead up to the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Consistent with OIG practice, in spring 2022 the OIG paused aspects of our review to ensure that the OIG’s investigative work did not conflict with or compromise any ongoing DOJ criminal investigations or prosecutions. Having been informed by federal prosecutors last year that our review would no longer potentially interfere with pending criminal prosecutions, we resumed our work on this matter. In doing so, we were cognizant of the amount of time that had passed, as well as the number of non-DOJ OIG oversight reports that had been publicly released regarding the events of January 6. We determined that an area that had not yet been thoroughly reviewed by other entities was the FBI’s direction and handling of its CHSs in the lead-up to and on January 6, and whether the FBI exploited its CHSs and other available information to determine the nature of threats in advance of the electoral vote certification on January 6. Accordingly, we focused our review on that topic.

The findings in today’s report include:

• The FBI Took Significant and Appropriate Steps in Advance of January 6 to Prepare for its Supporting Role. Despite playing only a supporting role in preparing for and responding to the events of January 6, the FBI recognized the potential for violence and took significant and appropriate steps to prepare for this supporting role.
• The FBI Did Not Canvass Field Offices for Intelligence from CHSs Prior to January 6, which Could Have Helped the FBI and Law Enforcement with Their January 6 Preparations. The FBI could have taken an additional step to canvass its field offices in advance of January 6 to identify any intelligence, including CHS reporting, that might have assisted with the FBI and law enforcement partners’ preparations for January 6. FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate described the lack of a canvass prior to January 6 as a “basic step that was missed,” and told the OIG that he would have expected a formal canvassing of sources to have occurred.
• Confusion and Lack of Coordination Contributed to the FBI’s Inaccurate Report to Congress that It Had Canvassed Field Offices. After January 6, the FBI reported to Congress that it had directed its field offices prior to January 6 to canvass their CHSs for information concerning threats in connection with the January 6 Electoral Certification. However, as noted, we found that no canvassing of field offices for source information had occurred. We found that the FBI’s statements to Congress were not intentionally inaccurate, and that confusion and lack of coordinated communications contributed to the inaccurate reporting

 

• No Undercover FBI Employees at Protests or at the Capitol on January 6. We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6.

 

•  

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

There's no AI in my browser. Duh

There IS AI in Acrobat Reader.

 

[Hodad]

This is likely false, given the source, but let's play along and pretend it's credible.

Sending LEOs to the scene of a violent insurrection already in progress is suuuper political?

Like sending squad cars to a bank robbery. Politics!

Edited September 26, 2025 by Hodad

[West]

So people were debanked over a hoax. Sad

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

This is likely false, given the source, but let's play along and pretend it's credible.

Sending LEOs to the scene of a violent insurrection already in progress is suuuper political?

Like sending squad cars to a bank robbery. Politics!

Who said anything like that? 

OH, that's right, the agents that took the orders. They said they action was political because they were sent in without IDs and not in uniform. 

[Legato]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

This is likely false, given the source, but let's play along and pretend it's credible.

Sending LEOs to the scene of a violent insurrection already in progress is suuuper political?

Like sending squad cars to a bank robbery. Politics!

My cement mixer is broken, can I use some of that spin to start it up?

[Hodad]

5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Who said anything like that? 

OH, that's right, the agents that took the orders. They said they action was political because they were sent in without IDs and not in uniform. 

Who said anything like that? 

Well, you did. Did not not even bother to read your OP, FFS?

"revealing for the first time that the FBI had a total of 274 agents deployed to the Capitol in plainclothes and with guns after the violence started"

Just because the algorithm spoonfeeds an endless sewer of claims from like-minded people that does not mean that you're anywhere near the truth.  

[gatomontes99]

24 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Who said anything like that? 

Well, you did. Did not not even bother to read your OP, FFS?

"revealing for the first time that the FBI had a total of 274 agents deployed to the Capitol in plainclothes and with guns after the violence started"

Just because the algorithm spoonfeeds an endless sewer of claims from like-minded people that does not mean that you're anywhere near the truth.  

I posted the OP. I bolded the words you bolded. Them being there before or after the violence started doesn't determine if they were sent there for politics. In fact, if you read the after action report, they complained about the treatment of the J6ers in relation to other rioters, like BLM. It is in the report. 

Try to mock me for not reading the op? You didn't even read who posted it. 

Edited September 27, 2025 by gatomontes99

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

I posted the OP. I bolded the words you bolded. Them being there before or after the violence started doesn't determine if they were sent there for politics. In fact, if you read the after action report, they complained about the treatment of the J6ers in relation to other rioters, like BLM. It is in the report. 

Try to mock me for not reading the op? You didn't even read who posted it. 

 

 

"Oh, it's a miracle! You've remembered "Who said anything like that?"

I called it "your OP," dummy. I said that you said something like that. Obviously I knew you posted it. That's what made it so absurd that you're asking who said it. 

So, back in reality...

274 armed LEOs  from the FBI were dispatched to a violent insurrection threatening the lives of our legislators. Pretty straightforward.

And you weirdos are going to pretend that it's somehow political. Lol

Edited September 27, 2025 by Hodad

[gatomontes99]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbis-patel-clarifies-role-hundreds-agents-jan-6-says-wray-lied-congress.amp

"Agents were sent into a crowd control mission after the riot was declared by Metro Police – something that goes against FBI standards," Patel told Fox News Digital. "This was the failure of a corrupt leadership that lied to Congress and to the American people about what really happened."

**********

Why would Wray lie about agents sent in after? I believe that's what they did. I just don't understand why they lied about it? Seems like something people would understand. And why send them without IDs as the after action report suggests?

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbis-patel-clarifies-role-hundreds-agents-jan-6-says-wray-lied-congress.amp

"Agents were sent into a crowd control mission after the riot was declared by Metro Police – something that goes against FBI standards," Patel told Fox News Digital. "This was the failure of a corrupt leadership that lied to Congress and to the American people about what really happened."

**********

Why would Wray lie about agents sent in after? I believe that's what they did. I just don't understand why they lied about it? Seems like something people would understand. And why send them without IDs as the after action report suggests?

You're a FOOL to believe ANYTHING Patel says. ALL HE IS, IS a SYCHOPHAT who will do WHATEVER TRUMP TELLS HIM. Duh 

The FACT that you STILL cite FOS LIES tells us you DON'T CARE about the TRUTH.

[gatomontes99]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're a FOOL to believe ANYTHING Patel says. ALL HE IS, IS a SYCHOPHAT who will do WHATEVER TRUMP TELLS HIM. Duh 

The FACT that you STILL cite FOS LIES tells us you DON'T CARE about the TRUTH.

Then it shouldn't be hard to prove him wrong. For someone that heavily leans on the appeal to authority fallacy, you must really be struggling with this. 

[Deluge]

On 9/26/2025 at 7:49 AM, gatomontes99 said:

Just The News: FBI Bombshell: 274 agents sent to Capitol for J6, many later complained they were political ‘pawns’

...

The most persistent complaint was that the bureau during the James Comey and Chris Wray era had become infected with political biases and liberal ideology that treated the protesters from the summer 2020 Black Lives Matter riots far differently than those arrested in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 episode.

...

"Currently, the US Attorneys office is dictating what it is that gets investigated. This is a dangerous precedent because we can barely get them to prosecute investigations that clearly meet thresholds needed for Federal prosecutions,"

...

The document has proven a bombshell to lawmakers, revealing for the first time that the FBI had a total of 274 agents deployed to the Capitol in plainclothes and with guns after the violence started but with no clear safety gear of way to be recognized by other law enforcement agencies working in the chaos of the riot.

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2025-09/FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001-000050.pdf

**********

What these documents prove is that the FBI was acting politically, they were at J6 (why they didnt admit it is beyond me) and that they did treat J6ers more harshly than BLM rioters and used FBI agents for low level crimes that could and should have been handled by local police. That last one implies the brass at the FBI didnt trust the local police room be political enough to charge J6ers with petty crimes.

No surprise over here. Everyone knows democrats are lying sacks of shit, even the democrats know they are lying sacks of shit. 

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're a FOOL to believe ANYTHING Patel says. ALL HE IS, IS a SYCHOPHAT who will do WHATEVER TRUMP TELLS HIM. Duh 

The FACT that you STILL cite FOS LIES tells us you DON'T CARE about the TRUTH.

And you're a FOOL if you think you have the wool pulled over everyone's eyes. lol

Edited September 29, 2025 by Deluge

[WestCanMan]

On 9/26/2025 at 10:05 AM, robosmith said:

Your DOCUMENT LINK is corrupted and cannot be opened in Adobe Acrobat Reader 2025.001.20693 LMAO

The link in the article is readable.

Robo, wha are you doing here? 

You're not supposed to access this information. It is forbidden for members of your cult. 

[WestCanMan]

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/no-undercover-fbi-agents-at-jan-6-riot-watchdog-finds-in-rebuke-to-conspiracy-theories

• No undercover FBI agents at Jan. 6 riot, watchdog finds in rebuke to conspiracy theories

PBS is so reliable. Whenever they make a declarative statement along political lines, you never have to guess how accurate it is. 

[WestCanMan]

There were "26 paid informants" there from the FBI on Jan 6th.

Quote

the 274 agents included those who had “responded”

26 paid FBI informants were in Washington, DC, that day

So:

1. not all of the 274 FBI Agents were inserted prior to the riots, some came after the rioting has started (a very small window of opportunity)
2. there were 26 paid FBI informants there. (HELLO RAY EPPS)