gatomontes99 Posted November 9, 2025 Report Posted November 9, 2025 Just The News J6 Shocker: FBI informants warned of armed violence, Antifa presence before riot, lawmaker reveals ********* Loudermilk made it known that the FBI had a lot of intelligence that indicated violence would have been worse on J6. Some of the intelligence indicated armed violence. Some indicated ANTIFA would be embedded in the crowd. All of it is intelligence that came from informants. Not all of it was accurate. But it does show that DC and the Capitol police should have accepted Trump's informal offer of NG troops. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
CdnFox Posted November 9, 2025 Report Posted November 9, 2025 Not surprising all things considered. Credible threats on j6? Meh it's just rumors. Unsubstantiated vague accusations in a faked dossier provided by the democrats? MY GOD - ASSIGN 63 AGENTS NOW AND IF YOU HAVE TO LIE TO GET A WARRANT YOU DO IT!!!!! yeash. 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
gatomontes99 Posted November 9, 2025 Author Report Posted November 9, 2025 7 hours ago, CdnFox said: Not surprising all things considered. Credible threats on j6? Meh it's just rumors. Unsubstantiated vague accusations in a faked dossier provided by the democrats? MY GOD - ASSIGN 63 AGENTS NOW AND IF YOU HAVE TO LIE TO GET A WARRANT YOU DO IT!!!!! yeash. But a live bomb that nearly killed the VP elect wasn't worth investigating. 🤔 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Venandi Posted November 9, 2025 Report Posted November 9, 2025 (edited) 13 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: J6 Shocker Not a shocker at all and IMO the FBI (and other sources) didn't ignore anything... given the open source reporting I was astounded by the lack of preparation and response. In other words (and IMO of course) the information provided in the threat assessment was at best disregarded and at worst deliberately ignored and consciously not acted on... and the question is why. Either that or the level of incompetence in capital security circles is off the charts... and I know that's not true. This goes above the capital police level IMO, I can't see folks of that calibre shrugging off threat assessments that would have set off a MASTER WARNING light for me and I don't believe for one second that the FBI or any other intelligence sources simply sat on relevant information with the hope everything would burn to the ground. So ya, there are a whole bunch of WTF questions here and I suspect that the "FBI didn't tell us" angle (in whole or in part) is about as credible as the dog ate my homework. All that to say that IMO, there's a lot more to this than meets the eye. Edited November 9, 2025 by Venandi Quote
robosmith Posted November 9, 2025 Report Posted November 9, 2025 20 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Just The News J6 Shocker: FBI informants warned of armed violence, Antifa presence before riot, lawmaker reveals ********* Loudermilk made it known that the FBI had a lot of intelligence that indicated violence would have been worse on J6. Some of the intelligence indicated armed violence. Some indicated ANTIFA would be embedded in the crowd. All of it is intelligence that came from informants. Not all of it was accurate. But it does show that DC and the Capitol police should have accepted Trump's informal offer of NG troops. ^This is lDIOTIC. Trump has PROVEN that he needs NO ACCEPTANCE from ANYONE to send NG TROOPS to DC. Duh Quote
gatomontes99 Posted November 10, 2025 Author Report Posted November 10, 2025 2 hours ago, robosmith said: ^This is lDIOTIC. Trump has PROVEN that he needs NO ACCEPTANCE from ANYONE to send NG TROOPS to DC. Duh I thought you were ignoring me because you couldn't handle debating me? Yeah. Because Pelosi and Schumer taught him that they are working against him so he shouldnt trust any democrat. This 2nd term is a reaction to Democrat behavior and not a continuance of his. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted November 10, 2025 Report Posted November 10, 2025 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: I thought you were ignoring me because you couldn't handle debating me? No I am ignoring you because you're always LYING HERE. 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yeah. Because Pelosi and Schumer taught him that they are working against him so he shouldnt trust any democrat. This 2nd term is a reaction to Democrat behavior and not a continuance of his. Doesn't change the FACT that Trump has NO EXCUSE for not sending NG Troops to the Capitol on J6. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted November 10, 2025 Author Report Posted November 10, 2025 1 minute ago, robosmith said: No I am ignoring you because you're always LYING HERE. Doesn't change the FACT that Trump has NO EXCUSE for not sending NG Troops to the Capitol on J6. Yes he does. He offered and they denied. But it is good to know you think he has the authority to use the NG any time he wants. I suppose you now oppose the judge that said Trump can't send the NG to Portland? 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Venandi Posted November 10, 2025 Report Posted November 10, 2025 (edited) 46 minutes ago, robosmith said: No I am ignoring you because you're always LYING HERE. Edited November 10, 2025 by Venandi 1 Quote
Venandi Posted November 10, 2025 Report Posted November 10, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Trump has NO EXCUSE for not sending NG Troops to the Capitol on J6. 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: I suppose you now oppose the judge that said Trump can't send the NG to Portland? Quote
robosmith Posted November 10, 2025 Report Posted November 10, 2025 3 hours ago, Venandi said: I suppose you are IGNORANT of the PROFOUND DIFFERENCE between the Federally run DC and Portland. LMAO Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.