Even after the murder of Cory Comparatore and Charlie Kirk, left wingers still try to play victim, accuse their opponents of stifling "free speech"

[Chrissy1979]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

We know 100% for sure. So seeing is the back half of your statement is a lie is there any reason we shouldn't believe that you're lying about your feelings about the front half?

The left has never believed that and has supported repression of free speech when it suited them. Now that it doesn't suit them they want free speech respected

But whether the right degrees or not it is a simple fact that both sides have to play by the same rules. When the left starts calling out free speech issues that involve their side, you can probably expect the right to be calling out their own people. But as long as the left supports the attack of their enemies then the right is going to allow it to

You can't have free speech only when it suits you Chrissy

If there was another example of the government censoring free speech, I'm opposed to that too. But it's nice to see you also admit you are now against it. 

And I note you concede you lied about Trump's alleged victim too.

[User]

6 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

If there was another example of the government censoring free speech, I'm opposed to that too. But it's nice to see you also admit you are now against it. 

And I note you concede you lied about Trump's alleged victim too.

Another example - What was the first one?

 

[Venandi]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Unlike Trump WHO PROMISED LAWFARE, Biden never said ANYTHING ABOUT COMMANDING THE DOJ because they are INDEPENDENT in the PURSUIT of JUSTICE.

I'VE already SAID I don't LIKE this PARTICULAR EO but HEH, there WAS no HINT of LAWFARE under THE Biden ADMINISTRATION umbrella... right?

The VILLAGE ide0t says:

"Thanks for confirming you STILL GOT BUPKIS LMAO"

[WestCanMan]

On 9/18/2025 at 1:24 PM, Michael Hardner said:

Please.

If they were really conservatives they would place some value on freedom.

I have many posters here on mute, have any self-described conservatives spoken against this?

STFU, libt4rd liar. 

You've never spoken in favour of a conservative talking point since I've been here. 

And you of all people have no effing right to talk about freedom when you stood in favour of forced vaccinations, the gesundheitspass, the police stealing gas and trampling people with horses or beating them in the streets after they had already surrendered on their knees, churches were closed and not even allowed to congregate outside (but BLM rallies were ok there lol), people couldn't have funerals, etc, etc.

You're a f'ing joke, Michael. Nothing but a pathetic, f'ing joke. 

You keep on saying that you're a conservative and I promise that there isn't a single conservative on this site who agrees with that.

 Now run away, MH. Because "you have me on ignore" lol. Gutless loser. 

[robosmith]

18 minutes ago, Venandi said:

I'VE already SAID I don't LIKE this PARTICULAR EO but HEH, there WAS no HINT of LAWFARE under THE Biden ADMINISTRATION umbrella... right?

The VILLAGE ide0t says:

"Thanks for confirming you STILL GOT BUPKIS LMAO"

You're the one who still has BUPKIS. "Hint" is ambiguous and NOT WHAT I SAID. Duh

Biden never SAID anything about COMMANDING his DoJ

Now can you refute ^REALITY INSTEAD OF YOUR DISHONEST STRAWMAN "ARGUMENTS"? LMAO 

[Venandi]

16 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Biden never ADMITTED THAT HE SAID anything about COMMANDING his DoJ

There, FIXED it FOR you.

THE final WORD is YOURS and HERE it IS: 

^YOUR OPINIONS don't make ME WRONG, lDIOT.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

If there was another example of the government censoring free speech, I'm opposed to that too. But it's nice to see you also admit you are now against it. 

 

You have never been Opposed to the government censoring free speech. Name one time when you were here opposing it. There are many many examples.

There's nothing about now, I've already said on this forum publicly in opposition to some of the other right wing people that I don't feel this was entirely legitimate.

It was pointed out that this was a decision of the employer and yes absolutely the employer has that right considering that the statements were made on the employer's dime. I'd be a lot more against it if it was just something that was said in his own private leisure time but he did say it while working for the employer and the employer has the right to say that is off base and they're getting rid of him.  IT's not about HIS free speech per se, it's about his actions on behalf of his employer. 

And that is all valid and true.  Still rubs me a little wrong, what he said was pretty terrible but did it cross the line into trying to justify the killing by pointing out how horrible kirk was? Not really, tho it wandered close.  But everyone's got a viewpoint. 

The thing is i'm consistent.  

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

And I note you concede you lied about Trump's alleged victim too.

Ahhh taking to lying again are you   

You already proved i was right in this very conversation by the very dictionary definition of the word recant. 

Sorry chrissy, you lose again. I think you must like it  

[Chrissy1979]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

You have never been Opposed to the government censoring free speech. Name one time when you were here opposing it. There are many many examples.

There's nothing about now, I've already said on this forum publicly in opposition to some of the other right wing people that I don't feel this was entirely legitimate.

It was pointed out that this was a decision of the employer and yes absolutely the employer has that right considering that the statements were made on the employer's dime. I'd be a lot more against it if it was just something that was said in his own private leisure time but he did say it while working for the employer and the employer has the right to say that is off base and they're getting rid of him.  IT's not about HIS free speech per se, it's about his actions on behalf of his employer. 

And that is all valid and true.  Still rubs me a little wrong, what he said was pretty terrible but did it cross the line into trying to justify the killing by pointing out how horrible kirk was? Not really, tho it wandered close.  But everyone's got a viewpoint. 

The thing is i'm consistent.  

Ahhh taking to lying again are you   

You already proved i was right in this very conversation by the very dictionary definition of the word recant. 

Sorry chrissy, you lose again. I think you must like it  

Give an example of government suppressing free speech and I will say I don't support it. You can't say the same.

 

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Give an example of government suppressing free speech and I will say I don't support it. You can't say the same.

 

Give an example where you did in the past and we'll take a look. Plenty of examples under biden, we've discussed many here. I never once saw you come to the defense of free speech and you seemed to support the surpression at the time.  There was about 57 times biden was involved in gov't censorship (some of which was of seriously questionable legality),  so tell me which one you opposed. 

I on the other hand have spoken up about all censorship.  So once again  you accuse others of your own crimes. What a shock. 

[Chrissy1979]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Give an example where you did in the past and we'll take a look. Plenty of examples under biden, we've discussed many here. I never once saw you come to the defense of free speech and you seemed to support the surpression at the time.  There was about 57 times biden was involved in gov't censorship (some of which was of seriously questionable legality),  so tell me which one you opposed. 

I on the other hand have spoken up about all censorship.  So once again  you accuse others of your own crimes. What a shock. 

It's ridiculous and desperate to ask me to go search through old posts on a forum with no search function to prove there is no whataboutism that would make you feel better about being a hypocrite. If I were a hypocrite in the past, it still wouldn't mean you're not a hypocrite who is exploiting Kirk's death to get rid of free speech.

[WestCanMan]

20 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Give an example of government suppressing free speech and I will say I don't support it. You can't say the same.

The FBI shut down the dissemination of information that they knew to be true about the Hunter Biden laptop. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Venandi said:

There, FIXED it FOR you.

Since YOU CAN'T QUOTE IT, Biden NEVER SAID IT, Parrot. Duh

[robosmith]

38 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The FBI shut down the dissemination of information that they knew to be true about the Hunter Biden laptop. 

LMAO. You don't know what the FBI "knew to be true."

Do you know that NYP refused to release hard disk contents of that laptop for WEEKS?

No one was stupid enough to believe NYP when they wouldn't SHOW THEIR HAND. Duh

[suds]

"Both sides must take responsibility for their own extremists if political violence is to be stopped."  (Bill Maher)

Instead, we end up with both sides using the first amendment whenever it suits them and throwing the word 'democracy' around as if they've invented the damn thing. I'm a free speech supporter who I'll admit sometimes gets mixed feelings regarding limitations when someone dies for no reason other than expressing their beliefs. Bill's right, political violence must be condoned by both sides regardless of who does it. Because there's no other way if you believe in free speech.

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

It's ridiculous and desperate to ask me to go search through old posts on a forum with no search function to prove there is no whataboutism that would make you feel better about being a hypocrite. If I were a hypocrite in the past, it still wouldn't mean you're not a hypocrite who is exploiting Kirk's death to get rid of free speech.

I didn't ask you any such thing.  I asked you which example of biden's numerous assaults on free speech you stood up for here. 

LOLOL you painted yourself into a corner and are having a freak out yet again aren't you   You never  supported free speech at all, you were happy to see it squashed under biden. 

Now you look stupid and you're getting desperate. Shame on you

[Venandi]

12 hours ago, robosmith said:

Since YOU CAN'T QUOTE IT, Biden NEVER SAID IT, Parrot. Duh

DID he NEED to SAY it WHILE he WAS DOING it FOR it TO count, MONKEY Duh?

The ROBO-MONKEY says:

"YOUR ^FANTASIES" are RIDICULOUS.  See Dunning-Kruger thread for WHY."

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Venandi said:

DID he NEED to SAY it WHILE he WAS DOING it FOR it TO count, MONKEY Duh?

The ROBO-MONKEY says:

"YOUR ^FANTASIES" are RIDICULOUS.  See Dunning-Kruger thread for WHY."

Parrot has nothing but repeating ^arguments AGAINST HIMSELF. LMAO

Trump PROMISES lawfare, and Biden NEVER spoke about it, so all allegations against Biden have NO EVIDENCE he was involved, since he's always advocated INDEPENDENCE of the DoJ in pursuit of JUSTICE. Duh.

Admit it; you got BUPKIS against Joe.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Parrot has nothing but repeating ^arguments AGAINST HIMSELF. LMAO

Oh good lord..... he's gotten in front of his mirror again and is attacking his reflection, someone go take it away before he injures himself! 

[Legato]

20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Parrot has nothing but repeating ^arguments AGAINST HIMSELF. LMAO

Trump PROMISES lawfare, and Biden NEVER spoke about it, so all allegations against Biden have NO EVIDENCE he was involved, since he's always advocated INDEPENDENCE of the DoJ in pursuit of JUSTICE. Duh.

Admit it; you got BUPKIS against Joe.

Joe did speak about it but he liked Bupkis with a little maple syrup too much. It was always dribbling from the corner of his mouth and splashing the teleprompter, that's why he always mumbled something unintelligible.

[Venandi]

45 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

..... he's gotten in front of his mirror again and is attacking his reflection, someone go take it away before he injures himself! 

Except that:

ROBOMONKEY NEVER spoke about it, so all allegations against ROBOMONKEY have NO EVIDENCE he was involved in LOOKING at HIMSELF in A mirror. Duh.

It could be that  he simply has:

"NOTHING BETTER than a gish gallop of NON EXPERT BULLSHIT and try to pretend that means something."

In any case it's fun

"Just to see the clown draw really STUPID conclusions with DRIVEL."

... and argue with himself at length.  

21 minutes ago, Legato said:

that's why he always mumbled something unintelligible.

"Like "turbo charge the merg"

Here he is delivering the speech Robo wrote for him:

 

Edited September 21, 2025 by Venandi

[CdnFox]

21 minutes ago, Venandi said:

Except that:

ROBOMONKEY NEVER spoke about it, so all allegations against ROBOMONKEY have NO EVIDENCE he was involved in LOOKING at HIMSELF in A mirror. Duh.

It could be that  he simply has:

"NOTHING BETTER than a gish gallop of NON EXPERT BULLSHIT and try to pretend that means something."

In any case it's fun

"Just to see the clown draw really STUPID conclusions with DRIVEL."

... and argue with himself at length.  

"Like "turbo charge the merg"

Here he is delivering the speech Robo wrote for him:

 

well played   it would have been perfect if you'd snuck "dunning kruger" in there somewhere but i suspect you weren't around for the year he was crazy for it 

[robosmith]

43 minutes ago, Legato said:

Joe did speak about it but he liked Bupkis with a little maple syrup too much. It was always dribbling from the corner of his mouth and splashing the teleprompter, that's why he always mumbled something unintelligible.

PROVE IT, TROLegato

[Legato]

52 minutes ago, robosmith said:

PROVE IT, TROLegato

It's common knowledge, shares in teleprompter cleaning materials were at an all time high.

Bupkis sales tanked after Joe stepped down.

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Joe did speak about it but he liked Bupkis with a little maple syrup too much. It was always dribbling from the corner of his mouth and splashing the teleprompter, that's why he always mumbled something unintelligible.

So not a lot different than your typical useless and unintelligible riddles.  As with Joe, clearly there are consequences to aging...

[User]

24 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

So not a lot different than your typical useless and unintelligible riddles.  As with Joe, clearly there are consequences to aging...

Sure, there are consequences to aging, just usually it is not by the guy who is President with one of the most corrupt coverup scandals of our lifetime for him.