Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Again, you don’t seem to understand how threats work. We saw the threat. Everything else is just a threatened party responding under duress.

This is all speculation on your part, not facts. 

 

 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The threat was as clear as can be and everyone saw it. You'd be better off trying to defend it than to pretend it didn't happen.

Your circular argument is akin to the old fashioned whipping top.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The threat was as clear as can be and everyone saw it. You'd be better off trying to defend it than to pretend it didn't happen.

The threat happened, yes, but your take on how that is why everyone did what they did was all speculation. 

 

 

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, User said:

The threat happened, yes, but your take on how that is why everyone did what they did was all speculation. 

 

The threat is the point, dummy. Again, you’d be better off saying the threat was no big deal than trying to say maybe no one responded to the threat so therefore it’s okay for the government to threaten businesses.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The threat is the point, dummy. Again, you’d be better off saying the threat was no big deal than trying to say maybe no one responded to the threat so therefore it’s okay for the government to threaten businesses.

I am not doing anything other than pointing out that you are speculating. That is a fact. 

You have no real argument here. None. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, User said:

I am not doing anything other than pointing out that you are speculating. That is a fact. 

You have no real argument here. None. 

You admit there was a threat and your only defence is ABC might have chosen to do what they were threatened to do or else.

Posted
18 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Because of a threat by the FCC. Now you’re going to argue it’s okay for them to make threats?

No, YOU already argued it was ok for them to make threats. 

remember? Just a few posts ago you said it didn't apply to CORPORATONS......  well abc is a corporation.  So any 'threat' to them doesn't apply. 

You said this when i pointed out the white house pressured google and other social media. "doesn't count' you said. Well the whitehouse pressured ABC.  Doesn't count i guess 

Sorry, you can't have it both ways. 

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The threat is the point, dummy. Again, you’d be better off saying the threat was no big deal than trying to say maybe no one responded to the threat so therefore it’s okay for the government to threaten businesses.

You said the threat wasn't the point. You said that it doesn't count when it's between the government and a business. That's not what free speech is about you said

So now you're caught in your own lie.

If you didn't care then you can't care now and @User is right to call you on it. 

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, YOU already argued it was ok for them to make threats. 

remember? Just a few posts ago you said it didn't apply to CORPORATONS......  well abc is a corporation.  So any 'threat' to them doesn't apply. 

You said this when i pointed out the white house pressured google and other social media. "doesn't count' you said. Well the whitehouse pressured ABC.  Doesn't count i guess 

Sorry, you can't have it both ways. 

You said the threat wasn't the point. You said that it doesn't count when it's between the government and a business. That's not what free speech is about you said

So now you're caught in your own lie.

If you didn't care then you can't care now and @User is right to call you on it. 

You’re even dumber than I thought. I get the impression pretend you don’t know what you’re talking about when you feel trapped and exposed, just to save face. Brendan Carr said “we can do this the easy way or the hard way.” You think everything is fine because ABC chose the easy way. 😆 
 

Posted
Just now, Chrissy1979 said:

You’re even dumber than I thought. I get the impression pretend you don’t know what you’re talking about when you feel trapped and exposed, just to save face.

LOL wow, it's not even noon and you're having your first hysteri-chrissy hissy fit :)  Awww sorry sweetie. 

 

Quote

Brendan Carr said “we can do this the easy way or the hard way.” You think everything is fine because ABC chose the easy way. 😆 

I think you and yours have been demanding the media be held accountable for spreading misinformation and disinformation for years, And Kimmel did that when he suggested the shooter was maga. 

I think you personally cheered when the white house censored the right wing for 4 years numerous times.  You thought that was just grand  :) 

So i may not like the rules YOUR side chose, but those are the rules now.  Why are you pretending to be upset with the very policies you cheered for under biden?

Kimmel lied and used 'hate speech' to attack people and the FCC warned that if something wasn't done they would consider regulation for his abuses. ABC could hae censured (not censored) him, fined him, given him a few weeks unpaid leave and had someone do the show,  hell he'd probably have gotten away with an apology 

Instead they canned him. that was  choice, and not one driven by the threat.  Sorry 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
49 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You admit there was a threat and your only defence is ABC might have chosen to do what they were threatened to do or else.

Pointing out that you are speculating and not providing facts is not my defense (correct spelling), it is just me pointing out a fact on the shortcomings of your arguments. 

 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Kimmel's back tomorrow.  Looks like Disney is more concerned with public pressure than they are of the corrupt administrations, as they should be.  Trump's got to be a happy guy today 😂

But wait... we were told the FCC cancelled him. That it was government censorship. 

So... how can they bring him back? 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, User said:

But wait... we were told the FCC cancelled him. That it was government censorship. 

So... how can they bring him back? 

You're too oblivious to understand what the pressure of FCC threats meant and why they initially pulled the show, so pointless in trying to explain.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You're too oblivious to understand what the pressure of FCC threats meant and why they initially pulled the show, so pointless in trying to explain.  

"pressure?"

No, we have been told for days now this was a Trump authoritarian dictatorship that forced them to take him off the air with the full force of government power! POWER! FORCE! CENSORSHIP!

Now they can just bring him back?

 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, User said:

"pressure?"

No, we have been told for days now this was a Trump authoritarian dictatorship that forced them to take him off the air with the full force of government power! POWER! FORCE! CENSORSHIP!

Now they can just bring him back?

 

It's repetitive, but my last comment....

You're too oblivious to understand what the pressure of FCC threats meant and why they initially pulled the show, so pointless in trying to explain.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It's repetitive, but my last comment....

You're too oblivious to understand what the pressure of FCC threats meant and why they initially pulled the show, so pointless in trying to explain.  

Its repetitivie, you are too dishonest to own up to the arguments being made the last few days and the complete melt down going on over OMG TRUMP DICTATOR

"pressure?"

No, we have been told for days now this was a Trump authoritarian dictatorship that forced them to take him off the air with the full force of government power! POWER! FORCE! CENSORSHIP!

Now they can just bring him back?

 

 

Posted

Asides being completely unable to point out anything Kimmel said about Kirk to justify the accusation that had anything to do with the cancellation.

Trump hates being mocked by comedians. Corporate media wants mergers and can't risk objections from the govt. So they obey.
Plain as day, right there in everyone's face. But dimwits refuse to see it, mock everyone who can as liars or extremists.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You're too oblivious to understand what the pressure of FCC threats meant and why they initially pulled the show, so pointless in trying to explain.  

I fully expect the FCC to apply pressure on the corporation, to force it to do its bidding.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
51 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I fully expect the FCC to apply pressure on the corporation, to force it to do its bidding.

I wonder...  You know Disney/ABC would have thought through every angle and what the FCC could ultimately do.  I don't watch the show but if I can stay awake 😂 I just might tomorrow to see if there's any type of directive to dial back on the Trump jokes. I'd certainly hope not, and that has nothing to do with my dislike for Trump.

Posted

Its so weird...Kimmel is back on the air...I thought tmTrump was a fascist that forced ABC to take him off the air? If thats the case, hiw could this happen?

Dumbasśes be dumbasseś

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I wonder...  You know Disney/ABC would have thought through every angle and what the FCC could ultimately do.  I don't watch the show but if I can stay awake 😂 I just might tomorrow to see if there's any type of directive to dial back on the Trump jokes. I'd certainly hope not, and that has nothing to do with my dislike for Trump.

It wasn't a "Trump joke" that caused any concern in the first place. 

 

Just now, gatomontes99 said:

Its so weird...Kimmel is back on the air...I thought tmTrump was a fascist that forced ABC to take him off the air? If thats the case, hiw could this happen?

Dumbasśes be dumbasseś

I know. Just yesterday Trump was an authoritarian dictator whose government forced him off the air with the government power. 

 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I fully expect the FCC to apply pressure on the corporation, to force it to do its bidding.

So what you're saying is if it doesn't then you are 100% wrong in your expectations aren't based on facts

It'll be interesting to see what else you're  wrong about

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted

Every Democrat accusation is an admission: 

 

Apparently they want to force Sinclair to either air Jimmy Kimmel or they will break up the company. What happened to Trump was a fascist because he told ABC to stop airing Jimmy? 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...