What The Liberals Did To Canada

[LinkSoul60]

17 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Quite obviously, he is not.

ZERO projects approved in a year.

ZERO projects fast-tracked in a year.

An MOU is nothing but a piece of paper.

Both he and his cabinet members have confirmed that no project will go forward without full Indigenous consent.  And then who does he meet with?  "Coastal First Nations", which is a US-funded anti-Canadian industry group, not a coalition of Indigenous people, who told him they would give their approval to NO projects.

Case closed.

 

lol... guess Moe forgot about the canola and mining, or Houston forgot about the lobster and crab.

Your ONLY wish is a pipeline because that's all you can think of.  The funny part of that with yourself is that you deplore the recent China agreement you just conveniently forgot about but no problem selling them oil, which we do today anyway.  No comments on expanding TransMountain or is it only going against the Coastal FN's (and a lot of BC voters) wishes to get a northern pipeline?

[LinkSoul60]

19 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

F*ck that. This is a complete bullshit narrative. I hate how the Liberals get congratulated for not f*cking up as much as Trump. Let's remember what they actually did, and you tell me which of these major policies they should be congratulated for.

1. Let the emergency stockpile of PVE gear deteriorate. Threw it out as it got old. Didn't replace it.

2. Told us there was nothing to worry about. Told us to all go on vacation. Sent our remaining PVE gear to China

3. Said it would be racist to close the border to China, or to subject those coming from there to health checks

4. Took no actions at all until Sophie Trudeau caught Covid. Closed the borders the next day - sort of.

5. Refused to quarantine those returning from China.

6. Decided to throw in our lot with China (who hated us) to help them develop a vaccine.

7. After many weeks, finally realized China wasn't going to give us any vaccine, threw billions at every pharmaceutical company in the world in hopes of butting in line. To this day, won't tell us how much.

8. When they finally agreed to quarantine people, did so in public hotels, charging more money than the fine so that people ignored them. And made the quarantine for three days for a disease that had a ten-day incubation period.

 

He's about a thousand times more qualified than Trudeau was.

LOL...that's a badge of honour?  My 96 year old mother in law was more qualified than Trudeau.  But, at least he's got that, which is something.

Don't worry, the next 10 years of liberal government will fly by.

[LinkSoul60]

15 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Trump is a handy excuse. That's why the Liberals are ragging the puck and not trying to get a deal. It's good for their popularity to have Trump mouthing off at us.

All the problems that had the Liberals down in the polls before Trump arrived, are still in place. Trump didn't create our low productivity, our low and diminishing GDP per person, our industries decamping for China, our mess of homeless encampments and violence in the streets, our huge deficits, our staggering healthcare system. All of these predate Trump.

And none of them are going to improve based on current government policies.

Yes, a very handy excuse/reason given the tariffs he's put onto lumber, steel/aluminum and auto.  Maybe ask the people who lost jobs because of those protectionist action if it was an excuse.

Use your head man....

[Goddess]

6 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

 No comments on expanding TransMountain or is it only going against the Coastal FN's (and a lot of BC voters) wishes to get a northern pipeline?

What's to comment on?  I'm not going to sit here all day trying to convince you that we need resource development in Canada.

I'm FOR resource development in Canada.

You're not.  The Liberals are not.

Carry on, my dude.

[LinkSoul60]

12 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Federal regulations control what can and can't be exported, as well.

In what area? Give me some specifics.

I find it irritating how so many brainless twats on the Left use the term 'far right' for basically anyone conservative.

Yeah, just like tariffs have a big impact on what can be exported.  Maybe try thinking twice, talking once...?

I don't find you crying in your sleep conservatives irritating... more comical and hopeless than anything.  

[LinkSoul60]

13 minutes ago, Goddess said:

What's to comment on?  I'm not going to sit here all day trying to convince you that we need resource development in Canada.

I'm FOR resource development in Canada.

You're not.  The Liberals are not.

Carry on, my dude.

lol...  you don't think I'm aware of that my dudette....  Wonder if Carney has thought of it?  

Is it only 'conservatives' who knows what's happened and is what is going on in Canada?  I suppose the answer is that you profoundly sad complainers seem to think you are the only ones given 39 pages of "What the liberals did to Canada", or is this topic just a good way of dealing with and cleansing another election defeat?   Carry on to 40...

 

[Goddess]

7 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

is this topic just a good way of dealing with and cleansing another election defeat?

Ooooooh, damn.  You're on to me.

[LinkSoul60]

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Ooooooh, damn.  You're on to me.

lol... 🫵

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

Federal regulations control what can and can't be exported, as well.

In what area? Give me some specifics.

I find it irritating how so many brainless twats on the Left use the term 'far right' for basically anyone conservative.

"Far right" now means anyone right of castro as near as i can tell. 

[CdnFox]

48 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

lol...  you don't think I'm aware of that my dudette....  Wonder if Carney has thought of it?  

 

 

He has, and he's doing everything in his power to prevent it while pretending that he's all for it

The industry was clear where they want and then they'll build a pipeline and he absolutely did exactly the opposite.

Any deliberately stirred up a fight between Alberta and British Columbia and picked a fight with the first nations and got them so worked out they'll never green light it

There isn't going to be a single new pipeline when carney leaves office then when he got to office. We aren't going to build any major projects that we weren't going to build anyway. The guy doesn't care and he doesn't want to look like he's against the environment

 

[Army Guy]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

That's not necessarily true at all, if Poilievre had expanded his call on 'useless' lobbyists to take their asks straight to the people and actually make most if not all in-camera lobbying obsolete I would have campaigned door to door for him.  As it was he and his staff soon thereafter went on to meet with dozens of lobbyists, most for Big Fossil Fuel so....no, I had no good reason for voting Conservative. 

And I'm serious, if I had voted for the Conservative in my riding just to satisfy you people, the Liberals might have have won. Trust me you got the best possible result you could have from my vote, a minority Liberal government.

Again I say to you ridiculously ungrateful people, you're welcome. WTF do I have to do to get a little respect around here?

I respect you eyeball, i may not like your politics or even most of your points of views, but i do respect you...I'd give you a hug , but you know , you can't be seen hugging conservatives....and i got an image to protect as well.... 

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

The industry was clear where they want and then they'll build a pipeline and he absolutely did exactly the opposite.

Say again....??   Who is the industry said they'll finance pipeline under what conditions, and what exactly is the exact opposite? (if that's what you were trying to say)

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Any deliberately stirred up a fight between Alberta and British Columbia and picked a fight with the first nations and got them so worked out they'll never green light it

You mean Smith stirring the sh*t up right?  Coastal FN didn't and doesn't want it but end of day the balls in Smith's court to get it to the point of serious FN discussions.

 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

There isn't going to be a single new pipeline when carney leaves office then when he got to office. We aren't going to build any major projects that we weren't going to build anyway. The guy doesn't care and he doesn't want to look like he's against the environment

 

Word has it that he just in to prop BN share price then get out when the goings good.

 

[CdnFox]

44 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Say again....??   Who is the industry said they'll finance pipeline under what conditions, and what exactly is the exact opposite? (if that's what you were trying to say)

 

This has been posted here a hundred times at least a dozen by me

. Enbridge came out and very clearly stated that they had money to invest but they would not be putting it into Canada under the regulatory environment that we have right now. They said that the no tanker ban means they won't even begin to look at the possibility. And that they would be putting their money in the united states for pipelines there.

As I have told you many times if you feel the need to lie to make your point then you haven't got a very good point. Let's not pretend ignorance. At least I hope you're pretending

46 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You mean Smith stirring the sh*t up right?  Coastal FN didn't and doesn't want it but end of day the balls in Smith's court to get it to the point of serious FN discussions.

No no actually it isn't. That's actually Carney's job. It's a federal responsibility not an Alberta responsibility. But long before smith got involved in the discussion carney deliberately entered into negotiations with Alberta and even brought in Saskatchewan that has absolutely nothing to do with it and left the first nations out in the cold. When they complained he basically said why would I invite you? You couldn't pee them off more if you slap them

47 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Word has it that he just in to prop BN share price then get out when the goings good.

Well there's a lot of reasons why it benefits him to pretend there's a pipeline and then not actually deliver.

[LinkSoul60]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

This has been posted here a hundred times at least a dozen by me

. Enbridge came out and very clearly stated that they had money to invest but they would not be putting it into Canada under the regulatory environment that we have right now. They said that the no tanker ban means they won't even begin to look at the possibility. And that they would be putting their money in the united states for pipelines there.

As I have told you many times if you feel the need to lie to make your point then you haven't got a very good point. Let's not pretend ignorance. At least I hope you're pretending

I understand that but like I said, Smith has a lot of work to do before it comes back to the federal government. FN's partnerships, BC partnership, a route, and having it tie into the pathways project.

 

20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well there's a lot of reasons why it benefits him to pretend there's a pipeline and then not actually deliver.

It's best case scenario. Go through the motions so people can find out it would be much easier and quicker to expand TMX.  

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I understand that but like I said, Smith has a lot of work to do before it comes back to the federal government. FN's partnerships, BC partnership, a route, and having it tie into the pathways project.

No everything you just mentioned is federal. about the only thing will be the route and even that's largely federal. 

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It's best case scenario. Go through the motions so people can find out it would be much easier and quicker to expand TMX.  

That's the most ridiculous statement to date

[eyeball]

8 hours ago, Goddess said:

Not bullshit.

I heard him speak extensively on this many times.  His platform was to do away with lobbyists and have them go directly to the people and lobby the citizens.

Then why did he and his staff get together with lobbyists privately between the time he spoke extensively and the election he lost?

8 hours ago, Goddess said:

He's not in power, dipsh!t.  Pretty much stuck with this system until he gets in and change it.  Which he promised to do.

There's nothing at all in the system that mandates he has to meet in private with lobbyists.

8 hours ago, Goddess said:

WTF are you talking about.

You said Polievre did not expand on his plan to eliminate lobbyists and force them to plead their case directly to citizens.

Then why did he keep meeting with them?

8 hours ago, Goddess said:

I'm saying he did.  He spoke about it at nearly every rally.  He did interviews where he talked about it.

While meeting with lobbyists anyways. Almost 100 of them.

8 hours ago, Goddess said:

OBVIOUSLY.....that platform could not be implemented because you m0r0ns voted in the Liberals.  AGAIN.

See?  This is why so many of us think you're full of crap.

You say you want lobyists done away with - the Conservatives run on THAT VERY POLICY........and you vote for the Liberals.

LMAO! Not me.

Meanwhile Poilievre says he wants to make lobbyists obsolete because they're useless then promptly meets with them. Many multiple times.

Go look it up yourself. They have to register the fact they met.

[eyeball]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Sure.  But that doesn't change the fact she's a millionaire on paper only

Sure, just like most of the economy is little more than pie in the sky.

[eyeball]

8 hours ago, I am Groot said:

F*ck that. This is a complete bullshit narrative. I hate how the Liberals get congratulated for not f*cking up as much as Trump.

Yeah, I can see it really gets under your skin alright.

You take partisanship way way WAY to personally.

[Barquentine]

20 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Now.  If she were to borrow money on that property to buy another property she would now still have to have a mortgage on both properties. If you do the math, she would not be albe to rent out the second property in MOST cases for enough to cover the mortgages these days, she'd fall a little short. 

Sorry for your cherry-picked 'old lady'.

You're trying to say no one makes money off of real estate? You're dumb as a stump! Oh wait. Sorry, I didn't mean as dumb as a stump. Dumber!

No one buys and owns real estate as an investment? No one borrows against that collateral to invest and make more money?

Stump - 1 : Cdnfxx - 0

You choked and it was a shameful performance!

[LinkSoul60]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No everything you just mentioned is federal. about the only thing will be the route and even that's largely federal. 

You're lazy.  Read the MOU. 

 

[LinkSoul60]

15 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Sorry for your cherry-picked 'old lady'.

You're trying to say no one makes money off of real estate? You're dumb as a stump! Oh wait. Sorry, I didn't mean as dumb as a stump. Dumber!

No one buys and owns real estate as an investment? No one borrows against that collateral to invest and make more money?

Stump - 1 : Cdnfxx - 0

You choked and it was a shameful performance!

Comparing Cdnfxx to a stump is an insult to stumps everywhere.

[Goddess]

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

Then why did he and his staff get together with lobbyists privately between the time he spoke extensively and the election he lost?

I answered this already.

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

While meeting with lobbyists anyways. Almost 100 of them.

I'm getting really tired of you just saying things with no cites.  But in this case, ti doesn't really matter, since he holds no power to change the system.

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

Meanwhile Poilievre says he wants to make lobbyists obsolete because they're useless then promptly meets with them. Many multiple times.

I answered this already.  He is not in power.  He's stuck with a system he has no power over.  He says that if he was PM, he would make lobbyists plead their cases directly to the people.  He spoke on this many times.

I don't think it's fair to hold him accountable for things he promised to do when he gets to be PM, at a time when he does not have the power to change anything.

If he ever gets elected as PM, if he does not do what he promised to do, I will be holding him to account the same as I hold the Liberals to account.  

For now, he doesn't have the power to change the system.

[I am Groot]

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

Yeah, I can see it really gets under your skin alright.

You take partisanship way way WAY to personally.

Don't mistake judgment for partisanship. Was anything I wrote incorrect?  I can't believe Ford got re-elected after that debacle either. People died because people like Ford and Trudeau weren't up to the job.

 

[I am Groot]

15 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yeah, just like tariffs have a big impact on what can be exported.  Maybe try thinking twice, talking once...?

I don't find you crying in your sleep conservatives irritating... more comical and hopeless than anything.  

So no specifics. Just you talking out of your ass again, desperate to pump up the narrative of Carney as economic genius.

15 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yes, a very handy excuse/reason given the tariffs he's put onto lumber, steel/aluminum and auto.  Maybe ask the people who lost jobs because of those protectionist action if it was an excuse.

Use your head man....

So once again, dodging the points. We were in trouble in every economic area before Trump got elected. The cause? Your beloved Liberal party.

[LinkSoul60]

19 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

So no specifics. Just you talking out of your ass again, desperate to pump up the narrative of Carney as economic genius.

This information isn't hard to find....  I'm surprised (?) you have no idea what's going on with tariffs.  And now that you bring it up... not sure if genius is there right word.  A 'Highly qualified economist' would be a more appropriate phrasing.

23 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

So once again, dodging the points. We were in trouble in every economic area before Trump got elected. The cause? Your beloved Liberal party.

Well maybe I'm not surprised that you don't understand the impact that tariffs have had on some sectors.  Rather than searching for useless articles on immigration maybe try looking for something that's applicable to today's economic challenges.  Just a thought....