What The Liberals Did To Canada

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, I am Groot said:

Another Liberal party recession is upon us - aided by Trump.

The EDC points out that beyond this year’s poor GDP numbers, in the medium-term Canada will continue to be held back by low productivity, which is the result of lagging investment. C.D. Howe Institute economists noted recently in FP Comment that in Q2 2025, machinery and equipment investment per worker in Canada was less than one-third of what it was in the U.S., and new investment “is falling short of depreciation and population growth, so the stock per worker is falling.” A decade of bad tax policy, expanding regulation, and unchecked government spending will do that.

 

https://archive.is/q7L1P

And it's getting worse. Productivity was already in the crapper for the last half decade and now it's just going to nose dive. And we can't make more money as employees with poor productivity, it just doesn't work that way.

[taxme]

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You're an uneducated fool.  Stay indoors with the curtains closed so the liberals don't find you.

Why? Because i do not go along with your leftwing lieberal Marxist bullshit and lies? The nonsense you peddle here says and shows to me that i am the well educated one here and not you, dummy. I think that you should be the one that stays indoors because you appear to be an uneducated buffoon who probably hurts yourself every time you go out. Just saying. LOLOLOL.

[Goddess]

On 10/16/2025 at 8:58 PM, Shady said:

Yikes.  It’s like they did pretty much everything they could do to f**k up Canada.  It’s almost like that was their goal or something.

This is the point that I'm at, too.

There's been sooooo much damage done to our country at every level - healthcare, immigration, the justice system, housing, the economy, the covid over-reaction, scandal after scandal after scandal - it's too much to be just chalked up to simple incompetence.

It has to be deliberate.

And the gaslighting - MSM relays the Liberal government's mantra that "Everything is great!"  "Canada is doing better than ever!"  If I heard "Triple A credit rating!" one more time, I'm gonna stab myself in the throat.  All that tells the Liberals is that they can continue borrowing and printing money.

For the last 5+ years, I feel like I'm living in bizarro world.

19 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Productivity was already in the crapper for the last half decade and now it's just going to nose dive.

Like they say, a country falls in the same way a person goes bankrupt - slowly and then all at once.

[Goddess]

I watched the Liberal press conference the other day about forking over $283 million to fix a Toronto sewer line.

Feds announce $283M for Toronto sewer upgrades in Black Creek | CBC News

 

This is how low the Liberals are setting the bar for government competence and most Canadians will clap like seals for this.  They want applause and accolades FOR DOING THEIR DAMN JOBS!

Your job is literally maintaining Canada's infrastructure by using OUR tax dollars.  That money doesn't come from the Liberal gov't.  The gov't has no money.  It's YOUR money.

 

[Venandi]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

It has to be deliberate.

And the gaslighting - MSM relays the Liberal government's mantra that "Everything is great!"

I think so too, it can't be by accident.

Sometimes looking at dramatic fail points speaks to the motivation (or possible motivation) behind what appears (at first glance) to be madness.

Policing is an example of what I mean.  No sensible person defunds police, increases felony theft amounts and legislates easy bail conditions without realizing the consequence of doing so... especially when all of those things are done at the same time.

It was deliberate (especially in the US) and the question is why? 

IMO again, it's an effort to make things so bad that federalizing municipal police (and intelligence services) under one umbrella with loyalty and tasking priorities under the purview of a centralized federal authority becomes seen as something to applaud. A victory of sorts for the common man who would never (and I mean N E V E R) have supported the idea otherwise. You had to scare him into it.

The fun part is that this particular strategy requires a concerted effort to control short term election outcomes for a period that's long enough to reap the benefits that comes with it. We certainly saw that in spades with the democrats... I think Trump came as an unwelcome surprise and I laugh every time I see him capitalizing on what the democrats worked hard at inventing.

In any case, the end state is the amalgamation of government, media and security forces (which includes intelligence) under one cohesive umbrella.

I call it the unholy trinity.

Legitimate refugees should be extensively interviewed in a public forum for all to see, they know the pattern... that's why they're here. Ironically, liberals and democrats expect them to be on their side and support what (and how) they're doing things. That's usually not the case though, same thing with veterans who served in the locations where legitimate refugees typically hail from.

It's kind of fun to watch and overall it speaks to the notion that knowing what you don't want is every bit as important as thinking you know what you might maybe want.

Dictators for life have the benefit of time and political parties don't. The mighty see-saw can easily get out of phase with what either party initially planned... Trump was unplanned and progressives should have known better than to risk it.

Conservatives are celebrating now and progressives are screaming Hitler. In the fullness of time the see-saw will have its way with both groups in turn and the reversal of fortunes (at least in my household) will be measured in popcorn consumption.

 

Edited October 18, 2025 by Venandi

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, Venandi said:

I think so too, it can't be by accident. Sometimes looking at dramatic fail points speaks to the motivation (or possible motivation) behind what appears (at first glance) to be madness.

The biggest fail point I see is orchestrating mass immigration with little to no vetting of who is coming in.

India warned Canada that we were letting in massive amounts of criminals.

Just fixing this problem would go a long way to getting a handle on every other problem - healthcare, housing, the economy, skyrocketing crime.

I believe this was done deliberately.  I have my theories on WHY it was done.  We all do.

It CANNOT be incompetence.  Nobody who owns a 3-bedroom house would invite 200 people to live in it with your family, for free.  Your house would be destroyed, your finances even worse.  Your neighborhood would suffer.

That's common sense and we all have it.  Except Liberal voters.  They've applauded this and voted for it, every step of the way and show zero signs of coming to their senses.

Carney is still on a spending spree, actually even worse that Trudeau was.  Where is that money going to come from?  The middle class in Canada has been devastated.  They will come next for upper middle class and lower wealthy - anyone who still has assets or money in a savings account.  Remember Freeland musing in a press conference about how Canadians had too much money in savings and the gov't had to find a way to unlock it?  They did it with Capital Gains and the Liberal party commissioned studies in the last few years on how much money they could get from Canadian's home equity.

Next, they will be coming after the ones who voted for them because they had enough assets to not be affected by the economic and housing upheavals.

Mark my words.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Venandi said:

I think so too, it can't be by accident.

Sometimes looking at dramatic fail points speaks to the motivation (or possible motivation) behind what appears (at first glance) to be madness.

Policing is an example of what I mean.  No sensible person defunds police, increases felony theft amounts and legislates easy bail conditions without realizing the consequence of doing so... especially when all of those things are done at the same time.

It was deliberate (especially in the US) and the question is why? 

IMO again, it's an effort to make things so bad that federalizing municipal police (and intelligence services) under one umbrella with loyalty and tasking priorities under the purview of a centralized federal authority becomes seen as something to applaud. A victory of sorts for the common man who would never (and I mean N E V E R) have supported the idea otherwise. You had to scare him into it.

The fun part is that this particular strategy requires a concerted effort to control short term election outcomes for a period that's long enough to reap the benefits that comes with it. We certainly saw that in spades with the democrats... I think Trump came as an unwelcome surprise and I laugh every time I see him capitalizing on what the democrats worked hard at inventing.

In any case, the end state is the amalgamation of government, media and security forces (which includes intelligence) under one cohesive umbrella.

I call it the unholy trinity.

Legitimate refugees should be extensively interviewed in a public forum for all to see, they know the pattern... that's why they're here. Ironically, liberals and democrats expect them to be on their side and support what (and how) they're doing things. That's usually not the case though, same thing with veterans who served in the locations where legitimate refugees typically hail from.

It's kind of fun to watch and overall it speaks to the notion that knowing what you don't want is every bit as important as thinking you know what you might maybe want.

Dictators for life have the benefit of time and political parties don't. The mighty see-saw can easily get out of phase with what either party initially planned... Trump was unplanned and progressives should have known better than to risk it.

Conservatives are celebrating now and progressives are screaming Hitler. In the fullness of time the see-saw will have its way with both groups in turn and the reversal of fortunes (at least in my household) will be measured in popcorn consumption.

 

 

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

The biggest fail point I see is orchestrating mass immigration with little to no vetting of who is coming in.

India warned Canada that we were letting in massive amounts of criminals.

Just fixing this problem would go a long way to getting a handle on every other problem - healthcare, housing, the economy, skyrocketing crime.

I believe this was done deliberately.  I have my theories on WHY it was done.  We all do.

It CANNOT be incompetence.  Nobody who owns a 3-bedroom house would invite 200 people to live in it with your family, for free.  Your house would be destroyed, your finances even worse.  Your neighborhood would suffer.

That's common sense and we all have it.  Except Liberal voters.  They've applauded this and voted for it, every step of the way and show zero signs of coming to their senses.

Carney is still on a spending spree, actually even worse that Trudeau was.  Where is that money going to come from?  The middle class in Canada has been devastated.  They will come next for upper middle class and lower wealthy - anyone who still has assets or money in a savings account.  Remember Freeland musing in a press conference about how Canadians had too much money in savings and the gov't had to find a way to unlock it?  They did it with Capital Gains and the Liberal party commissioned studies in the last few years on how much money they could get from Canadian's home equity.

Next, they will be coming after the ones who voted for them because they had enough assets to not be affected by the economic and housing upheavals.

Mark my words.

I think you two have some excellent points.  but i think you're missing a very important one.  

There doesn't need to be malice to drive the country into the ground,  a car is going to crash if the driver stops driving whether he wants it to or not. 

I think the problem is the liberals are entirely focused on milking the system to put massive amounts of money into their own pockets. I think the only thought they give to the economy is that it has to be strong enough to provide the billions they funnel into special interest groups, international charities, consultants and businesses all of which will provide them with vast wealth when they're out of office,  and also spending hundreds of millions in taxpayer money on their own perks and benefits while in office and to make connections for when they leave ,

I think they just stopped driving the economic car, and if it crashed oh well, as long as it was still strong enough to pay for justin's 1000 dollars a plate airline food etc  

I think the only time they bothered with policy was the minimum they had to do to avoid being thrown out. 

 

In other words, they're more like vampires than overlords - they want to keep the country barely alive and not fighting back so they can enjoy their meal ticket.  I'm sure they wouldn't be mad if we were more successful, they're just not prepared to put any energy into making that happen. 

[Goddess]

15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

There doesn't need to be malice to drive the country into the ground,

I agree with you to an extent.

But these people have power and they are paid handsomely to, in many cases, make life and death decisions for Canadians.  Canada's politicians are the second highest paid on the planet, second only to Singapore.

Malice does not have to imply intent.  It can also be inferred by willful negligence and disregard for others' rights and safety.

In law, when negligence is so egregious that it shows a conscious indifference to consequences, courts may infer a malicious mindset.

You are more generous in your assessment of them than I am.

I do agree that they have no intentions to govern Canada to success and are only in it to line their own pockets.  Everything they do is nothing but virtue-signaling. Like holding a press conference to announce they are fixing a sewer line.

[Goddess]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

they are paid handsomely to, in many cases, make life and death decisions for Canadians.

Eby has recently come out and admitted the "safe supply" experiment was a mistake.

The devastation and deaths to Canadian families from that decision alone.....there needs to be accountability.

But the Canadian public has always been apathetic to holding our very-highly-paid politicians accountable for policies that everyone knew were going to have bad, or even horrific, outcomes.

Look at the extreme case of the vapors all the Liberals have right now because Polievre dared to say that Trudeau should be in jail for some of his scandals and that the RCMP helped cover them up.

He's not wrong.  He's absolutely correct.

Democracy Watch is still fighting to bring the SNC Lavalin case to justice. In fact, they were successful in getting the documentation released that Trudeau tried to prevent and the RCMP could have gotten, but refused to try. Most Canadians don't know that the RCMP Commissioner is appointed by the Prime Minister and serves at his pleasure. Their job security is dependent on pleasing the PM. In this case, Duheme had only been appointed as INTERIM commissioner, so his job security was doubly in jeopardy if he chose to charge Trudeau. 

Democracy Watch forwarded all the documents to media outlets and offered interviews and they were roundly ignored by MSM.  Only APTN has done stories on it.

Edited October 18, 2025 by Goddess

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

For the last 5+ years, I feel like I'm living in bizarro world.

It's been like this since at least 9/11, that's when the loony tunes really got underway.

But even before that you could see signs of the impending right-wing melt down that's been setting much of the world on fire these days. 

[blackbird]

22 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Eby has recently come out and admitted the "safe supply" experiment was a mistake.

That should be investigated by the RCMP and a public enquiry.

[eyeball]

52 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I think the problem is the liberals are entirely focused on milking the system to put massive amounts of money into their own pockets.

I thought Stephen Harper fixed this.

Conservatives have been in power plenty of times over the decades and decades to do something about this. There's no excuse for this still being an issue.

[eyeball]

38 minutes ago, Goddess said:

He's not wrong.  He's absolutely correct.

Sure he is but transparency and accountability are so yesterday these days, even amongst Conservatives. They're probably just really embarrassed at how ineffectual they've been at doing anything about it is my guess so sweep it under the rug...It's how Ottawa rolls.

Top aide to former PM Harper rips Poilievre’s comments about RCMP and Trudeau

 

[CdnFox]

16 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I thought Stephen Harper fixed this.

 

He did. But the libs broke it again. For some reason you keep supporting them even though that's the simple truth

17 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Conservatives have been in power plenty of times over the decades and decades to do something about this.

They did. Liberals keep changing it back. And you keep voting and supporting them so why wouldn't they

[Goddess]

30 minutes ago, eyeball said:

But even before that you could see signs of the impending right-wing melt down that's been setting much of the world on fire these days. 

It's been far-left governments running the show for at least 10 years.  Some countries are getting rid of them - the US, Italy, etc.

I think Canada and the UK have nearly have enough of far-left fire setting, starting to fight back.  We'll see......

[eyeball]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Liberals keep changing it back.

Like I said Conservatives suck at accountability and transparency whether they're trying to get away with something or do anything about it.

Anyway, now is Poilievre's chance to out-do Stephan Harper and produce what he tried and failed to do - a foolproof Transparency and Accountability Act that even voters can't change.

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

now is Poilievre's chance to out-do Stephan Harper and produce what he tried and failed to do - a foolproof Transparency and Accountability Act that even voters can't change.

I saw an interview with Conservative MP Garnet Genuis just before the last election and he said they already had legislation drafted for this, but you guys all voted for more of the same unaccountability from the Liberals, because orangemanbad.

[eyeball]

16 minutes ago, Goddess said:

It's been far-left governments running the show for at least 10 years.

You're saying it's finally pushed you people off the deep end?

22 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Some countries are getting rid of them - the US, Italy, etc.

I think Canada and the UK have nearly have enough of far-left fire setting, starting to fight back.  We'll see......

I think people are looking at that Shining Beacon for your right-wing alternative to the south of us and backing away slowly.

It pretty clear it's why Poilievre wasn't elected.

Mostly though it's because the right-wing alternative these days embraces the craziest moonbats in political and ideological history - it's a veritable Freaker's Ball under that Big Ol' Tent and people are more wary of it.

[eyeball]

18 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I saw an interview with Conservative MP Garnet Genuis just before the last election and he said they already had legislation drafted for this, but you guys all voted for more of the same unaccountability from the Liberals, because orangemanbad.

Don't give me that shit lady. You know full well I've been a staunch advocate for having Trudeau charged with interfering with justice.

And I'll also have you know I voted for the Khmer Orange.

[Goddess]

3 hours ago, Venandi said:

The mighty see-saw can easily get out of phase with what either party initially planned.

 

3 hours ago, Venandi said:

In the fullness of time the see-saw will have its way with both groups in turn

I think, in general, it's good that Canada has 3 main political parties, unlike the US's 2.

Yes, about the see-saw.  But it can also bring balance to a party that's going off the rails and taking the country down with it.  The NDP should be the party that balances out both the other ones, whichever one is in power. 

They didn't do that with Trudeau.  They cheered him on and helped him steer us off the cliff.

I had an NDP guy come to my door before the last election and he asked if they could count on my support and I couldn't help it but I laughed and said, "Fuque, NO!"  He didn't say anything, just walked away.

I did feel a little bad, but my reaction was totally gut instinct.

[Goddess]

4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You're saying it's finally pushed you people off the deep end?

Not us.  You.  

Tampons in men's bathrooms, dude.  

You guys went too far.  Most people just want to be left alone.  But you had to call them racists, bigots, Nazi's, fascists.  It wasn't good enough that most people don't care about sexual or gender orientation, you had to force people to actively participate in and loudly voice approval for increasingly far-left ideologies.

People just wanted to be left alone.

[Goddess]

6 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Don't give me that shit lady. You know full well I've been a staunch advocate for having Trudeau charged with interfering with justice.

And I'll also have you know I voted for the Khmer Orange.

Baloney. 🙄

You're here every day either actively supporting or making excuses for Liberal ideologies.

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Don't give me that shit lady.

Did you just assume my gender?

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Tampons in men's bathrooms, dude. 

A commie under every bed isn't enough but a tampon dispenser is too much.

LMAO!

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Baloney. 🙄

You're here every day either actively supporting or making excuses for Liberal ideologies.

No I'm not. I'm just mocking and not accepting your lame assed ridiculous criticisms of left wing ideologies. You need to do better if you expect people to have any respect for the political parties, politicians and ideals you support.

People like you are almost entirely why I don't.

If all you can say is baloney to everything I've said around here for years about throwing Trudeau in jail it's because you've been driven bonkers by your haywire assumptions about what it means to be left wing.

7 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Did you just assume my gender?

Is that you in drag in your avatar?

That's me gaffing a fish aboard my boat back in the day just in case you were wondering.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

all you can say is baloney to everything I've said

Do you prefer......"Horseshit"?

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

just in case you were wondering.

I wasn't.