Trump to sign executive order to require voter ID

[Legato]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It is.  A direct hit.

?! Come on sunshine you couldn't hit a barn side with a 4 bore at 10 yards.

The ducks and elephants are all laughing.

Try a punt gun but don't lose the paddle.

[LinkSoul60]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

?! Come on sunshine you couldn't hit a barn side with a 4 bore at 10 yards.

The ducks and elephants are all laughing.

Try a punt gun but don't lose the paddle.

And you're the little duck on the pond....

If you're capable, try talking as most people do and not always in half riddles. 

[Legato]

2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

And you're the little duck on the pond....

If you're capable, try talking as most people do and not always in half riddles. 

You are the only one butterscotch.

[herbie]

Are you truly going to tell me that in the USA people can vote without proper ID (driver license, birth certificate, passport, naturalization card)?
Or is this a scam so only those on a pre-compiled list made by politicos can 'qualify' to vote?

All we do is check a box on our tax return and we're on the list. And still must show 2 pcs of ID. If we're not on the list and have ID that provers your identity and citizenship you can still vote

[LinkSoul60]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

You are the only one butterscotch.

Sunshine, Butterscotch....   Pet feminine names that you're partial to?

[robosmith]

30 minutes ago, herbie said:

Are you truly going to tell me that in the USA people can vote without proper ID (driver license, birth certificate, passport, naturalization card)?
Or is this a scam so only those on a pre-compiled list made by politicos can 'qualify' to vote?

All we do is check a box on our tax return and we're on the list. And still must show 2 pcs of ID. If we're not on the list and have ID that provers your identity and citizenship you can still vote

We provide ID with signature to REGISTER to vote. Signatures are compared with registration when voting.

Right wingers don't understand how that is secure and just spread conspiracy theories to justify their VOTER SUPPRESSION.

[herbie]

We're well aware that most of what's going on down there are different methods of voter suppression.

What I was asking is at the polling place, you must show proper ID to be handed a ballot, right?
Ans if you're not on the list - are you denied your right to vote?

Plus, how do people in the hospital or invalid in a care home, a remote location, or in jail get to vote? All I know about the process is you're supposed to register a Party affiliation when you register which is total anti-democratic bullshit for a supposed secret ballot.

Edited September 2, 2025 by herbie

[Nationalist]

32 minutes ago, herbie said:

We're well aware that most of what's going on down there are different methods of voter suppression.

Who is "we"?

I know proper ID is necessary to vote.

[herbie]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Who is "we"?

Anyone in the real world other than MAGA USA.

[Nationalist]

9 minutes ago, herbie said:

Anyone in the real world other than MAGA USA.

Ahhh...of course...you limp Libbies.

Got it.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Legato said:

You are the only one butterscotch.

I was going to write "he's never going to get any of that" ,  but i see he took the time to prove it first  

I'm sure this is a younger kid. He doesn't get any references that an adult would. 

[CdnFox]

14 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Ahhh...of course...you limp Libbies.

Got it.

LOL  Who else?

Lefties have a weird language tick, if they hear a word that they realize people think is 'bad' then they use it for anything they don't like.  

That's why everything's racist, everything's genocide, etc etc. 

So any attempt to make elections more fair is 'voter suppression', because they've heard that's bad. 

What it really is would be "illegal vote suppression",  but they don't want to talk about that. 

they freely admit that more mail in ballots benefits the dems, and the obvious reason is it's easy to commit fraud. But it's NOT unfair to increase mail ins, but it IS unfair to benefit the republicans by allowing less 🙄🙄🙄

It's just getting so predictable that even democrat voters aren't buying it, with 68 percent apparently backing these provisions. 

[Moonlight Graham]

15 hours ago, robosmith said:

The POTUS has NO AUTHORITY over how states manage ELECTIONS. LMAO

Separation of powers FTW.

I agree with ID requirements in theory.  But I don't think Trump is doing this for the right reasons.

[robosmith]

16 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Who is "we"?

I know proper ID is necessary to vote.

In many states including CA, it is necessary TO REGISTER. After that, signature match is all that's necessary.

Since you have never been a poll worker, you have no idea how strong that security is.

And Canada doesn't have the LONG HISTORY of VOTER SUPRRESSION that we do, esp in the South.

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Separation of powers FTW.

I agree with ID requirements in theory.  But I don't think Trump is doing this for the right reasons.

RepuliCONS have always favored voter ID for the purposes of VOTER SUPPRESSION, since blacks are less likely to have ID and that's who they don't want voting.

[Nationalist]

16 minutes ago, robosmith said:

In many states including CA, it is necessary TO REGISTER. After that, signature match is all that's necessary.

Since you have never been a poll worker, you have no idea how strong that security is.

And Canada doesn't have the LONG HISTORY of VOTER SUPRRESSION that we do, esp in the South.

Sweetie...one has to actually check the signatures...which i understand they often do not.

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Sweetie...one has to actually check the signatures...which i understand they often do not.

YOU KNOW NOTHING about it, which is WHY you NEVER POST EVIDENCE.

[CdnFox]

21 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And Canada doesn't have the LONG HISTORY of VOTER SUPRRESSION that we do, esp in the South.

And yet we have the same laws being proposed and nobody's suppressed. 

Maybe you meant to say we don't have the long history of lying about voter suppression that you do.   

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

YOU KNOW NOTHING about it, which is WHY you NEVER POST EVIDENCE.

He knows more than you. I guess that means you know LESS than nothing   

[Nationalist]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

YOU KNOW NOTHING about it, which is WHY you NEVER POST EVIDENCE.

Ok.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-10-28/2020-election-voter-signature-verification

Mail-in ballots are problematic and should be eliminated. 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Ok.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-10-28/2020-election-voter-signature-verification

Mail-in ballots are problematic and should be eliminated. 

Even as we speak, his neighbours are wondering where the sound of grinding teeth is coming from  

Of course he'll be back in a moment to screech that your facts don't count because they're....  not... well... they're.... er...  BAD! BAD FACTS!! GO TO YOUR ROOM!!!

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Even as we speak, his neighbours are wondering where the sound of grinding teeth is coming from  

Of course he'll be back in a moment to screech that your facts don't count because they're....  not... well... they're.... er...  BAD! BAD FACTS!! GO TO YOUR ROOM!!!

Of course. The boy? Girl? Whatever...is a zombie. 

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ok.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-10-28/2020-election-voter-signature-verification

Mail-in ballots are problematic and should be eliminated. 

Per YOUR CITE:

Quote

President Trump has repeatedly asserted, with no evidence, that mail-in voting is rife with fraud.

Thanks for verifying what I SAID.

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Of course. The boy? Girl? Whatever...is a zombie. 

YOU and CdnLIAR are LYING.

[CdnFox]

58 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Per YOUR CITE:

Thanks for verifying what I SAID.

YOU and CdnLIAR are LYING.

No, you didn't read it. 

The fact that trump can say that and nobody can refute it is proof it's problematic. 

There doesn't have to be fraud, there just has to be no faith there isn't. 

I realize that basic english and math is hard for you, but if voters can't have faith in the results then democracy starts to fall apart and that's where america is right now. 

So.  Job one is to make it so hard to cheat that nobody believes it happened. That means getting rid of mail in ballots. 

 

Also stop crying. We're going to have to get you a bib if that keeps up

Edited September 3, 2025 by CdnFox

[Nationalist]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, you didn't read it. 

The fact that trump can say that and nobody can refute it is proof it's problematic. 

There doesn't have to be fraud, there just has to be no faith there isn't. 

I realize that basic english and math is hard for you, but if voters can't have faith in the results then democracy starts to fall apart and that's where america is right now. 

So.  Job one is to make it so hard to cheat that nobody believes it happened. That means getting rid of mail in ballots. 

 

Also stop crying. We're going to have to get you a bib if that keeps up

PLUS...

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/partner_surveys/one_in_five_mail_in_voters_admit_they_cheated_in_2020_election

So yes @robosmith, mail-in voting is rife with fraud.

[CdnFox]

15 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

PLUS...

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/partner_surveys/one_in_five_mail_in_voters_admit_they_cheated_in_2020_election

So yes @robosmith, mail-in voting is rife with fraud.

Yeah, the evidence is pretty overwhelming that if there is fraud it can be done without being detected, so there either is or they might very well be and in either case it's death to democracy.