Shooting in a Christian School in the US. Whether or not it will be Highly Publicized is Yet to be Determined (ie, the shooter's political status)

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I don't remember specifics of shootings the last few years but any facts I can find say there isn't a 'trans shooter' problem. That's just political rhetoric....

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/most-mass-school-shootings-are-not-carried-out-by-transgender-people-2024-09-06/

A lot of other links and all similar...

The link only says that not all shootings were transgender. But it says the 2% of the school shootings were transgender which is certainly disproportionately large or the transgender population. As you can see here in no state does the transgender population even reach 1%. So it is fair to say that transgenders are disproportionately attacking schools

What Percentage of the Population is Transgender in 2025?

Whether or not the shootings were a result of them being transgender is not examined. And commonality is not causality.

But there is evidence enough to say that there appears to be a disproportionately large number of transgender shooters at schools.

[Venandi]

2 hours ago, Boges said:

Ultimately the problem is private ownership of semi-automatic weapons.

After reviewing some of the previous posts I’ve come to the conclusion that I’m not going to change any minds here so I’ll just leave you with a final thought.

From what I’ve seen of the world, the weapon used has never qualified as the problem’s cause nor the absence of it the problem’s solution.

I think it would be great if we could eliminate suicide bombers by banning back packs and baggy clothes and car bombs by banning cars, agricultural fertilizer, fuel oil, Russian mines, analogue alarm clocks, electrical wire etc. I’d even add Donkey borne IEDs (DBIED) to the mix by banning donkeys… ya, it actually is a thing but I don’t think the delivery mechanism (in this case a donkey) addresses any of the underlying issues and we'd be moving on to dogs after the last donkey was eaten.

Regulations limiting authority to possess, transport, and carry don’t seem to be working well in Toronto… neither do magazine capacity restrictions or lifetime ownership bans, we seem to be killing a bunch of people pretending they do though.

In this particular scenario I think banning guns in the US (a logistic challenge if ever there was one) would be every bit as effective as banning catholics, children, churches, or trans people…. it’s all a bit more complicated than that. If it wasn’t we would have done it “over there,” it would have worked, and we’d have been home in time for Christmas.

I’m rooting for ya though….

Edited August 28, 2025 by Venandi

[Venandi]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Maybe you got a better one that YOU FORGOT TO POST.

How about one of your's:

^Pure DRIVEL.

Birds of a feather share DELUSIONS together…

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ya except, you can scream, howl, or try to reason. Nothing will change the American desire for firearms. 

 

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Uh...if they were outlawed, of course the proliferation of them declined.

Gawd are you stoopid.

You're SO STUPID you don't even know when you've BEEN PROVEN WRONG.

Making them illegal DID CHANGE "the American desire for firearms." Duh

Edited August 28, 2025 by robosmith

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

 

You're SO STUPID you don't even know when you've BEEN PROVEN WRONG.

Making them illegal DID CHANGE "the American desire for firearms." Duh

It didn't.  

You are still riding the shorter short bus i see 

[User]

53 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I don't remember specifics of shootings the last few years but any facts I can find say there isn't a 'trans shooter' problem. That's just political rhetoric....

Notice the subtle deception here. The argument was not that there was a "trans shooter problem" it was merely the observation that there are more trans shootings now, or specifically, it is growing alarmingly high. 

At its core, this is just a factual observation, but instead, LinkSoul60 wants to play dishonest games and try to argue against the subjective nature of calling it a problem. 

Well, gee... I guess your big point is that you don't think its a problem that trans people are engaged in mass shootings?!

[WestCanMan]

20 hours ago, Shady said:

How do you determine whether someone is mentally ill before they act out?

Political leanings.

If the shooter was conservative then they were clear-headed messengers of the evil faith, but if they were leftists or allakaboomers then they hit their head

[herbie]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

There is no problem with gun culture. It's the a$$holes wielding the guns that's the problem - like the a$$hole in the OP.

The guy claims there's no problem then points out exactly what the problem is. Too f*cking blind to see they're hand in hand.
Yet another typical Americanism.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

The link only says that not all shootings were transgender. But it says the 2% of the school shootings were transgender which is certainly disproportionately large or the transgender population. As you can see here in no state does the transgender population even reach 1%. So it is fair to say that transgenders are disproportionately attacking schools

What Percentage of the Population is Transgender in 2025?

Whether or not the shootings were a result of them being transgender is not examined. And commonality is not causality.

But there is evidence enough to say that there appears to be a disproportionately large number of transgender shooters at schools.

Transgenders are still lightweights compared to allakabomers. The trans are only doubling their expected rate of killings.

Allakaboomers make up less than 2% of the population and are responsible for at least 50% of what we'd call "terrorist attacks" (the layman's definition is a mass-killing event for political/religious reasons, not just really obnoxious graffiti or the yelling of some profanities and slurs).

6 minutes ago, herbie said:

Yet another typical Americanism.

OK, typical left4rd cultist. Thanks for whatever that was. 

[herbie]

Cuz only leftists have enough brains not to allow crazy people guns.

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, herbie said:

Cuz only leftists have enough brains not to allow crazy people guns.

Like was said earlier, some of the biggest terrorist attacks involved fertilizer and diesel, trucks, vans, knives, etc. Gun attacks are actually quite small on average, by comparison to the others.  

Gun events are sexy for you guys, because disarming innocent people is fun for you, but people have shown over and over again that preventing people from having guns doesn't prevent them from racking up large body counts. 

And FYI recent gun events in the US include no less than 3 leftists who were programmed by the Dems and their CNN/MSNBC cultist-handlers to shoot conservatives (Scalise and all the GOP congressmen at a baseball game, plus Trump and Trump), and that's not counting all the people killed at various BLM riots. 

How are the dems supposed to get people to assassinate their political rivals if all of their guns are taken away? You didn't think that one through, did you....

[Deluge]

22 minutes ago, herbie said:

The guy claims there's no problem then points out exactly what the problem is. Too f*cking blind to see they're hand in hand.
Yet another typical Americanism.

Wrong.

Another left-wing stupidism.

Guns don't aim themselves and shoot people, just like knives don't sneak up on people and stab them. It's 100% the person 100% of the time. 

You're a gun grabbing psychopath, nothing more. 

 

[herbie]

That's right dude. if you haven't had a safety course, a criminal and psych test, or keep your gun in a locked cabinet separate from your ammo, I'm gonna take it f^cking away and melt it into slag.
If I find it in your car or under your coat or loaded and laying around your own private house, I will lock you up too.
Just like how if you don't hunt and aren't a member of a gun club and want it only for 'protection' you'll not pass the course to get one in the first place.

[WestCanMan]

28 minutes ago, herbie said:

That's right dude. if you haven't had a safety course, a criminal and psych test, or keep your gun in a locked cabinet separate from your ammo, I'm gonna take it f^cking away and melt it into slag.
If I find it in your car or under your coat or loaded and laying around your own private house, I will lock you up too.
Just like how if you don't hunt and aren't a member of a gun club and want it only for 'protection' you'll not pass the course to get one in the first place.

Whoa, calm down Ayatollah DumbFock.

No one really gives a ship what you think, so you might as well not run your mouth like that. 

[User]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

That's right dude. if you haven't had a safety course, a criminal and psych test, or keep your gun in a locked cabinet separate from your ammo, I'm gonna take it f^cking away and melt it into slag.
If I find it in your car or under your coat or loaded and laying around your own private house, I will lock you up too.
Just like how if you don't hunt and aren't a member of a gun club and want it only for 'protection' you'll not pass the course to get one in the first place.

This is the American forum. You ain't gonna do crap. 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

That's right dude. if you haven't had a safety course, a criminal and psych test, or keep your gun in a locked cabinet separate from your ammo, I'm gonna take it f^cking away and melt it into slag.
If I find it in your car or under your coat or loaded and laying around your own private house, I will lock you up too.
Just like how if you don't hunt and aren't a member of a gun club and want it only for 'protection' you'll not pass the course to get one in the first place.

Pretty strong words for a diapered nanny statist. 

Come get our guns.  

[West]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Can you figure out why transsexuals might have grievances and blame the Catholic Church?

No I can't figure out why youd defend someone killing small children at church

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, herbie said:

That's right dude. If you haven't had a....... criminal and psychological test.....

Well that rules YOU out from ever owning a gun   

ANd you can take my guns anytime you want.  Just grab the barrel and pull  

[herbie]

3 hours ago, User said:

This is the American forum. You ain't gonna do crap. 

Neither are you. Thoughts and prayers, only thoughts and prayers. That's all your capable of. And criticize anyone who thinks that';s not enough as being 'against' offering prayers.

And I see I'm an Ayatollah for pretty much citing gun regs in the dummy's own country.

[CdnFox]

Just now, herbie said:

Neither are you. Thoughts and prayers, only thoughts and prayers.

Which are still two things you can't do and two more things than you're gonna do. You're such a 'tough guy' behind a keyboard. 

[User]

1 minute ago, herbie said:

Neither are you. Thoughts and prayers, only thoughts and prayers. That's all your capable of. And criticize anyone who thinks that';s not enough as being 'against' offering prayers.

And I see I'm an Ayatollah for pretty much citing gun regs in the dummy's own country.

[robosmith]

27 minutes ago, West said:

No I can't figure out why youd defend someone killing small children at church

Well, that's because I AM NOT, lDIOT.

Understanding phenomena is NOT A DEFENDING of that PHENOMENA. Duh

But, thanks for admitting you have NO UNDERSTANDING of HUMAN BEHAVIOR.

Edited August 29, 2025 by robosmith

[CdnFox]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Well, that's because I AM NOT, lDIOT.

 

But in fact you are !diot.   You are very much !diot

New 'Clue' Board Game For Liberals Just Has You Blame The Murder Weapon | Babylon Bee

[User]

38 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Understanding phenomena is NOT A DEFENDING of that PHENOMENA. Duh

You are such an awful liar. 

You were not here to "understand" this, you are here blaming and advocating against the Catholic Church. One of your first comments here:

"Or maybe we should teach everyone to love trannies to minimize their persecution and grievances."

[West]

3 hours ago, User said:

You are such an awful liar. 

You were not here to "understand" this, you are here blaming and advocating against the Catholic Church. One of your first comments here:

"Or maybe we should teach everyone to love trannies to minimize their persecution and grievances."

I guess by his logic because Christians are now targets of vile hate crimes by far left activists we are now able to take matters into our own hands