Pierre is back!

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I'm not running from anything or going anywhere.  You can go f*ck yourself though.

You already did run away. You literally asked a question and when I honestly answered with actual facts and truths instead of coping with it you had your little freak out claimed you were done and ran off to stick your head in the sand

And we've seen this from you with myself and every other poster who engages you. The moment you face a fact that you don't like you pack it up and run for the exit screening how everybody else is a terrible person.

You can't defend your thoughts so you don't try. And you're mad at everyone else as a result.

[Shady]

Maybe Pierre can fix this too.  Liberals are still dragging their feet.  The most inept government ever.

 

[LinkSoul60]

38 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You already did run away. You literally asked a question and when I honestly answered with actual facts and truths instead of coping with it you had your little freak out claimed you were done and ran off to stick your head in the sand

And we've seen this from you with myself and every other poster who engages you. The moment you face a fact that you don't like you pack it up and run for the exit screening how everybody else is a terrible person.

You can't defend your thoughts so you don't try. And you're mad at everyone else as a result.

You honestly have no idea what the f*ck you're talking about do you....   Going to where this started....I copied facts from Canadian labor sectors that was apparently BS because you know the facts better than the people that put them together. That turned into you telling me what I said, me being a kid, running with my tail between my legs, lying and living in my Mom's basement.  Then you had to jump into another conversation about Carney and Poilievre resumes which turned into left ideologies and comments of Trudeau.  I said pointless because of your inability to think critically, but then of course your childish schtick of name calling had to shine again. You're a f*cking broken record and as reliable as the sun coming up every day when it comes to the same nonsense.

You don't listen to what's said if you can't grasp it, but you tell people what they said to suit your narrative whether they did or didn't say it.  Have it, just leave me out of your conversations or replying to any of mine.

And no I'm not mad, I just think you're a little f*cking idi0t.  Have a nice day!

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Shady said:

Maybe Pierre can fix this too.  Liberals are still dragging their feet.  The most inept government ever.

 

Fixing this is simple, get rid of the 'no pipeline law' and send a clear message to the industry that you'll back any project that gets green lit 100 percent and make it happen, and at the same time go to the first nations and say "we're shortening the process, lets talk about how you're going to get full and fair consultation within that and see if we can agree in principle to some points of interest to speed things up". 

Pipeline companies WANT to build in canada they just have zero faith in the gov't.  The liberals spent 10 years destroying them wherever they could and of course they don't trust carney. 

 

[LinkSoul60]

16 minutes ago, Shady said:

Maybe Pierre can fix this too.  Liberals are still dragging their feet.  The most inept government ever.

 

Poilievre's too busy with his try to be likeable classes.  Carney's on it....

Touting ‘enormous’ LNG opportunities, Carney says Canada to unveil new port infrastructure investments within two weeks

Amid his push to strengthen energy and economic ties with Europe, Prime Minister Mark Carney revealed Tuesday that the federal government will imminently be unveiling major new investments in port infrastructure. 

“Our government is in the process of unleashing half a trillion dollars of investment in energy infrastructure, port infrastructure, particularly intelligence infrastructure, as well, with AI,” Carney said Tuesday.

Speaking alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in Berlin, the prime minister said the first of those investments will be announced “in the next two weeks” and pointed to building up the Port of Montreal and “a new port, effectively, in Churchill, Manitoba,” as examples. 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/article/touting-enormous-lng-opportunities-carney-says-canada-to-unveil-new-port-infrastructure-investments-within-two-weeks/

“Which would open up enormous LNG, plus other opportunities, and other East Coast ports for those critical minerals,” Carney said.

[WestCanMan]

Shitty thing for Pierre is that the whole narrative about how well Canada is doing under the Libs to this point has been so positive, but there are a lot of abject failures to take into account, and if Pierre gets elected PM then our MSM will suddenly start noticing how many jobs have been lost, how hard it is for homeowners to pay their mortgages, etc. 

Canada is in dire straits right now, and it's actually a good thing that it's the LPOC wearing it instead of a CPC fall guy. 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You honestly have no idea what the f*ck you're talking about do you....

You say that every time you get shown to be wrong.

Quote

   Going to where this started....I copied facts from Canadian labor sectors that was apparently BS because you know the facts better than the people that put them together.

 

I posted facts from statcan about the gdp but apperently you know better than statcan. And you didn't really copy 'facts'.

So you don't like the facts, and you have a freak out. 

Then i answer YOUR question about PP's qualification and yep another freak out. 

I listen just fine kid.  You think anyone who questions what you say "isn't listening", which is common to see in teenagers.  But it's simply wrong. 

I noted that the tech sector historically in the states and canada is  a similar size in relation to the economy. That's a simple fact. You freaked out. 

I noted that PP is far more qualified to be the top politician than carney who has NEVER done the job in his life, and you freak out. 

Then you break into tears and say you're going to go stick your head in the sand.... and magically it's my fault. 

Hey. Dipshit.  Carney isn't qualified and hes proving it.  He relies entirely on advisors and it's showing.  He's got no spine. 

And  yes we absolutely were tech heavy if you're defining it as being similar to the states in terms of percent of the economy. We're still fairly tech heavy tho it's gone down under the libs. 

And your stupidity and inability to cope with simple facts is YOUR problem, not my fault. 

Suck it up kiddo. And go change your underwear. 

 

 

4 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Poilievre's too busy with his try to be likeable classes.  Carney's on it....

 

Touting ‘enormous’ LNG opportunities, Carney says Canada to unveil new port infrastructure investments within two weeks

Amid his push to strengthen energy and economic ties with Europe, Prime Minister Mark Carney revealed Tuesday that the federal government will imminently be unveiling major new investments in port infrastructure. 

“Our government is in the process of unleashing half a trillion dollars of investment in energy infrastructure, port infrastructure, particularly intelligence infrastructure, as well, with AI,” Carney said Tuesday.

Speaking alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in Berlin, the prime minister said the first of those investments will be announced “in the next two weeks” and pointed to building up the Port of Montreal and “a new port, effectively, in Churchill, Manitoba,” as examples. 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/article/touting-enormous-lng-opportunities-carney-says-canada-to-unveil-new-port-infrastructure-investments-within-two-weeks/

“Which would open up enormous LNG, plus other opportunities, and other East Coast ports for those critical minerals,” Carney said.

LOL sure we'll see.   

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Shitty thing for Pierre is that the whole narrative about how well Canada is doing under the Libs to this point has been so positive, but there are a lot of abject failures to take into account, and if Pierre gets elected PM then our MSM will suddenly start noticing how many jobs have been lost, how hard it is for homeowners to pay their mortgages, etc. 

Canada is in dire straits right now, and it's actually a good thing that it's the LPOC wearing it instead of a CPC fall guy. 

There's truth in that.  Usually it's the conservative gov't that's got to go through the pain fixing the mistakes of the liberals and then people hate them and want the liberals back.  This time it may be carney who wears all the negatives and cuts and the cpc that winds up enjoying the benefits.

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Poilievre's too busy with his try to be likeable classes.  Carney's on it....

 

Touting ‘enormous’ LNG opportunities, Carney says Canada to unveil new port infrastructure investments within two weeks

Amid his push to strengthen energy and economic ties with Europe, Prime Minister Mark Carney revealed Tuesday that the federal government will imminently be unveiling major new investments in port infrastructure. 

“Our government is in the process of unleashing half a trillion dollars of investment in energy infrastructure, port infrastructure, particularly intelligence infrastructure, as well, with AI,” Carney said Tuesday.

Speaking alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in Berlin, the prime minister said the first of those investments will be announced “in the next two weeks” and pointed to building up the Port of Montreal and “a new port, effectively, in Churchill, Manitoba,” as examples. 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/article/touting-enormous-lng-opportunities-carney-says-canada-to-unveil-new-port-infrastructure-investments-within-two-weeks/

“Which would open up enormous LNG, plus other opportunities, and other East Coast ports for those critical minerals,” Carney said.

"A day late and a dollar short."

The LPOC should have been putting Canada first ten years ago, not trying to divide us by race, vax status, etc and committing scandals to enrich their families. 

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Now you've convinced yourself that banker and tax avoidance specialist makes somebody a great politician.

I had my doubts about someone with Carney's background being a great tax collector. OTOH maybe it takes an avoider to catch one.

In any case I made up my mind back when I pointed out his first official lie - when he said there were better alternatives to the carbon tax.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I had my doubts about someone with Carney's background being a great tax collector. OTOH maybe it takes an avoider to catch one.

 

Set a thief to catch a thief is indeed an old axiom, but the challenge is that i havent' seen any signs yet that he's going to close any of the loopholes he got rich exploiting,  and it's reasonable to be concerned that he may very well put in place some new ones quietly that he'll 'advise' people on when he leaves. 

Quote

In any case I made up my mind back when I pointed out his first official lie - when he said there were better alternatives to the carbon tax.

I don't know that he said that tho?  I think he said that the carbon tax was the best but it had become toxic and didn't have the support of the people so he'd find another way. 

In either case it's a lie tho so fair point     

[eyeball]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Set a thief to catch a thief is indeed an old axiom, but the challenge is that i havent' seen any signs yet that he's going to close any of the loopholes he got rich exploiting, and it's reasonable to be concerned that he may very well put in place some new ones quietly that he'll 'advise' people on when he leaves.

It's interesting how the only politician that truly closed an exploitative enriching loophole had to explicitly lie to put himself into the position to be able to do so.

[LinkSoul60]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You say that every time you get shown to be wrong.

 

I posted facts from statcan about the gdp but apperently you know better than statcan. And you didn't really copy 'facts'.

So you don't like the facts, and you have a freak out. 

Then i answer YOUR question about PP's qualification and yep another freak out. 

I listen just fine kid.  You think anyone who questions what you say "isn't listening", which is common to see in teenagers.  But it's simply wrong. 

I noted that the tech sector historically in the states and canada is  a similar size in relation to the economy. That's a simple fact. You freaked out. 

I noted that PP is far more qualified to be the top politician than carney who has NEVER done the job in his life, and you freak out. 

Then you break into tears and say you're going to go stick your head in the sand.... and magically it's my fault. 

Hey. Dipshit.  Carney isn't qualified and hes proving it.  He relies entirely on advisors and it's showing.  He's got no spine. 

And  yes we absolutely were tech heavy if you're defining it as being similar to the states in terms of percent of the economy. We're still fairly tech heavy tho it's gone down under the libs. 

And your stupidity and inability to cope with simple facts is YOUR problem, not my fault. 

Suck it up kiddo. And go change your underwear. 

 

 

LOL sure we'll see.   

I'm wrong because the discussion was about stocks and Canada not being tech heavy....  No I'm not wrong about anything I said or copied and pasted for industry sector comments..  You just have an inability to listen and understand.

We only have ~118 tech companies on the TSX which is one reason for the amount of Canadian money in the US markets and where this subject started.  TSX has ~118 tech stocks and the NASDQ alone has ~4,075 tech stocks.  See any disparity there and why there may be a few more options in the US?  And type all you want but Canada while bringing on more tech jobs, is not a tech heavy industry and has never been, but of course you'd say something partisan and stupid like it's the libs fault.  And what the f*ck does GDP have to do with the amount of companies on an exchange and where investment gravitates to?  What a f*cking idi0t.....   

I can think critically and have no problem whatsoever with anyone disagreeing, but you have a child's mindset where you can't resist telling people they're angry, kids, wet their pants, and whatever rhetoric your little mind thinks of in any conversation you can't grasp.  You're a waste of time, so again....  Go f*ck yourself little man

[I am Groot]

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

That has nothing to do with TFW's.  That's a reflection of peoples drive, or lack thereof.

Do you think all people are really created equal? There are a lot of people who who have low IQs and who really can't manage much more than a minimum wage job.

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yes, most of us did start with a minimum wage job.  To my earlier comments though.... when was the last time you've seen young Canadian's lining up for jobs in fast food restaurants, cleaning hotel rooms, driving taxi, picking fruit, etc.

How old are you anyway? That's not meant as an insult, but I know young people who really were trying for such jobs. One tried for and got a part-time job as a dishwasher. Another is a construction labourer. A third worked last summer at Staples. Lots of young people are applying for such jobs, even if they pay minimum wage. Now is that enough to fill those jobs? Perhaps not. So then the pay rate for those jobs is being artificially suppressed by the use of foreign workers.

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Our economy is stagnant and businesses are generally not looking for people.

So again I ask, why are we bringing over hundreds of thousands of foreign workers?

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

 

Then I'll assume your world is a 'mom and pop' type company/companies that don't comply with workers rights and labor laws.  That's not the world of businesses that operate within law abiding and legal frameworks. That I can assure of.

Suuuure, they do. Businesses wouldn't pretend they can't find Canadians so they can hire a TFW. That would be... wrong.

[I am Groot]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Poilievre's too busy with his try to be likeable classes.  Carney's on it....

Touting ‘enormous’ LNG opportunities, Carney says Canada to unveil new port infrastructure investments within two weeks

Oh yeah, he's 'on it', meaning he's 'on' his public relations tour.

https://x.com/junonewscom/status/1960334841683312725

[I am Groot]

So on the subject of foreign workers:

Late last year, the federal Liberal government said it would cap the number of people entering Canada through the Temporary Foreign Worker Program at 82,000 for 2025, but so far this year they’ve allowed in 105,000. Meanwhile, the International Mobility Program was supposed to be capped at 285,000 and in the first six months, we’ve added 302,000 through this program.

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/liberals-promised-fewer-temporary-foreign-workers-we-got-more?itm_source=index

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, I am Groot said:

So on the subject of foreign workers:

Late last year, the federal Liberal government said it would cap the number of people entering Canada through the Temporary Foreign Worker Program at 82,000 for 2025, but so far this year they’ve allowed in 105,000. Meanwhile, the International Mobility Program was supposed to be capped at 285,000 and in the first six months, we’ve added 302,000 through this program.

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/liberals-promised-fewer-temporary-foreign-workers-we-got-more?itm_source=index

That's ok though, because we had a lot of job losses. By liberal math, that's good. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

It's interesting how the only politician that truly closed an exploitative enriching loophole had to explicitly lie to put himself into the position to be able to do so.

I know i'm going to regret asking, but what are you referring to    

[Legato]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Poilievre's too busy with his try to be likeable classes.  Carney's on it....

 

Touting ‘enormous’ LNG opportunities, Carney says Canada to unveil new port infrastructure investments within two weeks

Amid his push to strengthen energy and economic ties with Europe, Prime Minister Mark Carney revealed Tuesday that the federal government will imminently be unveiling major new investments in port infrastructure. 

“Our government is in the process of unleashing half a trillion dollars of investment in energy infrastructure, port infrastructure, particularly intelligence infrastructure, as well, with AI,” Carney said Tuesday.

Speaking alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in Berlin, the prime minister said the first of those investments will be announced “in the next two weeks” and pointed to building up the Port of Montreal and “a new port, effectively, in Churchill, Manitoba,” as examples. 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/article/touting-enormous-lng-opportunities-carney-says-canada-to-unveil-new-port-infrastructure-investments-within-two-weeks/

“Which would open up enormous LNG, plus other opportunities, and other East Coast ports for those critical minerals,” Carney said.

To do what with the ports, create a White Star steamship line?

More empty words from the empty word grand master.

 

[CdnFox]

47 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I'm wrong because the discussion was about stocks and Canada not being tech heavy....  No I'm not wrong about anything I said or copied and pasted for industry sector comments..  You just have an inability to listen and understand.

You're wrong because you're a whiny twat. 

Your information was useless and i countered it by providing data on GDP that refuted your claim. Your problem is you didn't understand what you were looking at initially

So you said something, i considered it and replied with data showing my point. And then you freaked out and are now acting like a spoiled teen.  

Sorry kid, the problem here is you. 

49 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

We only have ~118 tech companies on the TSX which is one reason for the amount of Canadian money in the US markets and where this subject started.

Your claim wasn't a lack of tech companies.  You claimed canada was NEEVVVVEERRRRRR tech heavy. What i demonstrated is that it was almost as tech heavy as the states. 

What you are now saying is that it's a numbers game. And when i pointed that out before you freaked and said "NO IT"S NOOOOT!"  Now you say it is. 

You have ZERO ability to think critically. You cannot address my points and every time that happens you demand it's my fault. Your inability to think is not my fault kiddo

You make statements you cannot support and then poop yourself when people point that out. 

So lets get back to the reality here.  Investment is fleeing to the south in unprecedented amounts. In fact in some respects this is the first time in our history we've seen a net outflow of investment from foreign sources as well

Canada suffering 'major capital drain' as foreign investors go MIA | Financial Post

So people are selling their shares in canada and leaving. First time in our history it's been like this. 

So all your bullshit was just that, bullshit. At the end of the day we're bleeding like mad and it's not because the us is "tech heavy' and we're not. 

Now we have to address the fact that the liberals have made Canada toxic to investment.  Even Carney moved his business out. 

3 minutes ago, Legato said:

To do what with the ports, create a White Star steamship line?

More empty words from the empty word grand master.

 

We'll see the details but i suspect i'll be a lot of promises and not so much contracts and we'll have to pay a crap tonne of money just like trudeau's big "battery investments" that fell short. And the money wont' start flowing for 10 years or something stupid. 

But we'll see. 

[Legato]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

We'll see the details but i suspect i'll be a lot of promises and not so much contracts and we'll have to pay a crap tonne of money just like trudeau's big "battery investments" that fell short. And the money wont' start flowing for 10 years or something stupid. 

But we'll see. 

The delay is so Brookfield will have time to get their ducks in a row.

 

 

[LinkSoul60]

21 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Oh yeah, he's 'on it', meaning he's 'on' his public relations tour.

https://x.com/junonewscom/status/1960334841683312725

Should have just sent a couple emails and a few texts to see if we can get those trade deals ramped up.  Would save a bunch of money on travel expenses...

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Should have just sent a couple emails and a few texts to see if we can get those trade deals ramped up.  Would save a bunch of money on travel expenses...

Should have taken off the no pipeline and no tanker laws and private industry would take care of it themselves. 

[LinkSoul60]

12 minutes ago, Legato said:

To do what with the ports, create a White Star steamship line?

More empty words from the empty word grand master.

 

As the headline title says, guess we'll find out in a couple weeks.

I do find it funny though that still crying in their beer conservatives who know nothing of the details from an obviously  positive headline put a spin on expecting, and likely hoping for failure.  

[LinkSoul60]

10 minutes ago, Legato said:

The delay is so Brookfield will have time to get their ducks in a row.

 

 

Poilievre is invested in (VCE) Vanguard FTSE Canada Index ETF, where Brookfield Corp is one of the top assets. Think he's hopeful?