The Gov't Privy Council was testing out the "elbows up" message months before trump announced tariffs at taxpayers expense for the liberals.

[Nationalist]

Looks to me like the Libbies are now trying to justify being lied to.

"WE WON! TOO BAD SO SAD FOR CONSERVATIVES!"

One even exposed his TDS by saying Poilievre is too "trumpy".

Meh..."Elbows Up" goofballs. 

Now watch your lyin' sack o' minority, cave to "trumpy" yet again.

[ExFlyer]

2 hours ago, Shady said:

We had an unelected person as PM from January to April.  Regardless, whether is Pierre or Scheer living in Stornaway, it’s the same cost.

But you had PM appointed by the party where as the conservatives have an interim leader sitting in parliament.

Oh and Carney did not move into Rideau Cottage.

Edited July 14, 2025 by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

When you say stuff like that, you're just confirming you have nobody in your life, and nothing else to do with your time. 

 

When you say stuff like that, bolded no less, you're just confirming that you're a tiny little man with severe emotional issues that spends his days daydreaming about what my life must be like because his own life is so depressing.   

And you didn't keep me waiting, I honestly forgot about you. It's fairly obvious though that you spent your time thinking about it and it's kind of sad that that's the best you could come up with.

I mean 90 to 95% of your posts here are to me, so let's not pretend that's not what was on your mind.

And no, twisting someone's word is not outlining anything. All it is is proving that you had no argument and so you had to try and manufacture one in A desperate and slightly pathetic attempt to try and salvage your battered pride because you keep losing arguments with me.

And again, I'm forced to explain to you using crayons and small words a fairly simple concept. In Canada getting 41% of the vote is considered to be a remarkable achievement. Few achieve it even when they win majority.

So when you say that they "ONLY" got 41 percent of the vote, it's very much like saying someone ONLY won a massive amount of money or someone ONLY won a silver medal or ONLY did some really remarkable achivement,. 

In other words, you're severely downplaying an achievement.  Because you're an !diot and are angry the cpc did better under PP than you would like.

And trying to focus on that is what we call a Motte and Bailey fallacy.  Or perhaps the lesser version known as the 'troll's truth'. It's an extremely dishonest form of debate that I noticed your fond of. Having lost to the general principle argument you now try and reduce it to a literal context in order to try and make it sound less reasonable because you know you have utterly failed to make a valid point.

 

There would have to be a hell of a lot Smaller gap between our IQ scores for you to be able to pull that off without me laughing at you.   You'd have to gain about 20 points or so just to be competitive.  And just to be clear, that doesnt' mean mine is particularly high. Sadly it just means yours is particularly low. 

[CdnFox]

57 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

But you had PM appointed by the party

Who never won a seat.  Like, ever. Anywhere. And in fact wasn't even running for a seat at the time. 

The interim leader has always had a seat. 

And of course he didn't move into Rideau, poor justin was still moving out  Gotta give the guy time to pack his socks, have a heart man  

 

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Who never won a seat.  Like, ever. Anywhere. And in fact wasn't even running for a seat at the time. 

The interim leader has always had a seat. 

And of course he didn't move into Rideau, poor justin was still moving out  Gotta give the guy time to pack his socks, have a heart man  

 

He was chosen by the party...  conservatives are not sure yet...but they gave PP till January to get his shit together 

The conservatives needed an "interim" leader cause PP was a LOSER...like you LOL And Carney did run so PP could lose LOL

You LOSERS stick together... like the velcro hook and loop LOL

Justin quit in beginning January Carney was chosen a month later ...lots of time to move a single guy you DOLT!!!

Looks to me you are stepping into your own bullshit LOL  LOSER!!!!

Edited July 14, 2025 by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

He was chosen by the party...

And? You never want to seat, he never want to vote, canadians didn't pick him.

Now that can happen and normally when it does it's understood that the person does as little as possible and just toes the line until an election can be held or at least until they can run and win a seat

But instead he used the whole thing as an opportunity to campaign.

Once again, liberals have no ethics. It would take a complete scumbag to support them and obviously you fall into that category.

[Shady]

5 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

But you had PM appointed by the party where as the conservatives have an interim leader sitting in parliament.

Oh and Carney did not move into Rideau Cottage.

Who the f**k cares if he was appointed by the party?  He was unelected, and didn’t even have a riding.  Be at least a little consistent if you expect people to take you seriously.

[ExFlyer]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And? You never want to seat, he never want to vote, canadians didn't pick him.

Now that can happen and normally when it does it's understood that the person does as little as possible and just toes the line until an election can be held or at least until they can run and win a seat

But instead he used the whole thing as an opportunity to campaign.

Once again, liberals have no ethics. It would take a complete scumbag to support them and obviously you fall into that category.

What and who you babbling about???

You are just a LOSER stumbling over your own words LOL

LOSER!!!

Oh and here are 70 more Harper and conservative blunders and abuse of power

"Stephen Harper is a serial abuser of power. How do we know? Because the Tyee compiled a 70-item list."

https://rabble.ca/politics/canadian-politics/harper-serial-abuser-power-heres-70-facts-to-prove-it/

Read em and weep LOSER LOL

Edited July 15, 2025 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

13 hours ago, Shady said:

Who the f**k cares if he was appointed by the party?  He was unelected, and didn’t even have a riding.  Be at least a little consistent if you expect people to take you seriously.

Well, clearly you do not have a clue how the political and parliamentary system works when a leader quits or dies..

And your guy?? He went in to the election and his party lost and no only that, he lost his own seat yet...you folks keep him on as leader of the party??? If consistency is what you are after...look at the inconsistency of your own house LOL

Get some knowledge and then come back and apologize for making such a stupid post  LOL

Edited July 15, 2025 by ExFlyer

[Moonbox]

17 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's fairly obvious though that you spent your time thinking about it and it's kind of sad that that's the best you could come up with.

That's just a sad commentary on your headspace though, isn't it?

The notion that other people actually do things on a summer weekend is alien to you, because you have nothing and nobody in your life.  

Hope it felt good pounding that rant out on your keyboard, because nobody is going to read it.  If someone's read one of your useless, longwinded tirades, they've read them all.  🙃

Losing the election = Fantastic Result - CndFox, 2025

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

What and who you babbling about???

 

Oh sorry, I forgot. A lot of those words had more than one syllable in it and I know that that throws you. That's my bad   

Can't address the points so you just have a little meltdown. Pretty typical of you  

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

That's just a sad commentary on your headspace though, isn't it?

 

No, it's an observation about your head space.  

And it's 100% accurate.

How's the math lessons coming? LOL

[ExFlyer]

38 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Oh sorry, I forgot. A lot of those words had more than one syllable in it and I know that that throws you. That's my bad   

Can't address the points so you just have a little meltdown. Pretty typical of you  

No, it's an observation about your head space.  

And it's 100% accurate.

How's the math lessons coming? LOL

More BS...you should be empty by now but it seems you keep ingesting something that keeps producing BS LOL

LOSERS seem to be full of BS all the time. LOL

Edited July 15, 2025 by ExFlyer

[WestCanMan]

Down-Arrow boy is back! Left4rds REJOICE!

[WestCanMan]

18 hours ago, Shady said:

Be at least a little consistent if you expect people to take you seriously.

😂

Ex-Flyer is about 100,000,000,000 posts away from being taken even remotely seriously, and he will never have actual credibility.

If extra-ftarded ever gets the rights of an argument against you, it's time to hang up your keyboard. 

[Moonbox]

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Can't address the points so you just have a little meltdown. Pretty typical of you  

If you actually had a point, you should have led off with it rather than burying it in 10 paragraphs of useless projection and limp, recycled insults.  

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No, it's an observation about your head space.  

And it's 100% accurate.

You're the one assuming I spent my weekend stewing and preparing a response to your buffoonery, rather than just...enjoying my weekend.  That says a lot more about you than it does about me.  🙃

[BeaverFever]

On 7/7/2025 at 5:06 PM, CdnFox said:

So it would seem that the liberals were using government resources to conduct focus groups to test drive and refine their political campaign message. This isn't any government business focus, this is strictly electioneering and planning. They knew they'd be going to the poll soon and they knew they were in trouble and they were testing out slogans and pitches that would work and they were doing it with government money.

I would hope even those who are on the left on this board would be upset by this and say it's not a good thing. But I realize that is probably wishful thinking

 

Holly Doan on X: "DOCUMENTS: Main themes of @liberal_party “elbows up” re-election campaign were tested in confidential federal focus groups by @PrivyCouncilCA months before the U.S. announced tariffs. https://t.co/WS8KS8rUwO #cdnpoli https://t.co/srApQ1v3gc" / X

So once the government foresaw tariffs were coming they started planning for them.  That is not news, shocking, or bad.   Especially when you consider how unprepared and late to the party the conservatives were on this topic. 

[BeaverFever]

On 7/8/2025 at 12:31 PM, Nationalist said:

So...you're ok with using tax payer money to fund Liberal election focus groups?

It wasn’t liberal election focus groups nowhere doe it say that. Governments run focus groups all the time. A common criticism of both Harper and Trudeau governments was that they ran a lot of focus groups and polling all the time. 

[CdnFox]

18 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

If you actually had a point, you should have led off with it rather than burying it in 10 paragraphs of useless projection and limp, recycled insults.  

 

Awwww did i make your head hurt by forcing you to read more than one sentance again?!?! Here, have a children's chewable aspirin,   

And once again for the billionth time you can't understand something so it's my fault

 

Quote

You're the one assuming I spent my weekend stewing and preparing a response to your buffoonery

Based on the fact that you almost only ever replied to me, often without me having spoken to you first, it seems pretty evident that that's the case. 

That the sad thing is I never think about you at all. I feel bad a little, considering how much energy you put into thinking about me

[Shady]

13 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Well, clearly you do not have a clue how the political and parliamentary system works when a leader quits or dies..

And your guy?? He went in to the election and his party lost and no only that, he lost his own seat yet...you folks keep him on as leader of the party??? If consistency is what you are after...look at the inconsistency of your own house LOL

Get some knowledge and then come back and apologize for making such a stupid post  LOL

I understand how our system works, it allows an unelected private citizen that’s worked for foreign governments to become PM without facing an election and without representing a riding.  I’m sorry that fact irritates you.  He didn’t even have to disclose his financial interests until after an election! 🤣

What a system we live under! 🤡

[Shady]

Cue the Curb Your Enthusiasm music!

 

Edited July 16, 2025 by Shady

[Shady]

13 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Well, clearly you do not have a clue how the political and parliamentary system works when a leader quits or dies..

And your guy?? He went in to the election and his party lost and no only that, he lost his own seat yet...you folks keep him on as leader of the party??? If consistency is what you are after...look at the inconsistency of your own house LOL

Get some knowledge and then come back and apologize for making such a stupid post  LOL

Btw, what Pierre is doing is also allowed by your beloved system, so what are you complaining about you dopey c**t?

[LinkSoul60]

25 minutes ago, Shady said:

What a system we live under!

Same circumstances....  Would your opinion be any different if this happened to be a conservative?

[Moonbox]

16 hours ago, CdnFox said:

That the sad thing is I never think about you at all. I feel bad a little, considering how much energy you put into thinking about me

Yep that's why you prepare 10+ paragraph responses to my one-liners.  That makes so much sense!  🤣👍

Edited July 16, 2025 by Moonbox

[LinkSoul60]

3 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Yep that's why you prepare 10+ paragraph responses to my one-liners.  That makes so much sense!  🤣👍

lol... no kidding!  Every response is an essay in bias stupidity, which he does excel at though.

Old saying....  Wise men talk because they have something to say. Fools talk because they have to say something.

The latter category is a custom fit for him....

[CdnFox]

59 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Yep that's why you prepare 10+ paragraph responses to my one-liners.  That makes so much sense!  🤣👍

The hilarious thing is my 10 paragraph posts take me about 2 seconds to think of and three seconds to make.

Your one-liners take you days and you still manage to get it wrong and look stupid  

How's those math lessons coming?