Is Poilievre screwing up again?

[ExFlyer]

Just now, Legato said:

I actually play the piano, how are your kazoo lessons going?

WOW...a piano playing second stringer on the confux cesspool team...  get much "playing " time? LOL Standing room only during your performances??? 

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

HA HA HA...

I cannot believe you are so stooipd as to actually believe that??? Even the people in his own riding knew he was far from that LOL LOL LOL

 

We will see...

[ExFlyer]

4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

We will see...

Yup

Actually, I would not be surprised. 

There are a lot of fools out there that are just waiting to hear his voice moan and whine and cry again and again and over and over and end up getting nothing LOL

 

[Nefarious Banana]

4 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Let's see...I have Communist, Marxist, Globalist...Lieberal and...Yep, there it is!  Carnage!

Difficult to understand yours and others thinking when you elect a federal government that has a history of damaging Canada.  What's the attraction?  Has your political choice made Canada a better place?  Just wondering what your mind`set is . . . 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Yup...WOW!!!!

 

Still can't function normally yet huh?   

2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Hey look...a minor player on the confux cesspool team want to say something....as profound as always ...NOT  LOL

LOL  looks like legato also knows how to make you fill your diapers  

 

[LinkSoul60]

12 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

What's the attraction? 

Maybe a better question is why do Canadian's find Conservative leadership unattractive?

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Maybe a better question is why do Canadian's find Conservative leadership unattractive?

But they didn't. They found it almost as attractive as carney. So that doesn't seem like a very good question

Are you honestly saying you can't articulate why you voted for The liberal party despite the fact that they damaged Canada so badly? Is it just tribalism?

[LinkSoul60]

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

They found it almost as attractive as carney. So that doesn't seem like a very good question

Moral victories are for losers

[Barquentine]

49 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

almost as attractive as carney

Is that how you console yourself? looked at their favorability polls lately?

Jun 30, 2025 — According to the latest numbers from Nanos Research, Carney is at 52.1 per cent, and Poilievre at 23.2 per cent.

... almost as attractive as carney....Hahahahahahahahahashahahaha!

[Nefarious Banana]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Maybe a better question is why do Canadian's find Conservative leadership unattractive?

You're comparing Conservative leadership vs Liberal policy.  Your endorsement of the Liberals now that they are running a Poilievre platform, is a roundabout Conservative endorsement.

[LinkSoul60]

35 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

You're comparing Conservative leadership vs Liberal policy.  Your endorsement of the Liberals now that they are running a Poilievre platform, is a roundabout Conservative endorsement.

By 'leadership' I meant which party Canadians chose to lead the country.  

That was a bad attempt at a moral victory.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Moral victories are for losers

That's not a moral victory. That's a statement of fact

Denial of facts is for losers. I really wish you'd learn to understand that.

So you still have no ability to articulate why you voted liberal. You didn't think about it you just felt that that's what you had to do.

I've always kind of suspected that about them little motors. No real thought just belief that that's what's expected of them.

4 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

That was a bad attempt at a moral victory.

I'm not sure you understand what a moral victory is  You keep using the phrase and it doesn't actually apply to anything you're talking about

[Moonlight Graham]

7 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

We all know Trudeau wore out his welcome and stepped down ...why can PP not see that is the honerable thing to do??

Because most politicians aren't honourable, they're self-serving careerist sociopaths who will do just about anything to win.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Because most politicians aren't honourable, they're self-serving careerist sociopaths who will do just about anything to win.

You're a rational hatred is blinding you.

The guy is going to face a leadership vote. This is nothing to do with Honor, he lost the election but he Had a good showing and now it will be up to the party to determine whether he stays or he goes. He really doesn't get a say.

So how is it in any way dishonorable to stick around and allow the democratic process to play out?

If anything Trudeau was the one without honor. He inappropriately froze parliament so that he could avoid having to face the music for his actions and ran like a coward

[LinkSoul60]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I'm not sure you understand what a moral victory is

I don't, but judging by your non-stop applause at results of this latest Conservative loss, you certainly do....  

[ExFlyer]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Still can't 

LOL

 

get you to stop biting the bait LOL

Caught the same suckerfish on my troll line...just to pi$$ you off and it works every time HA HA HA

You are truly a OCD CREEPY LOSER LOL

[Nefarious Banana]

42 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

get you to stop biting the bait LOL

Caught the same suckerfish on my troll line...just to pi$$ you off and it works every time HA HA HA

You are truly a OCD CREEPY LOSER LOL

Your retardation is less than charming . . . . any chance you could just stfu ?

[ExFlyer]

57 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Your retardation is less than charming . . . . any chance you could just stfu ?

Nope....not as long as you and your ilk keep responding.

You an your buddies stfu and so will I but as long as one of you keep coming...I will keep going LOL

Edited July 25, 2025 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

Fact Check Time: Crime Rates in Canada

By Steve Ward

The Conservative Party of Canada and its unelected leader, former MP Pierre Poilievre, have been insisting for years that Canada's crime rate is rising at an alarming pace. In fact, one of Poilevre'e key three-word campaign policy slogans focused on this issue. During April's federal election Poilievre urged Canadians to "Stop The Crime" by voting Conservative.

Right-wing parties often resort to a tough on crime agenda to address a purported surge in criminal activity. The actual statistics are typically ignored or manipulated in order to manufacture a crisis and whip people into a frenzy to frighten them into voting for the Conservatives who will 'solve' the crime issue and keep everyone safe.

The party's approach toward criminality is also harsh and exceedingly punitive with longer jail sentences, tougher thresholds to earn parole, and little emphasis on rehabilitation or assisting former inmates in navigating various obstacles as they try to re-adjust to living in society. Conservative policies also tend to stigmatize people convicted of an offense for years after they have paid their fine and/or served their time. For example, the Harper Govenment extended the wait time to apply for a record suspension (referred to as a pardon in pre-Harper years) from three to five years. The additional two years of wait time does not deter crime. Instead, this shame-based approach only delays people from beng able to clear their record and get on wih their lives.

So, do the actual facts support Poilievre's rants about a continuous and alarming rise in the number of criminal acts beng committed in Canadian society? The chart below uses official Statistics Canada data to track the number of violent, property, and other crimes committed by year from 1990-2023. I have not included data from each year during this thirty-three year period. Instead, overall trends can be identified easily enough using data from the following five years as a representative sample: 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020, and 2023.

1990-2023 Police Reported Crime Rate per 100,000 Population (Statistics Canada)

1990

Violent Crimes: 973

Property Crimes: 5,612

Other Crimes: 2,900

Total Crimes: 9,485

2000

Violent Crimes: 996

Property Crimes: 4,081

Other Crimes: 2,534

Total Crimes: 7,610

2010

Violent Crimes: 907

Property Crimes: 2,802

Other Crimes: 2,451

Total Crimes: 6,160

2020

Violent Crimes: 851

Property Crimes: 2,274

Other Crimes: 2,214

Total Crimes: 5,339

2023

Violent Crimes: 967

Property Crimes: 2,546

Other Crimes: 2,329

Total Crimes: 5,843

Comparative Data

2023 compared to 1990

Violent Crimes: -0.04%

Property Crimes: -55%

Other Crimes: -20%

Total Crimes: -38%

2023 compared to 2000

Violent Crimes: -23%

Property Crimes: -43%

Other Crimes: -8%

Total Crimes: -23%

2023 compared to 2010

Violent Crimes: +6%

Property Crimes: -10%

Other Crimes: -5%

Total Crimes: -5%

2023 compared to 2020

Violent Crimes: +12%

Property Crimes: +11%

Other Crimes: +5%

Total Crimes: +9%

During the thirty-three year period between 1990 and 2023, property crimes had the largest decrease at 55% while the total number of crimes dropped 38%.

During the twenty-three year period between 2000 and 2023, all types of crime decreased with the largest drop being 43% in property crimes. The total number of crimes declined by 23%.

During the thirteen year period between 2010 and 2023, only violent crimes saw a 6% increase and the other types of crime declined, with the largest drop being 10% in property crimes. The total number of crimes decreased by 5%.

There was an increase in all types of crime during the three-year period between 2020 and 2023 while the total number of crimes rose by 9%. It should be noted that this period included the COVID-19 pandemic.

Canada's population totalled 27.7 million people in 1990 compared to 40.1 million in 2023, an increase of 12.4 million people or 31%. Despite population growth, the number of total crimes reported still dropped 38% during this thirty-three year period. This statistic serves to counter another right-wing contention, namely that increased immigration results in more criminal activity.

Crime rates per 100,000 people peaked during the 1990s and then decreased over subsequent years. Crime rates did rise marginally between 2020-2023 and violent crimes increased gradually after 2010. However, 2023's total number of crimes was still 38% below 1990 levels, 23% below 2000 levels and 5% less than 2010 levels.

Based on this data, it doesn't seem like we are facing a 'Crime Crisis.' Things were significantly more problematic on this front three decades ago. The very small rise in crimes since 2020 can possibly be attributed to the chaos and upheaval of the current decade (e.g. pandemic, steep increase in the cost of apartment rentals, overloaded health care system, lack of access to mental health supports and medications, etc.)

A tough on crime focus is not essential at the present time. It would be more advantageous to allocate our finite resources to proactively strengthen our social programs, expand pharmacare, fix the health care system, enhance mental health supports, implement a living wage, replace ODSP and OW with a Basic Income Guarantee and build more affordable housing. If we invest in these positive supports, there will be less need in the future for significant investments in the justice system and policing. Better social programs and supports result in improved social outcomes and fewer people committing criminal acts.

[ExFlyer]

16 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Difficult to understand yours and others thinking when you elect a federal government that has a history of damaging Canada.  What's the attraction?  Has your political choice made Canada a better place?  Just wondering what your mind`set is . . . 

Well, the liberals were government 27 times vs 17 for the Conservatives since Confederation.

Seems Canadians prefer Liberal.

[taxme]

21 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Thanks for proving my point chucklef*ck.  You shake your head around, jumble the words, and then spit them back out in a different order.  The absurd stupidity of calling folks Fascists and Marxists at the same time is lost on you, but you're excellent comic relief here.  

Give your head another shake and give us the next arrangement.  Can't wait.  😆

What's the matter, stunned? Truth hurts you, comrade? If that is all that you can come back with, it just shows me once again that all you left wing lying lieberals here are nothing more than a bunch of commie imbeciles. Now that is the truth, chuckle fuk. 😂

[taxme]

21 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

One of the reasons I come to this forum is to shake my head in amazement and laugh at partisan hacks like you.  Keep the foolish comments coming....the entertainment is comical.

I have to shake my head in disbelief all of the time when i have to keep replying to lying lieberal no minds like yourself that can never offer anything that smacks of common sense and logic. You are the one that is boring here because you never have anything to say that appears to show some intelligence. Keep on laughing because i am not going anywhere. 

Lieberals like you are quite entertaining alright just like Corbeil who just lost his job because he was not funny at all. All he was good for was to keep attacking and mocking Trump all the time and the people that once watched his stupid and not so funny lieberal clown show got fed up with his lieberal woke nonsense. 

I would like to know your views as to what Canada is really good for anymore. Can you at least give me something? I can give you a week to come up with something lieberal. 😁

[taxme]

21 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Who is paying for all of these new programs and benefits?  Where are these "4 million new homes"?  How is the rising minimum wage affecting inflation?  Are the poor better off than 10 years ago despite all this spending?

Progressives running our government have all of these seemingly nice ideas but have no cue lhow one policy will affect another.  Look at how their ridiculous migration policies have affected housing, health care, and cost of living.  They live in a fantasy world.

Is PP the answer?  Not really.  I don't think a twitter-addicted meme-lord with no expertise in anything besides huckster slogans and kissing Harper's arse has the brains to manage a country adequately.  Would do better than Trudeau though given PP doesn't have a giant hole in his head and a castration scar on his nutsack.

Lieberals like you enjoy mocking and attacking PP, but what has Carnage done so far since the PM of Chanukistan took over the dictatorship of Canukistan? You and that arse hole flyer can quit with the PP jokes now. The globalist Marxist lieberals won.

But what I would really like to see from you is something that Carnage has done already that is going to help make Canada great again. Are you able to give me something or are you just all talk? So far, all i have seen is sweet dyk all from Carnage.

Well? 😇

[Moonlight Graham]

Just now, taxme said:

Lieberals like you enjoy mocking and attacking PP, but what has Carnage done so far since the PM of Chanukistan took over the dictatorship of Canukistan? You and that arse hole flyer can quit with the PP jokes now. The globalist Marxist lieberals won.

But what I would really like to see from you is something that Carnage has done already that is going to help make Canada great again. Are you able to give me something or are you just all talk? So far, all i have seen is sweet dyk all from Carnage.

Well? 😇

Ewww don't ever call me a Liberal.   You take that back!!

No i don't like the globalist Marxist Liberals at all, they're disgusting.   Does that make PP a peach.  He's not nearly as bad, but he's also a half-chud bordering on full.

[Moonbox]

36 minutes ago, taxme said:

If that is all that you can come back with...

You're assuming that a comeback is required for anything you say.  All of your posts are the same and interchangeable.  They're just a stirred up salad of slogans,  and pet-words/insults you repeat in different combinations and orders no matter who you're talking to.  

Commie commie Lieberal Marxist Globalist Fascists...🫠