Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Several media sources are reporting that trump left the G7 early to deal with a developing situation in Iran, the Nimitz Carrier Group is on Route and a number of tankers and support aircraft are heading in that direction.

Iran go boom now you think? Kinda sounds like a fairly big operation is being considered

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

Apparently not yet. There sure was a lot of speculation that that would be the case. 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Let Iran have nukes. Netenyahoo would think twice. Mutually assured destruction kept the US and Russia from war for decades. Same for India and Pakistan. After all, no one cares that Kim Jong Loon has nukes. And who the f#ck are the Americans to preach. Nukes twice on civilian populations. Unfortunately Trump is too dim-witted to think of consequences.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Let Iran have nukes. Netenyahoo would think twice. Mutually assured destruction kept the US and Russia from war for decades. Same for India and Pakistan. After all, no one cares that Kim Jong Loon has nukes. And who the f#ck are the Americans to preach. Nukes twice on civilian populations. Unfortunately Trump is too dim-witted to think of consequences.

M.A.D. does not work if the other side thinks they'll get 72 virgins if they are a martyr. 

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 3

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
47 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Let Iran have nukes. Netenyahoo would think twice. Mutually assured destruction kept the US and Russia from war for decades. Same for India and Pakistan. After all, no one cares that Kim Jong Loon has nukes. And who the f#ck are the Americans to preach. Nukes twice on civilian populations. Unfortunately Trump is too dim-witted to think of consequences.

Islam teaches that we are infidels to be enslaved or killed. The acts of Muslims enforce that belief. You want to allow such people to have nukes.

Libbies...could you not just all go to Kumbaya Island alone? You can invite disaster till your hearts' content.

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Let Iran have nukes. Netenyahoo would think twice. Mutually assured destruction kept the US and Russia from war for decades. Same for India and Pakistan. After all, no one cares that Kim Jong Loon has nukes. And who the f#ck are the Americans to preach. Nukes twice on civilian populations. Unfortunately Trump is too dim-witted to think of consequences.

If Iran had a nuke Netanyahu would think once, boom wacka boom, nukes gone along with Iran,

You obviously do not understand the Muslim mentality.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Let Iran have nukes. Netenyahoo would think twice. Mutually assured destruction kept the US and Russia from war for decades. Same for India and Pakistan. After all, no one cares that Kim Jong Loon has nukes. And who the f#ck are the Americans to preach. Nukes twice on civilian populations. Unfortunately Trump is too dim-witted to think of consequences.

Easy to be this flippant about things when you are some random dude on the internet that will never be impacted and has not lived in Israel under constant threat of war from Iran and listening to them say they will destroy you. 

 

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Let Iran have nukes. Netenyahoo would think twice. Mutually assured destruction kept the US and Russia from war for decades. Same for India and Pakistan. After all, no one cares that Kim Jong Loon has nukes. And who the f#ck are the Americans to preach. Nukes twice on civilian populations. Unfortunately Trump is too dim-witted to think of consequences.

They are religious fanatics or pretend to be to fool their few supporters. They will use it believing that if they die they will go to heaven not knowing that the only place for them is hell next to devil.

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Several media sources are reporting that trump left the G7 early to deal with a developing situation in Iran, the Nimitz Carrier Group is on Route and a number of tankers and support aircraft are heading in that direction.

Iran go boom now you think? Kinda sounds like a fairly big operation is being considered

Islamic Republic going boom. Iran and Iranians will prosper as a result. 

Israel must continue to the end till this regime collapses completely and Israel and the whole world would become a much safer regime. Top regime leaders and commanders must be eliminated and sent to hell. The US must actively enter the war and end this regime for once and all.

The worst scenario is if the regime survives. The will go for all kinds of weapons of mass destruction and will acquire them in short time because Israelis cannot bomb the brains with the knowledge training for decades how to build them. Israel and the whole world will be in greater danger than before.

Edited by CITIZEN_2015
Posted
11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Iran go boom now you think? 

All the adults here think you sound like a self-important child ("go boom now") who had to create his own thread instead of posting his update on the existing thread.

Posted
23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

All the adults here think you sound like a self-important child ("go boom now") who had to create his own thread instead of posting his update on the existing thread.

Speak for yourself, coward... if you are brave enough to stop hiding and do so. 

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Legato said:

You obviously do not understand the Muslim mentality.

And you think you do? Give me a break!

 

3 hours ago, User said:

Easy to be this flippant

The original post was "Iran-go-boom now" and you call me flippant??

 

3 hours ago, User said:

has not lived in Israel under constant threat of war

No I haven't. Nor have I lived in Gaza with bombs raining down killing thousands of children. Haven't lived in the West Bank and had my house stolen by armed thugs. Lot of bad shit going on over there.

Netenyahoo has been PM for what, 15-16 years? And the worst Hamas attack happened on his watch. Obviously his way doesn't work. But hey, why stop now? Kill a few thousand more, what's the difference? With Trump backing him up of course.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

The original post was "Iran-go-boom now" and you call me flippant??

Yes. You were being flippant. 

If you wish to say the thread creator was as well, with their choice of words, that would be a separate and distinct observation from your own behavior. 

4 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

No I haven't. Nor have I lived in Gaza with bombs raining down killing thousands of children. Haven't lived in the West Bank and had my house stolen by armed thugs. Lot of bad shit going on over there.

Netenyahoo has been PM for what, 15-16 years? And the worst Hamas attack happened on his watch. Obviously his way doesn't work. But hey, why stop now? Kill a few thousand more, what's the difference? With Trump backing him up of course.

You have a habit of changing the subject. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

All the adults here think you sound like a self-important child

well of course they do, i was writing in a fashion that YOU would understand!  Self important child was what i was going for!  (ya gotta write to your audience)

And look it worked, here you are! :)   Hey little guy, thanks for coming out  ;) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

And you think you do? Give me a break!

 

Why would I do that. That's Meatloaf territory.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

No. I was serious.

That is not saying much, figuring your position was not a very serious one and doesn't impact you...

3 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

No. I kept talking about Iran and Israel. Too difficult to follow?

It is not hard to follow someone off a cliff, but I choose not to. 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Islamic Republic going boom. Iran and Iranians will prosper as a result. 

Israel must continue to the end till this regime collapses completely and Israel and the whole world would become a much safer regime. Top regime leaders and commanders must be eliminated and sent to hell. The US must actively enter the war and end this regime for once and all.

The worst scenario is if the regime survives. The will go for all kinds of weapons of mass destruction and will acquire them in short time because Israelis cannot bomb the brains with the knowledge training for decades how to build them. Israel and the whole world will be in greater danger than before.

Ya, the US has such a great record when it comes to regime change in the Middle East. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Ya, the US has such a great record when it comes to regime change in the Middle East. 

I mean... that's kind of a fair point honestly..... 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
38 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Ya, the US has such a great record when it comes to regime change in the Middle East. 

Nobody said the US or Israel should change the regime. I said Israel and US should eliminate the Islamic Republic murderous leaders in particular the top leader hiding in a hole and the commanders of Sepah and oppressive apparatus of the regime to pave the way for the people of Iran to rise up and pour into streets and overthrow this fascist regime for once and all without being massacre by the mercenary security forces. This nation has risen up many times in the past 8 years and each time thousand were shot dead on streets or died under torture after their arrests and this included women and children.

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I mean... that's kind of a fair point honestly..... 

No it is not fair point but a misleading point because Israelis and US have said it many times that their goal is to neutralize Islamic Republic nuclear capabilities and it is up to the people of Iran to topple this regime. Unlike Iraq and Afghanistan there will be NO ground forces landing or military invasion. Military, intelligence, mercenary security forces must be attacked from the air and regime's criminal leaders must be eliminated same way that Hezbollah leaders were eliminated.

Edited by CITIZEN_2015
Posted
20 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Nobody said the US or Israel should change the regime. I said Israel and US should eliminate the Islamic Republic murderous leaders in particular the top leader hiding in a hole and the commanders of Sepah and oppressive apparatus of the regime to pave the way for the people of Iran to rise up and pour into streets and overthrow this fascist regime for once and all without being massacre by the mercenary security forces. This nation has risen up many times in the past 8 years and each time thousand were shot dead on streets or died under torture after their arrests and this included women and children.

When that happens you have a vacuum. Look what has happened in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. As bad as Saddam may have been; he kept Iran occupied instead of Israel and was really no threat to the region after the 1st Gulf War. The US and Britain engineered the overthrow of a democratic regime in Iran during the 50's and put the Shah in power. The eventual result was the Islamic revolution, not because most Iranians loved the Ayatollah's but they hated the Shah even more. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Ya, the US has such a great record when it comes to regime change in the Middle East. 

And ignoring the one it needs at home!

The usual solution: save them from their oppression by blowing them into small pieces of bloody meat.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,919
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Milla
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...