Canadian Forest Management Fails, Fueling Massive Wild Fires.

[robosmith]

For all you right wing Canucks who blame "forest management" for US wild fires, YOUR'S FAILED, TOO. LMAO

 

WRAL.com

 

Heads up: Smoke from Canadian fires makes it into North Carolina sky Sunday, Monday

1 day ago

 

 

The New York Times

 

What to Know About Canada’s Wildfires in Manitoba and Saskatchewan

 

[gatomontes99]

Why is this in the US side? Shouldn't it be in the Canadian side?

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

For all you right wing Canucks who blame "forest management" for US wild fires, YOUR'S FAILED, TOO. LMAO

 

WRAL.com

 

Heads up: Smoke from Canadian fires makes it into North Carolina sky Sunday, Monday

1 day ago

 

 

The New York Times

 

What to Know About Canada’s Wildfires in Manitoba and Saskatchewan

 

We know.  The federal gov't has done absolutely nothing at all to address the situation for a decade now despite knowing the problems. We knew that when bamff burned down.   Many of these forests are national parks 

umm.. you knew that was a left wing gov't right? You knew that it was trudeau, who said we could beat climate change if we paid a carbon tax right?

You're kind of proving our point 

[herbie]

?? What right wing Canadians are saying that?

Most Canadians are aware that in those tiny postage stamp countries you have to manage the forests or you won't have any. 
Here the forests manage YOU.

Only a demented orange skinned old crook is dumb enough to think we have to send 40,000,000 people with rakes out to pick up the leaves and twigs every spring.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Why is this in the US side? Shouldn't it be in the Canadian side?

Smoke from Canuck's forest management failure is blowing across the Northern US. Clean it UP!

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

We know.  The federal gov't has done absolutely nothing at all to address the situation for a decade now despite knowing the problems. We knew that when bamff burned down.   Many of these forests are national parks 

umm.. you knew that was a left wing gov't right? You knew that it was trudeau, who said we could beat climate change if we paid a carbon tax right?

You're kind of proving our point 

NO ONE rakes their forests' floor. Duh

Which is why when you right wingers blamed CA forest management, and I asked what you're doing about it, NO ONE made a peep.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Smoke from Canuck's forest management failure is blowing across the Northern US. Clean it UP!

No. Suck on it leftie 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

NO ONE rakes their forests' floor. Duh

 

??????

I never said ANYTHING about raking forest floors lOLOLOL

that was @herbie.  He's a twat. Ignore him. 

But forest management is without a doubt a thing in Canada and both provincial gov'ts and fed gov'ts have been slow on adapting to the changing needs.  

Trudeau was horrible. Federal parks are his mess and he's done nothing despite NUMEROUS reports advising he must or there will be serious problems. 

As to cleaning it up, you let your stupid come across our borders and infect our discussion forums, you can suck our smoke ya little tard. Anyway it's good for the zucchini. 

[Aristides]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No. Suck on it leftie 

Intelligent. BC alone has an area of over 360,000 sq miles, most of if forest and much of it vertical. It has had record or below normal snow pack levels 3 years in a row.  The prairie provinces have experienced 4 years in a row of drought conditions. Must be the fault of "lefties". 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Intelligent. 

It's audience appropriate intellectually speaking given whom i was replying to    

Quote

BC alone has an area of over 360,000 sq miles, most of if forest and much of it vertical. It has had record or below normal snow pack levels 3 years in a row.  The prairie provinces have experienced 4 years in a row of drought conditions. Must be the fault of "lefties". 

None of that is possible,  i paid my carbon tax and you lefties assured me that would solve climate change.  Otherwise, why did we do it?

You seem to be implying that forest management isn't possible somewhere like bc.   Did you want to go there and wind up looking like a complete twat? It's entirely possible and as i said the gov't recommendations to the federal gov't to prevent a disaster at Banff was ignored and guess what. 

But sure, there's no such thing as forest managment and nobody has ever suggested it would make a difference, i'm just making it up. 

 

Provincial government data indicates that 45% of public land in BC is at high or extreme threat of wildfire. The consequences of catastrophic wildfires are far-reaching, impacting human health and safety, the economy, biodiversity and ecosystem health. This year’s record-setting fire season highlights the urgent need to change how BC’s forests are managed.

[Deluge]

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

For all you right wing Canucks who blame "forest management" for US wild fires, YOUR'S FAILED, TOO. LMAO

 

WRAL.com

 

Heads up: Smoke from Canadian fires makes it into North Carolina sky Sunday, Monday

1 day ago

 

 

The New York Times

 

What to Know About Canada’s Wildfires in Manitoba and Saskatchewan

 

robomarx thinks responsible forest management causes and exacerbates forest fires. 

robomarx is a stunted pervert and a dumbass. 

[Aristides]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's audience appropriate intellectually speaking given whom i was replying to    

None of that is possible,  i paid my carbon tax and you lefties assured me that would solve climate change.  Otherwise, why did we do it?

You seem to be implying that forest management isn't possible somewhere like bc.   Did you want to go there and wind up looking like a complete twat? It's entirely possible and as i said the gov't recommendations to the federal gov't to prevent a disaster at Banff was ignored and guess what. 

But sure, there's no such thing as forest managment and nobody has ever suggested it would make a difference, i'm just making it up. 

 

Provincial government data indicates that 45% of public land in BC is at high or extreme threat of wildfire. The consequences of catastrophic wildfires are far-reaching, impacting human health and safety, the economy, biodiversity and ecosystem health. This year’s record-setting fire season highlights the urgent need to change how BC’s forests are managed.

 

We haven't changed the way they are managed but these huge wildfires are becoming far more frequent. Why?

Drought and higher temperatures are making forests more vulnerable. Why are we experiencing more frequent droughts and higher temperatures?

No one has ever said carbon tax would solve climate change, it was to encourage people to make the changes that would at least slow change. Anyway it is gone now so find another whipping boy.

 

Edited Monday at 02:52 PM by Aristides

[WestCanMan]

14 hours ago, robosmith said:

For all you right wing Canucks who blame "forest management" for US wild fires, YOUR'S FAILED, TOO. LMAO

 

WRAL.com

 

Heads up: Smoke from Canadian fires makes it into North Carolina sky Sunday, Monday

1 day ago

 

 

The New York Times

 

What to Know About Canada’s Wildfires in Manitoba and Saskatchewan

 

Thanks, illiterate dummy. 

FYI forestry management and preventing forest fires goes against leftist government policy, because it reduces climate hysteria, which they rely on the control credulous dolts like you. 

If there weren't any forest fires then they could never say: "OMG, LOOK AT THAT! An entire forest is burning! That has never happened before in the history of the planet! It's because of anthropogenic global warming manmade climit chanje! Ignore your porous border, rising crime, inflation, rising racial and religious intolerance, and re-elect the Dems/Libs to fight the climate bogeyman!"

[robosmith]

31 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Thanks, illiterate dummy. 

FYI forestry management and preventing forest fires goes against leftist government policy, because it reduces climate hysteria, which they rely on the control credulous dolts like you. 

If there weren't any forest fires then they could never say: "OMG, LOOK AT THAT! An entire forest is burning! That has never happened before in the history of the planet! It's because of anthropogenic global warming manmade climit chanje! Ignore your porous border, rising crime, inflation, rising racial and religious intolerance, and re-elect the Dems/Libs to fight the climate bogeyman!"

^lDIOT pretending a circular argument is valid. LMAO

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

 

We haven't changed the way they are managed but these huge wildfires are becoming far more frequent. Why?

 

You literally answered your own question. 

Our forests are in a constant state of evolution. Things today are not the way things were 10 yeas ago, and 10 years ago they weren't the way things were 10 years before. And so on. There's tonnes of factors at play and one change leads to another. 

But our forestry practices, as you note, have not changed. So out of control wildfires become more frequent. 

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Drought and higher temperatures are making forests more vulnerable. Why are we experiencing more frequent droughts and higher temperatures?

Same reason we did in the 30's i guess?  It can't be climate change, i paid my carbon tax so that's not an issue any more. 

At the end of the day "why" is less important than 'what now'. We wasted a decade pissing away billions and billions of dollars in the name of 'climate change' and clearly it didn't do a single thing.  So now we need to look at how we adapt, what we need to change, where we go from here. 

But lets be clear. If a report is produced saying "cut down the bug kill near Banff or it'll burn down', and we don't, and it burns down....  that's not "climate change".  That's us. 

[Nationalist]

Ok...robotwit's abject stupidity aside. Cleaning the forest of dead fall and dry brush was a normal process forever. Then came the idiocy of the greenies. In Czech...and all of Europe I believe...it is now illegal to do so.

The laws here are worded such that "sustainability" is paramount...but "sustainability" is tied to all sorts of ridiculous regulations that make forest maintenance impossible. 

[robosmith]

6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Ok...robotwit's abject stupidity aside. Cleaning the forest of dead fall and dry brush was a normal process forever. Then came the idiocy of the greenies. In Czech...and all of Europe I believe...it is now illegal to do so.

The laws here are worded such that "sustainability" is paramount...but "sustainability" is tied to all sorts of ridiculous regulations that make forest maintenance impossible. 

Too bad you have ZERO evidence for ^this OPINION.

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Too bad you have ZERO evidence for ^this OPINION.

Everyone in Canada knows this. We've been having discussions here for decades about the need for better forest management. I just posted a link to a resource that discusses this\

Too bad all you have is lies and ignorance

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Everyone in Canada knows this. We've been having discussions here for decades about the need for better forest management. I just posted a link to a resource that discusses this\

Too bad all you have is lies and ignorance

Nope, I have cited news stories PROVING Canada's fire management FAILURE.

And now this:

Why does California not clear the brush?

 

In fact, because of the local ecology, they say clearing vast swaths of native brush could actually make the landscape even more flammable. That's the opposite of what California's forests need. In forests, too much dense undergrowth has built up, creating the fuel for extreme wildfires.Feb 11, 2025

Why clearing brush around Los Angeles won't reduce fire danger

NPR

https://www.npr.org › 2025/02/11 › nx-s1-5270034 › lo..

 

[gatomontes99]

32 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope, I have cited news stories PROVING Canada's fire management FAILURE.

And now this:

Why does California not clear the brush?

 

In fact, because of the local ecology, they say clearing vast swaths of native brush could actually make the landscape even more flammable. That's the opposite of what California's forests need. In forests, too much dense undergrowth has built up, creating the fuel for extreme wildfires.Feb 11, 2025

Why clearing brush around Los Angeles won't reduce fire danger

NPR

https://www.npr.org › 2025/02/11 › nx-s1-5270034 › lo..

 

I don't know who is stupid enough to believe that getting rid of kindling will make a fire easier, but they don't need to have a computer. 

 

[robosmith]

8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I don't know who is stupid enough to believe that getting rid of kindling will make a fire easier, but they don't need to have a computer. 

I know you're stupid enough to believe you know better than experts without even reading what was cited. Duh

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Too bad you have ZERO evidence for ^this OPINION.

I read the regulations dummy.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

I read the regulations dummy.

Prove it, lDIOT.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Nope, I have cited news stories PROVING Canada's fire management FAILURE.

Sorry kiddo but that's a lie and you know it.

If you have to lie to make your point then you haven't got a very good point. 

[herbie]

4 hours ago, Aristides said:

these huge wildfires are becoming far more frequent. Why?

Big meanie! You'll force their brains to explode trying to come up with a reason that it's not what it is.

Always had forest fires in these parts, but none so big there were evacutation alerts for almost a hundred years. There's been three alerts and one evacuation in the last 10....
the local ski hill is on it's last legs from years of low snowfall. Can't make money if ski season is less than a month!

Not only that, "forest management" in N America is another bullshit term. It actually stands for forst economic management, how to extract the trees and resources for the maximum profit. Fire fighting doesn't make money for the forest owners regardless if they're private or govt owned forests.