Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

It must be miserable to genuinely believe scientists, historians, and journalists spent their entire lives lying to you, but a reality TV celebrity with decades of documented fraud is your sole source of truth.

robosmith

By robosmith
in Federal Politics in the United States

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hodad Grand Master

Hodad

Posted
Posted (edited)

This is EXACTLY where they're at. It boggles the mind and beggars belief.

Dumb people used to be grateful for people with brains and education helping us all to navigate and thrive in the world. Today, they resent and reject the value of those things entirely. 

Who knew that Idiocracy was a near-future documentary?

 

Edited by Hodad
Legato Grand Master

Legato

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Hodad said:

Who knew that Idiocracy was a near-future documentary?

 

In which you are the sole actor.

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted

Yes, Trump is such a liar:

Snopes: Did Trump Say Biden 'Has Dementia' and Is Moving to a Wisconsin Nursing Home? Former U.S. President Donald Trump used his own social media platform, Truth Social, to spread baseless claims about the current president's health.

He was sooooo wrong about that.

Politico: Top Trump officials pushed the Covid-19 lab-leak theory. Investigators had doubts.

Hahaha...obviously a bat flew over 1000 miles from Laos to Wuhan and just happened to bite one dog near the Wuhan Institute for Corona Virus studies that used bats to collect specimens and alter the virus and that dog was eaten and then passed COVID19 on to everyone. It didn't leak from the lab, working with the same virus, just right next door. That's stupid.

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
West Grand Master

West

Posted
Posted (edited)

There are many quality researchers. There's also been a weaponization of the academia by the Democrats to push nonsense not rooted in reality but rather radical Marxism. Climate science activism is one such example where you could only get grants if you provided the Obama administration with weaponized talking points to keep the large scale laundering scam going. 

Funding is often tied now to woke religion such as DEI which creates dangerous group think 

Edited by West
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1
robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, West said:

There are many quality researchers. There's also been a weaponization of the academia by the Democrats to push nonsense not rooted in reality but rather radical Marxism. Climate science activism is one such example where you could only get grants if you provided the Obama administration with weaponized talking points to keep the large scale laundering scam going. 

It's EASY for you to make ^these LUDICROUS CLAIMS but IMPOSSIBLE for you to prove them true because they ARE NOT.

2 hours ago, West said:

Funding is often tied now to woke religion such as DEI which creates dangerous group think 

What is "dangerous" or "group think" about DEI?

You're just repeating BULLSHIT you heard on FOS LIES.

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It's EASY for you to make ^these LUDICROUS CLAIMS but IMPOSSIBLE for you to prove them true because they ARE NOT.

What is "dangerous" or "group think" about DEI?

You're just repeating BULLSHIT you heard on FOS LIES.

Robo, how does it feel? to be the dumbest person on this forum i mean? You seem to be at peace with it but i've always wondered if it bugged you. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

West Grand Master

West

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It's EASY for you to make ^these LUDICROUS CLAIMS but IMPOSSIBLE for you to prove them true because they ARE NOT.

What is "dangerous" or "group think" about DEI?

You're just repeating BULLSHIT you heard on FOS LIES.

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/putting-the-con-in-consensus

Here's a thorough debunking of the main lie that the Obama administration used 

robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, West said:

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/putting-the-con-in-consensus

Here's a thorough debunking of the main lie that the Obama administration used 

An economist is no expert on climate change, and his stated standard that fossil fuel burning HAS BEEN more advantageous than dangerous IGNORES the evidence that the danger is INCREASING and the cost of renewables is declining and in MANY CASES LOWER NOW.

IOW, your rebuttal ONLY addresses a tiny and obsolete issue.

Rebuttal to Ross McKitrick, an economics professor sowing the seeds of doubt regarding human caused climate change and global warming?
 
Oct 26, 2018 — ”), Ross McKitrick continues to try to move the goalposts on climate action with a misleading argument about global climate models, while ...
Oct 28, 2010 — The report presents responses to the most prominent arguments of climate change skeptics, including claims that Earth is not warming; that any ...
Deluge Grand Master

Deluge

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

An economist is no expert on climate change, and his stated standard that fossil fuel burning HAS BEEN more advantageous than dangerous IGNORES the evidence that the danger is INCREASING and the cost of renewables is declining and in MANY CASES LOWER NOW.

IOW, your rebuttal ONLY addresses a tiny and obsolete issue.

Rebuttal to Ross McKitrick, an economics professor sowing the seeds of doubt regarding human caused climate change and global warming?
 
Oct 26, 2018 — ”), Ross McKitrick continues to try to move the goalposts on climate action with a misleading argument about global climate models, while ...
Oct 28, 2010 — The report presents responses to the most prominent arguments of climate change skeptics, including claims that Earth is not warming; that any ...

The only experts on your side of the fence are arsonists and radical activists. 

Legato Grand Master

Legato

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You mean the only ones YOU can UNDERSTAND. LMAO

Theses people understand......a very windy band.

 

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, robosmith said:

An economist is no expert on climate change, and his stated standard that fossil fuel burning HAS BEEN more advantageous than dangerous IGNORES the evidence that the danger is INCREASING and the cost of renewables is declining and in MANY CASES LOWER NOW.

IOW, your rebuttal ONLY addresses a tiny and obsolete issue.

Rebuttal to Ross McKitrick, an economics professor sowing the seeds of doubt regarding human caused climate change and global warming?
 
Oct 26, 2018 — ”), Ross McKitrick continues to try to move the goalposts on climate action with a misleading argument about global climate models, while ...
Oct 28, 2010 — The report presents responses to the most prominent arguments of climate change skeptics, including claims that Earth is not warming; that any ...

So you are ignoring the scientific findings that lack of CO2 will cause the planet to heat to uninhabitable levels?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Legato Grand Master

Legato

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

So you are ignoring the scientific findings that lack of CO2 will cause the planet to heat to uninhabitable levels?

What I find amazing is people calling CO2 a pollutant. These idi*ts don't realise that they are a carbon based lifeform and without CO2 there would be no life on this planet.

  • Like 2
West Grand Master

West

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

An economist is no expert on climate change, and his stated standard that fossil fuel burning HAS BEEN more advantageous than dangerous IGNORES the evidence that the danger is INCREASING and the cost of renewables is declining and in MANY CASES LOWER NOW.

IOW, your rebuttal ONLY addresses a tiny and obsolete issue.

Rebuttal to Ross McKitrick, an economics professor sowing the seeds of doubt regarding human caused climate change and global warming?
 
Oct 26, 2018 — ”), Ross McKitrick continues to try to move the goalposts on climate action with a misleading argument about global climate models, while ...
Oct 28, 2010 — The report presents responses to the most prominent arguments of climate change skeptics, including claims that Earth is not warming; that any ...

 No offense but I have more respect for women and gender studies than climate whacktovists

  • Haha 1
CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, West said:

 No offense but I have more respect for women and gender studies than climate whacktovists

That's racist.  Probably. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, West said:

 No offense but I have more respect for women and gender studies than climate whacktovists

No offense, but your completely UNINFORMED respect carries ZERO WEIGHT.

You can't even specify with what part of the CLIMATE SCIENCE you disagree, because you just don't know anything about the science of fossil fuel burning GW. And the climate scientists for whom you have no respect know FAR MORE than you ever will.

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Now you've stepped in it.

I've brought up and issue with question for which you have ^NO ANSWER.

robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, Legato said:

What I find amazing is people calling CO2 a pollutant. These idi*ts don't realise that they are a carbon based lifeform and without CO2 there would be no life on this planet.

You have NO IDEA what climate scientists realize because you've never even read a climate science journal.

Thanks for demonstrating just how ignorant you are about your ignorance. LMAO

Nationalist Grand Master

Nationalist

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No offense, but your completely UNINFORMED respect carries ZERO WEIGHT.

You can't even specify with what part of the CLIMATE SCIENCE you disagree, because you just don't know anything about the science of fossil fuel burning GW. And the climate scientists for whom you have no respect know FAR MORE than you ever will.

I've brought up and issue with question for which you have ^NO ANSWER.

Sally...DEI is as racist as it gets.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Sally...DEI is as racist as it gets.

Sure. Must be much more racist OPPRESSION than SLAVERY. :sarcasm: LMAO

A lot of you right wingers never understand that racial discrimination is ONLY BAD when employed to oppress people.

Particularly those who have suffered a LONG HISTORY of DENIAL OF THEIR RIGHTS. 🤮

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403
    AlembicoEMR
    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined

  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...