Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, West said:

Charges will be dropped just like those against the Mayor, because Federal legislators are specifically protected by law from arrest during official  duties.

Quote
Yes, federal legislators do have a specific privilege from arrest during official duties, as outlined in the U.S. Constitution. This protection, also known as legislative immunity, ensures they can fulfill their duties without fear of interference or arrest. 
 
Here's a more detailed explanation:
  • Constitutional Basis:
    Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution grants this privilege. 
     
  • Scope of Protection:
    The protection extends to "all cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace" while attending the session of their respective houses and during travel to and from those sessions. 
     
  • Exceptions:
    While the privilege is broad, it does not protect against serious crimes like treason, felony, or breach of the peace. 
     
  • Purpose:
    The purpose of this privilege is to ensure that legislators can carry out their legislative functions independently and without undue interference. 

 

Posted

The dumb fat biatch is going to jail and will be a Libbie martyr.

@robosmith will soon leave his wife and her cucumber for a love affair with this dumb fat biatch. 

Ain't life grand...

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Charges will be dropped

I swear, do you even bother to read your own crap?

She was not arrested while performing her official duties; she is being charged with a crime she will have to answer for. 

 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, West said:

Nonsense. You can't assault a cop no matter who you are. Duh 

It wasn't "assault," dummy. She pushed his arm away. Did you even see the video? LMAO

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

The dumb fat biatch is going to jail and will be a Libbie martyr.

@robosmith will soon leave his wife and her cucumber for a love affair with this dumb fat biatch. 

Ain't life grand...

Your FANTASIES may be grand for you. LMAO

Posted
25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It wasn't "assault," dummy. She pushed his arm away. Did you even see the video? LMAO

Your FANTASIES may be grand for you. LMAO

Lol...I saw the video and that fat biatch is gonna pay for her BS.

My fantasies? No Tweenkie-Poo.

Don't forget the lube...LOL.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...I saw the video and that fat biatch is gonna pay for her BS.

My fantasies? No Tweenkie-Poo.

Don't forget the lube...LOL.

Don't forget the salt and pepper for your CROW dinner.

Posted

Well, this is obviously going nowhere legally, but the brazenness of this corrupt Trump administration continues to be alarming. That's the real story here. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It wasn't "assault," dummy. She pushed his arm away. Did you even see the video? LMAO

Unwanted forceful touching is a crime. You can't push a police officer away. 

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Well, this is obviously going nowhere legally, but the brazenness of this corrupt Trump administration continues to be alarming. That's the real story here. 

Just amazing how you guys have no moral, ethical, or legal consistency. You just say whatever you want or can when it is politically convenient. 

 

 

 

Posted

lit

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Don't forget the salt and pepper for your CROW dinner.

Crow's okay but four and twenty blackbirds (with a little ginger) baked in a pie and served with orange sauce is outstanding.

Posted
6 hours ago, User said:

I swear, do you even bother to read your own crap?

 

I'm sure he does.  i mean he needs a laugh same as we do right? 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 hours ago, User said:

Unwanted forceful touching is a crime. You can't push a police officer away. 

 

I'm sure there's a reason you've CITED NOTHING to prove ^this.

The officer was abusing his power, which is why the Mayor was not charged. 

And the rep probably got carried away in the moment and "assault" is a complete overreach, which is why the charges against her will be dropped.

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I'm sure there's a reason you've CITED NOTHING to prove ^this.

The officer was abusing his power, which is why the Mayor was not charged. 

And the rep probably got carried away in the moment and "assault" is a complete overreach, which is why the charges against her will be dropped.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/111

LOL, I love how you are moving those goal posts to got carried away... yeah, sure, the folks on January 6th just got carried away too!

You guys will do or say anything. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

×
×
  • Create New...