Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Of course he wanted Carney. He can talk business with him. He can negotiate intelligently with him.

 

Negotiate intelligently? My my what a change in attitude from a guy with stage 5 TDS.

Blowing in the wind.

  • Downvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Legato said:

Negotiate intelligently? My my what a change in attitude from a guy with stage 5 TDS.

Blowing in the wind.

???

Shit, PP could not even leave the country so he would have been eaten by Trump or jumped all over him and blown him LOL. 

PP has no negotiation skills. He is only expert at whining and criticizing. LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

???

Shit, PP could not even leave the country so he would have been eaten by Trump or jumped all over him and blown him LOL. 

PP has no negotiation skills. He is only expert at whining and criticizing. LOL

I'm not talking about Poilievre, but your about face regarding Trump. Now he has intelligent conversations?

I'll point that out the next time your stack blows when Trump does something you don't like.

Posted
19 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Isn’t this something you Trump fans should like about the guy?

I do not vote for liars or thieves. If you do...shame on you.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Legato said:

I'm not talking about Poilievre, but your about face regarding Trump. Now he has intelligent conversations?

I'll point that out the next time your stack blows when Trump does something you don't like.

Nope...read again. I said Carney can negotiate intelligently and have an intelligent conversation as opposed to PP.

I fully understand and sympathize with your comprehension issues. :)

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
2 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Nope...read again. I said Carney can negotiate intelligently and have an intelligent conversation as opposed to PP.

I fully understand and sympathize with your comprehension issues. :)

Your statement....."Of course he wanted Carney. He can talk business with him. He can negotiate intelligently with him"

He, meaning Trump.

Squirm all you like, the chain broke on your back peddler.

 

Posted
32 minutes ago, Legato said:

Your statement....."Of course he wanted Carney. He can talk business with him. He can negotiate intelligently with him"

He, meaning Trump.

Squirm all you like, the chain broke on your back peddler.

 

Your comprehension issues keep you from understanding.

Sorry but there is no help for the unintelligent but you can get professional help.

Keep on trying, it will come one day LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
35 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Your comprehension issues keep you from understanding.

Sorry but there is no help for the unintelligent but you can get professional help.

Keep on trying, it will come one day LOL

Well sunshine, didn't take long for your usual tailspin.

  • Downvote 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Aristides said:

Not when she is intentionally making it difficult for Carney to deal with the US. Alberta is still part of Canada no matter what Smith wants. I don't have a problem with her sticking up for Alberta but maybe wait and see what Carney does before she starts making ultimatums while he is dealing with the greatest threat to this country in 200 years. What's her plan if Albertans do vote to separate, they don't know what they want because their only realistic option would be to join the US and who in their right mind would want to join that shit show. How much influence would a state of 4 million people have in a country of more tha 330 million? A lot less than they do now.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-one-in-four-people-in-alberta-identify-as-albertans-first-canadians/

How is she doing that, Carney knew well before he was elected what a shit show it was out west, and how the liberals have neglected them....and he knows that bill C-69 is the key to placating them, but refuses to counter that bill. Are you suggesting that Carney, can't handle two things at once....i mean according to his resume he is almost superman, 

Come on, the largest threats in 200 years, did we forget WWI, WWII, Korea, how about the 30's ....this is perhaps the smallest trade war we have been in....lets keep it real...

Well thanks to treebeard, he has educated me on the process, first the vote, then both federal and provincial governments will decide on the question, once that is decided and put to vote and  passed, and separation is what they want then both sides federal and provincial will negotiate the divorce...there are lots of options on would be a western coalition meaning Alberta, Sask, maybe BC or Manitoba...other options would be join the US....Oil and gas are powerful political tools, having more than texas would give them the power they need...what power do they have now...the liberals turn off oil and gas exploration, and pipelines, and is currently not even talking to the chinese about their tariffs...  

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Just trying to get down to your level.

 

You think it's down because you spend so much of your time with your head buried in the sand  :)  If you were twice as smart as you are you still wouldn't be half way to my level :)  Or in fact that of the average gerbil

  • Downvote 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
6 hours ago, Benz said:

Do you think she is just bluffing like Robert bourrassa was doing back then, or she is totally converted to the concept of Alberta`s sovereignty?

In other words, if Carney gives her most ofwhat she wants, do you think she will stop heading toward Alberta's sovereignty, or she stood up Alberta's autonomy until the end?

Is she bluffing, i don't think so, the idea of separation is growing , not to the point they will have enough for a vote....but thats me guessing , polls say around 30 % want to leave...so who knows...She is going with the flow, one way or another...

The process is way to long and outcomes not guaranteed, as Quebec found out... everyone has this picture of how things should look like....but borders actual land mass size, currency, military, the list goes on and on all have to be agreed to by both sides....

If Alberta gets recognized for what and who they are, i think this separation thing might subside....i mean it is a win win for Canada, not sure why not everyone wants it....like in Quebec, it's still there but separation is an idea that is very distant..

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Legato said:

Well sunshine, didn't take long for your usual tailspin.

Funny, when confronted with the truth...it is a tailspin to you LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You think it's down because ....

Sorry, I cannot get down to your level...it is far too low.

You are at the bottom of the barrel.

image.jpeg.8d631099aae7dbe9b4cae2c17c8cd538.jpeg

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
Just now, Nefarious Banana said:

Why do you f'k-up every thread?

Just because you don't like my take???

Maybe you are f'k up in every thread.

Besides, I am 100% correct about PP. The only time he can leave the country is on vacation because without security clearance, no other government will talk with him LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
6 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Are you an Albertan?

No but I did live there for six years and have a lot of time for Albertans in general and sympathy for some of their complaints. My opinion of Smith stands.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Sorry, I cannot get down to your level...

You're holding the chart upside down again :P 

Like honestly I don't think these comebacks would even impress someone in grade one. I've obviously emotionally damaged you to the point where you're too busy crying to be able to think of a decent reply :) 

Remember you're only value here is entertainment so step it up.

  • Sad 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

Is she bluffing, i don't think so, the idea of separation is growing , not to the point they will have enough for a vote....but thats me guessing , polls say around 30 % want to leave...so who knows...She is going with the flow, one way or another...

The process is way to long and outcomes not guaranteed, as Quebec found out... everyone has this picture of how things should look like....but borders actual land mass size, currency, military, the list goes on and on all have to be agreed to by both sides....

If Alberta gets recognized for what and who they are, i think this separation thing might subside....i mean it is a win win for Canada, not sure why not everyone wants it....like in Quebec, it's still there but separation is an idea that is very distant..

A non sovereign province trying to negociate with the federal, is like playing poker but, you are showing your cards to your opponent. So far, all the provinces but Quebec did not mind because it was a cultural acceptation that Ottawa play in your sandbox.

It seems that Alberta is starting to think like Quebec. I just wonder at what phase they actually are. Still thinking you can play poker by showing your cards, or ready to assume full sovereignty attitude. Quebec sovereignists are observing with serious interests.

In another post, I suggested that we should improve the canadian federalism and make it possible for a province to become an autonomous state within Canada with the following features.
-Opt out from federal program with full compensation
-Select your own senators the way you want it (election involved if it is what you want)
-Select your own judges
-Can make treaties to other countries without needing an approval from Ottawa as long as it does not enter into conflict with the federal ones
-Ottawa's decisions, even regarding international deals, can't be done without the provincial/state if it regards a competency of the state.

Right now, there are no federal parties that offer this and it is pointless to wait for it.

So if Alberta and Quebec coordinate a plan for a referendum on sovereignty and then offer this kind of partnership to Ottawa, I think it could become very interesting. Ottawa won't be able to cope a NO and then deal with the consequences of a collapsing system. But if we engage that way, we can't bluff. It's all in by assuming decisions of sovereign nations.

Posted
38 minutes ago, Benz said:

A non sovereign province trying to negociate with the federal, is like playing poker but, you are showing your cards to your opponent. So far, all the provinces but Quebec did not mind because it was a cultural acceptation that Ottawa play in your sandbox.

It seems that Alberta is starting to think like Quebec. I just wonder at what phase they actually are. Still thinking you can play poker by showing your cards, or ready to assume full sovereignty attitude. Quebec sovereignists are observing with serious interests.

In another post, I suggested that we should improve the canadian federalism and make it possible for a province to become an autonomous state within Canada with the following features.
-Opt out from federal program with full compensation
-Select your own senators the way you want it (election involved if it is what you want)
-Select your own judges
-Can make treaties to other countries without needing an approval from Ottawa as long as it does not enter into conflict with the federal ones
-Ottawa's decisions, even regarding international deals, can't be done without the provincial/state if it regards a competency of the state.

Right now, there are no federal parties that offer this and it is pointless to wait for it.

So if Alberta and Quebec coordinate a plan for a referendum on sovereignty and then offer this kind of partnership to Ottawa, I think it could become very interesting. Ottawa won't be able to cope a NO and then deal with the consequences of a collapsing system. But if we engage that way, we can't bluff. It's all in by assuming decisions of sovereign nations.

It's true,but lets not forget,the feds have the last word, they do not have to change the constitution, which does not allow a province to leave without changing the constitution which requires the feds to do that...along with following the clarity act...Everything is negotiated, federal lands, borders, currency, military the whole thing.....

Quebecs has already opted out of some programs, with compensation....

Senators would be easy enough....but what party is the question....in Quebecs case do you really want liberal or conservative or green party...?

I thought most judges in Quebec were from Quebec? or french speaking...

the other two i'm not sure on....

the referendum is but one small part, Ottawa does not have to approve separation...there is no clause that says they have to amend the constitution...to allow for separation....and there is no rules or policy they have to give that province what they ask for....and say if Quebec says they are separating anyways, then it would be hard for that province to gain international recognition from the UN or rest of the globe....

 

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
10 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Of course he wanted Carney. He can talk business with him. He can negotiate intelligently with him.

Riiiiight. Trump wanted Canada to have its most capable PM possible while he was in a trade war with us 😂

Why did Xi want Carney? Does Xi also wish nothing but the best for Canada during their trade war with us? 

It's like you're battling myata for the title of "dumbest guy on the internet". Sorry dude, you're gonna have to work a little harder. Myata's starting stupid threads that are monuments to stupidity and ignorance while you're just doing some light trolling. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Riiiiight. Trump wanted Canada to have its most capable PM possible while he was in a trade war with us 😂

Why did Xi want Carney? Does Xi also wish nothing but the best for Canada during their trade war with us? 

It's like you're battling myata for the title of "dumbest guy on the internet". Sorry dude, you're gonna have to work a little harder. Myata's starting stupid threads that are monuments to stupidity and ignorance while you're just doing some light trolling. 

Trump, Xi, Man so many world leaders out there who are just desperate for Canada to have the very best representation so that they can have an intelligent conversation with them and work out a deal that's fair for Canada as well. None of these guys want what's best for their country after all :) 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You're holding the chart upside down again :P 

...

Nope, double checked and you definitely are in the bottom of the barrel of intelligence.

So far down you cannot see light at the top LOL

LOSER!!

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Riiiiight. Trump wanted Canada to have its most capable PM possible while he was in a trade war with us 😂

...

I am glad you finally see it is Carney as most capable person. 

Hey, suck it up...fortunately for Canada Carney is the one leading the negotiations. 

Better than zero PP

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

I am glad you finally see it is Carney as most capable person. 

Hey, suck it up...fortunately for Canada Carney is the one leading the negotiations. 

Better than zero PP

Yeah, fortunately for Canada we had Trudeau for the last ten years, right? 

Canadians actually wanted to struggle to pay bills, be homeless, be called genocidal by Iran, end up in a trade war with the US, but have no pipelines to move our own oil around while we fight it.

To be honest, Canadians are so stupid that a lot of them would do it if the CBC told them to. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
28 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yeah, fortunately for Canada we had Trudeau for the last ten years, right? 

C...

Like Carney told PP during the debate...Trudeau is gone. Canada voted for the person they though would do best.

Move on, time to live in the present.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...