Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

How do you take his word................if he's leaving out details?

 

What happened to TRANSPARENCY?

 

 

"The president says lots of things, but the essence of the discussion and where we moved the conversation to, was exactly what I said," Carney said during a campaign stop in Port Moody, B.C., Thursday. 

Carney said that while Trump did bring up the 51st state, he chose, at the time, to describe where the two leaders ended their conversation, rather than giving a detailed blow-by-blow of the call. 

 

In March, when Carney was first asked to describe the tone of the conversation with Trump, he said it was "cordial" and "positive" and that "the president respected Canada's sovereignty today both in his private and public comments." 

At the time Carney did not mention that Trump brought up the 51st state again, but according to two sources with knowledge of the discussion who spoke with Radio-Canada this week, the issue of Canadian sovereignty was, in fact, raised in the first part that March 28 conversation.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-trump-51st-state-1.7517252

 

 

But, we were led to believe that Trump never brought it up, and that somehow it points to Trump's respect for Carney.  Making it look like Carney is the best guy to deal with Trump.

Leaving out that detail, was good for Carney's campaign.

Edited by betsy
Posted
1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

You’re a big Trump person, no?  

Where has this love of the truth been all this time?  

Ahhhh yes, whataboutism. The lefts' answer for everything. 

There is an answer for that but why don't you answer the question for carney first you hypocrite?

3 hours ago, betsy said:

How do you take his word................if he's leaving out details?

 

What happened to TRANSPARENCY?

 

 

"The president says lots of things, but the essence of the discussion and where we moved the conversation to, was exactly what I said," Carney said during a campaign stop in Port Moody, B.C., Thursday. 

Carney said that while Trump did bring up the 51st state, he chose, at the time, to describe where the two leaders ended their conversation, rather than giving a detailed blow-by-blow of the call. 

 

In March, when Carney was first asked to describe the tone of the conversation with Trump, he said it was "cordial" and "positive" and that "the president respected Canada's sovereignty today both in his private and public comments." 

At the time Carney did not mention that Trump brought up the 51st state again, but according to two sources with knowledge of the discussion who spoke with Radio-Canada this week, the issue of Canadian sovereignty was, in fact, raised in the first part that March 28 conversation.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-trump-51st-state-1.7517252

 

 

But, we were led to believe that Trump never brought it up, and that somehow it points to Trump's respect for Carney.  Making it look like Carney is the best guy to deal with Trump.

Leaving out that detail, was good for Carney's campaign.

They don't care dude. It's about tribalism for them. All they care about is that their tribe wins. If that means accepting insane lies, watching the country burn, stealing the future from a couple of generations, well that's just the price you pay isn't it. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Trump's different, because everyone knows he doesn't mean what he says.

 

 🤔

So you couldn't answer the questi on about carney either huh :) 

Never noticed how the left especially the far left such as Michael here freak out and thrash wildly trying to change the subject when asked a simple question and inevitably come to the conclusion that somehow it's all your fault :) 

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 hours ago, betsy said:

How do you take his word................if he's leaving out details?

 

What happened to TRANSPARENCY?

 

 

"The president says lots of things, but the essence of the discussion and where we moved the conversation to, was exactly what I said," Carney said during a campaign stop in Port Moody, B.C., Thursday. 

Carney said that while Trump did bring up the 51st state, he chose, at the time, to describe where the two leaders ended their conversation, rather than giving a detailed blow-by-blow of the call. 

 

In March, when Carney was first asked to describe the tone of the conversation with Trump, he said it was "cordial" and "positive" and that "the president respected Canada's sovereignty today both in his private and public comments." 

At the time Carney did not mention that Trump brought up the 51st state again, but according to two sources with knowledge of the discussion who spoke with Radio-Canada this week, the issue of Canadian sovereignty was, in fact, raised in the first part that March 28 conversation.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-trump-51st-state-1.7517252

 

 

But, we were led to believe that Trump never brought it up, and that somehow it points to Trump's respect for Carney.  Making it look like Carney is the best guy to deal with Trump.

Leaving out that detail, was good for Carney's campaign.

Trump has said that he prefers to have to deal with a lieberal. I guess this means that Trump does not like having to deal with our conservative party in Canada. Interesting indeed. 

Posted
Just now, taxme said:

Trump has said that he prefers to have to deal with a lieberal. I guess this means that Trump does not like having to deal with our conservative party in Canada. Interesting indeed. 

He's already doing a lot of business with carney. Carney's company leases their American office from the kushner's. Carney knows a lot of people that trump knows. Trump is certain he's going to be able to get concessions from carney that he needs because he knows he can reward carney in ways that will benefit carney even if they don't benefit Canada at Large.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
9 minutes ago, taxme said:

Trump has said that he prefers to have to deal with a lieberal. I guess this means that Trump does not like having to deal with our conservative party in Canada. Interesting indeed. 

Don’t you consider Trump’s endorsement of Carney a good thing?  I thought you liked Trump.

Posted
12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

He's already doing a lot of business with carney. Carney's company leases their American office from the kushner's. Carney knows a lot of people that trump knows. Trump is certain he's going to be able to get concessions from carney that he needs because he knows he can reward carney in ways that will benefit carney even if they don't benefit Canada at Large.

It is plain as day to see that a Corney shill lieberal win means  Canada will become a real WEF globalist country with the end results that Canada will become a tyranny like country where freedom of speech and assembly will pretty much be no more. The WEF globalists cabal will not show any mercy on Canada or Canadians. I have read enough of what those WEF globalists want for the world. Total domination, tyranny and slavery. Bugs and buses will be on the menu for we the sheeple, while the globalists will eat steak and fly around the world in their private jets. It is our call to see that does not happen. Vote conservative or else the alternative of what i mentioned above. Believe it or not. 😇

Posted
10 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Don’t you consider Trump’s endorsement of Carney a good thing?  I thought you liked Trump.

I like Trump, but after what he said, that Trump would prefer to deal with a lieberal government, that has me wondering as to what the hell that was all about. I believe that the WEF Zionist🤔 globalists played a part in the assassination attempts on Trumps life. Just my opinion. 

Posted

If it comes down to trust look at the numbers.

Carney to stand up to Trump?
Or Milhouse VanHoughten Poilievre who's peddling a copy of Trumpism to appease and surrender to him?

Look at the polling numbers on that issue and tell us we're all wrong.

Posted
4 hours ago, herbie said:

If it comes down to trust look at the numbers.

Carney to stand up to Trump?
Or Milhouse VanHoughten Poilievre who's peddling a copy of Trumpism to appease and surrender to him?

Look at the polling numbers on that issue and tell us we're all wrong.

You're wrong

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,899
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Shemul Ray
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...