robosmith Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago And ^this does not even account for the variations caused by a brain that is NOT SYNCHRONIZED with the body. 2 Quote
Scott75 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 20 minutes ago, robosmith said: And ^this does not even account for the variations caused by a brain that is NOT SYNCHRONIZED with the body. I can agree with all of that, but from what I've read, most people are either biologically male or biologically female. Quote
robosmith Posted 15 hours ago Author Report Posted 15 hours ago 1 minute ago, Scott75 said: I can agree with all of that, but from what I've read, most people are either biologically male or biologically female. So what? Are you saying that justifies the persecution of outliers? 1 Quote
TreeBeard Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 56 minutes ago, Scott75 said: I can agree with all of that, but from what I've read, most people are either biologically male or biologically female. Mostly, yes. No one has claimed otherwise. But those exceptions mean that biological sex is not binary. I had this conversation with some of the weirdos on this forum and they insisted that, despite the many exceptions, biological sex was still binary. It was bizarre. 2 Quote
eyeball Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 8 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: Mostly, yes. No one has claimed otherwise. But those exceptions mean that biological sex is not binary. We're talking about biological exceptions that only make up 1% or so of the population. It's ludicrous how so few people can cause so many of the 40% of Canadians who are conservative to be so hostile towards everyone. It is what it is I guess. 2 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Legato Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 17 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: Mostly, yes. No one has claimed otherwise. But those exceptions mean that biological sex is not binary. I had this conversation with some of the weirdos on this forum and they insisted that, despite the many exceptions, biological sex was still binary. It was bizarre. How many chromosomes do you have? Quote
TreeBeard Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Legato said: How many chromosomes do you have? Irrelevant. 1 Quote
eyeball Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Legato said: How many chromosomes do you have? How big is your amygdala? Political ideology linked to subtle differences in brain structure, study finds The study showed that conservative voters tend to have a slightly larger amygdala than progressive voters—by approximately the size of a sesame seed. The amygdala is the part of the brain responsible for processing fear, rage and anxiety. 1 1 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
herbie Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Quit feeding the ignorant trolls that think their own quality of life depends on what some other person has or calls what's between their legs. Quote
robosmith Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago 2 minutes ago, herbie said: Quit feeding the ignorant trolls that think their own quality of life depends on what some other person has or calls what's between their legs. I think it's more like they fear that normalization of outliers will encourage their own offspring to come out of the closet. Or maybe they are phobic of the homosexual within. Quote
Deluge Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, robosmith said: So what? Are you saying that justifies the persecution of outliers? What persecution? There is no persecution. The only persecution that we have seen is gender bending weirdos foisting their agenda on the public. You have two choices: the men's room or the women's room. Both have toilets, so if you're a guy who thinks he's a chick, then you can still sit down in the men's room because everyone else knows you're a guy. If you're a chick who thinks you're a guy, you can still sit down in the women's room because you know everyone else knows you're a chick. It's easy. Edited 11 hours ago by Deluge Quote
robosmith Posted 11 hours ago Author Report Posted 11 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Deluge said: What persecution? There is no persecution. The only persecution that we have seen is gender bending weirdos foisting their agenda on the public. You have two choices: the men's room or the women's room. Both have toilets, so if you're a guy who thinks he's a chick, then you can still sit down in the men's room because everyone else knows you're a guy. If you're a chick who thinks you're a guy, you can still sit down in the women's room because you know everyone else knows you're a chick. It's easy. Sorry your arrogance doesn't entitle YOU to set the rules. That is YOUR PERSECUTION. Quote
Deluge Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago (edited) 22 minutes ago, robosmith said: Sorry your arrogance doesn't entitle YOU to set the rules. That is YOUR PERSECUTION. It's the way it is, numbnuts - look around; where are the bathrooms for the 463 different genders you dumbf*cks pretend to exist? Edited 10 hours ago by Deluge Quote
Legato Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 2 hours ago, TreeBeard said: Irrelevant. You don't seem to think so. 2 hours ago, eyeball said: How big is your amygdala? Political ideology linked to subtle differences in brain structure, study finds The study showed that conservative voters tend to have a slightly larger amygdala than progressive voters—by approximately the size of a sesame seed. The amygdala is the part of the brain responsible for processing fear, rage and anxiety. Goalposts. Quote
eyeball Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Legato said: You don't seem to think so. Goalposts. It's biology not ideology. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Legato Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, eyeball said: It's biology not ideology. That's right, how many sex chromosomes do we have? Note:- the answer isn't goalposts. Quote
robosmith Posted 10 hours ago Author Report Posted 10 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Legato said: You don't seem to think so. Goalposts. Do you know that you're a HORRIBLE debater. You need to post full sentences if you want to have ANY HOPE of CONVINCING ANYONE. But I think the reason you don't is because YOU CANNOT. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago Threads like this are a hoot. What @robosmith has done is taken legitimate DSD issues and prescribed them to all people that identify themselves as trans. There is a big problem with that. There are far more people that identify as trans than there are actual DSD patients. Here are the numbers: The incidence of a child with a disorder of sexual development (DSD) is approximately 1 in 1000 to 4500 live births. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557435/ At most, 0.1% of births have a form of DSD. No less than 0.022% are born with DSD. But... About 5% of young adults in the U.S. say their gender is different from their sex assigned at birth https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/06/07/about-5-of-young-adults-in-the-u-s-say-their-gender-is-different-from-their-sex-assigned-at-birth/ So that means, at most, 2% of those claiming they are trans are actually trans with as few as 0.44% actually being trans. The other 98% plus are either mentally ill or liberal. (I know I said the same thing twice) Just because DSD exists doesn't mean that all trans people have DSD. The numbers show, the vaàaaàaaaast majority of trans people do not have a chromosome issue. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted 9 hours ago Author Report Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 51 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Threads like this are a hoot. What @robosmith has done is taken legitimate DSD issues and prescribed them to all people that identify themselves as trans. There is a big problem with that. There are far more people that identify as trans than there are actual DSD patients. Here are the numbers: The incidence of a child with a disorder of sexual development (DSD) is approximately 1 in 1000 to 4500 live births. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557435/ At most, 0.1% of births have a form of DSD. No less than 0.022% are born with DSD. But... About 5% of young adults in the U.S. say their gender is different from their sex assigned at birth https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/06/07/about-5-of-young-adults-in-the-u-s-say-their-gender-is-different-from-their-sex-assigned-at-birth/ So that means, at most, 2% of those claiming they are trans are actually trans with as few as 0.44% actually being trans. The other 98% plus are either mentally ill or liberal. (I know I said the same thing twice) Just because DSD exists doesn't mean that all trans people have DSD. The numbers show, the vaàaaàaaaast majority of trans people do not have a chromosome issue. YOU ARE LYING. I said NOTHING about the number of people who have diagnosed DSD which is why you QUOTED NOTHING from my posts. Duh And your numbers with a huge range are proof that the actual number is very poorly understood. Edited 8 hours ago by robosmith Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: YOU ARE LYING. I posted a scientific study and a well known and respected pollster. How is that lying? Oh, right, you are defining lying by how the word feels and now what it actually means. Aka rule #5. 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: I said NOTHING about the number of people who have diagnosed DSD which is why you QUOTED NOTHING from my posts. Duh You implied trans and DSD are the same thing. I didn't quote your meme because it was just a meme and everyone knew what I was talking about so it wasn't necessary. I did, however, use verifiable and reliable sources. You just have a meme. Soooooo...... Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted 8 hours ago Author Report Posted 8 hours ago Just now, gatomontes99 said: I posted a scientific study and a well known and respected pollster. How is that lying? As I said, I SAID NOTHING about the number of people with DSD. Duh. AKA you lied. Just now, gatomontes99 said: Oh, right, you are defining lying by how the word feels and now what it actually means. Aka rule #5. Read your post about what you claimed I said. Just now, gatomontes99 said: You implied trans and DSD are the same thing. I didn't quote your meme because it was just a meme and everyone knew what I was talking about so it wasn't necessary. I did, however, use verifiable and reliable sources. You just have a meme. Soooooo...... My post was NOT about diagnosed DSD people. It is about you A-HOLES who believe in BINARY SEXUAL IDENTIFICATION. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: As I said, I SAID NOTHING about the number of people with DSD. Duh. AKA you lied. You just listed every type of DSD as if that is what everyone that identifies as trans must have. Now you want to pretend you were not talking about DSD? Is that because you don't know what DSD is? 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: It is about you A-HOLES who believe in BINARY SEXUAL IDENTIFICATION. Ah, rule #2. Got it. So your argument, that I'm lying, is that I'm wrong in saying 99.9% of people fit into two categories because you listed every DSD condition, but you weren't talking about DSD even though every Trans person has the right to not claim they are part of a binary gender identification even though 98% are actually part of the binary gender system and those that aren't are part of the binary gender system but have a deformity that makes it hard to identify that? Did I get that right? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 6 hours ago, TreeBeard said: Mostly, yes. No one has claimed otherwise. But those exceptions mean that biological sex is not binary. I had this conversation with some of the weirdos on this forum and they insisted that, despite the many exceptions, biological sex was still binary. It was bizarre. Anomalies do not change the fact that sex is binary. 1 Quote
User Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, herbie said: Quit feeding the ignorant trolls that think their own quality of life depends on what some other person has or calls what's between their legs. No one cares if you or anyone else wants to pretend you are something you are not. The issue is that folks like you don't want that, what you want is to force all of us to go along with the delusion AND push this shit onto kids as normal, "affirm" kids are something they are not without parental support or knowledge, transition kids, change the definitions of woman, force women to have to compete against dudes as well as share their personal spaces... Edited 7 hours ago by User Quote
User Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 6 hours ago, eyeball said: We're talking about biological exceptions that only make up 1% or so of the population. It's ludicrous how so few people can cause so many of the 40% of Canadians who are conservative to be so hostile towards everyone. It is what it is I guess. What do you base claiming 40% or any large amount of Canadians who are conservative are so hostile towards folks who are born with genetic disorders like these? Your comment only shows the dishonesty of this entire thread. You guys are dishonestly conflating genetic disorders with dudes who think they are women or have some fetish in claiming to be a woman. 5 hours ago, robosmith said: I think it's more like they fear that normalization of outliers will encourage their own offspring to come out of the closet. Or maybe they are phobic of the homosexual within. Come out of the closet? You are dishonestly conflating genetic disorders with a lifestyle choice or delusion to think you are something you are not. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.