Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The CBC journalists all had long faces, and really attacked the REBEL NEWS on tv...............for how they claimed, the REBEL NEWS had hijacked the traditional  scrum session that happens after debates, and were able to ask questions!  

 

They also attacked the Canada Elections guy for letting it happen.   They want blood!

 

Here's the other side.  Grab your popcorn!   Some of these scenes  I have not seen on mainstream media. 

 

 

 

Edited by betsy
  • Like 2
Posted

Yeah that was pretty bad. Whether you like it or not rebel news has been recognized as a legitimate news source it has won the right to attend I did everything about board and did nothing that anyone else couldn't have done. The efforts of the Legacy Media and shamefully the NDP are absolutely horrible in a free society.

To be blunt, all of the things that Jaggers said about rebel media I have said about the CBC. But I would never say that they should be denied access to a media event.

This was just ultra scummy and it was disappointing to see to say the least. Rebel media fought hard, they earned their right, they got to the front of the line, they asked their questions. Anybody could have done that, they did it, this is ridiculous

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Yeah that was pretty bad. Whether you like it or not rebel news has been recognized as a legitimate news source it has won the right to attend I did everything about board and did nothing that anyone else couldn't have done.

.....

Years ago, I bought the Globe and Le Devoir for 50 cents or so. (In Quebec City!)

I enjoyed my morning read, argument. Richard Needham. Claude Ryan.

======

Nowadays, I don't know what to read. There is so much!

-I would be willing to pay 50 cents each day for a trustworthy editor.

Posted
9 minutes ago, August1991 said:

Years ago, I bought the Globe and Le Devoir for 50 cents or so. (In Quebec City!)

I enjoyed my morning read, argument. Richard Needham. Claude Ryan.

======

Nowadays, I don't know what to read. There is so much!

-I would be willing to pay 50 cents each day for a trustworthy editor.

Sadly, in this day and age there's always someone willing to pay 60 cents to get them to lie

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sadly, in this day and age there's always someone willing to pay 60 cents to get them to lie

Disagree.

I paid 50 cents for a good read, an editor who would choose. Good intriguing writers.

Nowadays, a Google algorithim sends me crap.

Posted
52 minutes ago, August1991 said:

Disagree.

Well you're wrong. I noticed you often disagree because you don't like the truth not because it isn't the truth

 

Quote

 

I paid 50 cents for a good read, an editor who would choose. Good intriguing writers.

Nowadays, a Google algorithim sends me crap.

 

Because you don't understand what I said. If you did you would understand why that's happening.

And you probably didn't have as good an editor as you thought. Well over 100 years ago mark twain said "If you don't read the paper you're uninformed. If you do read the paper you're misinformed." Newspapers have always screwed up the stories and they've always been slanted based on the political and social leanings of the editors and owners

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

A lot of outrage over a few questions from Rebel.

They were able to cleverly pull a legal trick that gave them access to asking more questions than even the CBC was allowed. I mean they played by the rules, none of it was a lie or a cheat, but the mainstream media completely lost their shit. There are a number of videos of them circulating where mainstream media reporters are just behaving in a fashion that anybody would find unacceptable towards them. I don't think they care for the idea that Someone that they perceive as being little more than an internet influencer and shit disturber managed to have higher priority than they did.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
16 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

A lot of outrage over a few questions from Rebel.

As economists say, there's a lot of money sitting on the table.

In the past, it was in classified ads.

Posted
7 minutes ago, August1991 said:

As economists say, there's a lot of money sitting on the table.

In the past, it was in classified ads.

That's....  actually true and accurate. 

:) Well done :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)

The fall-out continues.  

 

A question, is a question...................even if it doesn't come from the privileged, elitist media.

 

Mark Carney runs from Rebel News' questions in Montreal!

 

 

Edited by betsy
Posted (edited)

Here's the thing:

 

 

If you're going to deal with TRUMP - you have to be prepared for everything!


WOKE, is a big issue to Trump!
Protecting women in sports and identity, is a big issue to Trump!


You can't run away from them if Trump puts them on the table in his negotiations............................or in other ways he deals with trade!

Why do I say that?
Because of this:

 

Trump administration asks French companies to comply with DEI ban

 




Therefore, the question asked by True North, is very much relevant to the debate!
It was an important question that wasn't addressed in the debate!

Too bad - candidates were not asked the same thing! They should've been asked in that formal debate.

Edited by betsy
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Carney was caught off-guard by the questions. The questions were WOKE-related......and we know that WOKE is a big issue to Donald Trump.
Therefore - it is part of the issue, but for the obvious reason of time constraint, was not included among the questions in the debate.

F**K! Why would I want a repeat spin on a question that was already discussed at the debate?
The question asked by this independent media, is relevant - since it's a WOKE issue, and woman-issue!

 

 

 

 

 

here is the full scrum

 

 

 

Edited by betsy
Posted
18 hours ago, betsy said:

The CBC journalists all had long faces, and really attacked the REBEL NEWS on tv...............for how they claimed, the REBEL NEWS had hijacked the traditional  scrum session that happens after debates, and were able to ask questions!  

 

They also attacked the Canada Elections guy for letting it happen.   They want blood!

 

Here's the other side.  Grab your popcorn!   Some of these scenes  I have not seen on mainstream media. 

 

 

That bald guy's voice (5:40) was getting all high-pitched like he was about to cry. What happened to cause that? 

I don't see it in the video. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
15 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Whether you like it or not rebel news has been recognized as a legitimate news source it has won the right to attend I did everything about board and did nothing that anyone else couldn't have done.

Levant and his freak show were not in attendance as legitimate news sources but as registered political advocates.

The government's Leaders Debate Commission that allowed this nonsense to happen needs to be scrapped and responsibility for organizing televised debates and following question periods returned to the consortium of national  broadcasters that used to do it.

This is like the dumbass approach the White House is taking and using to stack it's press scrums with political advocates instead of a properly vetted press pool that's organized by journalists themselves.

And it's all a result of the unending right wing moral panic over media and news.

 

  • Like 2

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

And the young guy at 11:20...

These guys are falling apart. I don't even understand it.

It doesn't seem like this is just about "CBC losing control of the narrative", they're all acting like a child got injured or something. 

Were questions that were asked by Rebel News shown live on CBC after the debate? Was Rebel News right at the debate and part of a media scrum on live TV?

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Levant and his freak show were not in attendance as legitimate news sources but as registered political advocates.

The government's Leaders Debate Commission that allowed this nonsense to happen needs to be scrapped and responsibility for organizing televised debates and following question periods returned to the consortium of national  broadcasters that used to do it.

This is like the dumbass approach the White House is taking and using to stack it's press scrums with political advocates instead of a properly vetted press pool that's organized by journalists themselves.

And it's all a result of the unending right wing moral panic over media and news.

Canadians aren't all watching CBC, CTV and Global anymore. They're just liars and propagandists.

I saw one video of Jagmeet Singh being very politely asked a question by a black lady from Rebel, and he let her finish the question but then he just huffed off like a child. 

Why don't these guys answer questions? 

Are we supposed to believe that Jim Acosta and Rosemary Barton are more serious journalists than this guy even:

ScreenShot2025-04-20at8_44_12AM.thumb.png.247e6789685e65cd899909d530c6322c.png

Do you think that your approach would eliminate guys like Jim Acosta from the press pool? That guy got promoted just by being a lying clown. I don't think that even you can deny that.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Why don't these guys answer questions? 

They do when they're asked by legitimate journalists.

Why do Rebel News billboard trucks need political messages on them?

image.thumb.jpeg.58ae99ba97e2ea9b357b32fac08a95ac.jpeg

Got any pics of CBC trucks with Fùck Poilievre bumper stickers on them?

  • Like 2

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

Why do Rebel News billboard trucks need political messages on them?

image.thumb.jpeg.58ae99ba97e2ea9b357b32fac08a95ac.jpeg

Got any pics of CBC trucks with Fùck Poilievre bumper stickers on them?

Exactly.  People who think this is normal aren't being honest.

The line of thinking is: objectivity is impossible so why even try ?  Instead we'll openly and aggressively push one candidate and tell everyone the others are the same.

Shameful behaviour and we should do our best to ignore it.

  • Like 3
Posted

Watching CBC talking heads pretending to be serious journalists is like watching WWE wrestlers pretending that wrestling is a real sport. 

"OMG, we're all so legitimate, and then there's this group of people who have never told the truth about anything, ever, and all they do is try to start another holocaust!!!😱"

This is from the CBC themselves:

  • Residential school denialists tried to dig up suspected unmarked graves in Kamloops, B.C., report finds

    Denialism is the last step of genocide, says report from independent interlocutor

The CBC gave credence to all these reports of mass-graves, Trudeau spent over a year hamming it up and acting like it was all 100% concrete evidence of mass-murder of children, and in the end NOT ONE CHILD WAS FOUND THERE. There were zero kids buried at Kamloops in that "mass grave".

They hyped it up and hyped it up, along with the media, and the media never talked about TB, smallpox or the Spanish flu or any other reason why there might be mass graves (mass graves were not uncommon among white communities during the Spanish flu) and the gov't delayed doing any actual searches that whole time.

It was literally a mass-gave media circus which turned out to have zero graves.

Rosemary Barton: "Yes there were graves but I won't say where."

It was honestly the most Rosemary Barton thing you ever saw. "WE MAKE THE TRUTH! WE CONTROL THE NARRATIVE! WE DON'T NEED TO EXPLAIN OURSELVES: WE TELL - YOU LISTEN! WHY WON'T THE DEBATE COMMISSION BACK US UUUUUP😭

 

Was the whole mass grave media circus done just so that First Nations chiefs could get the power to block pipelines? 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

More to it than that.  Loaded questions beyond the pale, parking a truck out front as per eyeball's cite above, and aggressively taking up question time from the real journalists.

 

Aggressively taking up time? Gee, I hope everyone was ok, Mike.

They had four questions. Once every four years. It was not Rebel who caused the fighting there. It's all on video. They successfully sued in the two prior elections to be there, and the debate commission tried to trick them this time by telling them they could bring so many reporters while omitting that only one would be allowed to ask a question. So Rebel had their lawyers call them and they caved and gave them 4 questions. Probably because they didn't want to have to explain to a judge why they were defying a ruling for a third time.

Moreover they asked some really good questions that matter to people. Everyone is forced to pay for the CBC, but many people do not feel represented by them. The question about whether or not Jagmeet would condemn the burning of churches is relevant. CBC would never care about that issue. But a lot of Canadians do.

Edited by CouchPotato
Posted
43 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Levant and his freak show were not in attendance as legitimate news sources but as registered political advocates.

 

That is simply a lie. And the courts have been quite clear on two occasions now that what you just said isn't true.

I get that as a left Winger you want to silence anybody who you don't agree with but unfortunately that doesn't make what you say true. Your feelings are not facts

Quote

The government's Leaders Debate Commission that allowed this nonsense to happen

They didn't allow it to happen. As they mentioned in the story the courts allowed it to happen. They took rebel news to court twice to try and prevent them from coming over the last few years to the debates and both times they lost badly.

Technically rebel news was allowed by law and court order to have up to 11 of their journalists attend and ask questions. The commission negotiated them down to five and four actually asked questions.

Blaming the commission for it is childish. No matter who is running the debates they are going to have to listen to the courts

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
19 minutes ago, eyeball said:

They do when they're asked by legitimate journalists.

Why do Rebel News billboard trucks need political messages on them?

image.thumb.jpeg.58ae99ba97e2ea9b357b32fac08a95ac.jpeg

Got any pics of CBC trucks with Fùck Poilievre bumper stickers on them?

So you're still pretending that "CBC News is always legitimate - they never lie or spread disinformation - and everyone else just lies all the time!", is that it?

 

Do you feel like you knew that Canada was setting a massive record for covid deaths and hospitalizations in 2022? Did you know that eyeball, or did you think that covid deaths and hospitalizations were waaaay down? 

You believed what CBC told you, and I proved that your/their narrative was 100% false...

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,899
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Shemul Ray
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...