Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Sure. Along with the charges that are WAY PAST the statute of limitations.

Thanks for proving once again you know NOTHING about the US legal system. LMAO

Suddenly the statute of limitations matters to leftards 😂

I doubt that there will be charges filed, I don't know if any of this is recent enough, but she should lose her job if she committed fraud, which she apparently did. 

  • Like 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
52 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Suddenly the statute of limitations matters to leftards 😂

Only in your fantasies about NY state law, did it ever not matter. 

52 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I doubt that there will be charges filed, I don't know if any of this is recent enough, but she should lose her job if she committed fraud, which she apparently did. 

Sorry but "apparently" does not mean she committed fraud. You can believe whatever stories you like, just like you  believe CONMAN Trump.

Posted
14 hours ago, robosmith said:

Sure. Along with the charges that are WAY PAST the statute of limitations.

Thanks for proving once again you know NOTHING about the US legal system. LMAO

Nobody is above the law...lol.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
17 hours ago, robosmith said:

Only in your fantasies about NY state law, did it ever not matter. 

Sorry but "apparently" does not mean she committed fraud. You can believe whatever stories you like, just like you  believe CONMAN Trump.

The standard of evidence required for sending someone to prison is far higher than the level of evidence required to get someone fired.

Also, there's no statute of limitations on getting fired. 

Sorry for proving how stupid you are again, please don't take it personally. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
35 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The standard of evidence required for sending someone to prison is far higher than the level of evidence required to get someone fired.

Also, there's no statute of limitations on getting fired. 

Sorry for proving how stupid you are again, please don't take it personally. 

No TRIAL, No EVIDENCE. Duh

20 yo newspaper stories carry little weight with the public.

Esp when she has done a great job exposing Trump's CRIMES with CONVICTIONS.

Posted
9 hours ago, robosmith said:

No TRIAL, No EVIDENCE. Duh

20 yo newspaper stories carry little weight with the public.

Esp when she has done a great job exposing Trump's CRIMES with CONVICTIONS.

Her job against Trump was pretty good, after all she had lots of practice.

Unfortunately practice does not always mean perfect.

You Democrat's pulled down the statue of limitations, now you want to rebuild it.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

No TRIAL, No EVIDENCE. Duh

Evidence isn't strictly a legal term, m0r0n, although it does exceed your 5-letter limit for comprehension so I'll give you a 'close enough for a ret4rd' pass on that one.

Quote

20 yo newspaper stories carry little weight with the public.

Wrong again, liar. You guys all got bent out of shape over:

  1. "In about 1985 or '86, kinda close to the town I lived when I was in high school, at a house that I can't quite remember, I was almost about to get raped once but I never told any friends, family, police officers, guidance counsellors or anything. This is a really serious accusation and i think that people should believe me, even if all my witnesses think I'm crazy"
  2. In 1998 or 1999 I was on the streets in NY City wearing 4" pumps and a skirt - in the winter - when a dude I never met before picked me up and asked me to model lingerie for him. Of course I said "yes", but when I took him into the change room with me he treated me like a whore. There was no one in the department store to witness it.  

100 million leftists cried their eyes out over both of those blatant BS stories, including you and the left4ard crew here, and they were both 20 years old

You would be out petitioning for Letitia "criminal/witch hunter" James to be fired right now if you weren't such a liar and hypocrite. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Evidence isn't strictly a legal term, m0r0n, although it does exceed your 5-letter limit for comprehension so I'll give you a 'close enough for a ret4rd' pass on that one.

Wrong again, liar. You guys all got bent out of shape over:

  1. "In about 1985 or '86, kinda close to the town I lived when I was in high school, at a house that I can't quite remember, I was almost about to get raped once but I never told any friends, family, police officers, guidance counsellors or anything. This is a really serious accusation and i think that people should believe me, even if all my witnesses think I'm crazy"
  2. In 1998 or 1999 I was on the streets in NY City wearing 4" pumps and a skirt - in the winter - when a dude I never met before picked me up and asked me to model lingerie for him. Of course I said "yes", but when I took him into the change room with me he treated me like a whore. There was no one in the department store to witness it.  

100 million leftists cried their eyes out over both of those blatant BS stories, including you and the left4ard crew here, and they were both 20 years old

You would be out petitioning for Letitia "criminal/witch hunter" James to be fired right now if you weren't such a liar and hypocrite. 

Really stupid that you believe alleged and hard to understand financial crimes carry the same weight with the public as SEXUAL ASSAUHTS which everyone understands and MANY know about personally in their lives. 🤮

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Really stupid that you believe alleged and hard to understand financial crimes carry the same weight with the public as SEXUAL ASSAUHTS 

So you just literally said that financial crimes are the same thing as a sexual assault. 

You expect to be taken seriously after that, you honestly expect people to agree with you that a financial crime is the same as a sexual assault?

Posted
9 hours ago, robosmith said:

Unfortunate how ^IGNORANT you Canucks are about NY state laws. LMAO

Well we do know you bumbles have hissy fits when its's used against.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

You don't know the difference between the SoL in Trump's case and the MUCH OLDER case against James. LMAO

Dude I had to explain what a subpoena was to you. And you've been wrong on every single case that's gone to court. I don't know that I would be drawing any attention to your legal credentials :) 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, robosmith said:

You don't know the difference between the SoL in Trump's case and the MUCH OLDER case against James. LMAO

The difference is none, zero (not the warplane), zilch, nought, naught (for our southern neighbors) nothing, cipher, nil, 0, null character, Oddjobs bowler.

Posted
3 hours ago, Legato said:

The difference is none, zero (not the warplane), zilch, nought, naught (for our southern neighbors) nothing, cipher, nil, 0, null character, Oddjobs bowler.

Thanks for confirming you don't know the difference. Seems I've overestimated your intelligence since a child should understand the difference when one is 20 yo and the other was just on the edge of the limit. LMAO

Posted
3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for confirming you don't know the difference. Seems I've overestimated your intelligence since a child should understand the difference when one is 20 yo and the other was just on the edge of the limit. LMAO

Bìtch dun did it.

  • Thanks 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
8 hours ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for confirming you don't know the difference. Seems I've overestimated your intelligence since a child should understand the difference when one is 20 yo and the other was just on the edge of the limit. LMAO

Bothonthelimit. First politically motivated and now the the second politically motivated.

Tit for Tat The end.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 4/20/2025 at 12:13 PM, CdnFox said:

No problem, just change the laws so that it isn't. That's what the democrats did to go after trump

Also make sure you try her in a super red area. Also get a judge to say she was guilty without trial.

Edited by Fluffypants

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,897
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...