taxme Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 On 4/7/2025 at 11:28 AM, CdnFox said: He's running a strong campaign. He's turning out people to his rallies by the thousands rather than Kearney who's turning them out by the dozens. Despite all the noise that trump is making he is still managing to push through and the polls are beginning to move in his direction. If this had happened anytime other than when trump was attacking Canada kearney would be able to count the number of seats he was likely to win on his hands We'll see at the end how terrible poilievres campaign was The polls appear to be in PP's favor. PP is getting thousands of people at his rallies, while Corney gets a dozen or so of stupid mor0ns if lucky. It is the leftist liberal polls that are trying to make it appear as though Corney is winning. The surprise will be post election day where we will have a new conservative government in power. And only buffoons and idi0ts will vote for WEF Corney who is just another WEF Turdeau. I just wish that there were some way of arresting Turdeau and bring him to justice and make him pay for his crimes against humanity and crimes against Canada. It's for bloody sure that Canada will never survive another 5 years of another liberal Marxist WEF government. If we think that massive 3rd world immigration is bad today, just wait until Corney opens the border gates wide open and lets the whole 3rd world come in en masse by the millions. It will be goodbye white Canada forever. Believe it or not. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 Just now, taxme said: The polls appear to be in PP's favor. Well, not in his favor yet. But they are certainly moving in that direction and momentum is so important in an election Quote PP is getting thousands of people at his rallies, while Corney gets a dozen or so of stupid mor0ns if lucky. It is the leftist liberal polls that are trying to make it appear as though Corney is winning. The surprise will be post election day where we will have a new conservative government in power. And only buffoons and idi0ts will vote for WEF Corney who is just another WEF Turdeau. I just wish that there were some way of arresting Turdeau and bring him to justice and make him pay for his crimes against humanity and crimes against Canada. It will always bug me that Trudeau is now living a very rich life making millions of dollars sitting on boards of companies doing nothing because he funnels money to those companies while he was prime minister and they're paying him back. But sadly that was what the majority chose. Sort of Quote It's for bloody sure that Canada will never survive another 5 years of another liberal Marxist WEF government. If we think that massive 3rd world immigration is bad today, just wait until Corney opens the border gates wide open and lets the whole 3rd world come in en masse by the millions. It will be goodbye white Canada forever. Believe it or not. Oh we would survive. But we wouldn't survive unscathed. Canada would be worse, Canada would have less money and less prosperity and Canada would be able to afford far less in terms of service and support for its people. It would be bad. The kids would really suffer And that is why the young people are so strongly in support of the CPC. They can see the writing on the wall even if their grandparents can Quote
taxme Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 13 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Well, not in his favor yet. But they are certainly moving in that direction and momentum is so important in an election It will always bug me that Trudeau is now living a very rich life making millions of dollars sitting on boards of companies doing nothing because he funnels money to those companies while he was prime minister and they're paying him back. But sadly that was what the majority chose. Sort of Oh we would survive. But we wouldn't survive unscathed. Canada would be worse, Canada would have less money and less prosperity and Canada would be able to afford far less in terms of service and support for its people. It would be bad. The kids would really suffer And that is why the young people are so strongly in support of the CPC. They can see the writing on the wall even if their grandparents can A survey taken recently showed that it is the people over 60 that would likely vote for Corney. They could either make or break the liberal party from winning the election. Sadly, there are way too many older people who do not know enough about politics. They vote with their wallets and not with their heads. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 1 hour ago, taxme said: A survey taken recently showed that it is the people over 60 that would likely vote for Corney. They could either make or break the liberal party from winning the election. Sadly, there are way too many older people who do not know enough about politics. They vote with their wallets and not with their heads. Well you have to remember for a huge percentage of the older people they're only access out of habit more than anything else is watching CBC news. My granddad every freaking night on the prairies would sit down after supper and enjoy an ice cream cone while watching CBC news. Now in fairness in those days they only had three channels and there was no such thing as internet, but a lot of today's elderly grew up at a time when they were taught news is what is on television in the evening, and they might occasionally read one paper as well. It's the young people that are watching pierre's rallies and listening to him, it's young people that are reading multiple news sources and seeing the new sources that cover what a scumble Carny is with regards to his business practices and his Chinese connections. It's the young people that watch PoilievreS YouTube videos and to watch the news clips of Kearney stumbling over simple questions because he doesn't want to answer them So the people who have more access and use to the internet and social media and A variety of news sources tend to vote conservative, people with a more restricted CBC Centric view tend to be liberals. We will see what happens after the debates and whether or not the young people eventually managed to trickle up the information to the older generation Quote
August1991 Posted April 11 Report Posted April 11 On 4/6/2025 at 5:19 PM, Army Guy said: ... If Canada had taken it's sovereignty seriously we would not be even talking about this scenario...All the excuses we used to just give up on our nations responsibilities is endless, really...we have no one but ourselves to blame... ... Disagree, kinda. I remember the family debates of the 1970s - 90s. Maybe Canada is nowadays different. But I think English-Canadians, women in particular, will stand up for their country. We're not fanatical nationalists - but they won't be bullied. Canadian women always prefer a politician who makes us get along. Quote
Barquentine Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 On 4/10/2025 at 8:41 PM, CdnFox said: So the people who have more access and use to the internet and social media and A variety of news sources tend to vote conservative, You mean people who get all their info from their phones. In my experience (knowing and working with a lot of people of all ages) these phone educated people are the most ignorant and naive, most susceptible to fallacious arguments, lies and conspiracies. And btw, your disdain for older people (you seem to think they are the gullible, naive ones) is wrong and insulting. Wisdom trumps the barrage of suspect info flowing through the online media sewers. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 1 hour ago, Barquentine said: You mean people who get all their info from their phones. No I pretty much meant what I said. But I love that you couldn't address what I said so you had to rewrite what I said in order to be able to make an argument Very left wing of you Quote In my experience (knowing and working with a lot of people of all ages) these phone educated people are the most ignorant and naive, most susceptible to fallacious arguments, lies and conspiracies. It's just a stupid thing to say. There's absolutely no basis in truth, and not only is this just your anecdotal nonsense but it is painfully obvious from your own posts here that you are the last person in the universe who is qualified to determine what is or is not ignorant and naive Quote And btw, your disdain for older people (you seem to think they are the gullible, naive ones) is wrong and insulting. Wisdom trumps the barrage of suspect info flowing through the online media sewers. And once again you have to pretend I said something I never said. On top of which I'm pretty much in that group so maybe you should have thought of that before you claimed I was trying to show disdain If it helps I think YOU'RE gullable and naive I assume you're pretty young tho, you don't see many people get to old age as think as you are However all people of every age tend to develop habits. And what you see is people that grew up in an age before internet tend to get their news from one or two sources on television and possibly a newspaper if they have time. Back in Manitoba back in the day when my granddad finished supper granny would make him an ice cream cone and he would sit down and watch CBC news. It was like a ritual. They only got three channels and they were in rural Manitoba so that was basically all their options. But even after he got cable and had more options or even when he was over visiting our place in British Columbia that's still what he did. So his only exposure to news would have been CBC. Most people that are older still follow the same habits they have all of their life and most of their life involve the time that didn't include internet and social media. Not all, but a much higher percentage than of the young people. And that's a simple truth, it has nothing to do with their intelligence or gullibility or anything like that. It has to do with habit, and how much energy you want to spend on things. A 20 year old is going to be more apt to be surfing social media sites then a 70 year old. Take a look for yourself Social Media Demographics to Inform Your 2025 Strategy | Sprout SociaSocial Media Usage Statistics by Age [Updated November 2024] The 2024 Social media demographics guide Do you need more? There's more. Have you considered thinking before you type your responses? I mean you look very stupid right now and I imagine you probably feel very stupid right now even if you don't want to say that. And there's no need to feel and look this stupid if you just take a minute to do some research beforehand Quote
eyeball Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 On 4/10/2025 at 4:41 PM, CdnFox said: ...a lot of today's elderly grew up at a time when they were taught news is what is on television in the evening, and they might occasionally read one paper as well. Yup, I can still remember after saying our prayers singing God Save the Queen and Oh Canada being reminded it was our duty to watch and pay attention to everything we saw or heard on the CBC. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 2 hours ago, eyeball said: Yup, I can still remember after saying our prayers singing God Save the Queen and Oh Canada being reminded it was our duty to watch and pay attention to everything we saw or heard on the CBC. The amount of drugs and booze you seem to concern these days I doubt you can remember last Thursday..... Quote
eyeball Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: The amount of drugs and booze you seem to concern these days I doubt you can remember last Thursday..... Having your mental faculties mocked by someone who can't utter a cogent sentence never gets old. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 (edited) 12 minutes ago, eyeball said: Having your mental faculties mocked by someone who can't utter a cogent sentence never gets old. Funny i was just thinking that so you're welcome to keep it up Edited April 13 by CdnFox Quote
Barquentine Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 14 hours ago, CdnFox said: If it helps I think YOU'RE gullable and naive I assume you're pretty young tho, you don't see many people get to old age as think as you are I looked up hubris - there was a picture of you. You being only 5'2" explains a lot. And your assumptions show an embarrassing lack of intelligence. "As think as you are"? So you're just spouting off into the mic on your device without thinking first or reading your own words before you post. Either that or you're a really bad bot. 14 hours ago, CdnFox said: A 20 year old is going to be more apt to be surfing social media sites then a 70 year old. Exactly. Those 20 year olds are the misinformed I was talking about. Did you not get that or just have a pathological need to 'Mansplain" every thing to make yourself feel superior? 14 hours ago, CdnFox said: Have you considered thinking before you type your responses? I mean you look very stupid right now and I imagine you probably feel very stupid right now even if you don't want to say that. And there's no need to feel and look this stupid if you just take a minute to do some research beforehand Mirror, mirror... As I said before: Data is not knowledge, knowledge is not wisdom 14 hours ago, CdnFox said: Back in Manitoba back in the day when my granddad finished supper granny would make him an ice cream cone and he would sit down and watch CBC news. It was like a ritual. Ain't that quaint? And the Waltons listened to Lum and Abner. My parents had habits too, but they knew a d*ckhead like PeePee when they saw one. And I know one when I read his bullsh*t opinions Quote
CdnFox Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 5 hours ago, Barquentine said: I looked up hubris - there was a picture of you. You being only 5'2" explains a lot. LOL how original! But i love that now i've damaged you to the point where you're having fantasies and imagining me in your mind Quote And your assumptions show an embarrassing lack of intelligence. There's no assumptions kid. I backed up what i said with evidence 5 hours ago, Barquentine said: "As think as you are"? Yeah should have been as 'thick' but i do use a lot of voice dictation and every now and then it misses. Most people would have figured it out but i see that one typo has completely flabbergasted you LOLOL I take it your programmers didn't believe in AI? Quote Mirror, mirror... As I said before: Data is not knowledge, knowledge is not wisdom And as everyone else has said before, you don't have ANY of those. Quote Ain't that quaint? And the Waltons listened to Lum and Abner. My parents had habits too, but they knew a d*ckhead like PeePee when they saw one. I'm sure they loved you anyway 🤣😆😁😂 So basically you couldn't refute anything i said so you had a hissy fit and a little mental melt down That DOES seem to be your traditional way of admitting defeat Quote
Barquentine Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 Another point about age differences, habits and biases. Young people are far more susceptible and likely to agree with their peer's opinions, to fit in. Older folks, especially retired ones with enough money to get by, no longer give much of a shit about 'What other people think." And that's wisdom. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 29 minutes ago, Barquentine said: Another point about age differences, habits and biases. Young people are far more susceptible and likely to agree with their peer's opinions, to fit in. Source? You demanded I provide all my information and called me basically a liar Even after I did so let's see your source. Unless you just lying through your ass in which case don't worry about it, that's pretty much what we expected 30 minutes ago, Barquentine said: Older folks, especially retired ones with enough money to get by, no longer give much of a shit about 'What other people think." And that's wisdom. No, that is apathy. It is in no way shape or form wisdom. It is actually stupid. Intelligent people are very interested in the opinion of others and they listen carefully to it and add that information to their own pool of knowledge in order to make better choices. Which is why I know that a) you're not very old at all and b) you have no idea what the hell wisdom or intelligence actually is That was just pathetic. You say I have bias towards various ages unreasonably Quote
Barquentine Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 9 hours ago, CdnFox said: No, that is apathy. It is in no way shape or form wisdom. It is actually stupid. Intelligent people are very interested in the opinion of others and they listen carefully to it and add that information to their own pool of knowledge in order to make better choices. I can't decide if you're unable to read well, if you're just stupid, or completely ignorant by choice. 9 hours ago, CdnFox said: Which is why I know that a) you're not very old at all and b) you have no idea what the hell wisdom or intelligence actually is All the clues I've given you and you're too dumb to figure it out. If you ever go to court, for God's sake DON"T represent yourself! 9 hours ago, CdnFox said: Source? You demanded I provide all my information and called me basically a liar Even after I did so let's see your source What's the point? I've cited reliable, bi-partisan sources before and you choose to ignore them because they refute your dogma. As I keep saying: You are an amphigory: Amphigory Noun: a nonsense verse or composition : a rigmarole with apparent meaning which proves to be meaningless Merriam-Webster 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 4 hours ago, Barquentine said: I can't decide if you're unable to read well, if you're just stupid, or completely ignorant by choice. Without reading another word I knew you realized you were wrong and your buthurt about it LOL Quote All the clues I've given you and you're too dumb to figure it out. If you ever go to court, for God's sake DON"T represent yourself! Well there is what you say and then there is what you do. The two often conflict. Plus you're not all that interesting so I don't pay super close attention. But by your knowledge base and your ability to argue I would put you somewhere in the mid to late teens. By your claims you are older than that but frankly I don't think you're terribly trustworthy so it's hard to say Quote What's the point? I've cited reliable, bi-partisan sources before and you choose to ignore them because they refute your dogma. You have done no such thing. And you and I both know it. Perhaps you think your grandstanding for others but you and I both know you're a liar Quote As I keep saying: You are an amphigory: Amphigory Noun: a nonsense verse or composition : a rigmarole with apparent meaning which proves to be meaningless Merriam-Webster We all know what you're saying is that you know I'm right and you're angry so rather than try and make an argument you're just simply going to break down into tears and make the most painfully awkward insults I think I've ever seen in my life This is what I mean when I say your level of knowledge and your behavior puts you in the mid ish teen age range. So to recap. I made logical statements that I then backed up with a large body of facts and evidence to prove my point. You made baseless assumptions that you can't back up in any way shape or form nor can you refute any of the sources I provided And now your big mad at the meanie who was so nasty to you by providing facts and proofs and all LOLOLOL Loving your salty tears kid 1 Quote
TreeBeard Posted April 14 Author Report Posted April 14 Doug Ford defending Conservative Party critic now! Is Poilievre having to take on Doug Ford too? https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/federal-election/article-doug-ford-defends-campaign-manager-kory-teneycke-for-criticizing/ Quote
CdnFox Posted April 15 Report Posted April 15 4 hours ago, TreeBeard said: Doug Ford defending Conservative Party critic now! Is Poilievre having to take on Doug Ford too? https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/federal-election/article-doug-ford-defends-campaign-manager-kory-teneycke-for-criticizing/ There's no doubt. It's quite obvious that Doug Ford would like to see Poilievre fail and then hopefully he will be kicked out and Doug can run for the leader of the conservatives. That is pretty obvious Quote
PIK Posted April 15 Report Posted April 15 Ford is wrong. Any other election PP would win a Majority. But the collapse of the NDP and others is the factor. We are seeing the best numbers the cons ever had. So we can actually thank Singh for the collapse of this great country. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
CdnFox Posted April 15 Report Posted April 15 3 hours ago, PIK said: Ford is wrong. Any other election PP would win a Majority. But the collapse of the NDP and others is the factor. We are seeing the best numbers the cons ever had. So we can actually thank Singh for the collapse of this great country. It's true, polls have the cpc in the high 30's some even in the low 40's, historically any CPC leader would have been very happy with those numbers. Harper won his majority with 39 percent. It's not that PP is doing bad, it's that the bloc, the ndp, and even the greens are evaporating and their support at the moment is coming together behind the Libs because of trump. If this exact same election was taking place without trump, PP is running away with it. The libs would be about 28 29 percent and the cpc would be looking at a strong majority. As it is, it's still a horse race. We could definitely still see a conservative victory and even a conservative majority. Carney is currently slipping in the polls and basically has been slowly since day one where he was at an all time high. If that accelerates even a little bit then the liberal 'coalition' will likely collapse and voters will return to their parties or stay home. This will be a bit of a pivotal week. We've got the debates and then we've got the long weekend, which studies do show makes a difference as families gather and talk about the election. We'll see Quote
TreeBeard Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago Poilievre’s Conservatives don’t get along with Nova Scotia PCs. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7518196 Houston's staff received a phone call from Conservative national campaign director Jenni Byrne. The sources claim Byrne told Houston's team that if Poilievre went on to become prime minister, they would not lift a finger to help the provincial party. The call changed the relationship between the two camps, according to sources. Why can’t Poilievre get along with his provincial party counterparts? Quote
CdnFox Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 2 hours ago, TreeBeard said: Poilievre’s Conservatives don’t get along with Nova Scotia PCs. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7518196 Houston's staff received a phone call from Conservative national campaign director Jenni Byrne. The sources claim Byrne told Houston's team that if Poilievre went on to become prime minister, they would not lift a finger to help the provincial party. The call changed the relationship between the two camps, according to sources. Why can’t Poilievre get along with his provincial party counterparts? Because they're not the same party. The liberal party in BC didn't get along with a little liberal party federally either Why do you ask questions that 8-year-olds know the answers to? Quote
August1991 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 2 hours ago, TreeBeard said: Poilievre’s Conservatives don’t get along with Nova Scotia PCs. ------ Why can’t Poilievre get along with his provincial party counterparts? More broadly, to win, Poilievre should have defended Canada. Trump sent him a soft ball. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.