eyeball Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 6 minutes ago, I am Groot said: In what way have I exaggerated or spoken a mistruth? Go ahead. Enlighten me. The complete destruction of the planet sounds a little exaggerated. 2 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
I am Groot Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 2 minutes ago, eyeball said: The complete destruction of the planet sounds a little exaggerated. Okay, I didn't mean the whole globe would shatter and spring off into space. But he is a purveyor of the kind of climate alarmism that says the planet will burn up and civilization will end due to global warming. Quote
Barquentine Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 13 hours ago, Goddess said: On the other hand, new Liberal campaign slogan could be: "At least we're not Luxembourg!" Now that's funny! Quote
CdnFox Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 2 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Oh? No answers??? You mean other than the ones I gave you that you pretend don't exist because they show you're wrong? Not really Quote What in any of the links I posted was incorrect??? The words. And i pointed it out, gave an example, gave facts and links, pointed to an entire gov't committee that says the guy was wrong and just that ONE example sent you flying over the edge in a brutal rage. Sorry, half of pp's people aren't lobbyists, as your own link showed if you'd bothered to read it. Sorry, grocery stores are NOT responsible for the rise in food prices. Sorry, ultra left propaganda sites are NOT really accurate and impartial sources of information Which is why you're losing your shit now. All the left wing and libs like yourself have is lies. Quote
eyeball Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 1 hour ago, I am Groot said: Okay, I didn't mean the whole globe would shatter and spring off into space. But he is a purveyor of the kind of climate alarmism that says the planet will burn up and civilization will end due to global warming. No it won't burn up until the sun turns into a red giant. Civilization is likelier to end due to fighting over scarce resources like water, food and livable regions. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
ExFlyer Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You mean other than the ones I gave... ... Which is why you're losing your shit now. ... Nope, once again FAIL!!! You gave diddley shit. Prove it. Show me (us) where. Nope, not losing anything, just remembering what major loser you are when you have no proof LOL Show me your answers...do a cut and paste LOL Oh wait, there are no answers, even after I repeated the links for you to watch and read. You are back to being the loser you truly are LOL Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 2 hours ago, BlahTheCanuck said: It's really hard to tell because it's unclear how Carney will govern. Canada's economy has already been struggling for a decade as far as productivity per hour worked is concerned and I'm not sure if Carney will do much differently from the previous Liberal government. If a prospective Carney gov't cuts some red tape, facilitates investment in research & development, reduces the housing crunch, maybe makes the tax system more competitive, the country's economic prospects could improve. If he does not do those things, the situation may remain the same or get worse. He's been the liberal economic adviser for 4 years. I think it's at least relatively clear Quote
ExFlyer Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 (edited) 1 hour ago, I am Groot said: I'm not sure how you believe this contradicts what I wrote above. Private members bills are just MPs making a statement to get their name in the local paper. Only a fraction of a fraction of them even pass on to be examined on their merits. And none get passed unless the government of the day wants them to be. Maybe Poilevre didn't feel the need to do something so that people would remember he's actually an MP, like most of the back bench MPs who propose private members bills. Why do you think that's a lot of money? He's been making a very good salary for many years. Here's a better question. Justin Trudeau's net worth was given as $1.2 million in 2015. After ten years as PM his net worth has someone ballooned to $96 million. How did that happen? Or more to the point, in what way could that be done legally? Yup, it is clear to me that you have no grasp of things even when they are pointed out and given to you. Love that one "Maybe Poilevre didn't feel the need to do something so that people would remember he's actually an MP". What a farce LOL Maybe he didnt realize he has to do something as an MP and cabinet minister to earn his fat salary?? LOL It is a lot of money for someone that has done nothing but suck the government teat for over 20 years. That makes him worth more than $5 Million??? Are you berserk??? Oh and JT's net worth is also $5 Million, not including his family fortune that he put in holding. And he was PM for 12 years. https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/presidents/justin-trudeau-net-worth/ Edited March 22 by ExFlyer Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Nope, once again FAIL!!! You gave diddley shit. Prove it. Show me (us) where. It's right above you kiddo You saw it, you know i'm right, you just can't cope and now you're having one of your world famous meltdowns 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿 1 minute ago, ExFlyer said: Yup, it is clear to me that you have no grasp of things even when they are pointed out and given to you. Love that one "Maybe Poilevre didn't feel the need to do something so that people would remember he's actually an MP". What a farce LOL Maybe he didnt realize he has to do something as an MP and cabinet minister to earn his fat salary?? LOL It is a lot of money for someone that has done nothing but suck the government teat for over 20 years. That makes him worth more than $5 Million??? Are you berserk??? Maybe you're just a bitter liberal Quote
ExFlyer Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: It's right above you kiddo .... No answers above,especially from you. LOL Show me you loser. LOL Should be easy for you to cut and paste but...it would be a big blank:) Like every republican...cannot take it when called out LOL Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 7 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: No answers above,especially from you. LOL Except of course for the ones I gave which proved you were wrong. Which is why you're having this meltdown I'll add it to you, you went a fair wild between complete mental collapses. That kind of forgot how fun these are The moment someone proves you're wrong with facts you come apart so fast people are in danger of getting hit by shrapnel LOLOL Sorry kiddo, you've been exposed. You were wrong, and you're definitely a liberal Are you about ready to get to the stage where you just whine and cry at the top of your lungs about me and then post a meme or two? No ass pictures please, I think we've all had enough of that from you Quote
ExFlyer Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 (edited) 17 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Except of course for the ones I gave which proved .... FAIL AGAIN LOL No answers AGAIN. Here are the links again in case you lost them. What is incorrect about them?? https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMBkdrJnH/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-parroting-big-pharma/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-conservatives-stack-council-corporate-lobbyists/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-parroting-big-pharma/ If you had any answers, then all you need to do is cut and paste them but hey, we know you are bullshitter and have nothing . C'mon, show us what is wrong with the links, what is incorrect. The only thing you have proved is that you are a LOSER AGAIN, we all know that you are so full of shit your grey hair has turned brown LOL Prove it, that is all we ask. Edited March 22 by ExFlyer Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 21 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: FAIL AGAIN LOL No answers AGAIN. Here are the links again in case you lost them. What is incorrect about them?? https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMBkdrJnH/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-parroting-big-pharma/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-conservatives-stack-council-corporate-lobbyists/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-parroting-big-pharma/ If you had any answers, then all you need to do is cut and paste them but hey, we know you are bullshitter and have nothing . C'mon, show us what is wrong with the links, what is incorrect. The only thing you have proved is that you are a LOSER AGAIN, we all know that you are so full of shit your grey hair has turned brown LOL Prove it, that is all we ask. LOLOL as i predicted Sorry to make you cry like that little guy The answers were given, which is why you've got your panties in a knot 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿 Quote
ExFlyer Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 (edited) 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: LOLOL as i predicted The answers were given,. as i predicted. FAIL AGAIN LOL No answers AGAIN. Prove the answers are given ...you lied again Here are the links again in case you lost them. What is incorrect about them?? https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMBkdrJnH/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-parroting-big-pharma/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-conservatives-stack-council-corporate-lobbyists/ https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-parroting-big-pharma/ If you had any answers, then all you need to do is cut and paste them but hey, we know you are bullshitter and have nothing . C'mon, show us what is wrong with the links, what is incorrect. The only thing you have proved is that you are a LOSER AGAIN, we all know that you are so full of shit your grey hair has turned brown LOL Prove it, that is all we ask. Your pitiful ego will ruin another thread. LOSER!!! 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿 Edited March 22 by ExFlyer Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
I am Groot Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Yup, it is clear to me that you have no grasp of things even when they are pointed out and given to you. I grasp that you have no idea what you're talking about.= 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Love that one "Maybe Poilevre didn't feel the need to do something so that people would remember he's actually an MP". What a farce LOL Maybe he didnt realize he has to do something as an MP and cabinet minister to earn his fat salary?? Okay. So you don't even know what MPs and cabinet ministers do. Well, I don't have time to give you the kind of education you ought to have gotten back in grade school, but in summary, the job of an MP is to look after constituent affairs. This is an often time-consuming task that involves speaking with and meeting constituents, both in Ottawa and in their riding. It involves helping them out with certain issues by making calls or sending emails to different ministers. They will also keep up to date on ongoing government/political issues that are in the public eye or soon will be. And, of course, they have to do the usual back home, visiting festivals and barbeques and other local celebrations, and meeting people at churches, temples, community halls, or whatever, listening to their concerns, giving speeches, glad-handing,etc. They might also be given tasks by the party. They might be on a committee, for example, which involves preparing for hearings, reading up on subject matter, researching and perhaps meeting with party colleagues and advisors on strategy, on potential witnesses to call, etc. If he/she is in the shadow cabinet, which Poilievre was, then they have to keep up to date on all ongoing programs and policies of the ministry they are going to be monitoring and critiquing. They need to meet with the party leader and other shadow cabinet members, as well as caucus to discuss policy and what strategy to take on questioning/attacking the government. Clearly this is reversed for cabinet ministers. Who also meet regularly and are in nearly continuous contact with ADMs and other high ministry officials, and have a group of policy advisors in their office to help deal with ongoing issues involving their ministry. They will also regularly attend cabinet meetings to discuss ongoing policy issues and problems. If a minister wishes a change made to something major they will bring it up back channel with the PMO, and then, if okayed, bring it up in cabinet for discussion. My point was that as Poilievre was almost always a high-profile MP, member of the shadow cabinet, and cabinet minister, he had no need to initiate private members bills to get attention. 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: LOL It is a lot of money for someone that has done nothing but suck the government teat for over 20 years. That makes him worth more than $5 Million??? Are you berserk??? I have been making less than him for fewer years than him and I'm probably worth about $2.5 million. 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Oh and JT's net worth is also $5 Million, not including his family fortune that he put in holding. And he was PM for 12 years. https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/presidents/justin-trudeau-net-worth/ Hiis 'family fortune' was listed as $1.5 million ten years ago. How did it grow to $90 million? https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-election-2015-google-questions-justin-trudeau-1.3248582 Quote
I am Groot Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 (edited) 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: as i predicted. FAIL AGAIN LOL No answers AGAIN. Prove the answers are given ...you lied again Here are the links again in case you lost them. What is incorrect about them?? https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMBkdrJnH/ I'm curious. Does it give you an stiffy every time you post the same tiktok video of this angry old bearded guy? Edited March 22 by I am Groot Quote
ExFlyer Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 (edited) 25 minutes ago, I am Groot said: I grasp that you have no idea what you're talking about.= .... Are you so far up PP's ass that you cannot smell anything but his shit?? LOL 22 minutes ago, I am Groot said: I'm curious.... I am curious too. I am helping him so he does not have to go hunting for the links. He has a habit of lying and deflecting so, I give him every opportunity Why does he not tell us what is wrong, incorrect or a lie in the links I posted I suspect you are on his side so, perhaps you can tell us what is incorrect and untrue in the links??? I suspect not and you will dance around too. I suspect you two are dance partners. Who leads LOL Is he is crowding you up PP's ass?? LOL Edited March 22 by ExFlyer Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
I am Groot Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 (edited) 4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Are you so far up PP's ass that you cannot smell anything but his shit?? LOL I think I've made it quite obvious for years that while I intend to vote Conservative I'm not a big fan of Poilivre. 4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: I am curious too. No doubt that's because of how little you understand about politics and government. Edited March 22 by I am Groot Quote
ExFlyer Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 (edited) 54 minutes ago, I am Groot said: I think I've made it quite obvious for years that while I intend to vote Conservative I'm not a big fan of Poilivre. No doubt that's because of how little you understand about politics and government. Ok...so what?? How would i know or even care if you are PP fan?? What I know about politics is that it is easy to pi$$ you and confox off It is like a BOGO Free sale https://www.thebeaverton.com/2025/03/poilievres-broken-slogan-generator-to-blame-as-he-vows-to-dink-the-rink-and-slime-the-grime/ Goin out for dinner now. You have a great evening. Edited March 22 by ExFlyer 1 Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Moonbox Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 On 3/20/2025 at 10:33 PM, CdnFox said: Oh wow I haven't seen this in a while The part where you realize you were wrong and you are trying to make yourself feel better by pretending that somehow there's something wrong with what was said So in your world there isn't monetary policy and fiscal policies, is this what you're saying? LOL! The federal reserve board says you're wrong The Fed - What is the difference between monetary policy and fiscal policy, and how are they related? You did, remember you literally just called it the most "clueless and full of shit" idea ever LOLOLOL At least wait one post before making yourself look stupid What? That you're about to say something stupid and have a hissy fit? LOL nailed it Well first off nobody said that. As per your usual routine you can't argue with what I actually said so you have to create something i didn't say everything I said is 100% true Secondly he's a banker not an economist. And while bankers may well take fiscal policy into account or consider it their job is all about monetary policy. They don't set fiscal policy, they don't control fiscal policy, they don't even often know what the next fiscal policy is going to be. Their worry is monetary policy But hey little guy, dont' take MY word for it - lets get you educated Among the key differences between monetary and fiscal policy is the party responsible for carrying them out. Monetary policy is carried out by a nation's central bank, such as the Fed in the U.S., the Bank of Canada (BOC), and the Bank of England. Fiscal policy, on the other hand, is the sole responsibility of a country's government Monetary Policy vs. Fiscal Policy: What's the Difference? Yeahhhh sorry little fella. Looks like you were wrong AGAIN LOLOLOLOLK Bankers worry about monetary policy. That's their job. THat's what they control. Gov'ts worry about fiscal policy. That's their job. They might well have an interest in what the other is doing but they don't do each others job. So now that you look like an uneducated tard..... LOL you've been back 5 minutes and you did it again didn't you. Jumped into a fight with me where you didn't understand what was being discussed and tried to find a way to "win" the discussion by faking what i said and trying to to twist words and now you look stupid. Again What is this.... about number 63 for you? LOLOL I do admire your consistency tho You're welcome for the free education. Can you point out where anyone argued monetary and fiscal policy are the same thing? Nope. That leads us to the next question, which is why would you pound out this useless, longwinded rant explaining it? The answer, as always, is that your belligerent stupidity was revealed yet again, and your automatic response is to throw a tantrum, and puke all over yourself as some sort of weird deflection. 😆👌 2 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
I am Groot Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 (edited) 2 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Ok...so what?? How would i know or even care if you are PP fan?? What I know about politics is that it is easy to pi$$ you and confox off It is like a BOGO Free sale LOL. I was almost going to say in that last post that it's clear your ignorance makes you angry and that's why you lash out when it becomes obvious. It's a predictable part of you. Any time you get contradicted you get angry. You're like a mean drunk. Okay until you've had a couple, then you get angry and bitter. Another predictable mannerism is how you try to swagger about how amazingly successful you are at debating people who disagree with you after you lose. Edited March 23 by I am Groot Quote
Goddess Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 11 hours ago, BlahTheCanuck said: If a prospective Carney gov't cuts some red tape, facilitates investment in research & development, reduces the housing crunch, maybe makes the tax system more competitive, the country's economic prospects could improve. If he does not do those things, the situation may remain the same or get worse. Here's my ish - Carney says he's going to do all those things now, but the Libs have been AGAINST all those things for the last 10 years. Like so against them, they have called everyone who WAS talking about those things racists, anti-immigration, Trumpers, Nazis and Fascists. I find it very unbelievable that they have suddenly and entirely flip-flopped and changed their opinion now, at campaign election time. People seem to forget that it was Carney who has been advising the Libs on economic policy since at least 2020-2021. On 3/21/2025 at 6:23 AM, ExFlyer said: You mist have missed or skipped over this https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMBkdrJnH/ A TikTok? Really? 🤣 1 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
BlahTheCanuck Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Goddess said: Here's my ish - Carney says he's going to do all those things now, but the Libs have been AGAINST all those things for the last 10 years. Like so against them, they have called everyone who WAS talking about those things racists, anti-immigration, Trumpers, Nazis and Fascists. I find it very unbelievable that they have suddenly and entirely flip-flopped and changed their opinion now, at campaign election time. People seem to forget that it was Carney who has been advising the Libs on economic policy since at least 2020-2021. I agree with you, and this is why the Conservatives are my preferred option. A lot of Carney's purported promises seem too Justin Trudeau 2015 esque to be believable. Edited March 23 by BlahTheCanuck 1 Quote
ExFlyer Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 (edited) 15 hours ago, I am Groot said: LOL. I was almost going to say in that last post that it's clear your ignorance makes you angry and that's why you lash out when it becomes obvious. It's a predictable part of you. Any time you get contradicted you get angry. You're like a mean drunk. Okay until you've had a couple, then you get angry and bitter. Another predictable mannerism is how you try to swagger about how amazingly successful you are at debating people who disagree with you after you lose. I am far far from ignorant. I observe and read and verify what I post. I do not lash out unless defending myself form the ignorants. Unlike you that seems calling names and making accusations the thing to do with you have no real answers. I never swagger about my points, I only ask you defend yours and, so far, you can and have not done so, it seems you swagger in your rhetoric. I only debate with people that have valid, verifiable and proven points. I call out those that keep piling on BS after BS and made up shit. If I lose and there has been proof I was wrong, I readily admit it ..... but, there has to be proof I am wrong, not just supposition and opinion. Edited March 23 by ExFlyer Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.