CdnFox Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 5 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Because it takes a lot of training and skill to understand it? This is part of the problem, in our current epistemic crisis, is that people think that opinions are knowledge. Evolution will eliminate people who drink bleach because a big man tells them to. Just FYI. It really doesn't. And this is part of the problem with our current Tribalistic political crisis, the left wants to be the only source of interpretation for anything. It would have you believe that you are too stupid to understand anything and must blindly accept anything before you by someone they consider to be a scientist, well in the same breath demanding you ignore scientists that they don't agree with Mike, I am perfectly willing to believe that you are too stupid to be able to read a scientific study and the peer review comments and reach a conclusion. I am not. And the fact that the left refuses to provide any science to back up their claims that climate change is a crisis is very telling. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 10 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Because it takes a lot of training and skill to understand it? This is part of the problem, in our current epistemic crisis, is that people think that opinions are knowledge. Evolution will eliminate people who drink bleach because a big man tells them to. Just FYI. Why do you think you have to be trained to read numbers? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Why do you think you have to be trained to read numbers? Because he can only get to four without taking his mittens off. It's about control dude. They want to start off by saying you are completely unqualified to understand anything that they put in front of you and you must only take the word of the scientists or other experts in the field because you're too stupid to figure it out yourself. Then they follow it up with you're too stupid to select your own experts! Only the experts that they pick because they are smart enough to do it are relevant and all other experts are not really experts they're just russians/ traitors/ crackpots/ deniers/ homophobes/ misogynists/ people who like pineapple on pizza. This is about control. Michael wants the ability to dismiss anything you say and any thought you have by simply waving his hand and claiming you're not qualified without even having to look at your argument. You don't have to be an expert to read and you don't have to be an expert to understand the vast majority of the substance of the scientific papers that are out there. There may be one element or another such as a methodology that you don't fully understand but you can at least understand the conclusion that they came to based on that methodology and then do a little research to see whether that methodology is respected or not or the problems that can or can't exist with it. But the way the left is they would have you believe that if you come upon a vehicle accident where a car has smashed into a telephone pole and won't start and offer the opinion that the pole may have damaged the engine, michael and his kind will come along and say you're not an automotive engineer and therefore can't have an opinion. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted March 17 Author Report Posted March 17 8 hours ago, Nationalist said: The universe has no "spin"? What a silly thing to say. Our own galaxy has "spin". Ever read A Breif History Of Time? Really robo...you take stoopid to a whole new level. Yes I read that book. IF you believe the universe spins, where is the center around which it spins. No science has said that the universe spins. Apparently you're also ILLITERATE because I already said galaxies have pseudo spin. Apparently you didn't understand WHY it's pseudo, nor what constant angular velocity independent of distance from the center is. LMAO It is you who is so stupid you can't even understand what I WROTE. And ^here you are making a FOOL OF YOURSELF calling me "stoopid" due to your FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND. Quote
Nationalist Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 16 minutes ago, robosmith said: Yes I read that book. IF you believe the universe spins, where is the center around which it spins. No science has said that the universe spins. Apparently you're also ILLITERATE because I already said galaxies have pseudo spin. Apparently you didn't understand WHY it's pseudo, nor what constant angular velocity independent of distance from the center is. LMAO It is you who is so stupid you can't even understand what I WROTE. And ^here you are making a FOOL OF YOURSELF calling me "stoopid" due to your FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND. It's not "psudo" anything. Would you like a bigger shovel? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
eyeball Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: And the fact that the left refuses to provide any science to back up their claims that climate change is a crisis is very telling. You actually need a cite to know the climate changes...interesting...🤔 1 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
robosmith Posted March 17 Author Report Posted March 17 26 minutes ago, Nationalist said: It's not "psudo" anything. Would you like a bigger shovel? The shovel is your because you keep demonstrating you have NO UNDERSTANDING about what I wrote. Duh You don't even understand why objects in galaxies have angular velocity independent of distance from the center. Or apparently not even what that means. LMAO Quote
Deluge Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 On 3/16/2025 at 11:32 AM, robosmith said: The Last Time the Globe Warmed Video The climate crisis that happened before is upon us. Man is NOT the only source of green house gases, but we have similar effects as nature has in the PAST. The last time I felt the globe warm was October of last year: What a great, unseasonably warm month it was. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 51 minutes ago, eyeball said: You actually need a cite to know the climate changes...interesting...🤔 No, that it's a crisis 🤣 1 Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
robosmith Posted March 17 Author Report Posted March 17 1 hour ago, Deluge said: The last time I felt the globe warm was October of last year: What a great, unseasonably warm month it was. ^Foolish person mistakes his immediate surroundings for the GLOBE. So typical of the MAGA CULT. Quote
Nationalist Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 1 hour ago, robosmith said: The shovel is your because you keep demonstrating you have NO UNDERSTANDING about what I wrote. Duh You don't even understand why objects in galaxies have angular velocity independent of distance from the center. Or apparently not even what that means. LMAO I know what angular is Stoopid. I also know you're full o'sh1t. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted March 17 Author Report Posted March 17 53 minutes ago, Nationalist said: I know what angular is Stoopid. I also know you're full o'sh1t. But you don't know why it's unusual for orbiting objects to all have the same angular velocity. LMAO Hint: it's what causes PSEUDO spin. You see, real spin is one object rotating, but galaxies have BILLIONS of objects orbiting around a central object. AKA not real "spin." Orbiting objects are not spinning except on their own axis. spin /spin/ verb 1. turn or cause to turn or whirl around quickly. "the girl spun around in alarm" Quote
CdnFox Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 3 hours ago, eyeball said: You actually need a cite to know the climate changes...interesting...🤔 I actually need one to know it's a crisis But.... strangely you don't have one Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CdnFox Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: No, that it's a crisis 🤣 Yeah. I get that the climate changes, that's to be expected. I get that it'll have an impact on us whether it's warming or cooling. But I see no evidence of it being a crisis. Nor do I see any evidence that anything we do is going to affect it at this point A reasonable and sensible human being would agree. It is reasonable to say "Why is this a crisis?" It is reasonable to ask what impact will anything we do have? The fact that you can't answer these and try and pass them off as some sort of unreasonable or humorous questions when they are Absolutely logical and reasonable suggest to me that you have no answers. In other words you have no reason to believe they're a crisis you just enjoy believing it's a crisis. You have no reason to believe we can do anything to affect it, but your echo chamber has told you to say that Which pretty much proves my point. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Deluge Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 2 hours ago, robosmith said: ^Foolish person mistakes his immediate surroundings for the GLOBE. So typical of the MAGA CULT. Someone, for God's sake, SAVE THE GIRLS!!! https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/women Quote
eyeball Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: I actually need one to know it's a crisis But.... strangely you don't have one The only crisis that matters is the sheer indifference to AGW. The flippancy of the climate-changes-all-the-time meme certainly underscores that. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Deluge Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 (edited) 21 minutes ago, eyeball said: The only crisis that matters is the sheer indifference to AGW. The flippancy of the climate-changes-all-the-time meme certainly underscores that. Indifference towards climate cultists is not a crisis. In fact, it's a necessity. Without pushback, you wokejobs would have the entire planet setting up and maintaining windmill farms. lol Edited March 18 by Deluge Quote
robosmith Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 19 minutes ago, Deluge said: Indifference towards climate cultists is not a crisis. In fact, it's a necessity. Without pushback, you wokejobs would have the entire planet setting up and maintaining windmill farms. lol Unfortunate that YOU don't understand how much better and less expensive renewables are, because you are a MAGA CULT toady who believes Trump's LIES. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 3 hours ago, eyeball said: The only crisis that matters is the sheer indifference to AGW. The flippancy of the climate-changes-all-the-time meme certainly underscores that. Ah, so what you're saying is there's no crisis at all. For some reason you feel that the climate doesn't change all the time? Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 14 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Ah, so what you're saying is there's no crisis at all. For some reason you feel that the climate doesn't change all the time? How many thousands of homes need to be destroyed in the heart of LA AND across America from extreme tornados before you MAGA NUT recognize a CRISIS? The winds just keep getting stronger and stronger with every barrel that is burned. Pretty soon your permafrost will melt and you won't know what hit YOU. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: How many thousands of homes need to be destroyed in the heart of LA AND across America from extreme tornados before you MAGA NUT recognize a CRISIS? Weather has been destroying homes in the united states since the day homes were first built. There's no crisis there. We've had tornadoes for quite some time now And if you know things are going to get worse and you don't take steps to resolve it then it's not climate change that's the problem. Again, where is the crisis? So far all you've said is a thing that has been happening for hundreds of years anyway and that is happening now somehow has morphed into a crisis. But again I will ask you if it is so obvious then you should be able to produce at least a few scientific studies that demonstrate that it's a crisis and that if we take action now we will have a substantial impact And the simple fact of the matter is neither of those things are true. If it was you wouldn't have spent 10 years on a useless carbon tax that didn't change a goddamn thing and trashed our economy just to fill the pockets of the liberals Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Nationalist Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 (edited) 14 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: No, that it's a crisis 🤣 You fckin' right you need a citation...or 50. Your premise concludes that our primary source of power and energy is absolutely destroying life on Earth. A very scary idea. Scary enough to make many people do just about anything to avoid. However, many others hear such dire predictions and think, 'Is that right? Let's see.' They do their own research and find out that the climate change scare is way overblown and the methods employed to mitigate are destroying our society from the bottom. The poor cannot afford the cost. Our entire economy has been artificially inflated to dizzying heights. And the climate religious come out in force, whenever their religion is questioned. Disadents must be crushed. Except...you all forget that those who think for themselves, are often stronger than those who blindly follow. Thus...you will eventually... Fail. Edited March 18 by Nationalist 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 10 hours ago, robosmith said: Unfortunate that YOU don't understand how much better and less expensive renewables are, because you are a MAGA CULT toady who believes Trump's LIES. Which renewables are better and less expensive? Talk about them. Quote
WestCanMan Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 I'm not sayin' that I've switched over to the "global warming" crowd, but a piece of the sky hit fell down and me on the little finger yesterday. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
gatomontes99 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: I'm not sayin' that I've switched over to the "global warming" crowd, but a piece of the sky hit fell down and me on the little finger yesterday. You left wing commie! Lol 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.