gatomontes99 Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 This should be good. Didn't the left say Trump was good buddies with Epstein? This just seems like a weird thing to do to a guy you like. 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 Of course all references to Trump being involved with underage sex will NOT BE RELEASED. Probably BURNED. 1 Quote
Barquentine Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 If they actually release the complete unredacted files, I'm all for it. 4 Quote
Videospirit Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 Why would Trump even care if he's mentioned in these documents at this point? The Supreme court has made him immune from all prosecution. He'd probably just brag about how alpha he is that he's able to sleep with minors and get away with it. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 21 Author Report Posted February 21 53 minutes ago, Videospirit said: Why would Trump even care if he's mentioned in these documents at this point? The Supreme court has made him immune from all prosecution. He'd probably just brag about how alpha he is that he's able to sleep with minors and get away with it. Trump isn't immune from prosecution. Step away from the leftist, delusional, emotion-driven reasoning and actually read the ruling. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CouchPotato Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: This should be good. Didn't the left say Trump was good buddies with Epstein? This just seems like a weird thing to do to a guy you like. This should be interesting. I wonder if they will release the rest of the JFK files. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 21 Author Report Posted February 21 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Videospirit Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Trump isn't immune from prosecution. Step away from the leftist, delusional, emotion-driven reasoning and actually read the ruling. Oh no, courts are allowed to unconditionally discharge sentences against Trump and literally nothing else. Trump better be scared, If they bring up charges related to Epstein that'll stop him! /s Quote
Hodad Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: This should be good. Didn't the left say Trump was good buddies with Epstein? This just seems like a weird thing to do to a guy you like. "The left" didn't say that Trump was buddies with Epstein. Trump did. 1 Quote
West Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 2 hours ago, Hodad said: "The left" didn't say that Trump was buddies with Epstein. Trump did. I say put it all on the table and let the chips fall where they may. Nobody wants pedos roaming around Quote
Hodad Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 12 minutes ago, West said: I say put it all on the table and let the chips fall where they may. Nobody wants pedos roaming around Well, except Trump's last labor secretary and his current AG, who let Epstein slide. They should all be released, but I absolutely do not trust the pathological liar and his toadies. 1 Quote
West Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 21 minutes ago, Hodad said: Well, except Trump's last labor secretary and his current AG, who let Epstein slide. They should all be released, but I absolutely do not trust the pathological liar and his toadies. No mention of Obama and Biden who've held power for 12 of the last 16 eh? 1 Quote
Hodad Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 (edited) 17 minutes ago, West said: No mention of Obama and Biden who've held power for 12 of the last 16 eh? A. Neither Obama nor Biden have Epstein the sweetheart deal of the century, which no one can justify. Nice try at deflection though. B. Epstein was arrested and was being prosecuted while Biden was in office, so WTF are you even talking about? C. Both were state and local cases, not federal. So again, WTF? Edited February 22 by Hodad Quote
West Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 22 minutes ago, Hodad said: A. Neither Obama nor Biden have Epstein the sweetheart deal of the century, which no one can justify. Nice try at deflection though. B. Epstein was arrested and was being prosecuted while Biden was in office, so WTF are you even talking about? C. Both were state and local cases, not federal. So again, WTF? B). We are talking about his client list that Biden refused to look into. C) They could've charged under federal statutes but decided not to. Quote
robosmith Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 1 hour ago, West said: B). We are talking about his client list that Biden refused to look into. Biden NEVER got involved with DoJ business and you have NO EVIDENCE that he did. 1 hour ago, West said: C) They could've charged under federal statutes but decided not to. Put that on Garland. Charging decisions are not (normally) made by POTUS. Only Trump makes those when he's promising revenge. Quote
Hodad Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 1 hour ago, West said: B). We are talking about his client list that Biden refused to look into. C) They could've charged under federal statutes but decided not to. B. You made up C. Why would they need to charge federally a man already in jail and being prosecuted? This is a very dumb conspiracy theory. You think your made up shit is really going to make people forget that Trump's people have already coddled Epstein? Quote
West Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 12 hours ago, Hodad said: B. You made up C. Why would they need to charge federally a man already in jail and being prosecuted? This is a very dumb conspiracy theory. You think your made up shit is really going to make people forget that Trump's people have already coddled Epstein? We are talking about his client list. Duh Quote
robosmith Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 7 hours ago, West said: We are talking about his client list. Duh You are talking about his client list that you imagine Biden had some responsibility to "look into." POTUS are NOT SUPPOSED to get involved in law enforcement because that makes it POLITICAL. Your problem is you don't understand just how ABNORMAL Trump is for getting involved. 🤮 Quote
West Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 15 minutes ago, robosmith said: You are talking about his client list that you imagine Biden had some responsibility to "look into." POTUS are NOT SUPPOSED to get involved in law enforcement because that makes it POLITICAL. Your problem is you don't understand just how ABNORMAL Trump is for getting involved. 🤮 I was responding to a comment. Duh Quote
CdnFox Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 On 2/21/2025 at 11:43 AM, Videospirit said: Why would Trump even care if he's mentioned in these documents at this point? The Supreme court has made him immune from all prosecution. He'd probably just brag about how alpha he is that he's able to sleep with minors and get away with it. First off they didn't make him immune from prosecution, they said that prosecution would have to happen within the confines of impeachment. Second off it was only for those things that were directly typed to his presidency. He wouldn't be off the hook for rape for example and thirdly that wouldn't cover things that happened when he wasn't president. Didn't you follow this whole case at all with regards to presidential immunity? I feel like you may have grossly misunderstood what happened Quote
robosmith Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 On 2/21/2025 at 9:23 PM, West said: No mention of Obama and Biden who've held power for 12 of the last 16 eh? 2 hours ago, West said: I was responding to a comment. Duh YOU are the one who brought Biden into the discussion trying to claim that he "held power" obligated his involvement in law enforcement. I'm just telling you that is NOT THE JOB of a POTUS, because you're obviously confused enough to believe it is. You need to learn about our Constitution, history and culture before you try to disparage people based on YOUR MISCONCEPTIONS. The FACT is, it is widely considered to be UNETHICAL for a POTUS to make decisions about prosecutions because they have POLITICAL motivations. YOU and Trump either don't understand that, OR you don't care about ETHICAL considerations. Joe Biden knows about all of that, and that's why you never heard him advocating for any legal prosecutions, despite what FOS LIES about it. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 23 Author Report Posted February 23 (edited) 9 hours ago, robosmith said: You are talking about his client list that you imagine Biden had some responsibility to "look into." POTUS are NOT SUPPOSED to get involved in law enforcement because that makes it POLITICAL. Your problem is you don't understand just how ABNORMAL Trump is for getting involved. 🤮 Article II, Section 3, Clause 5 (Faithful Execution Clause) holds that the President must "take care that the laws are faithfully executed". That makes him the nation's top law enforcement officer. Edited February 23 by gatomontes99 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted February 23 Author Report Posted February 23 6 hours ago, robosmith said: You need to learn about our Constitution, history and culture before you try to disparage people based on YOUR MISCONCEPTIONS. Project much? You don't even know that it is the President's job to ensure laws are properly enforced. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 On 2/21/2025 at 9:01 PM, Hodad said: Well, except Trump's last labor secretary and his current AG, who let Epstein slide. They should all be released, but I absolutely do not trust the pathological liar and his toadies. In what way did Trump let Epstein slide, Dummy? The same way that Obama let him slide, where he actually 'slid' for 8 years, or did he end up in prison, and then dead when Trump was POTUS? Who would Epstein vote for if he had to choose between Trump and Obama? Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.