Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, August1991 said:

Paul Krugman described the US federal government as a tank with a pension system.

The US is not sustainable.

Not with Trump as POTUS trying to DESTROY everything America stands for.

With Trump it's all about the MONEY for HIM. 🤮

Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Not with Trump as POTUS trying to DESTROY everything America stands for.

oh please, he's basically just William McKinley Redux

Spanish American War 2.0

Remember the Maine !

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, August1991 said:

I am real. I am a real person.

For many years, I have posted on this forum.

Dougie and Robo answer/post too quick.

=====

Welcome to AI. Scary.

Loyalist & Royalist A.I.

be afraid,  you Equalization Payment Collecting Frenchie bastard

Posted
1 hour ago, August1991 said:

I am real. I am a real person.

For many years, I have posted on this forum.

Dougie and Robo answer/post too quick.

=====

Welcome to AI. Scary.

Welcome to ^your imagination.

Posted

Looks like Musk already has a handle on how to START getting things straightened out:

Turns out the treasury department, and every other agency, is not properly coding their expenses. 

Why is that important?

If wach expense is coded, the auditors can group codes and check the expenses for validity more quickly. As it stands right now, auditors have to go through, line by line, and determine the purpose of each expense. In many cases, that probably means sending questions to the issuing agency and waiting for a reply.

Why would they not code their expenses?

While the lion's share of expenses are proper, the expenses that aren't are needles in a needle stack. Everything looks the same. Finding the fraud and waste becomes so time consuming and so tedious that it would take months, if not years to complete.

But Musk had a trick. AI and youthful computer savants. The swamp is mad because they thought they had more time.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
45 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Looks like Musk already has a handle on how to START getting things straightened out:

Turns out the treasury department, and every other agency, is not properly coding their expenses. 

Why is that important?

If wach expense is coded, the auditors can group codes and check the expenses for validity more quickly. As it stands right now, auditors have to go through, line by line, and determine the purpose of each expense. In many cases, that probably means sending questions to the issuing agency and waiting for a reply.

Why would they not code their expenses?

While the lion's share of expenses are proper, the expenses that aren't are needles in a needle stack. Everything looks the same. Finding the fraud and waste becomes so time consuming and so tedious that it would take months, if not years to complete.

But Musk had a trick. AI and youthful computer savants. The swamp is mad because they thought they had more time.

I bet you also believe your wife is getting her personal training sessions at 10 on a Friday night don’t you, you dumb cuck.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I bet you also believe your wife is getting her personal training sessions at 10 on a Friday night don’t you, you dumb cuck.

Rule #2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I can make up rules too:

Rule #1 : twinklover99s wife is getting railed by her personal trainer.

It’s a rule so it’s true, cuck.

Loser.

  • Haha 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
7 hours ago, Black Dog said:

I can make up rules too:

Rule #1 : twinklover99s wife is getting railed by her personal trainer.

It’s a rule so it’s true, cuck.

Rule #2 & #6

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
12 hours ago, Black Dog said:

I bet you also believe your wife is getting her personal training sessions at 10 on a Friday night don’t you, you dumb cuck.

Yet another exhibition of low morality and honor from the Libbies.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)

US? Russia? China?

Government, society, State? Place?

If any place is borrowing more than what its people can pay, asking more of others; it is not sustainable.

Edited by August1991
Posted

The US federal government is promising more than it can deliver.

Too many people expect social security, medicare. The US federal government is a Ponzi scheme.

The US federal government is borrowing at a faster rate than it can collect money.

Posted
On 2/6/2025 at 8:48 PM, August1991 said:

Paul Krugman described the US federal government as a tank with a pension system.

The US is not sustainable.

Paul Krugman thinks the last 250 years was a mass hallucination. Paul Krugman is an ldiot. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...