Hottest January on record shocks scientists

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Leo DiCaprio, John Kerry, Bill Gates, Greta Thunberg, some anonymous "climit siintists", and the anonymous members of some "climit monitering servissus" all agree, soooooo... We should too? 

Isn't it weird that the loudest voices on record about the perils of climate change are highly un-educated people who cruise around in yachts, fly in private jets, own several mega-mansions, and have the same carbon footprints as a small town?  

Why do so many actual climatologists go public to deny this but the ones who pimp it are just "anonymous members of a club"?

You left out NASA which is also ringing alarm bells and has the satellite data to prove it.

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, Aristides said:

You left out NASA which is also ringing alarm bells and has the satellite data to prove it.

I wish that I could trust NASA, but we now know that the FBI, DOJ, NIH, CDC in the US can't be trusted at all, so why should I trust NASA?

[robosmith]

13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No, the "97% of climatologists agree" tripe was debunked, and actual climatologists go on record - showing their faces - all the time to call BS on your blatant BS. 

NASA and AAAS say YOU'RE WRONG. Single climatologists are NOT EXPERTS on the statistics of fellow climatologists' OPINIONS

Scientific Consensus

 

NASA Science (.gov)

https://science.nasa.gov › climate-change › scientific-co...

 

Oct 21, 2024 — “Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening.” (2014).

 

What We Know | The scientists agree. The climate is changing ...

 

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

https://whatweknow.aaas.org

 

Based on the evidence, about 97% of climate experts have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening.

Though you can probably find fossil fuel industry sources that TRY to poke holes in those conclusions.

 

[Hodad]

26 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

My "infobubble" always has real-world stats and facts, right from the Gov't of Canada, while you're left scrambling for ridiculous excuses like "deaths only went up by 36% because infections went up astronomically - that's proof the vaccine w🤡rks!"

No, the "97% of climatologists agree" tripe was debunked, and actual climatologists go on record - showing their faces - all the time to call BS on your blatant BS. 

It's really not my fault that you can't grasp the concept of rates. Your life will be very difficult, but no amount of explaining seems to help.

 

And no, consistently, in every survey, climate scientists are in near unanimity. You just cream your pants when you find some heterodox "climate scientist" on the Twitter who tells you what you want to hear.

There's really no "debate" to be had on the fact of AGW. Just you loons howling in denial, pretending that all the scientists are conspiring to take away your precious fossil fuels for some unfathomable motive.

[User]

13 minutes ago, Hodad said:

There's really no "debate" to be had on the fact of AGW.

There is plenty of debate to be had. Just because you do some sampling of papers that most have written in some form about climate change doesn't mean all climate scientists are fear-mongering chicken littles like you are. 

[robosmith]

8 minutes ago, User said:

There is plenty of debate to be had. Just because you do some sampling of papers that most have written in some form about climate change doesn't mean all climate scientists are fear-mongering chicken littles like you are. 

NASA and AAAS say YOU'RE WRONG, TOO (see above).

You don't even understand how they came to that conclusion. No one here did that. Duh

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I wish that I could trust NASA, but we now know that the FBI, DOJ, NIH, CDC in the US can't be trusted at all, so why should I trust NASA?

Yup, stay in your conspiracy bubble with your blinders on if it makes you happy. Just hope you are old enough that you won’t see the worst of the consequences. Your kids and grandkids will, if you have any.

Edited February 7, 2025 by Aristides

[User]

53 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NASA and AAAS say YOU'RE WRONG, TOO (see above).

You don't even understand how they came to that conclusion. No one here did that. Duh

Nothing you posted above says I am wrong here. 

42 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Yup, stay in your conspiracy bubble with your blinders on if it makes you happy. Just hope you are old enough that you won’t see the worst of the consequences. Your kids and grandkids will, if you have any.

LOL. How old are you? Are you like 16 or something?

For the last 30 years we have had this fear-mongering. Hell, we are like 6 years into the 12 years we have to act before it is too late!!!! *GASP*

 

[robosmith]

24 minutes ago, User said:

Nothing you posted above says I am wrong here. 

The NASA and AAAS sources say that THEY compiled the data, and that proves you're wrong about Hodad "did some sampling of papers" Duh

Try again.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Yup, stay in your conspiracy bubble with your blinders on if it makes you happy. Just hope you are old enough that you won’t see the worst of the consequences. Your kids and grandkids will, if you have any.

• It's not a conspiracy bubble when no less than 2 judges RULE that way against the FBI, cultist child.
• It's not a conspiracy bubble when Fauci himself admits that he funded a bat coronavirus in the Wuhan BSL4 lab long before he said "LOOK, THERE GOES PANGO-ELVIS!!!", and people were banned from FB for saying "BSL4 lab", cultist child.
• Did you not just see the consequences of Biden's f'ing wars?
• Did you not see the consequences of forcing healthy youths to take the jab?
• Did you not se the consequences of Biden's open borders?
• Did you not see the consequences of the Dems'/Libs' wars on domestic energy?
• Don't talk to me about 'consequences' you half-wit cultist zero. You can't even tell the truth about a pile of bodies that's 10,000-deep, and the consequence of just joining in the lie is another pile, and another, and another... 

[impartialobserver]

sticking to the topic.. warmer temps do not help in my neck of the woods. However, humans adapt and move on. 

[User]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

The NASA and AAAS sources say that THEY compiled the data, and that proves you're wrong about Hodad "did some sampling of papers" Duh

Try again.

Do you practice being this dumb?

I was responding to his repeated claims about the so-called consensus of climate scientists. 

 

[gatomontes99]

Isn't it weird how we didn't have any of these stories while Joe's handlers were in charge?

 

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Isn't it weird how we didn't have any of these stories while Joe's handlers were in charge?

 

I read plenty of stories like this.. they just did not appear on this forum. 

https://www.noaa.gov/news/2022-was-worlds-6th-warmest-year-on-record

Edited February 8, 2025 by impartialobserver

[gatomontes99]

16 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

I read plenty of stories like this.. they just did not appear on this forum. 

https://www.noaa.gov/news/2022-was-worlds-6th-warmest-year-on-record

Why do you think that is?

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, User said:

Nothing you posted above says I am wrong here. 

LOL. How old are you? Are you like 16 or something?

For the last 30 years we have had this fear-mongering. Hell, we are like 6 years into the 12 years we have to act before it is too late!!!! *GASP*

 

Carry on, doesn't matter what you think or want, it will happen anyway.

[User]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Carry on, doesn't matter what you think or want, it will happen anyway.

Yes, climate will change and life will go on. Not worried about your absurd fear-mongering at all. 

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, User said:

Yes, climate will change and life will go on. Not worried about your absurd fear-mongering at all. 

No, you're not worried because you're COMPLETELY IGNORANT and thus your OPINIONS mean NOTHING.

Maybe learn how to read peer reviewed Climate Science Journals and come back in 5-10 years. LMAO 

[User]

23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, you're not worried because you're COMPLETELY IGNORANT and thus your OPINIONS mean NOTHING.

Maybe learn how to read peer reviewed Climate Science Journals and come back in 5-10 years. LMAO 

Once again, go cry to the Chinese if you are so worried about this.

 

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, User said:

Once again, go cry to the Chinese if you are so worried about this.

China has extensive plans to decarbonize energy generation. Trump has NONE.

You're welcome.

[CdnFox]

On 2/6/2025 at 4:27 PM, robosmith said:

Hottest January on record shocks scientists

Data adds to fears that climate change is accelerating, as La Niña phenomenon fails to cool global temperatures

Drill, baby drill is Trump's ONLY "plan." 🤮

Short term "thinking" never makes good plans.

That's not possible. I paid my carbon tax

19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

China has extensive plans to decarbonize energy generation. Trump has NONE.

You're welcome.

Planning to get worse for the next 5 years is not a plan.

[User]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

China has extensive plans to decarbonize energy generation. Trump has NONE.

You're welcome.

Go cry to China:

[myata]

7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

while Joe's handlers were in charge?

Can one be any more dumb? Or are they going for the all-time record?

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, myata said:

Can one be any more dumb? Or are they going for the all-time record?

Don't worry, your record is safe

[impartialobserver]

On 2/7/2025 at 5:52 PM, gatomontes99 said:

Why do you think that is?

randomness.. Relatively small group of contributors and why they make a thread on Day X... not sure you can pinpoint an exact reason.