West Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 Andrew Bailey plans on seizing Chinese assets i.e. farmland unless they pay $25 billion for damages. Good news. Quote
Hodad Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, West said: Andrew Bailey plans on seizing Chinese assets i.e. farmland unless they pay $25 billion for damages. Good news. That's remarkably dumb, but still probably not in the top ten for the last couple of weeks. This administration is bizzy. 2 Quote
Aristides Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 (edited) 2 hours ago, West said: Andrew Bailey plans on seizing Chinese assets i.e. farmland unless they pay $25 billion for damages. Good news. Considering the number of major US companies that have manufacturing plants in China, that's the dumbest thing he has come up with yet. Apple, Tesla, GM, Ford, just to name a few. Wonder how Elon will feel about losing his Chinese plant, BYD can take it over. Edited January 25 by Aristides 1 Quote
August1991 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 I completely disagree. === America won the Cold War against the Soviet Union. Now, it is in a different type of war against China. Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 4 hours ago, West said: Andrew Bailey plans on seizing Chinese assets i.e. farmland unless they pay $25 billion for damages. Good news. They should sue Trump for the damages he caused by pretending the virus would "just go away" before it started spreading across the entire nation. But he might be immune from damages cause by official utter stupidity. 🤮 1 1 Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 This is going to start a trade war, and probably the worst recession in modern history. Quote
West Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 42 minutes ago, robosmith said: They should sue Trump for the damages he caused by pretending the virus would "just go away" before it started spreading across the entire nation. But he might be immune from damages cause by official utter stupidity. 🤮 This is nonsense. Trump's pandemic response was proportionate and within the rule of law. Unlike Biden and democrats who had multiple orders slapped down in the courts due to violating the law. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 15 hours ago, West said: This is nonsense. Trump's pandemic response was proportionate and within the rule of law. Unlike Biden and democrats who had multiple orders slapped down in the courts due to violating the law. You obviously have not heard the Woodward tapes in which Trump made clear he knew the real dangers while he was LYING to the public. Nor do you understand all the things HE COULD have done instead of IGNORING them while he SACRIFICED LIVES to serve HIS CAMPAIGN PRETENSE. That's why our DEATH RATE was SO MUCH HIGHER than Canada's; but why would YOU CARE ABOUT THAT? 🤮 1 Quote
West Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, robosmith said: You obviously have not heard the Woodward tapes in which Trump made clear he knew the real dangers while he was LYING to the public. Nor do you understand all the things HE COULD have done instead of IGNORING them while he SACRIFICED LIVES to serve HIS CAMPAIGN PRETENSE. That's why our DEATH RATE was SO MUCH HIGHER than Canada's; but why would YOU CARE ABOUT THAT? 🤮 What Democrats wanted him to do was done by state governors. It was then slapped down in the court system. The democrats wanted Trump to break the law. When he didn't they cooked up conspiracy theories against him and started a predictable smear campaign in the press. Why do you support BREAKING THE LAW? sad Quote
eyeball Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 22 hours ago, West said: Andrew Bailey plans on seizing Chinese assets i.e. farmland unless they pay $25 billion for damages. Good news. That's all? That's peanuts...not even a handful really. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
West Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 16 minutes ago, eyeball said: That's all? That's peanuts...not even a handful really. Just one state with a small population Quote
Aristides Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 (edited) 10 minutes ago, West said: Just one state with a small population Barely covers Tesla’s investment in China. Apple has invested 275 billion in China since 2016. Edited January 25 by Aristides Quote
robosmith Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 2 hours ago, West said: What Democrats wanted him to do was done by state governors. It was then slapped down in the court system. ZERO EVIDENCE for ^this SPECULATION. 2 hours ago, West said: The democrats wanted Trump to break the law. When he didn't they cooked up conspiracy theories against him and started a predictable smear campaign in the press. The Woodward statements are ON TAPE as are Trump's LIES, dummy. 2 hours ago, West said: Why do you support BREAKING THE LAW? sad Why do you LIE? Because FOS LIES to YOU. Quote
robosmith Posted March 8 Report Posted March 8 1 hour ago, West said: Missouri won their case. It's not over until the FATTEST JUSTICE (AKA Thomas) SINGS. LMAO Eighth Circuit Revives Missouri’s COVID-19 Suit Against China Quote Missouri’s suit is the first of dozens to hurdle the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and could create major friction with China. .... Continued tension over these suits could lead the Chinese government to retaliate against the United States, potentially even by stripping the United States’s immunity in Chinese courts. Indeed, in its note, the embassy threatened that “[i]f the U.S. side allows the frivolous lawsuits to proceed, the Chinese side reserves the right to take reciprocal countermeasures.” Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 8 Report Posted March 8 It is telling how the left hopes this fails. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted March 8 Report Posted March 8 16 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: It is telling how the left hopes this fails. The left hopes that trump fails in general because trump They have to say I've got a lot of reservations about this. Simply seizing assets because you feel like it with no reasonable justification isn't just a slippery slope, it's a bottomless pit. The reprisals, the fear for anyone to invest in another country, it's all bad and none of it's good. Like he gets a few billion dollars to pay for some of his tax cuts but it's totally not worth it. You can like trump and still think he's making a mistake somewhere along the line. I feel this would be a pretty major mistake. I mean what's next, piracy on the high seas where you seize Chinese vessels to make up for the fact that Chinese food is making Americans fat? There is no way this is good precedent. Imagine if Canada said it was seizing all American private land here in Canada to make up for the tariffs or something. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
West Posted March 8 Author Report Posted March 8 1 hour ago, robosmith said: It's not over until the FATTEST JUSTICE (AKA Thomas) SINGS. LMAO Eighth Circuit Revives Missouri’s COVID-19 Suit Against China They won bud. 3 minutes ago, CdnFox said: The left hopes that trump fails in general because trump They have to say I've got a lot of reservations about this. Simply seizing assets because you feel like it with no reasonable justification isn't just a slippery slope, it's a bottomless pit. The reprisals, the fear for anyone to invest in another country, it's all bad and none of it's good. Like he gets a few billion dollars to pay for some of his tax cuts but it's totally not worth it. You can like trump and still think he's making a mistake somewhere along the line. I feel this would be a pretty major mistake. I mean what's next, piracy on the high seas where you seize Chinese vessels to make up for the fact that Chinese food is making Americans fat? There is no way this is good precedent. Imagine if Canada said it was seizing all American private land here in Canada to make up for the tariffs or something. Andrew Bailey has already won. China owes Missouri billions Quote
CdnFox Posted March 8 Report Posted March 8 11 minutes ago, West said: Andrew Bailey has already won. China owes Missouri billions That doesn't make it a good thing. Something can be legal and still be an absolutely horrible idea. I have no doubt whatsoever that if china decides to retaliate and sees all American property in china that magically they will win in the courts. I wasn't referring to legal principles alone when I said it was a bad idea I mean overall speaking this is not a good thing. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted March 8 Report Posted March 8 16 minutes ago, West said: They won bud. Andrew Bailey has already won. China owes Missouri billions ^This judge is NOT the SCOTUS nor the Supreme Court of Missouri. IF you actually knew the US legal system, you would know that the appeals have only just begun. Except it looks like China is just IGNORING the whole process and on the verge of taking extreme legal countermeasures. And you don't understand that NO ONE will enforce that judge's decision. As has been pointed out HERE, China can confiscate a lot more US property in China than they have here so "won" will mean NOTHING. Duh Quote
West Posted March 8 Author Report Posted March 8 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: ^This judge is NOT the SCOTUS nor the Supreme Court of Missouri. IF you actually knew the US legal system, you would know that the appeals have only just begun. Except it looks like China is just IGNORING the whole process and on the verge of taking extreme legal countermeasures. And you don't understand that NO ONE will enforce that judge's decision. As has been pointed out HERE, China can confiscate a lot more US property in China than they have here so "won" will mean NOTHING. Duh It's only just beginning. Duh. They scapegoats the unvaxxed and the media claimed that it was the unvaxxed causing covid. This shows that it was in fact CHINA who was responsible and many in the media as well as politicians LIED about the unvaxxed, violating their human rights. Duh Quote
robosmith Posted March 8 Report Posted March 8 7 minutes ago, West said: It's only just beginning. Duh. They scapegoats the unvaxxed and the media claimed that it was the unvaxxed causing covid. This shows that it was in fact CHINA who was responsible and many in the media as well as politicians LIED about the unvaxxed, violating their human rights. Duh Thanks for demonstrating you KNOW NOTHING about what happened HERE. FOS LIES to YOU. The CLAIM was that the unvaxxed were SPREADING COVID you NUMBSKULL, because they're the ones who have the VIRUS and SYMPTOMS like COUGHING and SNEEZING. Why do you lDIOTS who know NOTHING ABOUT SCIENCE try to explain something while having NO EXPERTISE? But you're right about one thing, the legal process has ONLY JUST BEGUN. Now the adults will take over. Quote
West Posted March 8 Author Report Posted March 8 16 minutes ago, robosmith said: Thanks for demonstrating you KNOW NOTHING about what happened HERE. FOS LIES to YOU. The CLAIM was that the unvaxxed were SPREADING COVID you NUMBSKULL, because they're the ones who have the VIRUS and SYMPTOMS like COUGHING and SNEEZING. Why do you lDIOTS who know NOTHING ABOUT SCIENCE try to explain something while having NO EXPERTISE? But you're right about one thing, the legal process has ONLY JUST BEGUN. Now the adults will take over. The vaxxed were catching a spreading covid too. So they misplaced the rage and targeted the unvaxxed. Even tho CHINA was at fault Quote
robosmith Posted March 8 Report Posted March 8 46 minutes ago, West said: The vaxxed were catching a spreading covid too. VERY FEW compared to the unvaxxed who were much easier to infect. 46 minutes ago, West said: So they misplaced the rage and targeted the unvaxxed. Even tho CHINA was at fault What EXACTLY did China do to spread the virus to North America? We KNOW what Trump did to spread it HERE. He made a big show of PRETENDING to implement a "travel ban" from China, but let 40,000 citizens fly back to the US with NO TRACKING, NO TESTING, and NO QUARANTINING, which are STANDARD METHODS to STOP DISEASE SPREAD. That was his FIRST SUPER-SPREADER EVENT, which was far more responsible for spreading the virus here than ANYTHING CHINA DID. Duh So you don't know JACK SHIT about what happened HERE. Quote
West Posted March 8 Author Report Posted March 8 7 hours ago, robosmith said: VERY FEW compared to the unvaxxed who were much easier to infect. What EXACTLY did China do to spread the virus to North America? We KNOW what Trump did to spread it HERE. He made a big show of PRETENDING to implement a "travel ban" from China, but let 40,000 citizens fly back to the US with NO TRACKING, NO TESTING, and NO QUARANTINING, which are STANDARD METHODS to STOP DISEASE SPREAD. That was his FIRST SUPER-SPREADER EVENT, which was far more responsible for spreading the virus here than ANYTHING CHINA DID. Duh So you don't know JACK SHIT about what happened HERE. China did not allow any western investigators in and allowed travel in and out of Wuhan. Duh Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.