NAME REMOVED Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 Trump adversary Jim Acosta has the highest rated CNN show. However, to appease Trump, CNN will be moving Acosta's show to midnight, when hardly anyone is watching, to appease Trump. CNN has taken the knee, and surrendered to MAGA. 1 Quote
Radiorum Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 5 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: Jim Acosta has the highest rated CNN show. However, to appease Trump, CNN will be moving Acosta's show to midnight, He is one of the bright lights on CNN. This is a very troubling turn, indeed. I guess ruling by fear is effective, but it creates a toxic environment. How can a society subject to constant threats and intimidation flourish? What place does truth have in such a society? 1 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 3 minutes ago, Radiorum said: He is one of the bright lights on CNN. This is a very troubling turn, indeed. I guess ruling by fear is effective, but it creates a toxic environment. How can a society subject to constant threats and intimidation flourish? What place does truth have in such a society? Well golly, you should know. After all...you Libbies invented the tactic. Alas...now people can freely express their opinions without fear of being canceled by screaming, green-haired freaks. Acosta is only the beginning. I do hope you enjoy having your own weapon...turned on you. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Radiorum Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 3 minutes ago, Nationalist said: screaming, green-haired freaks. I was speaking of the rulers. When did these supposed "freaks" rule? Trump rules by fear. No-one even comes close. 5 minutes ago, Nationalist said: now people can freely express their opinions Even if they are hateful ones that harm others? Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 23 Author Report Posted January 23 19 minutes ago, Radiorum said: He is one of the bright lights on CNN. This is a very troubling turn, indeed. I guess ruling by fear is effective, but it creates a toxic environment. How can a society subject to constant threats and intimidation flourish? What place does truth have in such a society? With what I have learned in the last 48 hours, it's clear America is officially a fascist nation. Sadly, the only way to counter this is with armed resistance. As history has shown us time and time again, this will end badly. Quote
Radiorum Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 8 minutes ago, Radiorum said: Trump rules by fear. No-one even comes close. I should clarify that I am referring to the democratic world 1 minute ago, DUI_Offender said: Sadly, the only way to counter this is with armed resistance. I fear for the future, too. I don't think America knows what it got when it elected Trump. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 16 minutes ago, Radiorum said: I was speaking of the rulers. When did these supposed "freaks" rule? Trump rules by fear. No-one even comes close. Even if they are hateful ones that harm others? So you don't like having your own weapons turned on you? What a surprise. Enjoy the consequences of your own actions. 11 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: With what I have learned in the last 48 hours, it's clear America is officially a fascist nation. Sadly, the only way to counter this is with armed resistance. As history has shown us time and time again, this will end badly. Do it. Go ahead. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Nationalist Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 10 minutes ago, Radiorum said: I should clarify that I am referring to the democratic world I fear for the future, too. I don't think America knows what it got when it elected Trump. A POTUS who knows what day it is? We know. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
gatomontes99 Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Radiorum said: Trump rules by fear. No-one even comes close. Just because you are afraid doesn't mean he is using fear. Edited January 23 by gatomontes99 3 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
NAME REMOVED Posted January 23 Author Report Posted January 23 (edited) 48 minutes ago, Radiorum said: I should clarify that I am referring to the democratic world I fear for the future, too. I don't think America knows what it got when it elected Trump. The end to me, came when the Bishop spoke about treating the vulnerable people of America with kindness and compassion, only to be attacked and berated by Trump and his inner circle. This was the point of no return. Sadly, we saw this in Nazi Germany, when a few Catholic Church ministers spoke out against the Jews, only to be threatened with arrest, and imprisonment into Concentration Camps. Edited January 23 by DUI_Offender Quote
Radiorum Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 5 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: The end to me, came when the Bishop spoke about treating the vulnerable people of America with kindness and compassion, only to be attacked and berated by Trump and his inner circle. This was the point of no return. Sadly, we saw this in Nazi Germany, when a few Catholic Church ministers spoke out against the Jews, only to be threatened with arrest, and imprisonment into Concentration Camps. What's happening now really does lend understanding to what happened then 1 Quote
User Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 47 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: The end to me, came when the Bishop spoke about treating the vulnerable people of America with kindness and compassion, only to be attacked and berated by Trump and his inner circle. This was the point of no return. Sadly, we saw this in Nazi Germany, when a few Catholic Church ministers spoke out against the Jews, only to be threatened with arrest, and imprisonment into Concentration Camps. You guys have gone off the deep end. 2 Quote
Legato Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 8 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: Trump adversary Jim Acosta has the highest rated CNN show. However, to appease Trump, CNN will be moving Acosta's show to midnight, when hardly anyone is watching, to appease Trump. CNN has taken the knee, and surrendered to MAGA. CNN launched a new show, “Democracy in Peril,” two weeks ago in the 9 p.m. ET slot, which was previously occupied by ousted anchor Chris Cuomo. Ratings are in for the first two hosts, Brianna Keilar and Jim Acosta, and so far, the new program has not stopped the viewership decline. Keilar was up first last week, helming the show at its outset. From Monday of last week to Monday of this week, CNN’s 9 p.m. hour averaged 556,000 total viewers, of whom just 139,000 were in the advertiser-coveted age demographic of 25 to 54. Compare that to Fox News’ Sean Hannity, whose competing program averaged 2.985 million total viewers Monday to Monday, with 426,000 in the demo, on average. CNN’s average total viewership number was closer to what Fox News pulled in the demo alone than it was to competing with Hannity’s total viewership. Rachel Maddow’s 9 p.m. show on MSNBC pulled in an average of 2.118 million total viewers, with 259,000 of them in the demo. https://www.thewrap.com/cnn-9-ratings-cuomo-keilar-acosta/ Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 Correction....Abilio Acosta Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Venandi Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 (edited) 3 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: Sadly, the only way to counter this is with armed resistance. IMO you now sound like an extreme version of the people you've been gleefully ridiculing here. Not that I'm accusing you of actually recommending that as a course of action mind you... but you see my point right? This is why peacekeeping missions tend to be challenging, human nature is governing and from what I've seen of the world it's universal. The pivot toward violence can come quickly and be a huge surprise to those who don't read sign... it can also be difficult to extinguish once tit for tat partisan madness kicks in. What you're experiencing now was absolutely predictable, I would inquire as to what you thought was going to happen as you were gleefully pushing your own agenda on others... especially since (from where I sit anyway) you could easily have reaped the benefits of a live and let live philosophy had you simply displayed the discipline it takes not to be intoxicated by the initial gains. Trump is here for a reason and if that reason is considered dispassionately you'l find part of it in the mirror. Once you come to grips with that I predict you'll have no choice but to approach your aspirations with a degree of humility that has been sadly lacking of late. You will (I think) appeal to peoples good nature, sense of fairness, kindness and compassion. It will take a bit of time though and I would urge patience since you violated each and everyone of the principles you will soon be using to redress those problems you created for yourself. So what you've actually done (IMO of course) is to set the stage for a giant political seesaw which will increase in amplitude and effect over time as the parties come and go. Until then, you'll bide your time and respond in the same manner you now vilify... you'll do it at the very first opportunity, and you'll cheer loudly as it happens. And by doing so you'll infuse your political foes with the resolve to respond in kind when it's their hand on the tiller. That's not anything even remotely approaching wisdom speaking BTW, it's sad experience, I'd love you to prove me wrong... but I don't believe for one second that you will. Edited January 23 by Venandi Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 24 Report Posted January 24 15 hours ago, Radiorum said: He is one of the bright lights on CNN. This is a very troubling turn, indeed. That is a terrible burn, indeed. 14 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Just because you are afraid doesn't mean he is using fear. The fear they feel is purely a factor of CNN's histrionics and their own stupidity. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
WestCanMan Posted January 24 Report Posted January 24 12 hours ago, Legato said: Rachel Maddow’s 9 p.m. show on MSNBC pulled in an average of 2.118 million total viewers That's serious cause for concern. Rachel Maddow is like the hate child of a demon and a poisonous worm. Seriously, 2.118M people can't just be channel surfers, and they're not checking in on MSNBC on their way up/down the dial. Almost all of those people would have watched the show multiple times before. How f'ing retarded does one have to be to watch her show twice? Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
gatomontes99 Posted January 24 Report Posted January 24 7 hours ago, WestCanMan said: The fear they feel is purely a factor of CNN's histrionics and their own stupidity. I don't think they watch CNN any more. It is not extreme left enough for them. They need Rachel Madcow to make them see how scared they should be. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
NAME REMOVED Posted January 24 Author Report Posted January 24 20 hours ago, Legato said: Rachel Maddow’s 9 p.m. show on MSNBC pulled in an average of 2.118 million total viewers, with 259,000 of them in the demo. https://www.thewrap.com/cnn-9-ratings-cuomo-keilar-acosta/ I've heard inside sources state that after Morning Joe couple Joe Scarborough and his wife Mika Brzezinski went down to mar-a-Lago, to kiss the ring of Trump, Maddow was so infuriated that she cornered Mika in a backstage hallway, and screamed at her. Sources say that Mika was visibly distraught, and on the verge of tears. Scarborough then went on his show, to try and justify the about turn with Trump, without much success... Quote
ironstone Posted January 24 Report Posted January 24 On 1/23/2025 at 3:18 AM, DUI_Offender said: Trump adversary Jim Acosta has the highest rated CNN show. Just to be clear, having the highest rated show on CNN in no way means that his show topped the overall ratings. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cnn-msnbc-ratings-plunge-half-203017149.html MSNBC’s prime-time audience has taken a staggering 53% hit, dropping from 1.34 million viewers before the election to just 632,000. CNN hasn't fared much better, losing 47% of its prime-time viewers, down to 398,000. On some nights, these networks aren't just losing to Fox News – they're losing to lifestyle channels like the Food Network, where more viewers are tuning into shows like Chopped than CNN's Anderson Cooper or MSNBC's Jen Psaki. 1 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Hodad Posted January 24 Report Posted January 24 18 minutes ago, ironstone said: Just to be clear, having the highest rated show on CNN in no way means that his show topped the overall ratings. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cnn-msnbc-ratings-plunge-half-203017149.html MSNBC’s prime-time audience has taken a staggering 53% hit, dropping from 1.34 million viewers before the election to just 632,000. CNN hasn't fared much better, losing 47% of its prime-time viewers, down to 398,000. On some nights, these networks aren't just losing to Fox News – they're losing to lifestyle channels like the Food Network, where more viewers are tuning into shows like Chopped than CNN's Anderson Cooper or MSNBC's Jen Psaki. Disengagement, ignorance and apathy is how President Camacho got elected in the first place. Now that election season is over even people on the margin are done thinking about it. Until they pay more for eggs, apparently. Quote
Deluge Posted January 24 Report Posted January 24 On 1/23/2025 at 1:18 AM, DUI_Offender said: Trump adversary Jim Acosta has the highest rated CNN show. However, to appease Trump, CNN will be moving Acosta's show to midnight, when hardly anyone is watching, to appease Trump. CNN has taken the knee, and surrendered to MAGA. Jim Acosta is woke a$$hole. They should've fired him and everyone else there. Getting back to unbiased news is the only way these perverts can "bend the knee to MAGA". They can keep Scott Jennings, though, he's good. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.