Why do right wingers believe they know so much about US politics when you only watch and cite right wing propaganda sites?

Nationalist · January 6

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Cause you believe his case was worth more? LMAO

It was a nuisance lawsuit:

Nick Sandmann's Net Worth And Biograph

Scottmax.com

https://scottmax.com › people › nick-sandmanns-net-w...

Although exact numbers may vary depending on the source, it is clear that his estimated net worth is around 2 million dollars. Nick Sandmann gained notoriety

You're the one out of touch with reality. Trump will be completely ineffective cause he's appointing incompetents to his cabinet. Just like when GWB appointed a LAWYER with NO emergency experience to run FEMA.

What was Michael Brown's job before FEMA?

Prior to joining FEMA he practiced law in Colorado and Oklahoma, where he served as a bar examiner on ethics and professional responsibility for the Oklahoma Supreme Court and as a hearing examiner for the Colorado Supreme Court. He had been appointed as a special prosecutor in police disciplinary matters.

Mike Brown, Former FEMA Director

George W. Bush White House Archives (.gov)

https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov › brown-bio

None of what you've said here is based on anything but your own biased opinion.

CdnFox · January 6

4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

None of what you've said here is based on anything but your own biased opinion.

That's not true. He also consulted with all of the voices in his head and gave careful consideration to their opinions as well.

Five of swords · January 6

On 1/5/2025 at 2:48 PM, robosmith said:

For those of us who consume a variety of sources, we know that you only get half the story at best because your posts reveal your ignorance of the other half.

The 'half' of the story you are talking about is just people debating over whether blacks or homosexuals got their feelings hurt more by the last thing Trump said.

People interested in politics do not consider such discussions useful.

robosmith · January 6

23 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

The 'half' of the story you are talking about is just people debating over whether blacks or homosexuals got their feelings hurt more by the last thing Trump said.

People interested in politics do not consider such discussions useful.

Nope. The half of the story is the REASONS why things happen that right wingers are hoping you don't know about.

Like the historical reasons why regulations exist when they're reporting right wing plans to deregulate.

User · January 6

14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Like the historical reasons why regulations exist when they're reporting right wing plans to deregulate.

Is it your honest position that 100% of all regulations we have are perfect and needed?

WestCanMan · January 6

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Like the historical reasons why regulations exist when they're reporting right wing plans to deregulate.

What are the historical reasons why regulations exist, robo? And if they're bad, why didn't the current prezedolt or A'Crock O'BlahBlah rush in to save the day?

If they're there to save the earth, why don't you summon president Great with the Batphone to save us all?

Save us robo!

robosmith · January 6

12 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

What are the historical reasons why regulations exist, robo? And if they're bad, why didn't the current prezedolt or A'Crock O'BlahBlah rush in to save the day?

If they're there to save the earth, why don't you summon president Great with the Batphone to save us all?

Save us robo!

Thanks for demonstrating your right wing propaganda sources only tell you half the story.

You're going to have do your own digging for the reasons behind regulations, because you've already demonstrated your refusal to accept STRONG evidence when it's served to you on a silver platter.

Like when you tried to pretend that one Trump LIE detailed by WAPO was actually true and that proved the others erroneous; but that LIE was actually false as demonstrated by you OWN video evidence.

You still have 30+K Trump LIES to to prove are actually true. LMAO

WestCanMan · January 7

16 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for demonstrating your right wing propaganda sources only tell you half the story.

You're going to have do your own digging for the reasons behind regulations, because you've already demonstrated your refusal to accept STRONG evidence when it's served to you on a silver platter.

Like when you tried to pretend that one Trump LIE detailed by WAPO was actually true and that proved the others erroneous; but that LIE was actually false as demonstrated by you OWN video evidence.

You still have 30+K Trump LIES to to prove are actually true. LMAO

I'm not asking you for anything real dipshit, because reality means nothing to you.

I was just asking you what you think the reasons are, because you seemed to be insinuating that there was something sinister about them when you said:

Nope. The half of the story is the REASONS why things happen that right wingers are hoping you don't know about.

Like the historical reasons why regulations exist when they're reporting right wing plans to deregulate.

🤣 I can't believe you thought that I was asking you for information 🤣 I'll ask Joe Biden what year it is next.

West · January 7

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

None of what you've said here is based on anything but your own biased opinion.

Delusions.. it's his delusions that are getting in the way of reality

robosmith · January 7

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm not asking you for anything real dipshit, because reality means nothing to you.

STOP ^LYING A-HOLE.

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I was just asking you what you think the reasons are, because you seemed to be insinuating that there was something sinister about them when you said:

Nope. The half of the story is the REASONS why things happen that right wingers are hoping you don't know about.

The reasons for WHAT EXAMPLE? There are hundreds. Duh

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 I can't believe you thought that I was asking you for information 🤣 I'll ask Joe Biden what year it is next.

You're just an ^lDIOT. Might as well go back to posting your baby jibber jabber.

Do you REALLY imagine there are NOT REASONS for regulations? Here's a clue for you: the reasons are often predatory practices in which the strong defraud the weakest in our society just because they can escape accountability when the impoverished don't have the resources to hold the predators legally accountable. Just like Trump has a long history of outlasting those less wealthy in prolonged legal battles as well as bribing officials with sizeable campaign contributions like when Trump got Pam Bondi to drop her Trump U investigation with a sizeable campaign contribution, it just went poof.

You're welcome.

Of course you are entirely ignorant of that.

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Like the historical reasons why regulations exist when they're reporting right wing plans to deregulate.

CdnFox · January 7

20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

STOP ^LYING A-HOLE.

The reasons for WHAT EXAMPLE? There are hundreds. Duh

You're just an ^lDIOT. Might as well go back to posting your baby jibber jabber.

Do you REALLY imagine there are NOT REASONS for regulations? Here's a clue for you: the reasons are often predatory practices in which the strong defraud the weakest in our society just because they can escape accountability when the impoverished don't have the resources to hold the predators legally accountable. Just like Trump has a long history of outlasting those less wealthy in prolonged legal battles as well as bribing officials with sizeable campaign contributions like when Trump got Pam Bondi to drop her Trump U investigation with a sizeable campaign contribution, it just went poof.

You're welcome.

Of course you are entirely ignorant of that.

Whooops! Triggered commie is triggered!

Five of swords · January 7

21 hours ago, robosmith said:

Nope. The half of the story is the REASONS why things happen that right wingers are hoping you don't know about.

Like the historical reasons why regulations exist when they're reporting right wing plans to deregulate.

Nobody in either political party ever cares about reasons. That is fake news.

robosmith · January 7

2 hours ago, Five of swords said:

Nobody in either political party ever cares about reasons. That is fake news.

Regulations are passed to deal with abuses of power and those are the reasons they exist whether you recognize them or not.

It is your lack of recognition, and false claim of "fake news" which is an example of why it is often so easy politically to dismantle the regulations.

RepubliCONS do the dismantling because the regulations interfere with their desire to make an unlimited amount of money. 🤮

Nationalist · January 7

49 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Regulations are passed to deal with abuses of power and those are the reasons they exist whether you recognize them or not.

It is your lack of recognition, and false claim of "fake news" which is an example of why it is often so easy politically to dismantle the regulations.

RepubliCONS do the dismantling because the regulations interfere with their desire to make an unlimited amount of money. 🤮

https://list25.com/25-stupid-head-shaking-government-regulations/

Explain these then Einstein.

Edited January 7 by Nationalist

robosmith · January 8

25 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

https://list25.com/25-stupid-head-shaking-government-regulations/

Explain these then Einstein.

Cherry picking a few examples does not negate the reasons for thousands of regulations which have good reason for existing. Duh

Only a simple minded dunce would believe your (lack of) logic.

Nationalist · January 8

27 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Cherry picking a few examples does not negate the reasons for thousands of regulations which have good reason for existing. Duh

Only a simple minded dunce would believe your (lack of) logic.

Lol...ok so you're full o' sh1t again.

gatomontes99 · January 8

I have to say, I posted a Politico article and robosmith just ignored it. Sounds like he doesn't have enough news orgs in his rotation.

CdnFox · January 8

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Cherry picking a few examples does not negate the reasons for thousands of regulations which have good reason for existing. Duh

Only a simple minded dunce would believe your (lack of) logic.

"Proving that what i said was wrong doesnt' make me wrong! And only a dunce would think that proof i was wrong was somehow an indication that i was wrong!"

I'm saving that to show the newspapers when they ask if there was ever signs he was mentally unstable in the past.

Hodad · January 8

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

https://list25.com/25-stupid-head-shaking-government-regulations/

Explain these then Einstein.

OMG, there is no better summary of your understanding of issues than citing a listicle. Chef's kiss!

User · January 8

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Cherry picking a few examples does not negate the reasons for thousands of regulations which have good reason for existing. Duh

Only a simple minded dunce would believe your (lack of) logic.

So... you do agree then that there are regulations that can be cut. Great!

gatomontes99 · January 8

43 minutes ago, Hodad said:

OMG, there is no better summary of your understanding of issues than citing a listicle. Chef's kiss!

You couldn't refute what he was talking about, could you?

His list directly disproved robosmith's hypothesis that government regulations only address abuse of power. What is more accurate is that some regulations protect people and some regulations protect businesses. It is no secret that large corporations can easily mitigate burdensome regulations as the cost to comply is a small fraction of their operating cost. However, smaller businesses strugle to comply as the cost to comply is a much larger percentage of their operating costs. That is why cutting regulations stimulates small business growth.

Nationalist · January 8

56 minutes ago, Hodad said:

OMG, there is no better summary of your understanding of issues than citing a listicle. Chef's kiss!

Huh...go kiss a dog.

Hodad · January 8

10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You couldn't refute what he was talking about, could you?

His list directly disproved robosmith's hypothesis that government regulations only address abuse of power. What is more accurate is that some regulations protect people and some regulations protect businesses. It is no secret that large corporations can easily mitigate burdensome regulations as the cost to comply is a small fraction of their operating cost. However, smaller businesses strugle to comply as the cost to comply is a much larger percentage of their operating costs. That is why cutting regulations stimulates small business growth.

🤣 There's nothing to "refute." It's a farking Buzzfeed-style listicle of 25 things the poster doesn't understand and is too vapid and incurious to even cursorily investigate.

User · January 8

21 minutes ago, Hodad said:

🤣 There's nothing to "refute." It's a farking Buzzfeed-style listicle of 25 things the poster doesn't understand and is too vapid and incurious to even cursorily investigate.

Simple question you won't answer, because you are cowardly hiding from me:

Do you think 100% of all regulations are perfect and needed?

Nationalist · January 8

30 minutes ago, Hodad said:

🤣 There's nothing to "refute." It's a farking Buzzfeed-style listicle of 25 things the poster doesn't understand and is too vapid and incurious to even cursorily investigate.

Explain this then:

Quote

In 2012, a man in Oregon was sentenced to 30 days in jail for collecting rainwater on his property (in a pond). In the state of Oregon, the government owns the rain, and you have to have a special permit to collect and hold it.

The state of Oregon owns the rain? Who can they put in jail when rain falls in Todd Lake?